(Updated!) Resident evil 7 benchmarks

[Guest Kloaked]

6 minutes ago, MageTank said:

Or, we chalk it up as a single title being extremely unoptimized. Yeah, I'm gonna go with that. 

Maybe Guru3d is just full of shit.

[MageTank]

1 minute ago, Kloaked said:

Maybe Guru3d is just full of shit.

That too.

[stealth80]

27 minutes ago, WereCat said:

Exactly.

R9 390x beating FuryX

R9 Fury Nano beating RX 470

RX 470 beating R9 Fury Nano

R9 390 beating R9 FuryX

R9 Fury beating R9 390

R9 390 beating RX 470

RX 470 beating R9 390

RX 480 beating R9 390

R9 390 beating RX 480

I don't think that's got anything to do with it, it's just a shitty port that needs work

[WereCat]

9 minutes ago, stealth80 said:

I don't think that's got anything to do with it, it's just a shitty port that needs work

I was obviously joking....

[ivan134]

19 minutes ago, MageTank said:

Or, we chalk it up as a single title being extremely unoptimized. Yeah, I'm gonna go with that. 

 

54 minutes ago, stealth80 said:

what?

 

 

axJmn.mp4

[ivan134]

How the hell do you insert gifs from a phone?

[Coaxialgamer]

1 hour ago, ivan134 said:

 

 

 

axJmn.mp4

Preparing blast shields

[ivan134]

26 minutes ago, Coaxialgamer said:

Preparing blast shields

I don't know how to insert gifs from my phone

[Kamina]

When I played the demo, HBAO+ and shadows would cripple your GPU. Even the frame limiter would chop your frame rate if kept on unlimited, I think.

 

Maybe that's why the preset benchmarks look so wonky. 

[MrCthuntoo]

4 hours ago, christianled59 said:

Game runs fine for me. I'm just very upset that there isn't any VR support on pc. I played vr on ps4 and it was a whole other level of scary. 

I just hope if Capcom don't add it, the community manages to mod in support for the Vive.

 

[MrCthuntoo]

I'm getting pretty solid 70-80fps, sometimes dipping to 50-60fps, while running at 1080p with mostly high settings on a GTX 670.

 

Only things turned down are reflections and shadows.

[christianled59]

7 minutes ago, MrCthuntoo said:

I just hope if Capcom don't add support, the community manages to mod in support for the Vive.

 

Same here.

[Belgarathian]

Man, good thing this wasn't out at the RX 480 launch. 

 

I've said it before, I'll say it again - that RX 480 keeps showing up in places it shouldn't... However, there is definitely some optimisation issues with this game on release. 

[AlTech]

Something is very wrong when the RX 480 beats out a Fury X........

[AlTech]

7 hours ago, Daring said:

Why does this game run slower than the RX 480 on the 1070? Makes no sense.

Two words..........

 

"AMD Radeon"

[Misanthrope]

So...Capcom as usual?

[dfg666]

It's funny because if AMD perform poorly in general the comments would've been something along the lines of "What can you say, it's AMD's garbage drivers  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ " Yet since it's Nvidia in this case let's blame the company that ran benchmark tests.

[CoolMarquis97]

So its a no go for a GTX 770?

[Derangel]

8 hours ago, MrCthuntoo said:

I just hope if Capcom don't add it, the community manages to mod in support for the Vive.

 

I haven't run across the source for the information but I've seen a lot of people say that VR support for it will be coming next year. It sounds like Sony paid for timed-exclusive VR support, which is a whole new level of utter bullshit.

[stealth80]

11 hours ago, WereCat said:

I was obviously joking....

Ok Mr Joker, why so serious all of a sudden?

[MageTank]

2 hours ago, dfg666 said:

It's funny because if AMD perform poorly in general the comments would've been something along the lines of "What can you say, it's AMD's garbage drivers  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ " Yet since it's Nvidia in this case let's blame the company that ran benchmark tests.

It's not that it's Nvidia. It's that even superior AMD cards are losing to inferior AMD cards. The RX 480 loses to a GTX 1070 in nearly every title, and mostly competes with a 1060, yet is actually close to a GTX 1080. It's beating out the Fury X by a large margin, and the 1070 is losing to a 470 in this title, a $170 GPU. 

 

If this was reversed, nobody would bat an eye because it would be normal. After all, none of us are surprised with a $400 GPU beats a $170 GPU, but we are certainly shocked to see it the other way around. 

[Carclis]

13 hours ago, Doobeedoo said:

Very odd indeed. Possible Fury X VRAM limit huh. Though it's interesting seeing how R9 390(X) compare with RX 480 though. My R9 290 would probably perform great then. I've seen it beating RX 480 the first benchmarks when it launched here and there, then read about differences and saw that in some parts sometimes the one and sometimes the other is better.

That's doubtful since the RX 470 performs just the same until you're hitting the higher resolutions. It's more likely that the drivers were optimised for the second generation of GCN and Polaris since most users are running those with the third gen only covering the Fury and 380.

[Dabombinable]

Just now, Carclis said:

That's doubtful since the RX 470 performs just the same until you're hitting the higher resolutions. It's more likely that the drivers were optimised for the second generation of GCN and Polaris since most users are running those with the third gen only covering the Fury and 380.

The performance difference wouldn't be this large though...

[Carclis]

18 minutes ago, Dabombinable said:

The performance difference wouldn't be this large though...

The Rx 470 (4GB) and 480 (8GB) both perform as close as you would expect them to if they were running any other game so I'm not sure what you're referring to. The Fury also seems to scale better into higher resolutions which would contradict that and suggests that it's just being under-utilised, which is nothing new really.

[Dabombinable]

28 minutes ago, Carclis said:

The Rx 470 (4GB) and 480 (8GB) both perform as close as you would expect them to if they were running any other game so I'm not sure what you're referring to. The Fury also seems to scale better into higher resolutions which would contradict that and suggests that it's just being under-utilised, which is nothing new really.

GPU that not much better than a GTX 980 in all other games (or eual to it) shouldn't be performing any where near as good or better than a:

• Titan X
• 980ti
• GTX 1070
• Fury X
• Nano (FuryX that thermal throttles hard)
• Fury

At any resolution.