AMD's own testing? Fury X vs GTX 980Ti

[dalekphalm]

Those custom coolers were not available in the uk until january 2014! 

That's unfortunate, and a problem with global product availability, though the cards themselves were available elsewhere for at least a month before that.

 

I digress though, that's getting quite off topic.

[Janne]

does anyone know when the NDA or whatever it is ends/when reviewers can upload their reviews? is it the 24th

[CoolaxGaming]

Bottleneck is the right word. DVI only supports a resolution of 2560 x 1600 60hz or 1920 x 1080 120hz and monitors at that resolution would have DisplayPort anyway. The HDMI can be used for a secondary monitor and the DP should be used for the primary.

?

I can run 144hz 1080p on dvi...

[CoolaxGaming]

does anyone know when the NDA or whatever it is ends/when reviewers can upload their reviews? is it the 24th

Linus mentioned that it's this tuesday

[Swndlr]

Its not official until Linus and Luke get their hands on one

I hope this card does well, will give Nvidia the lil kick in the booty that they so desperately need.

[Mightyinvader]

Im considering putting a fury over a 980ti in my fall pc build...

[TheKDub]

I wanna see linus benchmark the two against eachother

[Popingheads]

...

 

I don't see how a "hardware to hardware" comparison is even possible since the hardware is in no way the same, unless you were just talking about air and water cooling. In which case, I would point to everyone who said it was fine to constantly compare the reference cooling on the 290x's to other cards. The tables have turned (Titan X can throttle) but people can't just switch their opinions that easily. I mean they could, but they look stupid. The stock cooler should be compared from both if possible.

 

Wait... are you the same person (zMeul) from the AMD subreddit that got banned for, and I quote, flaming, misinformation, aggravation, and a host of other ill-intent things"? I remember reading you're posts from back then.

[othertomperson]

Looks like 4K on a single card isn't gonna be a thing yet...

 

They are clearly piling on MSAA to exaggerate the difference. My 970 SLI gets 80 fps in Thief.

[zMeul]

Wait... are you the same person (zMeul) from the AMD subreddit that got banned for, and I quote, flaming, misinformation, aggravation, and a host of other ill-intent things"? I remember reading you're posts from back then.

that ban was revoked not even 1h after

someone from AMD's social media "group" got aggravated when I started bringing in hard facts about R9 2xx series failure rates - corroborated with my own experience with 3 broken in the box R9 280X es

 

about 1week later, my RMA was resolved

said "fuck it !!", payed the difference and got my very 1st nVidia powered video card after about 14 years of Radeon exclusivity, since the very 1st one 

[spnidel]

for the price and the performance it delivers, this GPU seems like it'll be great

 

even though the performance gap is not that large between the 980 ti and the fury X, and it having 2gb less memory, for the same money you get a shit ton of memory bandwidth and high-end watercooling, which will hopefully allow for pretty damn high overclocks on the core side

[Kinda Bottlenecked]

that ban was revoked not even 1h after

someone from AMD's social media "group" got aggravated when I started bringing in hard facts about R9 2xx series failure rates - corroborated with my own experience with 3 broken in the box R9 280X es

 

about 1week later, my RMA was resolved

said "fuck it !!", payed the difference and got my very 1st nVidia powered video card after about 14 years of Radeon exclusivity, since the very 1st one 

 

So that explains why you are so active on LTT all of a sudden  :lol:

[Vozella]

Benchmarks from the company themselves? Well of course they'll be colourized.

[19_blackie_73]

If that's the sort of results to expect then I'm impressed. AMD really seems to have done it right with fiji in my opinion, especially as this is beating the 980ti at the same price point, and as the titan x is so close in performance, with a bit of overclocking you can expect to see this comfortably beat out all the competition, especially with an AiO already attached the temps will easily be able to handle it. If I had the money I'd be racing to bag one of these right now.

depends on whether the overclocking has the same effect in fps on both amd and nvidia or which of these cards you can push  higher. if you imagine a gaming g1 980ti and this watercooled fury x, it would be interesting which one you can push higher

[MoonSpot]

--Skyrim--

 

skip to time 5:50, use time stamped link https://youtu.be/ADN_mBG_-fQ?t=349 or watch in it's entirely.

 

See what I mean?  Logan's just about the only reviewer that gets to use modded skyrim bench results.  He's big enough, trusted enough, and He talks about skyrim and modding it often, and again not strictly as a vram joke.  He's even reviewed several mods, or really just talked about the ones he uses and maybe why.  Haven't seen any others do that, nor do I expect them to.  Logan's just a genuine fan, and we all know it.

[IAMSWIFT1]

Thats Not The Fury X,The Fury X Doesn't Have A Fan On It,It Has A Radiator With A Fan On It

[Texhnlyze]

Thats Not The Fury X,The Fury X Doesn't Have A Fan On It,It Has A Radiator With A Fan On It

 

Fury XT?

[duriel]

Fury XT?

 

fiji xt is literally the fury x

so no.

 

maybe dual fiji but i doubt that.

[Lethal Seraph]

I thought that was fan made.

[Kinda Bottlenecked]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADN_mBG_-fQ

skip to time 5:50, use time stamped link https://youtu.be/ADN_mBG_-fQ?t=349 or watch in it's entirely.

See what I mean? Logan's just about the only reviewer that gets to use modded skyrim bench results. He's big enough, trusted enough, and He talks about skyrim and modding it often, and again not strictly as a vram joke. He's even reviewed several mods, or really just talked about the ones he uses and maybe why. Haven't seen any others do that, nor do I expect them to. Logan's just a genuine fan, and we all know it.

Haha secretly(I guess it's not a secret now ) modded skyrim is always my top priority when picking a gpu. Of all people that reviewed the 7970/280x, Logan is the only one that showed modded skyrim performance. Logan's review was the most helpful one. Although his setup isn't the most graphically intensive, it gives a rough gauge since Logan also shows his mod list. I'll be waiting for a Fury X review from him

[DXMember]

Fury XT?

it was a fanmade poster, that's an r9 295x2 reused asset

[Valentyn]

Seems some sites are getting their hands on newer drivers for the Fury X. It's performing much better now it seems. Hopefully this is accurate and  AMD sorts out this driver debacle.

 

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ixbt.com%2Fvideo3%2Ffiji-part3.shtml

 

 

 

[Texhnlyze]

Seems some sites are getting their hands on newer drivers for the Fury X. It's performing much better now it seems. Hopefully this is accurate and AMD sorts out this driver debacle.

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ixbt.com%2Fvideo3%2Ffiji-part3.shtml

Thats been proven false already by an AMD rep. Even guru3d tested their fury x with the new drivers.

[Techhog]

Thats Not The Fury X,The Fury X Doesn't Have A Fan On It,It Has A Radiator With A Fan On It

It's fake.

[Majestic]

So, now that the cat is out of the bag (week late, had to sit in the corner). Who is still ready to defend AMD Fury X's awesome 95mhz overclocking capability? See, this is why I said about reading up on hardware for years and being able to correlate hidden information when presented with evidence.

 

It's a pretty nice card still, but the drivers are still pretty terrible. Can't really compete <4K.