Jump to content

Vega FE - Placebo Mode

tom_w141

So Gamers Nexus ran a suite of professional and gaming benchmarks in both "gaming" and "pro" mode.

 

 

The results indicate there is no difference between the modes regardless of task. Some people speculated that the reason for Vega FE's weak gaming performance might be down to the dual nature of the card. However here GN demonstrates the two "modes" do nothing and therefore performance can't be blamed on mode switching because mode switching does nothing apart from disable Wattman/Radeon Chill. I mean it even does a dummy screen flash to make you feel like something changed xD 

 

Article:

 

http://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/2979-vega-fe-pro-mode-vs-gaming-mode-whats-amd-doing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tom_w141 said:

I mean it even does a dummy screen flash to make you feel like something changed xD 

HAHAHA

well, TBF, this is a good way of letting the user know that his placebo has taken effect.

QUOTE/TAG ME WHEN REPLYING

Spend As Much Time Writing Your Question As You Want Me To Spend Responding To It.

If I'm wrong, please point it out. I'm always learning & I won't bite.

 

Desktop:

Delidded Core i7 4770K - GTX 1070 ROG Strix - 16GB DDR3 - Lots of RGB lights I never change

Laptop:

HP Spectre X360 - i7 8560U - MX150 - 2TB SSD - 16GB DDR4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, tom_w141 said:

So Gamers Nexus ran a suite of professional and gaming benchmarks in both "gaming" and "pro" mode.

 

 

The results indicate there is no difference between the modes regardless of task. Some people speculated that the reason for Vega FE's weak gaming performance might be down to the dual nature of the card. However here GN demonstrates the two "modes" do nothing and therefore performance can't be blamed on mode switching because mode switching does nothing apart from disable Wattman/Radeon Chill. I mean it even does a dummy screen flash to make you feel like something changed xD 

 

Article:

 

http://www.gamersnexus.net/guides/2979-vega-fe-pro-mode-vs-gaming-mode-whats-amd-doing

honestly I think it does switch to a different driver but the gaming driver right now is just the same thing because it has not been worked on. I think when RX comes out we will see some difference.

if you want to annoy me, then join my teamspeak server ts.benja.cc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a brand new card so naturally the drivers aren't going to work as they should. Common sense, people.

Main rig on profile

VAULT - File Server

Spoiler

Intel Core i5 11400 w/ Shadow Rock LP, 2x16GB SP GAMING 3200MHz CL16, ASUS PRIME Z590-A, 2x LSI 9211-8i, Fractal Define 7, 256GB Team MP33, 3x 6TB WD Red Pro (general storage), 3x 1TB Seagate Barracuda (dumping ground), 3x 8TB WD White-Label (Plex) (all 3 arrays in their respective Windows Parity storage spaces), Corsair RM750x, Windows 11 Education

Sleeper HP Pavilion A6137C

Spoiler

Intel Core i7 6700K @ 4.4GHz, 4x8GB G.SKILL Ares 1800MHz CL10, ASUS Z170M-E D3, 128GB Team MP33, 1TB Seagate Barracuda, 320GB Samsung Spinpoint (for video capture), MSI GTX 970 100ME, EVGA 650G1, Windows 10 Pro

Mac Mini (Late 2020)

Spoiler

Apple M1, 8GB RAM, 256GB, macOS Sonoma

Consoles: Softmodded 1.4 Xbox w/ 500GB HDD, Xbox 360 Elite 120GB Falcon, XB1X w/2TB MX500, Xbox Series X, PS1 1001, PS2 Slim 70000 w/ FreeMcBoot, PS4 Pro 7015B 1TB (retired), PS5 Digital, Nintendo Switch OLED, Nintendo Wii RVL-001 (black)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we all just agree that Vega FE was 100% rushed?

CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K | Motherboard: AsRock X99 Extreme4 | Graphics Card: Gigabyte GTX 1080 G1 Gaming | RAM: 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws4 2133MHz | Storage: 1 x Samsung 860 EVO 1TB | 1 x WD Green 2TB | 1 x WD Blue 500GB | PSU: Corsair RM750x | Case: Phanteks Enthoo Pro (White) | Cooling: Arctic Freezer i32

 

Mice: Logitech G Pro X Superlight (main), Logitech G Pro Wireless, Razer Viper Ultimate, Zowie S1 Divina Blue, Zowie FK1-B Divina Blue, Logitech G Pro (3366 sensor), Glorious Model O, Razer Viper Mini, Logitech G305, Logitech G502, Logitech G402

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, tmcclelland455 said:

It's a brand new card so naturally the drivers aren't going to work as they should. Common sense, people.

When Nvidia release a new Titan X it doesn't suck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

Can we all just agree that Vega FE was 100% rushed?

No. I will agree with you on that if AMD says that Vega FE was rushed.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Senzelian said:

I don't think the answer is that simple and I don't think AMD would be stupid enough trying to trick the consumers this way.
We all know how the 3.5GB GTX 970 fiasco went.

While not the same company, you basically defeat your own argument when you point out the exact situation in which a mayor company was that stupid to think people could  be fooled.

-------

Current Rig

-------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think pcper talked about this on one of their live streams or articles already, they asked AMD about this and AMD confirmed that it's just interface difference between modes.

Devices:

Desktop(s): Main Rig | CPU: R7 1700x, Ram: 16GB, GPU: GTX 1070 Ti

Server(s): My Server 

Laptop(s): Macbook Pro 13" (2015) 

Phone(s): iPhone SE (64GB), Nokia Lumia 925 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Senzelian said:

I will agree with you on that if AMD says that Vega FE was rushed.

So you believe everything that AMD says? lol

CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K | Motherboard: AsRock X99 Extreme4 | Graphics Card: Gigabyte GTX 1080 G1 Gaming | RAM: 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws4 2133MHz | Storage: 1 x Samsung 860 EVO 1TB | 1 x WD Green 2TB | 1 x WD Blue 500GB | PSU: Corsair RM750x | Case: Phanteks Enthoo Pro (White) | Cooling: Arctic Freezer i32

 

Mice: Logitech G Pro X Superlight (main), Logitech G Pro Wireless, Razer Viper Ultimate, Zowie S1 Divina Blue, Zowie FK1-B Divina Blue, Logitech G Pro (3366 sensor), Glorious Model O, Razer Viper Mini, Logitech G305, Logitech G502, Logitech G402

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Misanthrope said:

While not the same company, you basically defeat your own argument when you point out the exact situation in which a mayor company was that stupid to think people could  be fooled.

970 was an obvious hardware level problem with false advert while this is software, remember that software can be improved via updates, rx480/ 580 are worlds better than they were at launch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this is down to shitty drivers and/or shitty software, which honestly I should assume all things considered, then I hope AMD fixes this. Vega FE has been kinda bad for them so far.

If it's down to hardware... wowee. 

Check out my guide on how to scan cover art here!

Local asshole and 6th generation console enthusiast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Misanthrope said:

While not the same company, you basically defeat your own argument when you point out the exact situation in which a mayor company was that stupid to think people could  be fooled.

I know what you mean, but I can't agree with you.

The GTX 970 fiasco was a bit more tricky to find out. Nvidia probably didn't expect anyone to actually look into the memory speeds of a GPU at 3.5GB and above, while we can be sure that AMD is expecting benchmarks between the two modes. That was the point I was trying to make.

 

7 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

So you believe everything that AMD says? lol

 

Nice try - you could almost work for a cheap news outlet, but no, I don't believe everything that AMD says, but why would I believe anything you say?

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Senzelian said:

I know what you mean, but I can't agree with you.

The GTX 970 fiasco was a bit more tricky to find out. Nvidia probably didn't expect anyone to actually look into the memory speeds of a GPU at 3.5GB and above, while we can be sure that AMD is expecting benchmarks between the two modes. That was the point I was trying to make.

 

 

Nice try - you could almost work for a cheap news outlet, but no, I don't believe everything that AMD says, but why would I believe anything you say?

I agree that the similarities are not that many. But let's entertain some thoughts: How much performance Hawaii cards gained through driver optimization? Far too much which would to me confirm that AMD has indeed a history of maybe not malfunctioning but premature releases.

 

If we assume that most of the issues were actually HBM2 related (not very far fetched) and seeing how key features are not present in this drivers, I wouldn't be surprised if RX Vega was a complete dud at launch and even with all the delays still takes several months to reach it's full potential.

 

While it took a long time for the 970 RAM issue to be uncovered it also usually takes a long time for AMD to finally mature drivers. This FE Vega launch seems to indicate that despite their previous claims, their driver optimization it's still quite sub-par since this card should be used for some gaming since it's not entirely professional or entirely gaming centric both use cases should be competent enough.

-------

Current Rig

-------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Misanthrope said:

I agree that the similarities are not that many. But let's entertain some thoughts: How much performance Hawaii cards gained through driver optimization? Far too much which would to me confirm that AMD has indeed a history of maybe not malfunctioning but premature releases.

 

If we assume that most of the issues were actually HBM2 related (not very far fetched) and seeing how key features are not present in this drivers, I wouldn't be surprised if RX Vega was a complete dud at launch and even with all the delays still takes several months to reach it's full potential.

 

While it took a long time for the 970 RAM issue to be uncovered it also usually takes a long time for AMD to finally mature drivers. This FE Vega launch seems to indicate that despite their previous claims, their driver optimization it's still quite sub-par since this card should be used for some gaming since it's not entirely professional or entirely gaming centric both use cases should be competent enough.

Interesting thought - I like it! 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, The Benjamins said:

honestly I think it does switch to a different driver but the gaming driver right now is just the same thing because it has not been worked on. I think when RX comes out we will see some difference.

This is exactly what I was going to say. I think this theory is spot on.

CPU: Ryzen 9 5900 Cooler: EVGA CLC280 Motherboard: Gigabyte B550i Pro AX RAM: Kingston Hyper X 32GB 3200mhz

Storage: WD 750 SE 500GB, WD 730 SE 1TB GPU: EVGA RTX 3070 Ti PSU: Corsair SF750 Case: Streacom DA2

Monitor: LG 27GL83B Mouse: Razer Basilisk V2 Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red Speakers: Mackie CR5BT

 

MiniPC - Sold for $100 Profit

Spoiler

CPU: Intel i3 4160 Cooler: Integrated Motherboard: Integrated

RAM: G.Skill RipJaws 16GB DDR3 Storage: Transcend MSA370 128GB GPU: Intel 4400 Graphics

PSU: Integrated Case: Shuttle XPC Slim

Monitor: LG 29WK500 Mouse: G.Skill MX780 Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red

 

Budget Rig 1 - Sold For $750 Profit

Spoiler

CPU: Intel i5 7600k Cooler: CryOrig H7 Motherboard: MSI Z270 M5

RAM: Crucial LPX 16GB DDR4 Storage: Intel S3510 800GB GPU: Nvidia GTX 980

PSU: Corsair CX650M Case: EVGA DG73

Monitor: LG 29WK500 Mouse: G.Skill MX780 Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red

 

OG Gaming Rig - Gone

Spoiler

 

CPU: Intel i5 4690k Cooler: Corsair H100i V2 Motherboard: MSI Z97i AC ITX

RAM: Crucial Ballistix 16GB DDR3 Storage: Kingston Fury 240GB GPU: Asus Strix GTX 970

PSU: Thermaltake TR2 Case: Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ITX

Monitor: Dell P2214H x2 Mouse: Logitech MX Master Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, tom_w141 said:

When Nvidia release a new Titan X it doesn't suck

Because as of late their drivers are already at least working on lower-tier chips so there isn't as much fuckery to do in order to make them work.

Main rig on profile

VAULT - File Server

Spoiler

Intel Core i5 11400 w/ Shadow Rock LP, 2x16GB SP GAMING 3200MHz CL16, ASUS PRIME Z590-A, 2x LSI 9211-8i, Fractal Define 7, 256GB Team MP33, 3x 6TB WD Red Pro (general storage), 3x 1TB Seagate Barracuda (dumping ground), 3x 8TB WD White-Label (Plex) (all 3 arrays in their respective Windows Parity storage spaces), Corsair RM750x, Windows 11 Education

Sleeper HP Pavilion A6137C

Spoiler

Intel Core i7 6700K @ 4.4GHz, 4x8GB G.SKILL Ares 1800MHz CL10, ASUS Z170M-E D3, 128GB Team MP33, 1TB Seagate Barracuda, 320GB Samsung Spinpoint (for video capture), MSI GTX 970 100ME, EVGA 650G1, Windows 10 Pro

Mac Mini (Late 2020)

Spoiler

Apple M1, 8GB RAM, 256GB, macOS Sonoma

Consoles: Softmodded 1.4 Xbox w/ 500GB HDD, Xbox 360 Elite 120GB Falcon, XB1X w/2TB MX500, Xbox Series X, PS1 1001, PS2 Slim 70000 w/ FreeMcBoot, PS4 Pro 7015B 1TB (retired), PS5 Digital, Nintendo Switch OLED, Nintendo Wii RVL-001 (black)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, done12many2 said:

Rushing this release makes no sense, yet they did.  O.o

To save face. Vega was already delayed numerous times and they had commited to a Q2 release so probably felt they had to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, done12many2 said:

Rushing this release makes no sense, yet they did.  O.o

I am pretty sure that they rushed it because if they didn't their stock would plummet -_-

CPU: Intel Core i7-5820K | Motherboard: AsRock X99 Extreme4 | Graphics Card: Gigabyte GTX 1080 G1 Gaming | RAM: 16GB G.Skill Ripjaws4 2133MHz | Storage: 1 x Samsung 860 EVO 1TB | 1 x WD Green 2TB | 1 x WD Blue 500GB | PSU: Corsair RM750x | Case: Phanteks Enthoo Pro (White) | Cooling: Arctic Freezer i32

 

Mice: Logitech G Pro X Superlight (main), Logitech G Pro Wireless, Razer Viper Ultimate, Zowie S1 Divina Blue, Zowie FK1-B Divina Blue, Logitech G Pro (3366 sensor), Glorious Model O, Razer Viper Mini, Logitech G305, Logitech G502, Logitech G402

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tom_w141 said:

To save face. Vega was already delayed numerous times and they had commited to a Q2 release so probably felt they had to.

 

2 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

I am pretty sure that they rushed it because if they didn't their stock would plummet -_-

 

 I get it.  So to appease the guys who don't even buy the cards instead of the ones that do.  xD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×