PS4 World of Tanks Looks better Than PC Version

[RagnarokDel]

Friend brought over PS3 and played bf4 on it. Looks almost as good as my $2,000 Gaming PC. Thanks EA/Dice! I love when consoles get better quality games!

I beg your pardon?

 

 

 

Do you even play the Battlefield series? Then you would know that BF4 has had the worst PC port of all time....especially considering console games ACTUALLY WORKED upon release date. The PC version of BF4 Didn't even work upon launch..............................So there is my case.

That's your counter? Your claim is that the graphics are the same and when people disagree, you say that the game actually worked at launch over a year ago? Here's  real life boss thought to shove up your head. The only reason it didnt work on PC at launch is because they fucked up. It wasnt a flaw of PCs that made it impossible to game, no, they done fucked up.

[Ostwind]

-bloop-

I really hope you didnt buy both of those 260x's at the same time, if you did that was a serious missallocation of funds.

[TheMidnightNarwhal]

Better than PS3 specs I can tell you that.

Point being Dice/EA spent more time and gave a higher quality port to consoles than the PC versions.

My BF4 looks much better than on PS3 abd I have a 1700$ rig... so you're lying.

[spartaman64]

To both of you: The average gaming computer is low end with an average of 1024MB of vram and low end GPU: (http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/videocard/)

 

Just look at texture quality before the current generation of consoles launched; they were abysmal, and this includes PC exclusive titles. When the current console gen launched, you saw countless 770 users shit themselves, because their GPU's became completely vram starved and had to revert to medium textures. These consoles are mid to low-high end in performance. Of the total pc gaming market, only a tiny niche has 980ti's and other ultra high end cards.

 

So yeah, the general quality push comes from consoles, not pc's. In fact these new consoles being PC based means that PC's benefit a lot, especially thanks to AMD that helped the entire pc industry with low level API's like DX12 and Vulkan, thanks to them getting the contracts to put GCN in all consoles.

so all games including crysis and gta should come with graphics worse than those on the consoles ok

[Hunter259]

I beg your pardon?

 

That's your counter? Your claim is that the graphics are the same and when people disagree, you say that the game actually worked at launch over a year ago? Here's  real life boss thought to shove up your head. The only reason it didnt work on PC at launch is because they fucked up. It wasnt a flaw of PCs that made it impossible to game, no, they done fucked up.

He gas said multiple times that it was actually a PS4. Please read. The PS4 version is of much higher graphical fidelity that definitely rivals PC.

[Fred Castellum]

Meh PC version has so many graphics mods if you want to use em that blow away the game default graphics(even at max).

 

Tankers unite!

[Albatross]

they could

but they're too fucking lazy to do so

 

This is a reason...and they think the console community is larger so they only want to spend time on the consoles. I guess.

[RagnarokDel]

He gas said multiple times that it was actually a PS4. Please read. The PS4 version is of much higher graphical fidelity that definitely rivals PC.

huh no. 900p60fps doesnt rival PC.

[ShadowCaptain]

My BF4 looks much better than on PS3 abd I have a 1700$ rig... so you're lying.

 

BF4 on PS3 looks shit

[Trik'Stari]

huh no. 900p60fps doesnt rival PC.

I will quote Tek Syndicate:

 

"Don't argue with braindead people"

[Notional]

so all games including crysis and gta should come with graphics worse than those on the consoles ok

 

Where did I say that? But speaking of Crysis, the dev almost went bankrupt, because there's not enough money in super nice looking and expensive FPS games, you can only play on PC. As for a game like GTA, that is still made for the consoles, but has higher draw distance, detail level and number of cars, etc. Still made for the consoles and would not exist in it's current form if it was just made for PC.

[EvilWiffles]

And here I am enjoying War Thunder lol

[Hunter259]

huh no. 900p60fps doesnt rival PC.

BF4 on PS4 doesn't look that much different from PC. Does PC look better? Duh. Does it look insanely better? No not really. Same thing with COD. These games are designed for consoles, not for PC.

[TheMidnightNarwhal]

BF4 on PS3 looks shit

 

Yeah, that's what I wrote.

[ShadowCaptain]

Yeah, that's what I wrote.

 

yeah just backing you up, it looks like a PS1 game on PS3 h

[Trik'Stari]

BF4 on PS4 doesn't look that much different from PC. Does PC look better? Duh. Does it look insanely better? No not really. Same thing with COD. These games are designed for consoles, not for PC.

Looks better in 5760x1080 than it does in 1920x1080

[GlassBomb]

If only the PC version wasn't so terribly optimized to begin with...

I can't say that it runs like crap on my rig. But heck, it doesn't run anywhere near as good as many newer games do of my rig.

If only WoT could use more than a single core :c

[Castdeath97]

They will probably upgrade the graphics at some point, the problem is most world of tanks players have low end systems and laptops.

[Hunter259]

Looks better in 5760x1080 than it does in 1920x1080

didn't argue with that. But if you are trying to compare apples to apples in resolution they are similar.

[Prysin]

BF4 on PS4 doesn't look that much different from PC. Does PC look better? Duh. Does it look insanely better? No not really. Same thing with COD. These games are designed for consoles, not for PC.

can confirm. Owns PS4 with BF4... difference is mainly in slightly higher res textures (PS4 i think is upscaled 1600x900), and a few more levels of AA and some general sharpening for PC...

 

One thing though, the bloom on the PC is overkill. Was done much better (contrast wise) on the consoles...

[Notional]

BF4 on PS4 doesn't look that much different from PC. Does PC look better? Duh. Does it look insanely better? No not really. Same thing with COD. These games are designed for consoles, not for PC.

 

To be fair Battlefield 4 has never looked THAT good. Effects are nice, but textures are shit and made for crappy NVidia cards like the 770. Also bear in mind that BF4 on PS4 actually uses async compute, making it more effective to give it better performance.

[RagnarokDel]

To be fair Battlefield 4 has never looked THAT good. Effects are nice, but textures are shit and made for crappy NVidia cards like the 770. Also bear in mind that BF4 on PS4 actually uses async compute, making it more effective to give it better performance.

crappy?

[Notional]

crappy?

 

Yup, cards with planned obsolescence via very limited vram. How many modern cards can you run ultra textures on a 770 today? On a 280x you can still run almost all of them.

[Dabombinable]

Yup, cards with planned obsolescence via very limited vram. How many modern cards can you run ultra textures on a 770 today? On a 280x you can still run almost all of them.

Lel, the GTX 770 is as modern as the 280X, if not more so.

[Notional]

Lel, the GTX 770 is as modern as the 280X, if not more so.

 

It gets beaten to dust in DX12 games. But the 770 with 2GB of vram cannot run high/ultra textures on new games (especially open world games). Remember that higher textures has very little impact on performance.