Intel Xeon 28 Cores / 56 Threads

[Maticks]

Intel quietly releases it's Xeon 28 Cores / 56 Threads.

With rumor of 32 Core early this year.

 

http://wccftech.com/intel-launches-xeon-gold-and-platinum-series-processors-with-up-to-28-cores-56-threads/

 

[RS2007GOD]

Sounds  exspenive

[HelplmChoking]

Oooooh I like this... I can just imagine having one machine to run my whole workflow...

[Droidbot]

Just now, RS2007GOD said:

Sounds  exspenive

Businesses will pay for it. 

 

Yay, new socket. Shitty naming scheme however

[Maticks]

I am looking forward to seeing this on the bench. it's going to run very hot.

[IrshaadH]

I'd love to see a 7 gamers/1 CPU follow-up vid with this chip if it is indeed real.

[Silentprototipe]

Just now, IrshaadH said:

I'd love to see a 7 gamers/1 CPU follow-up vid with this chip if it is indeed real.

Probrably not since low clockspeeds would be an issue

[RadiatingLight]

2 minutes ago, Maticks said:

I am looking forward to seeing this on the bench. it's going to run very hot.

It will be skylake based instead of broadwell, so I'd assume the temperature increase from core count will be negated by temperature decrease from architecture efficiency.

[Droidbot]

5 minutes ago, Maticks said:

I am looking forward to seeing this on the bench. it's going to run very hot.

low clockspeed, low voltage. keeps em running quite cool

[Electronics Wizardy]

Just now, Droidbot said:

low clockspeed, low voltage. keeps em running quite cool

but they are going for 200w ish tdp's

 

They keep shoving more power in the cheaps as rack space costs money.

[mariushm]

It runs at up to 2.5 ghz for the 28 cores / 56 threads with a TDP of up to 205 watts. 

 

For comparison The Ryzen 1700 has 8 cores / 16 threads in 65w running at 3 ghz , so multiply that by 3 and you have 24 cores / 48 threads in 205 watts. Of course, by reducing the maximum frequencies to match Intel's 2.5 ghz and carefully selected dies, AMD could probably squeeze 4 x 8 cores = 32 cores / 64 threads in 205w

 

So it's not that big of  an achievement from Intel.

[Juanitology]

18 minutes ago, RS2007GOD said:

Sounds  exspenive

While Intel has not yet officially announced the CPUs, some stores are already listing them – no technical details, but pricing available. The Xeon Platinum 8180 costs a whopping £9600, while the ‘M’ variant, costs north of £12500.

Source: kitguru

so a 15.000 USD CPU. I'm guessing Linus is gonna ask for 2 and then brick both of them while doing something stupid

[RS2007GOD]

4 minutes ago, Terodius said:

While Intel has not yet officially announced the CPUs, some stores are already listing them – no technical details, but pricing available. The Xeon Platinum 8180 costs a whopping £9600, while the ‘M’ variant, costs north of £12500.

Source: kitguru

so a 15.000 USD CPU. I'm guessing Linus is gonna ask for 2 and then brick both of them while doing something stupid

Holy moly thats more than I expected.. 

[Hunter259]

7 minutes ago, mariushm said:

It runs at up to 2.5 ghz for the 28 cores / 56 threads with a TDP of up to 205 watts. 

 

For comparison The Ryzen 1700 has 8 cores / 16 threads in 65w running at 3 ghz , so multiply that by 3 and you have 24 cores / 48 threads in 205 watts. Of course, by reducing the maximum frequencies to match Intel's 2.5 ghz and carefully selected dies, AMD could probably squeeze 4 x 8 cores = 32 cores / 64 threads in 205w

 

So it's not that big of  an achievement from Intel.

Ryzen TDP is not calculated the same as Intel. The 1800X uses 160W which is the same as a 6900k while have a 95W TDP. 

[RadiatingLight]

1 minute ago, Hunter259 said:

Ryzen TDP is not calculated the same as Intel. The 1800X uses 160W which is the same as a 6900k while have a 95W TDP. 

What?

 

I knew TDP was calculated differently, but there's no fucking way it uses 160W. you'd essentially require either an AIO or a NH-D15 (Or other comparable air cooler) to cool a 160W TDP CPU.

[NumLock21]

Meh old news.

And users can already try them out.

[Hunter259]

11 minutes ago, RadiatingLight said:

What?

 

I knew TDP was calculated differently, but there's no fucking way it uses 160W. you'd essentially require either an AIO or a NH-D15 (Or other comparable air cooler) to cool a 160W TDP CPU.

https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Processors/AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-Review-Now-and-Zen/Power-Consumption-and-Conclusions

read that slightly wrong. It is more like 130-140 watts under load. 

[imreloadin]

9 minutes ago, RS2007GOD said:

Holy moly thats more than I expected.. 

Why does that surprise you? We're talking enterprise level equipment here.

The Xeon E5-4669 v4 (22c44t @ 2.2GHz with boost of 3GHz) was released back on Q2 of last year with a recommended price of $7,000 by Intel.

https://ark.intel.com/products/93805/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-4669-v4-55M-Cache-2_20-GHz

[RS2007GOD]

Just now, imreloadin said:

Why does that surprise you? We're talking enterprise level equipment here.

The Xeon E5-4669 v4 (22c44t @ 2.2GHz with boost of 3GHz) was released back on Q2 of last year with a recommended price of $7,000 by Intel.

https://ark.intel.com/products/93805/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-4669-v4-55M-Cache-2_20-GHz

Yea I was expectibg around that but 15k is another level. 

[RadiatingLight]

2 minutes ago, Hunter259 said:

https://www.pcper.com/reviews/Processors/AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-Review-Now-and-Zen/Power-Consumption-and-Conclusions

read that slightly wrong. It is more like 130-140 watts under load. 

That's system power consumption.

 

Broadwell-E and Ryzen power consumption is comparable because although Broadwell-E has a 140W TDP, it doesn't use nearly that much at stock speeds.

[Hunter259]

5 minutes ago, RadiatingLight said:

That's system power consumption.

 

Broadwell-E and Ryzen power consumption is comparable because although Broadwell-E has a 140W TDP, it doesn't use nearly that much at stock speeds.

Yes. And I took off about 20-30 watts and you get the CPU power consumption. It uses more than 95 watts. Around 30-40 more. 

[4960X]

but can it run crysis at 800x600?

[Energycore]

Hey,

 

Please edit your topic to bring it up to our Tech News and Reviews guidelines.

As soon as you do drop me a mention here @Energycore and I'll move the thread back. Cheers!

[Drak3]

1 hour ago, RadiatingLight said:

What?

 

I knew TDP was calculated differently, but there's no fucking way it uses 160W. you'd essentially require either an AIO or a NH-D15 (Or other comparable air cooler) to cool a 160W TDP CPU.

TDP on Ryzen, and all Intel CPUs, are heat output, not power draw.

Ryzen 7 draws the same amount of power as an X99 chip, but outputs less heat (?), meaning that power is being more efficiently used, and Ryzen has more components inside it to power, assuming AMD's TDP measuring methods are close to Intel's.

[RadiatingLight]

1 hour ago, Drak3 said:

TDP on Ryzen, and all Intel CPUs, are heat output, not power draw.

Ryzen 7 draws the same amount of power as an X99 chip, but outputs less heat (?), meaning that power is being more efficiently used, and Ryzen has more components inside it to power, assuming AMD's TDP measuring methods are close to Intel's.

Um.. not that's not how it works.

all energy that goes into a CPU gets outputted as heat. basic thermodynamics

Intel just puts all their X99 CPUs under a broad roof, 140W TDP, even though the TDP of a 6900K is probably more like 100W or less.