Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

AMD Radeon VII Benchmark/Launch Mega Thread

Title is pretty descriptive.

 

Note: There's some Press Driver issues, which likely won't be worked out for a bit. OC results are going to be limited for now.

 

Video Reviews:

LTT:

Spoiler

 

Gamer's Nexus, as hosted by Tech Jesus:

Spoiler

 

Digital Foundry:

Spoiler

 

 

JayZtwoCents:

Spoiler

 

BitWit:

Spoiler

 

Paul's Hardware:

Spoiler

 

Hardware Unboxed:

Spoiler

 

 

Hardware Canucks:

Spoiler

 

 

Text Reviews:

 

PcPerspective

TechPowerUp

Anandtech

Quote
Double Precision 3.5 TFLOPS
(1/4 rate)

Anandtech got a statement from AMD:

Quote

The Radeon VII graphics card was created for gamers and creators, enthusiasts and early adopters. Given the broader market Radeon VII is targeting, we were considering different levels of FP64 performance. We previously communicated that Radeon VII provides 0.88 TFLOPS (DP=1/16 SP). However based on customer interest and feedback we wanted to let you know that we have decided to increase double precision compute performance to 3.52 TFLOPS (DP=1/4SP).

 

VideoCardZ Round-up

 

Hardware Unboxed Individual Results

 

Phoronix with the Linux Benchmarks

 

My Thoughts:

 

Seems like Unreal 4 results aren't great (what else is new), but it's otherwise a 2080. Up & Down between a few. 

 

The FP64 issue popped back up. This is now the best GPU for University science departments that have smaller budgets. This GPU is going to have a really long life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hbm%20space_575px.png

  • LTT: spent die-shrink advantage in higher clocks instead of power economy; trade blows with 2080 (especially in workstation programs); beats with most DX12 games; not worth the price parity to 2080.
  • GN: Buggy review drivers; uneven die called for thermal pad use (instead of height machining the heatsink), thus impacting performance of pastes; better frametime consistency vs 2080/2070 (less stuttering)(minus SotTR); similar-slightly-higher power draw to 2080. not worth the price parity. revisit review promised on stable driver update.
  • Digital Foundry: VRAM capacity benefits some workstation tasks (less error-prone-from-limited-memory then a 12GB Titan in their example); ballparks around 2080 but has better frametime consistency; choice depends on choosing between 16GB and RTX/DLSS features
    • small note: there's an RX570 16GB "mining" card being released by powercolour..... I wonder if the same benefits would apply here
  • Jayz2c: ballpark around/above/below the 1080ti/2080/2070 in games; review driver issues impacted cooling control; stock cooler better than previous blower; hardware performance headroom restrained by review driver
  • Bitwit: what driver issue?
    • gaming performance ballpark about 1080ti/2080 (except for DOOM and GTAV)
    • note: VRAM statement Kyle makes does not account for Allocated Memory vs actual memory footprint used in game
  • HardwareUnboxed: gaming performance (1% fps lows) ballparks about 2070/2080; pars on average with 1080ti; similar power draw with the Vega 64; overclocking didn't work due to review driver; not worth the price. revisit review promised on stable driver update.
    • Paste actually performed better than the thermal pad o_o (reference with GN review)
    • RIP ARMA 3
  • HardwareCanucks: Loud; ballparks 1080ti/2080; Premiere Playback performance still worse than 2080 (pending driver update?); not worth the price.
  • Paul's Hardware: ballparks the 2080; buggy review drivers; loud on load

that being said, it feels like a 1080ti replacement, but no one should/could buy a 10-series card new today ._.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5-8% (1080p 1440p 2160p) higher scores than RTX 2080 in BFV without ray tracing.

 

NEW RYZEN BUILD CPU: AMD 3800X (4.275 @ 1.325V) Motherboard: Asus STRIX X570-E GPU: MSI RTX 2080 SEA HAWK EK X RAM: 16GB G.Skill 3600MHz/CL14  PSU: Corsair RM850x Case: NZXT H700 White Cooling: EK Velocity + MSI EK 2080 block + D5 pump + 360mm rad + 280mm rad
WHAT MY GF INHERITED CPU: Intel i7-6700K (4.7GHz @ 1.39v) Motherboard: Asus Z170 Pro GPU: Asus GTX 1070 8GB RAM: 32GB Kingston HyperX Fury Hard Drive: WD Black NVMe SSD 512GB Power Supply: XFX PRO 550W  Cooling: Corsair H115i Case: NZXT Switch 810 (white) Operating System: Windows 10 Pro 64bit Monitor: AOC 27" QHD 144Hz Keyboard: Corsair K70 Mouse: Razer DeathAdder Elite Audio: Bose QC25
Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't had a chance to dig at all yet, surprised to see Anandtech say AMD gave yet another answer on the FP64 question, and at 1/4 it is interesting to me again... argh!

Desktop Gaming system: Asrock Z370 Pro4, i7-8086k, Noctua D15, Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB 3200 4x16GB, Gigabyte 2070, NZXT E850 PSU, Cooler Master MasterBox 5, Optane 900p 280GB, Crucial MX200 1TB, Sandisk 960GB, Acer Predator XB241YU 1440p144 G-sync
TV Gaming system: Gigabyte Z490 Elite AC, i5-10600k, Noctua D15, Kingston HyperX RGB 4000@3600 2x8GB, MSI 3070 Gaming Trio X, EVGA Supernova G2L 850W, Corsair 230T, Crucial P1 1TB + MX500 1TB, LG OLED55B9PLA 4k120 G-Sync Compatible
Streaming system: Asus X299 TUF mark 2, i9-7920X, Noctua D15, Corsair Vengeance LPX RGB 3000 8x8GB, Asus Strix 1080Ti, Corsair HX1000i, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 970 Evo 500GB, Crucial BX500 1TB, BenQ XL2411 1080p144 + HP LP2475w 1200p60
Former Main system: Asus Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700k, Noctua D14, G.Skill Ripjaws V 3200 2x8GB, GTX 980Ti FE, Corsair HX750i, In Win 303 NVIDIA, Samsung SM951 512GB, WD Blue 1TB, Acer RT280k 4k60 FreeSync [link]
Gaming laptop: Asus FX503VD, i5-7300HQ, DDR4 2133 2x8GB, GTX 1050, Sandisk 256GB + 480GB SSD [link]


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a small note, since it's a future industry point, GDC in March is when all of the new gen console stuff should drop. Along with whatever AMD is doing with regards to DXR & Raytracing. That's going to be interesting to watch, as we could get a very different perspective on what this GPU can do after that point, though it's expected that's more about Navi.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, porina said:

Haven't had a chance to dig at all yet, surprised to see Anandtech say AMD gave yet another answer on the FP64 question, and at 1/4 it is interesting to me again... argh!

What?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Taf the Ghost said:

GDC in March is when all of the new gen console stuff should drop. Along with whatever AMD is doing with regards to DXR & Raytracing.

oh nuts o_o where was this mentioned?

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, CiBi said:

5-8% (1080p 1440p 2160p) higher scores than RTX 2080 in BFV without ray tracing.

 

Ray tracing in a game like BFV is a useless feature anyway, especially in MP, so that's notbad.jpg.

PC Specs - AMD Ryzen 5 5600X MSI B550M Mortar 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3600 @ CL15 - RX5700XT 660p 1TBGB & 256GB 600p Fractal Define Mini C CM V550 - Pop!_OS 20.04

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's interesting to see what some of the game engines really leverage. The Radeon VII just has so much more memory bandwidth compared to everything else, it was bound to throw out a few curve ball results.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Taf the Ghost said:

The RX Vega 56 is always going to be one of those special GPUs. Modders are going to be murdering it for at least another decade.

 

Coming Soon: MOAR COARS: 5GHz Confirmed Black Edition™ The Build

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm waiting for Wendel on this and what he has to say about the Card.


Though it might take another Day or two for his Video...

"Hell is full of good meanings, but Heaven is full of good works"

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TheRandomness said:

6dd17792e6e960cf2e355f208c230c01.png

 

Hmm.

 

 

I know this may be unrelated, but the Seasonic Focus Plus series of the PSU had an issue with V56/64 cards, I guess not anymore. Gosh, its so ridiculous to look at the Vega peak draw compared to its competitors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well... it isn't bad but it isn't anything to write home about.

 

I'll just keep waiting.

9900K  / Noctua NH-D15S / Z390 Aorus Master / 32GB DDR4 Vengeance Pro 3200Mhz / eVGA 2080 Ti Black Ed / Morpheus II Core / Meshify C / LG 27UK650-W / PS4 Pro / XBox One X

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Matsozetex said:

 

 

I know this may be unrelated, but the Seasonic Focus Plus series of the PSU had an issue with V56/64 cards, I guess not anymore. Gosh, its so ridiculous to look at the Vega peak draw compared to its competitors.

That modded Vega 56 I think was taking in 150% more power than stock or something ridiculous. It's just overclocker things.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Taf the Ghost said:

What?

FP64 performance is not as crippled as they previously said it would be. It is interesting enough again I just went looking to buy one. At my preferred supplier they had one model in stock, but I'm sneaking on at work and between looks it sold out. Don't see any more supply but not done a wide look by any means.

Desktop Gaming system: Asrock Z370 Pro4, i7-8086k, Noctua D15, Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB 3200 4x16GB, Gigabyte 2070, NZXT E850 PSU, Cooler Master MasterBox 5, Optane 900p 280GB, Crucial MX200 1TB, Sandisk 960GB, Acer Predator XB241YU 1440p144 G-sync
TV Gaming system: Gigabyte Z490 Elite AC, i5-10600k, Noctua D15, Kingston HyperX RGB 4000@3600 2x8GB, MSI 3070 Gaming Trio X, EVGA Supernova G2L 850W, Corsair 230T, Crucial P1 1TB + MX500 1TB, LG OLED55B9PLA 4k120 G-Sync Compatible
Streaming system: Asus X299 TUF mark 2, i9-7920X, Noctua D15, Corsair Vengeance LPX RGB 3000 8x8GB, Asus Strix 1080Ti, Corsair HX1000i, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 970 Evo 500GB, Crucial BX500 1TB, BenQ XL2411 1080p144 + HP LP2475w 1200p60
Former Main system: Asus Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700k, Noctua D14, G.Skill Ripjaws V 3200 2x8GB, GTX 980Ti FE, Corsair HX750i, In Win 303 NVIDIA, Samsung SM951 512GB, WD Blue 1TB, Acer RT280k 4k60 FreeSync [link]
Gaming laptop: Asus FX503VD, i5-7300HQ, DDR4 2133 2x8GB, GTX 1050, Sandisk 256GB + 480GB SSD [link]


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

With a performance like that, amd needs to drop the price by $200 or so around a rtx 2070. 

Intel Xeon E5 1650 v3 @ 3.5GHz 6C:12T / CM212 Evo / Asus X99 Deluxe / 16GB (4x4GB) DDR4 3000 Trident-Z / Samsung 850 Pro 256GB / Intel 335 240GB / WD Red 2 & 3TB / Antec 850w / RTX 2070 / Win10 Pro x64

HP Envy X360 15: Intel Core i5 8250U @ 1.6GHz 4C:8T / 8GB DDR4 / Intel UHD620 + Nvidia GeForce MX150 4GB / Intel 120GB SSD / Win10 Pro x64

 

HP Envy x360 BP series Intel 8th gen

AMD ThreadRipper 2!

5820K & 6800K 3-way SLI mobo support list

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Taf the Ghost said:

Anyone seen any CS:Go 1080p results?

 

 1942653338_CSGO4K.jpg.29df522baba8a7d2c43939e0dc42a66d.jpg

 

 This 4K result is really interesting. And I'm curious what the 1080p results are.

CSGO is pretty much 100% CPU dependent at 1080p TBH.

CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K | Motherboard: AsRock X99 Extreme4 | Graphics Card: Gigabyte GTX 1080 G1 Gaming | RAM: 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws4 2133MHz | Storage: 1 x Samsung 860 EVO 1TB | 1 x WD Green 2TB | 1 x WD Blue 500GB | PSU: Corsair RM750x | Case: Phanteks Enthoo Pro (White) | Cooling: Arctic Freezer i32

 

Mice: Logitech G Pro X Superlight (main), Logitech G Pro Wireless, Razer Viper Ultimate, Zowie S1 Divina Blue, Zowie FK1-B Divina Blue, Logitech G Pro (3366 sensor), Glorious Model O, Razer Viper Mini, Logitech G305, Logitech G502, Logitech G402

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Taf the Ghost said:

That modded Vega 56 I think was taking in 150% more power than stock or something ridiculous. It's just overclocker things.

Yeah for some reason AMD software allows for power target to be pushed to 150% vs 120% from NVidia. It kinda sucks for AMD because a lot of the hysteria surrounding Vega power draw was when overclocking with 150% PT benchmarks where shown, their own act to make to increase liberties in their software led to (I am assuming here) lower sales due to rumors or misinformation.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Taf the Ghost said:

That modded Vega 56 I think was taking in 150% more power than stock or something ridiculous. It's just overclocker things.

and if you remove nvidias power limiters similar thing happens 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×