FCC Live Stream

[NumLock21]

FCC LIve Stream. They will talk about other stuffs and what everyone is here for Net Neutraility.

Starts at 10:30 Eastern Time / 7:30 Pacific

 

https://www.fcc.gov/general/live

[Guest]

Captions: Speaking Foreign Language

Great... guess we will wait on the translator

[2FA]

14 hours ago, SC2Mitch said:

-snip-

It's one thing to say he is corrupt but to wish harm on the dude, jeez. How to make your side look shitty: step one.

[Eduard the weeb]

I watching in class

[Silentprototipe]

1 minute ago, Eduard the weeb said:

I watching in class

Same 

[ItsMitch]

1 minute ago, DeadEyePsycho said:

It's one thing to say he is corrupt but to wish harm on the dude, jeez. How to make your side look shitty: step one.

He's a literal sack of shit who's contributed literally nothing positive at all, hope he gets everything that comes to him. (Although my opinion is heavily based on politics but let's not walk down this road, I'm willing to leave it at that)

[goodtofufriday]

3 minutes ago, DeadEyePsycho said:

It's one thing to say he is corrupt but to wish harm on the dude, jeez. How to make your side look shitty: step one.

I don't condone violence. But he is pretty much setting a precedent for the entire world to not have net neutrality.   

[Devin92]

Is there any list of the claims this Ajit Pai guy make about how net neutrality is bad? And how removing it can help? Just want to get the whole picture of this debate. If the list can have a fact check too that would be great!

 

[A3r0Sp1k3]

Just now, Devin92 said:

Is there any list of the claims this Ajit Pai guy make about how net neutrality is bad? And how removing it can help? Just want to get the whole picture of this debate. If the list can have a fact check too that would be great!

 

Watch Paul and Wendel's videos.

[Bigbootyjudy]

22 minutes ago, Eduard the weeb said:

I watching in class

same, It would be great if the schools automatically let us watch it in class since it is actually important.

 

Has anyone else noticed that the top of Ajit Pai's head looks like the top of Barry b. benson's head from the bee movie?

[IrwinAllen13]

2 minutes ago, Devin92 said:

Is there any list of the claims this Ajit Pai guy make about how net neutrality is bad? And how removing it can help? Just want to get the whole picture of this debate. If the list can have a fact check too that would be great!

 

In his mind, he doesn't need any claims. He was told what to do by Trump and his former employer Verizon.

[2FA]

10 minutes ago, goodtofufriday said:

I don't condone violence. But he is pretty much setting a precedent for the entire world to not have net neutrality.   

The internet is not as US centered as you might believe.

 

12 minutes ago, SC2Mitch said:

He's a literal sack of shit who's contributed literally nothing positive at all, hope he gets everything that comes to him. (Although my opinion is heavily based on politics but let's not walk down this road, I'm willing to leave it at that)

You don't have to like him but making statements like that doesn't do much to attract people to your side, it usually does the opposite.

 

I'm all for NN but seriously, learn to have some rationality.

[captain_to_fire]

It's 12 in the morning here and I'm about to sleep. I'll probably wake up to my Twitter feed nagging me with notifications when the sun rises. I thought I'd just leave this video here. This appeared to my YouTube recommendations.

 

17 minutes ago, DeadEyePsycho said:

It's one thing to say he is corrupt but to wish harm on the dude, jeez. How to make your side look shitty: step one.

You know what they say, "When they go low you go high. But if they go lower, you go for the jugular." [/s]

 

But yes despite how so many people hate him, violence directed towards him is not the answer and would make things worse. It's better to combat bad ideas with good ideas. 

[goodtofufriday]

2 minutes ago, DeadEyePsycho said:

The internet is not as US centered as you might believe.

It's not about US Centered. 

 

its basically that if these laws can get passed in the US then other countries will follow suit to allow it as well.

[2FA]

Just now, goodtofufriday said:

It's not about US Centered. 

 

its basically that if these laws can get passed in the US then other countries will follow suit to allow it as well.

The US is one of the most, if not the most, conservative industrialized nations. I highly doubt that.

 

It also is not "a law getting passed." It's rescinding of classification based off of an already existing piece of legislation. If you're going to defend your side, at least know the details.

[knightslugger]

So far, they've discussed a Blue alert EAS, and now they're on rural communications funding.

 

snore-fest so far.

[Tcrumpen]

1 minute ago, knightslugger said:

So far, they've discussed a Blue alert EAS, and now they're on rural communications funding.

 

snore-fest so far.

What's the betting that 100% of the current viewership of the live stream are all wanting them to get to Net Neutrality and are currently spamming the sh*t outta the chat about it

[goodtofufriday]

5 minutes ago, DeadEyePsycho said:

The US is one of the most, if not the most, conservative industrialized nations. I highly doubt that.

 

It also is not "a law getting passed." It's rescinding of classification based off of an already existing piece of legislation. If you're going to defend your side, at least know the details.

Australia, New Zealeand, and some asian countries also throttle connections and have you pay more for certain kinds of traffic. Canada is looking to allow similar throttling, and the EU (or at least he UK) may be losing certain protections.

 

The first step is rescinding the in place legislation =/ and then enacting protections. This isn't a formal conversation and you well knew what I meant. 

 

But as you say"If you're going to defend your side, at least know the details."

[lookpuppy]

31 minutes ago, Eduard the weeb said:

I watching in class

Same

[2FA]

2 minutes ago, goodtofufriday said:

Australia, New Zealeand, and some asian countries also throttle connections and have you pay more for certain kinds of traffic. Canada is looking to allow similar throttling, and the EU (or at least he UK) may be losing certain protections.

 

The first step is rescinding the in place legislation =/ and then enacting protections. This isn't a formal conversation and you well knew what I meant. 

 

But as you say"If you're going to defend your side, at least know the details."

NN didn't ban throttling of consumers though, it just prevented ISPs from strong-arming companies into paying more.

[Megah3rtz]

They are covering 

• " Twilight Towers Public Notice
  The Commission will consider a Public Notice seeking input on a draft Program Comment addressing the historic preservation review requirements for collocating wireless communications facilities on certain communications towers. (WT Docket No. 17-79)"

right now,

 

"Restoring Internet Freedom" is next

 

The Commission will consider a Declaratory Ruling, Report and Order, and Order that will restore Internet Freedom by returning broadband Internet access service to its prior classification as an information service, and reinstate the private mobile service classification of mobile broadband Internet access service. The item also will eliminate the Commission’s vague and expansive Internet Conduct Standard, along with the bright-line rules. Additionally, it will modify the transparency rule to promote additional transparency, while eliminating burdensome and unnecessary requirements. (WC Docket No. 17-108)

 

[lookpuppy]

@Megah3rtz  rx 480 or gtx 1060

[Okjoek]

Ooh We get to watch the destruction of the internet live?

[Megah3rtz]

Just now, Fruitsnacc said:

@Megah3rtz  rx 480 or gtx 1060

Stay on topic. 

[Bouzoo]

My left ear is enjoying this.