Rate the Photo Above you

[GDRRiley]

6 minutes ago, sub68 said:

thanks, that was handheld with no nd's

NDs are someone I've though about for a long time but never bought any but if I move to an FS700R for video I don't really need them cus they are built in

[sub68]

5 minutes ago, GDRRiley said:

NDs are someone I've though about for a long time but never bought any but if I move to an FS700R for video I don't really need them cus they are built in

That’s nice that they are built in 

idk how that image wasn’t shaky 

[GDRRiley]

Just now, sub68 said:

That’s nice that they are built in 

idk how that image wasn’t shaky 

yeah its the kind of thing you expect from a high end video camera

it is a little but given most of the frame is motion it is hard to tell

[sub68]

3 minutes ago, GDRRiley said:

yeah its the kind of thing you expect from a high end video camera

it is a little but given most of the frame is motion it is hard to tell

Flowing water is one of my favorite things to do on a dslr because my phone can’t 

[Zodiark1593]

29 minutes ago, GDRRiley said:

yeah its the kind of thing you expect from a high end video camera

it is a little but given most of the frame is motion it is hard to tell

My Canon G7x mkii comes with an inbuilt 3 stop ND filter as well. Not a ton slower, but between that and F11, I’d gotten as slow as 1/15 on a bright day. 
 

 

[sub68]

Just now, Zodiark1593 said:

My Canon G7x mkii comes with an inbuilt 3 stop ND filter as well. Not a ton slower, but between that and F11, I’d gotten as slow as 1/15 on a bright day. 
 

 

That’s pretty good 

 

[Radium_Angel]

So I cheated a bit here on this shot. It's my back yard, but a photostitch of 3 shots (I'm not normally one to use PS for anything) from my dedicated IR Nikon D7000 with a Tokina 17mm 2.8 lens (set at f8)

and given the D7000 was converted to colour IR, I used PS again to remove the colour.

 

[GDRRiley]

10 minutes ago, Radium_Angel said:

So I cheated a bit here on this shot. It's my back yard, but a photostitch of 3 shots (I'm not normally one to use PS for anything) from my dedicated IR Nikon D7000 with a Tokina 17mm 2.8 lens (set at f8)

and given the D7000 was converted to colour IR, I used PS again to remove the colour.

you didn't rate mine

that looks really cool IR does weird stuff.

I've got a bunch of shots I should stitch together but I haven't spent the time to do it.

Canon SL2, 70-200F2.8L @70mm F2.8 1/500 iso400. I tend to dislike taking portraits but this was a random shot I took and I really like it.

[Radium_Angel]

50 minutes ago, GDRRiley said:

you didn't rate mine

Whoops, my bad, I'm sorry. The pine cone pseudo macro is cute, but the branches on the left hand side of the image are a major distraction.

 

 

[GDRRiley]

Just now, Radium_Angel said:

Whoops, my bad, I'm sorry. The pine cone pseudo macro is cute, but the branches on the left hand side of the image are a major distraction.

I do have one that focus is put in the pine cone but I wanted that one to be on the little pine tree.

I can easily crop it out.

Spoiler

'

 

[sub68]

21 hours ago, GDRRiley said:

you didn't rate mine

that looks really cool IR does weird stuff.

I've got a bunch of shots I should stitch together but I haven't spent the time to do it.

Canon SL2, 70-200F2.8L @70mm F2.8 1/500 iso400. I tend to dislike taking portraits but this was a random shot I took and I really like it.

I really like how the person is looking thought the trees

Canon xti, youngnou 50mm f1.8 @F7.1 1/50 iso 100

[GDRRiley]

2 hours ago, sub68 said:

I really like how the person is looking thought the trees

Canon xti, youngnou 50mm f1.8 @F7.1 1/50 iso 100

I wish it was more off center. I do like the wood grain flowing into the background.
canon SL2, 24-70 F2.8 @ 24mm F6.3 1/800 iso100

[sub68]

41 minutes ago, GDRRiley said:

I wish it was more of center.

I wanted to show the buttons

[GDRRiley]

6 minutes ago, sub68 said:

I wanted to show the buttons

typo I meant off center. It is to middle of the frame to me.

[sub68]

Just now, GDRRiley said:

typo I meant off center. It is to middle of the frame to me.

oh ok may be if cropped it just a bit

[GDRRiley]

Just now, sub68 said:

oh ok may be if cropped it just a bit

yeah that could do it. just my take

[sub68]

I know this looks like crap but manual fouces with no live view for astro is hard to get right.

this is Jupiter

canon xti iso 800 shutter 5 sec 

lens celestron NexStar 127SLT

[GDRRiley]

On 7/9/2020 at 7:48 AM, sub68 said:

I know this looks like crap but manual fouces with no live view for astro is hard to get right.

this is Jupiter

canon xti iso 800 shutter 5 sec 

lens celestron NexStar 127SLT

astro is hard. good try

SL2 yongonu 35mmF2@  F4 1/10 iso800. my GF loves these plushies a former classmate makes

[MrPhantastic]

On 7/11/2020 at 9:04 PM, GDRRiley said:

astro is hard. good try

SL2 yongonu 35mmF2@  F4 1/10 iso800. my GF loves these plushies a former classmate makes

The colors are great! The green and purple in the plushies and pig really stand out in this photo.

 

 

 

Canon 6D - Canon 24-105f4L - 1/60s - f/10 - 73mm - ISO100

[sub68]

On 7/13/2020 at 9:22 PM, MrPhantastic said:

The colors are great! The green and purple in the plushies and pig really stand out in this photo.

 

 

 

Canon 6D - Canon 24-105f4L - 1/60s - f/10 - 73mm - ISO100

noice landscape I havent seen london in this angle before

canon xti 18-55mm @55mm

shutter 1/40 aperture 5.6 ISO 800

 

 

[Radium_Angel]

On 7/17/2020 at 3:14 PM, sub68 said:

ISO 800

Noise seems fairly well controlled.

The following pic (and it's a pic, not an image) is nothing to write home about artistic-wise, but a test of my new Vivitar 100mm f/3.5 macro lens.

It is a crop of a larger image, but given the very shallow DoF of dedicated Macro lenses, I merely cropped out the blurry bits.

Canon 1D Mark II N

f/8, 1/160 ISO 400, afternoon daylight, no other changes.

 

[sub68]

6 minutes ago, Radium_Angel said:

Noise seems fairly well controlled.

yeah someone told me my 1600 iso shots where to noisy so my indoor limit is 800iso

[Radium_Angel]

14 hours ago, sub68 said:

yeah someone told me my 1600 iso shots where to noisy so my indoor limit is 800iso

noise is highly subjective. In bright outdoor light, you'll never see it, but indoor light, yeah it can be a problem. ISO performance (I feel) is about the only selling point of new camera bodies these days. High res video seems to be a solved issue, but one can never have too much low-light performance.

[sub68]

3 minutes ago, Radium_Angel said:

High res video seems to be a solved issue

that photo was taken on a 15 year old camera body

4 minutes ago, Radium_Angel said:

but one can never have too much low-light performance.

I use a 50mm 1.8 alot this helps with low light

[Radium_Angel]

1 hour ago, sub68 said:

that photo was taken on a 15 year old camera body

I hear you. I have work published in a magazine done with a Canon 10D. Granted, it's studio work where I can use ISO 100 and control the light, but your point still stands