should linus start uploading his videos in 60fps?

[STRMfrmXMN]

It really makes zero fucking difference when I'm watching a YouTube tech video, seriously.

Well, it depends on what you're watching. Gameplay? Yes. Fucking, just, literally everything else? Yeah, I don't care.

[IdortMasterRace]

Well, it depends on what you're watching. Gameplay? Yes. Fucking, just, literally everything else? Yeah, I don't care.

 

Of course but how often is gameplay uploaded to his channel?

 

Also the OP is implying all videos from the looks of things.

[STRMfrmXMN]

Of course but how often is gameplay uploaded to his channel?

 

Also the OP is implying all videos from the looks of things.

Yeah, I mean all videos in general. But what LMG does - no point in using 60FPS video.

From what I hear, LMG already uses a ton of storage for filming. Doubling the framerate would increase file sizes and just not help their situation.

[Calavera]

You are correct, and this does get to the point of subjectivity by the viewer. I know some people did like the HFR 3D in 'The Hobbit;' I found it made everything look plastic and artificial. The human eye is capable of much 'higher framerates' as you said, which is why we don't see motion blur (typically) with moving objects. Having said that though, 24fps is a vestige of the film days; the aesthetic of the motion blur with a shutter angle of 180* has become such a part of the 'cinematic look' that it has become standard. Remember when you could distinctly tell the difference between a video camera (VHS or the like) and a movie shot on film? That was only a difference of 6fps (24fps for film, 30fps for video). Granted, there were vast differences in dynamic range, interlaced scanning and other factors, but the way people and objects appeared to move in video versus film was different.

It's more than likely if film cameras started at 60fps, 24fps would look weird now, but they didn't. What differentiates between 'real life' and 'filmed life' (in the sense of anything captured by camera) is the fact that it is at slower framerates than 'reality.' I think what happened, for me at least, with the high frame rate 3D is it started to put a lot of stuff in the 'uncanny valley' because it was closer to 'real life' but not to the point where it fully convinced me.

Finally someene who knows what he's talking about without claiming their opinion is fact.

Yes, 24fps fixes a lot of isssues with movements such as motion blur which is created in your brain.

Doing this arteficially in games looks stupid.

[brownninja97]

Well lets think about this, he wants 4k, 4k is at the moment silly on youtube massive frame drops on machines that can handle it easily, 60fps is fine on machines that can handle it.

[Sharkyx1]

Well it's his channel, id rather he makes his decisions about the channel, but i know what id prefer and thats 60FPS, but i voted no because i don't think its worthwhile  compared to linus' interests in 4k

[AmericanToto]

I don't think it will make in videos. It will just make it a longer render and waste time.

[Swndlr]

Definitely YES, I dont like "cinematic" experience. This is tech channel not a movie.. so no reason to be on 30 FPS.

the wise words of ubi- 30 fps is cinematic. LMAO.

 

[Kingofpants]

Not going to happen anytime soon.

We can make fun of "cinematic" all we want when it comes to gaming, but when we're talking cameras, it's a whole differnet ball of wax.

There's only one content type we consistently film at 60FPS - Channel Super Fun. It gives us more flexibility in post to do silly slow mo stuff. That's the only reason I can think of to do it for slow moving live action stuff like we do...

How about 48 Fps

[Speedyv]

My interent only supports up to 360p 480 if I'm really lucky

I couldn't care less

[gundershot]

Only if it's for gameplay vids, otherwise I don't see the point, not that I'd complain

[Fgtfv567]

it's just tech vids and he rarely shows footage of video games so 30 FPS is fine, not to mention potential cost and time obstacles..

[Syntaxvgm]

If that's the case, why doesn't every movie shoot with a Phantom 1000fps camera? Did you see 'The Hobbit' in high framerate 3D? That was awful. I understand Peter Jackson's decision to do it, but the end result...do not want.

For gameplay, yes, more FPS means better quality. For motion picture, it's not empirically 'better,' it really just depends on what you're shooting.

I saw parts of it. Not a lotr fan Looked great to me. Effects were not really 48 fps ready, and it is jarring. But I use SVP to render movies at fake 60 fps. I prefer it by far. 

 

It's all teething. If all films went to 48 or 60 fps people would eventually get used to it. People hate it because they are used to 24, which is not better in any way beside budget for effects. 

Personally, I think 30 is ok though. I am much happier with that than 24. It matches the half the refresh rate of my screen and has no tearing

 

Are you saying we should keep a bad tradition becuase we a re used to it instead of pushing for a better one like we should have a long time ago? 

If it's practical, and it is, a higher frame rate for films should be sought after. 

[Liam-McShane]

No, it looks wrong on normal videos such as films and tv. Plus my internet can just about keep up with the 24/30 fps at 1080p, it has no chance at 60fps.

[asdfgh00]

I don't think switching to 60fps is necessary because:

1.) LTT is only a tech review channel (with some twists) and not a let's play or game/movie review channel.

yes there are some parts of some gameplay but its just a couple of seconds.

2.) Almost every video is not so "fast paced"..

3.) some internet issues? not all people have some really high internet speeds... like me

 

Well I am also agree to the 60fps thing but I just wish youtube will soon give an option for both 720p 30fps and 720p 60fps (also for 1080p, 1440p, and 4k)

[SanjayC]

As he said and many other youtubers, its not really worth it unless you're putting up game play videos where it would benefit from 60fps.

[Pugs501]

He already uploads 4k why get 60fps.  How many hard drives do you think it would it use.

 

Bonus:

[Maudima]

I'd take 60fps 1080p over 30 fps 4k any day. It's such a small amount of people that can take advantage of the resolution while a lot of people have 60hz monitors. I honestly don't understand it. The 4k filming makes sense for filming and editing but not for the final product. 

[Geekazoid]

I'm not bothered either way TBH.

[harrynowl]

Well I don't think his content would benefit apart from benchmark videos.

[Bustapalapeno]

If they start uploading gameplay on superfun yes. elsewise big no. Waste of resources.