Jump to content

"Dual-core iPhone 6s obliterates Galaxy S6, Note 5 and other top Android phones in performance tests"

SirNumbers

 

 

The first iPhone 6s benchmarks have emerged from a lucky buyer who received her handset a few days before the official September 25th launch date. The Geekbench 3 tests showed the Apple’s new flagship is significantly faster than last year’s iPhone 6. Even more impressive is the fact that the iPhone 6s and 6s Plus have almost the same scores as this year’s Retina MacBook laptops, both in single-core and multi-core tests.,
Reviewing the iPhone 6s models, Apple blogger Jon Gruber used Geekbench 3 benchmark software to test them, obtaining the same scores. According to Gruber, the iPhone 6s got a 2500 in single-core tests and 4340 in multi-core tests – that’s 1.6x and 1.5x faster than the iPhone 6, respectively.

Apple always had amazing processors but thats dual core vs 8 cores god damn

 

post-14596-0-24813700-1443039100.jpg

post-14596-0-07700400-1443039107.jpg

 

http://bgr.com/2015/09/23/iphone-6s-galaxy-s6-note-5-android/

Fedex Ground must be on Horse back, It took 7 days to go 200 miles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Expected.

 

What if apple made desktop cpus?

Nothing, because they don't make these either. They design them. Intel makes and designs. Intel would still be ahead.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Expected.

 

Nothing, because they don't make these either. They design them. Intel makes and designs. Intel would still be ahead.

 

Hmm maybe

Longboarders/ skaters message me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do people not know about big.LITTLE ?

i5 4670k @ 4.2GHz (Coolermaster Hyper 212 Evo); ASrock Z87 EXTREME4; 8GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3 RAM @ 2133MHz; Asus DirectCU GTX 560; Super Flower Golden King 550 Platinum PSU;1TB Seagate Barracuda;Corsair 200r case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do people not know about BIG.little?

what is that?

Fedex Ground must be on Horse back, It took 7 days to go 200 miles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

"obliterates"

Core per core its almost 50% higher thats insane

Fedex Ground must be on Horse back, It took 7 days to go 200 miles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

idk, maybe he means big.LITTLE.

whoops. Wrong caps D:

i5 4670k @ 4.2GHz (Coolermaster Hyper 212 Evo); ASrock Z87 EXTREME4; 8GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3 RAM @ 2133MHz; Asus DirectCU GTX 560; Super Flower Golden King 550 Platinum PSU;1TB Seagate Barracuda;Corsair 200r case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

these benchmarks are kind of shit

 

a dual core processor intended for a similar application versus a 4c+4c processor has comparable multicore speed but the dual core proc has higher single core speed

 

super interesting 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Core per core its almost 50% higher thats insane

No that's useless. Just a different design. Samsung is on big.Little you can see the 1 core performance and 4 core performance scale 1 to 3 pretty much which is great. The 4 small cores are power efficient though which is why Note 5 smashes iPhone 6 plus in battery, yes it has a bigger battery, but not that much bigger.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you can't exactly get a better spec'd phone then the iphone 6s

Fedex Ground must be on Horse back, It took 7 days to go 200 miles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No that's useless. Just a different design. Samsung is on big.Little you can see the 1 core performance and 4 core performance scale 1 to 3 pretty much which is great. The 4 small cores are power efficient though which is why Note 5 smashes iPhone 6s in battery, yes it has a bigger battery, but not that much bigger.

Yea I know, this probably wont show up in performance since its running ios. But it is the fastest mobile processor per core.

 

 

Inb4 im called a fanboy, im actually a android fanboy 

Fedex Ground must be on Horse back, It took 7 days to go 200 miles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The question is still unanswered, what's is big little? And how is that relevant?

:)

two sets of processing nodes, low load and smaller lighter tasks uses the weaker cluster and keeps the larger 4c off. 4 small 4 big. 

 

I don't get why we're comparing the single core of a dual core and a single core of a 4 core (8 total, typically 4 measured) 

 

and the term "obliterates" is clearly arbitrary 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea I know, this probably wont show up in performance since its running ios. But it is the fastest mobile processor per core.

 

 

Inb4 im called a fanboy, im actually a android fanboy 

Per core yes because it has huge cores in comparison.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Per core yes because it has huge cores in comparison.

Oh thats what you meant, Your original sentence was confusing

Fedex Ground must be on Horse back, It took 7 days to go 200 miles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Expected.

 

Nothing, because they don't make these either. They design them. Intel makes and designs. Intel would still be ahead.

 

Are they not ARM designed like most phone CPUs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Core per core its almost 50% higher thats insane

 

That doesn't matter much, cpu intensive applications on android are optimized for 4 cores for the most part. You need to go to the really, really low end to find a phone that isn't quad core (and isn't an iphone) these days. Plus, the note 5 isn't exactly new; it's better compared with the iphone 6, and as you can see in that case it wins hardcore, even though the ipc isn't quite as high.

 

Not that a phone has much use for all that power anyway, aside from a few games. At least the zenfone 2 can run windows 7 in a vm, which is arguably useless but cool nonetheless.

Don't ask to ask, just ask... please 🤨

sudo chmod -R 000 /*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since when is a 0.09% difference on the multi-core score enough to be classified as "obliterate"?

 

Those are some impressive single core performance numbers though, but I think it's kind of ridiculous to say it's better than the Note 5 and other top Android phones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh thats what you meant, Your original sentence was confusing

Exynos in Note 5 has 4 cores which match the dual core in iPhones. We can ignore the LITTLE cores because they are all disabled in bechmarking conditions. So it's 2 vs 4 in which case the difference is not that big.

 

 

Are they not ARM designed like most phone CPUs?

 
No, Apple designs their own chips.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exynos in Note 5 has 4 cores which match the dual core in iPhones. We can ignore the LITTLE cores because they are all disabled in bechmarking conditions. So it's 2 vs 4 in which case the difference is not that big.

No, Apple designs their own chips.

Which run the ARMv8 instruction set.

Software Engineer for Suncorp (Australia), Computer Tech Enthusiast, Miami University Graduate, Nerd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which run the ARMv8 instruction set.

Well yes, it's ARM based, but Apple designed.

Location: Kaunas, Lithuania, Europe, Earth, Solar System, Local Interstellar Cloud, Local Bubble, Gould Belt, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Milky Way subgroup, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea, Pisces–Cetus Supercluster Complex, Observable universe, Universe.

Spoiler

12700, B660M Mortar DDR4, 32GB 3200C16 Viper Steel, 2TB SN570, EVGA Supernova G6 850W, be quiet! 500FX, EVGA 3070Ti FTW3 Ultra.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×