Jump to content

The NSA's trying to build a quantum computer than can crack any encryption

Jeroen1322

A Quantum computer that can break any (modern day?) encryption? You don't say. Being able to try trillions of possible outcomes in seconds would probably be quite useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets just make AES-320000. problem solved.

"If a Lobster is a fish because it moves by jumping, then a kangaroo is a bird" - Admiral Paulo de Castro Moreira da Silva

"There is nothing more difficult than fixing something that isn't all the way broken yet." - Author Unknown

Spoiler

Intel Core i7-3960X @ 4.6 GHz - Asus P9X79WS/IPMI - 12GB DDR3-1600 quad-channel - EVGA GTX 1080ti SC - Fractal Design Define R5 - 500GB Crucial MX200 - NH-D15 - Logitech G710+ - Mionix Naos 7000 - Sennheiser PC350 w/Topping VX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

who the hell cares?

they can watch all my midget porn they want, there is nothing interesting, or illegal going on on my computer. (maybe illegel stuff, but still who cares)

"Probably Because I'm A Dangerous Sociopath With A Long History Of Violence"
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have not all the latest news articles been pointing to them collecting data on their own civilians, storing information from everyday people (like phone records) now they want to build a computer with the specific task of hacking encrypted information.  I did not say they wanted to hack my hard drive, but what's to say they won't use it to get into emails, phone records, bank details etc? Nothing, but that's the way the wind is blowing.

 

You have to understand that you're simply not that interesting, you're just not. What information about you is it exactly that you don't want them to know? I seriously can't see what all the fuzz is about. It may be immoral to spy on your own citizens but the fact of the matter is that they're not. Your bank details are not interesting to them. Your phone records are not interesting to them. Your emails are not interesting to them. All these things are true unless you truly have something to hide, and I damn well take it you don't. This doesn't mean that the NSA is spying on you only to find that you are not a thread, this means that the NSA is not actively spying on you what so ever. Do you have any idea what kind of resources it would take to spy on 300 million people?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to understand that you're simply not that interesting, you're just not. What information about you is it exactly that you don't want them to know? I seriously can't see what all the fuzz is about. It may be immoral to spy on your own citizens but the fact of the matter is that they're not. Your bank details are not interesting to them. Your phone records are not interesting to them. Your emails are not interesting to them. All these things are true unless you truly have something to hide, and I damn well take it you don't. This doesn't mean that the NSA is spying on you only to find that you are not a thread, this means that the NSA is not actively spying on you what so ever. Do you have any idea what kind of resources it would take to spy on 300 million people?

 

It's not about me or any one individual, it's about have the computing power to run heuristic scans on everybody. they don't need to be interested in individuals, once they have the computer it will be just like a virus scanner looking for suspect code on a machine, they can scan emails, bank details etc for suspect sentences, words or transactions. Not actually targeting any one person, but spying on everyone. 

 

They don't need to spy on all 300million at once, they could easily run heuristic scans on blocks of 10 million with the power offered by quantum computing. and even if that took 6 months to do they would have scanned most of the population within 15 years.

Grammar and spelling is not indicative of intelligence/knowledge.  Not having the same opinion does not always mean lack of understanding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dude it's all good. NSA is just trying to help us like Microsoft.

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/microsoft-passwords-fido-alliance-trusted-platform-hacking,25418.html

 

I can't wait to get rid of all my passwords for eye scanners. How nice of them. MS cares about us. I think everyone should go out and buy Windows 8 right now. It is SUPER. Cloud = awesome. Getting rid of passwords even better. I can't wait for Windows 9. 

CPU:24/7-4770k @ 4.5ghz/4.0 cache @ 1.22V override, 1.776 VCCIN. MB: Z87-G41 PC Mate. Cooling: Hyper 212 evo push/pull. Ram: Gskill Ares 1600 CL9 @ 2133 1.56v 10-12-10-31-T1 150 TRFC. Case: HAF 912 stock fans (no LED crap). HD: Seagate Barracuda 1 TB. Display: Dell S2340M IPS. GPU: Sapphire Tri-x R9 290. PSU:CX600M OS: Win 7 64 bit/Mac OS X Mavericks, dual boot Hackintosh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

who the hell cares?

they can watch all my midget porn they want, there is nothing interesting, or illegal going on on my computer. (maybe illegel stuff, but still who cares)

 

As Logan is wont to say, well why don't you just give me access to your credit card information and e-mails then?

 

It's bad when the population, who should have privacy knows less about their, politicians/state who should be transparent. That's the issue here. Yeah yeah, the state needs a few things to be secret too sure, but it should be at least mostly transparent.

I'm one of the few people I know that tend to repair electronics with a smith's hammer on a regular basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Logan is wont to say, well why don't you just give me access to your credit card information and e-mails then?

 

It's bad when the population, who should have privacy knows less about their, politicians/state who should be transparent. That's the issue here. Yeah yeah, the state needs a few things to be secret too sure, but it should be at least mostly transparent.

well, as long as they're not going to use my credit card and send my e-mails to other, i don't care.

"Probably Because I'm A Dangerous Sociopath With A Long History Of Violence"
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone has motivation to make a practical quantum computer, something nobody has been able to come close to doing, it's the NSA.

 

We're a long way from that.

I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason and intellect has intended us to forgo their use, and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them. - Galileo Galilei
Build Logs: Tophat (in progress), DNAF | Useful Links: How To: Choosing Your Storage Devices and Configuration, Case Study: RAID Tolerance to Failure, Reducing Single Points of Failure in Redundant Storage , Why Choose an SSD?, ZFS From A to Z (Eric1024), Advanced RAID: Survival Rates, Flashing LSI RAID Cards (alpenwasser), SAN and Storage Networking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Logan is wont to say, well why don't you just give me access to your credit card information and e-mails then?

 

It's bad when the population, who should have privacy knows less about their, politicians/state who should be transparent. That's the issue here. Yeah yeah, the state needs a few things to be secret too sure, but it should be at least mostly transparent.

The argument, "If you don't have anything to hide, then why don't/do you X?" is stupid.

If I said I don't care about the government spying on me because I have nothing to hide, I'm obviously referring to things I do daily, calling, emails, etc... It doesn't mean I'll give someone my credit card information or walk around naked. It's common sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Quantum computer that can break any (modern day?) encryption? You don't say. Being able to try trillions of possible outcomes in seconds would probably be quite useful.

*cough* cryptocurrency

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's like I'm getting used to all this and be all like, "yeah whatever it's not like we can do anything about it" (which is true but we shouldn't have that attitude)... just goes to show how psychologically just... downing all this is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very very nice! I'm surprised people don't see the benefits of this, damn it'll be sweet for the US to have this ability!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

So... while everyone sees the evil in this, can I bring you back to the real world for a second and show you a few things this might be used for? Hmmm, lets start off with cracking encrypted communications and/or data of terrorists. How about cracking encrypted communications and/or data of enemies of the United States of America and Her Allies? I would run down a history of cryptography and the vast amount of information there is to show you how breaking codes saved lives but I don't feel like creating a two hundred page forum post. (no lie on the size).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

So now the NSA also wants a quantum pc? none has succeded in making one so far, so I don't think the NSA will be capable either. 

"Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people."

Main rig:

i7-4790 - 24GB RAM - GTX 970 - Samsung 840 240GB Evo - 2x 2TB Seagate. - 4 monitors - G710+ - G600 - Zalman Z9U3

Other devices

Oneplus One 64GB Sandstone

Surface Pro 3 - i7 - 256Gb

Surface RT

Server:

SuperMicro something - Xeon e3 1220 V2 - 12GB RAM - 16TB of Seagates 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

So now the NSA also wants a quantum pc? none has succeded in making one so far, so I don't think the NSA will be capable either. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_quantum_computing

 

 

So... while everyone sees the evil in this, can I bring you back to the real world for a second and show you a few things this might be used for? Hmmm, lets start off with cracking encrypted communications and/or data of terrorists. How about cracking encrypted communications and/or data of enemies of the United States of America and Her Allies? I would run down a history of cryptography and the vast amount of information there is to show you how breaking codes saved lives but I don't feel like creating a two hundred page forum post. (no lie on the size).

 

no one ever left the "real world".  while we are all great full for the good things it can do, a lot of people are rightfully suspect of the things they will do that they shouldn't.

Grammar and spelling is not indicative of intelligence/knowledge.  Not having the same opinion does not always mean lack of understanding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not about me or any one individual, it's about have the computing power to run heuristic scans on everybody. they don't need to be interested in individuals, once they have the computer it will be just like a virus scanner looking for suspect code on a machine, they can scan emails, bank details etc for suspect sentences, words or transactions. Not actually targeting any one person, but spying on everyone. 

 

They don't need to spy on all 300million at once, they could easily run heuristic scans on blocks of 10 million with the power offered by quantum computing. and even if that took 6 months to do they would have scanned most of the population within 15 years.

 

What exactly is it that you're afraid of then? I mean are you not just hating on the NSA to hate? Or is your bank account filled with suspicious transactions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

What exactly is it that you're afraid of then? I mean are you not just hating on the NSA to hate? Or is your bank account filled with suspicious transactions?

Two things:

 

1. any heuristic scan can and does return false positives.  I don't know about you but the thought of having my name on a list that rings a bell and makes me a terrorist suspect every time my name is entered into a computer (like when applying for a passport) ain't my idea of living in a free country.

2. Ethics,  plain and simple.

Grammar and spelling is not indicative of intelligence/knowledge.  Not having the same opinion does not always mean lack of understanding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone who can actually make requests to deep trolling please request they shut down the NSA

I am good at computer

Spoiler

Motherboard: Gigabyte G1 sniper 3 | CPU: Intel 3770k @5.1Ghz | RAM: 32Gb G.Skill Ripjaws X @1600Mhz | Graphics card: EVGA 980 Ti SC | HDD: Seagate barracuda 3298534883327.74B + Samsung OEM 5400rpm drive + Seatgate barracude 2TB | PSU: Cougar CMX 1200w | CPU cooler: Custom loop

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two things:

 

1. any heuristic scan can and does return false positives.  I don't know about you but the thought of having my name on a list that rings a bell and makes me a terrorist suspect every time my name is entered into a computer (like when applying for a passport) ain't my idea of living in a free country.

2. Ethics,  plain and simple.

 

1. Do you really think they will be that careless? You need to take a step out of your negative bubble and take a realistic look at things.

 

2. Your ethics are outdated man. It is obvious that it is more desirable not to be spied on by government entities, however this isn't really realistic anymore (and haven't been for a damn long time). As long as you have nothing to hide there is no logical reason why your door shouldn't be open for them to drop by for a cup of java.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's certain encryptions that are so powerful, no computer you can think of making in this age can crack it. Maybe in 15-20 years we'll have the technology, but in all cases it would cost a fortune.

Source? I watch numberphile on youtube.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

?

Yes they are progressing, but none is nowhere near a practical working one for encryption cracking. 

"Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people."

Main rig:

i7-4790 - 24GB RAM - GTX 970 - Samsung 840 240GB Evo - 2x 2TB Seagate. - 4 monitors - G710+ - G600 - Zalman Z9U3

Other devices

Oneplus One 64GB Sandstone

Surface Pro 3 - i7 - 256Gb

Surface RT

Server:

SuperMicro something - Xeon e3 1220 V2 - 12GB RAM - 16TB of Seagates 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

?

Yes they are progressing, but none is nowhere near a practical working one for encryption cracking. 

I never said they were at that stage but they are working computers.  The nasa/google one has been working for a while now even though they wont tell us how its doing or the complexity of the programs it's running.

 

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-11/15/quantum-nasa

Grammar and spelling is not indicative of intelligence/knowledge.  Not having the same opinion does not always mean lack of understanding.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×