AMD Polaris 10 and Polaris 11 Specifications leak

[Lawliet93]

According to techpowerup, an industry insider told them the specs of the new AMD POLARIS GPUs.

 

POLARIS 10 should feature a TDP of less than 150W, one 6-pin power, 32 compute units and a total performance of 5,5TFLOP (the core clock should be around 1,342 GHz, if there are 64 stream-processors per CU).

POLARIS 11 should feature a TDP of 50w, PCI-E power only, 14 compute units and a total performance of 2,5TFLOP (and again, if there are 64 processors per CU, the core clock should be around 1,395GHz).

 

Source: http://www.overclock3d.net/articles/gpu_displays/amd_polaris_10_and_polaris_11_specifications_leak/1

 

Edit

Guys... apparently, videocardz says, that those cards are mobile parts, so desktop parts should be clocked even higher (looking back at the core difference of the hd 7970m and the hd 7870, the difference was around 150MHz).

http://videocardz.com/59903/possible-polaris-10-and-polaris-11-specifications-emerge

Desktop parts should look like this:

 

R7 470/470x stream processors 896/1280.

R9 480/480x stream processors 2048/2340

There was always a difference in core clock between the full gpu and the cut-down version (remember the hd 7970 and 7950?). A full POLARIS 10 GPU should perform like this (if it is clocked at 1,4GHz) 2x 2340x1,4= 6,552TFLOP.

 

 

 

[DXMember]

If it holds true Polaris 10 is right smack on with 290X compute performance which nails the VR recommended spec that they were aiming for

can wait for June/July )))

[Prysin]

1 minute ago, DXMember said:

If it holds true Polaris 10 is right smack on with 290X compute performance which nails the VR recommended spec that they were aiming for

can wait for June/July )))

and if that comes at 249-299 USD, that is a DAAAAAAMN good deal

[Memories4K]

Saw this.

Honestly, i don't even know.

It seems the 1070 for $380 is going to be the most requested card of this year.

That said i'm still getting Polaris 10 because we already know it's doing roughly around Fury/Fury X level performance and it'll likely be at a much better price-point than the 1070.

 

"Polaris isn't meant to compete with Nvidia's high-end cards!"

It's not about what's meant, it's about what the market will be.

Polaris is going up against Pascal from consumers, whether it's liked or not.

[DXMember]

Just now, Prysin said:

and if that comes at 249-299 USD, that is a DAAAAAAMN good deal

what was that they said at CAPSAICIN?

increasing the total targetable market for VR with VR ready GPUs below $300 MSRP?

[Prysin]

2 minutes ago, DXMember said:

what was that they said at CAPSAICIN?

increasing the total targetable market for VR with VR ready GPUs below $300 MSRP?

yeah, something like that.

[ivan134]

2 minutes ago, DXMember said:

what was that they said at CAPSAICIN?

increasing the total targetable market for VR with VR ready GPUs below $300 MSRP?

To paraphrase, pretty much.  Affordable VR. 

[Prysin]

3 minutes ago, Memories4K said:

Saw this.

Honestly, i don't even know.

It seems the 1070 for $380 is going to be the most requested card of this year.

That said i'm still getting Polaris 10 because we already know it's doing roughly around Fury/Fury X level performance and it'll likely be at a much better price-point than the 1070.

 

"Polaris isn't meant to compete with Nvidia's high-end cards!"

It's not about what's meant, it's about what the market will be.

Polaris is going up against Pascal from consumers, whether it's liked or not.

it will be around 390X performance. Not Fury or Fury X.

 

Vega (october release) is the REAL 390X/Fury/Fury X replacement.

[VagabondWraith]

So, if you're buying high end, go nVidia. If you're buying low end, buy AMD.

 

Seems simple enough, although Polaris 10 won't offer anything for people 970/290 up.

[ivan134]

More rumors to take with a grain of salt. Can't wait till all these cards launch so these rumors can end.  

[Memories4K]

1 minute ago, Prysin said:

it will be around 390X performance. Not Fury or Fury X.

 

Vega (october release) is the REAL 390X/Fury/Fury X replacement.

There was a demo on Polaris 10 running Hitman on 1440p at a higher frame-rate than a Fury card, is why i say Fury/Fury X performance.

 

Let me find it and link.

[multifrag]

Just now, Prysin said:

it will be around 390X performance. Not Fury or Fury X.

 

Vega (october release) is the REAL 390X/Fury/Fury X replacement.

It would be paradise 390x and Below $300 price, but not sure how it will be in reality.

[VagabondWraith]

1 minute ago, Memories4K said:

There was a demo on Polaris 10 running Hitman on 1440p at a higher frame-rate than a Fury card, is why i say Fury/Fury X performance.

 

Let me find it and link.

AMD refused to disclose the settings used to achieve that.

[Sakkura]

9 minutes ago, Prysin said:

and if that comes at 249-299 USD, that is a DAAAAAAMN good deal

Considering you could get an R9 290 for $250 a couple years ago, that's a damn terrible deal. But no worse than what Nvidia is offering.

[Memories4K]

3 minutes ago, VagabondWraith said:

AMD refused to disclose the settings used to achieve that.

Ultra settings.

 

There could be some slight tampering going on with clockspeed and drivers but so far i've not had much reason to worry.

@Prysin

[Ryoutarou97]

1 minute ago, Prysin said:

it will be around 390X performance. Not Fury or Fury X.

 

Vega (october release) is the REAL 390X/Fury/Fury X replacement.

I thought Vega was set to compete with the Pascal titan? Also, I thought 11 was set to be the 290x replacement and 10 was Fury X level. For some really bad napkin math that I have been going by, 390x is 275w TDP, 275/2.5 = 110, not 150. Did they ever actually confirm the 2.5x efficiency thing or was there just a cryptic tweet about the star being 2.5x brighter? I remember it being mentioned a lot, but no article actually confirming it.

[Memories4K]

1 minute ago, Ryoutarou97 said:

I thought Vega was set to compete with the Pascal titan? Also, I thought 11 was set to be the 290x replacement and 10 was Fury X level. For some really bad napkin math that I have been going by, 390x is 275w TDP, 275/2.5 = 110, not 150. Did they ever actually confirm the 2.5x efficiency thing or was there just a cryptic tweet about the star being 2.5x brighter? I remember it being mentioned a lot, but no article actually confirming it.

Vega 10/11 = Fury X/Fury replacement, last i checked.

[Lawliet93]

16 minutes ago, Lawliet93 said:

According to techpowerup, an industry insider told them the specs of the new AMD POLARIS GPUs.

 

POLARIS 10 should feature a TDP of less than 150W, one 6-pin power, 32 compute units and a total performance of 5,5TFLOP (the core clock should be around 1,342 GHz, if there are 64 stream-processors per CU).

POLARIS 11 should feature a TDP of 50w, PCI-E power only, 14 compute units and a total performance of 2,5TFLOP (and again, if there are 64 processors per CU, the core clock should be around 1,395GHz).

 

Source: http://www.overclock3d.net/articles/gpu_displays/amd_polaris_10_and_polaris_11_specifications_leak/1

GUYS!!!! It looks like, those are only mobile parts and non-x ones at that.

R9 470/470x 896/1280 stream processors

R9 480/480x 2048/2304 stream processors 

 

Core clocks should be well over 1,4GHz.

 

http://videocardz.com/59903/possible-polaris-10-and-polaris-11-specifications-emerge

[VagabondWraith]

5 minutes ago, Memories4K said:

Ultra settings.

 

There could be some slight tampering going on but so far i've not had much reason to worry.

@Prysin

Here's what I saw:

 

/u/AMD_Robert - Can you tell us what setting Hitman was on during the Polaris 10 demo to clear things up?
permalinkparent

AMD_RobertTechnical Marketing 8 points 6 days ago
"No. Because that would allow others to accurately triangulate the performance of the product, and we are not yet ready to publish those details. We will, in time, when everything is ready."

[Prysin]

6 minutes ago, ONOTech said:

The 1080 replaces the 980 and is clearly faster than the 980 Ti and Titan X. 

 

Replacement doesn't mean similar performance. Polaris could very well be as fast as a Fury or Fury X. 

 

Regardless, speculation is speculation. Best thing to do is wait

it is only faster in certain areas. In others it is equal to a 980 Ti.

For those who think the 1080 is flat out way way faster then a Titan X. It is not. It is only faster in niche cases, like compute heavy scenes. Because it has 40 SMMs (Nvidias ACEs) compared to the 24 found in the TItan X and the 20? found in the 980Ti

[Memories4K]

1 minute ago, VagabondWraith said:

Here's what I saw:

 

/u/AMD_Robert - Can you tell us what setting Hitman was on during the Polaris 10 demo to clear things up?
permalinkparent

AMD_RobertTechnical Marketing 8 points 6 days ago
"No. Because that would allow others to accurately triangulate the performance of the product, and we are not yet ready to publish those details. We will, in time, when everything is ready."

If that's the case then Overclock3D misreported and, yeah, might as well be ignored

[Prysin]

4 minutes ago, Memories4K said:

If that's the case then Overclock3D misreported and, yeah, might as well be ignored

they not gonna tell. They pulled the same shit with the Fury X slides. They were using only settings that ran extremely well on their GCN hardware. Whilst lowering settings that were disadvantageous to GCN.

[captain cactus]

Let's just wait until official benchmarks arrive shall we?

[Enderman]

8 minutes ago, Prysin said:

it is only faster in certain areas. In others it is equal to a 980 Ti.

For those who think the 1080 is flat out way way faster then a Titan X. It is not.

http://www.overclock3d.net/articles/gpu_displays/gtx_1080_overclocked_3dmark_performance_leaked/1

[LAwLz]

9 minutes ago, Prysin said:

it is only faster in certain areas. In others it is equal to a 980 Ti.

For those who think the 1080 is flat out way way faster then a Titan X. It is not. It is only faster in niche cases, like compute heavy scenes. Because it has 40 SMMs (Nvidias ACEs) compared to the 24 found in the TItan X and the 20? found in the 980Ti

I would wait for actual, proper benchmarks to come out before making any claim about performance.