Posted September 18, 2014 Anyone in this forum said otherwise? Damn that is one dumb person. Just like the guys saying these cards weren't gonna be release this year... I wonder what are they thinking now. Not one of those guys but I'd almost guarantee talks and emails discussing it went around internally at Nvidia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 Holy only 65c on the GTX970 That thing will be an overclocking beast. RTX2070OC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 Hmmm. Rather impressive. Can't wait to see what AMD counters with. I'm actually surprised that a 350$ dollar card is going against a 700 dollar card? Why does the 290x cost so much? Well, when does these babies come out? Hopefully around income tax time! The 290x is AMD's flagship...so it competes with the Nvidia flagship. If you're comparing numbers in these charts, well, it's a little unfair to compare last gen AMD with a brand new Nvidia release. I am very dissapointed, Yes at FullHD the improvement is great. At higher resolution ( Not 4K) Its really not that faster. Totally agree. You'd think they'd have found a way to improve higher res performance as I think that's what most enthusiasts really want. Oh believe me you will have a big headroom for overcklocking on 980 due to smaller wattage etc. Look at the card itself - it only requires two 6-pin connectors, that's some low wattage right there. While the wattage may be low, I see the temps remain pretty high. Only a few degrees cooler than last gen.I imagine this will have some effect on the amount of overclocking that can be done, no? CPU: Ryzen 9 5900 Cooler: EVGA CLC280 Motherboard: Gigabyte B550i Pro AX RAM: Kingston Hyper X 32GB 3200mhz Storage: WD 750 SE 500GB, WD 730 SE 1TB GPU: EVGA RTX 3070 Ti PSU: Corsair SF750 Case: Streacom DA2 Monitor: LG 27GL83B Mouse: Razer Basilisk V2 Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red Speakers: Mackie CR5BT MiniPC - Sold for $100 Profit Spoiler CPU: Intel i3 4160 Cooler: Integrated Motherboard: Integrated RAM: G.Skill RipJaws 16GB DDR3 Storage: Transcend MSA370 128GB GPU: Intel 4400 Graphics PSU: Integrated Case: Shuttle XPC Slim Monitor: LG 29WK500 Mouse: G.Skill MX780 Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red Budget Rig 1 - Sold For $750 Profit Spoiler CPU: Intel i5 7600k Cooler: CryOrig H7 Motherboard: MSI Z270 M5 RAM: Crucial LPX 16GB DDR4 Storage: Intel S3510 800GB GPU: Nvidia GTX 980 PSU: Corsair CX650M Case: EVGA DG73 Monitor: LG 29WK500 Mouse: G.Skill MX780 Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red OG Gaming Rig - Gone Spoiler CPU: Intel i5 4690k Cooler: Corsair H100i V2 Motherboard: MSI Z97i AC ITX RAM: Crucial Ballistix 16GB DDR3 Storage: Kingston Fury 240GB GPU: Asus Strix GTX 970 PSU: Thermaltake TR2 Case: Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ITX Monitor: Dell P2214H x2 Mouse: Logitech MX Master Keyboard: G.Skill KM780 Cherry MX Red Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 Hmmm. Rather impressive. Can't wait to see what AMD counters with. The 290x is AMD's flagship...so it competes with the Nvidia flagship. If you're comparing numbers in these charts, well, it's a little unfair to compare last gen AMD with a brand new Nvidia release. Totally agree. You'd think they'd have found a way to improve higher res performance as I think that's what most enthusiasts really want. While the wattage may be low, I see the temps remain pretty high. Only a few degrees cooler than last gen. I imagine this will have some effect on the amount of overclocking that can be done, no? I think they have named it 9XX to end the triple digit GTX series ( aka old era 1080P gaming. ) and with the next launch they will introduce ''next-gen'' pc gaming (aka 4/5K ready.) I just hope they don't fuck up the naming like AMD did. Interested in Business and Technology Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 Not one of those guys but I'd almost guarantee talks and emails discussing it went around internally at Nvidia. Rumors, people take rumors too seriously, I can guarantee you the same will happen with the next series. ●CPU: i7-4790K w/H100i ●Mobo: MSI Z97 MPower ●RAM: Corsair 16GB Dominator ●GPU: EVGA ACX SC 780 3GB(X2) ●SSD: 850 Pro 256GB ●Case: 450D ●PSU: AX 860i ●Monitor: Asus PB278Q 1440p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 Pretty sure that at stock clocks a gtx 780 Ti does not score that low in fire strike extreme. 9900K / Noctua NH-D15S / Z390 Aorus Master / 32GB DDR4 Vengeance Pro 3200Mhz / eVGA 2080 Ti Black Ed / Morpheus II Core / Meshify C / LG 27UK650-W / PS4 Pro / XBox One X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 To make it look like the 980 is that much better than a 780 Ti. No, they just took the stock clocks of both cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 Totally agree. You'd think they'd have found a way to improve higher res performance as I think that's what most enthusiasts really want. Nvidia did it on purpose otherwise they would've used the same 384bit/7Ghz bus as on the 780Ti. RTX2070OC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 Kinda weird how the 3DMark 11X results don't add up to the results I've been tracking on Futuremark all day. The lowest one I found was X6177. Also the clocks on the 980 seem to be ramped up and the 780 Ti for whatever reason is on stock clocks. And the ~4k score for R9 290x is about 4000 points too low for the most common score bracket on 3DM11X. FX 6300 @4.8 Ghz - Club 3d R9 280x RoyalQueen @1200 core / 1700 memory - Asus M5A99X Evo R 2.0 - 8 Gb Kingston Hyper X Blu - Seasonic M12II Evo Bronze 620w - 1 Tb WD Blue, 1 Tb Seagate Barracuda - Custom water cooling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 if this is true i didn't jizz my pants for no reason, otherwise i didnt mind. man if these price's and benchmarks are all true, darn... May the light have your back and your ISO low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 You mean it will beat the 680 ? WOW!! It actually reaches a performance of 3.5 for 4K + AA. Spoiler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 You mean it will beat the 680 ? WOW!! It actually reaches a performance of 3.5 for 4K + AA. look at the benchmark charts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 wtf is that 680 doing there and where is the 780? i9 11900k - NH-D15S - ASUS Z-590-F - 64GB 2400Mhz - 1080ti SC - 970evo 1TB - 960evo 250GB - 850evo 250GB - WDblack 1TB - WDblue 3TB - HX850i - 27GN850-B - PB278Q - VX229 - HP P224 - HP P224 - HannsG HT231 - 450D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 look at the benchmark charts I did. This is not how charts should be drawn. It says nothing about the product. First of all, it compares the 980 to the 680, not the 780. Secondly, the "performance" axis on the chart says absolutely nothing about performance. What does 3.5 means @ 4K + high AA. Also, why does performance scale exponentially the more you demand of the card. NO COMPONENT WORKS THAT WAY. What it means is videocardz.com have absolutely no information (or maybe just some specs) and try to sugar coat it with nice appealing graphs that showcase nothing useful at all. Spoiler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 I did. This is not how charts should be drawn. It says nothing about the product. First of all, it compares the 980 to the 680, not the 780. Secondly, the "performance" axis on the chart says absolutely nothing about performance. What does 3.5 means @ 4K + high AA. Also, why does performance scale exponentially the more you demand of the card. NO COMPONENT WORKS THAT WAY. What it means is videocardz.com have absolutely no information (or maybe just some specs) and try to sugar coat it with nice appealing graphs that showcase nothing useful at all. look at gallery 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 Pretty disappointing numbers: I mean they are running the 780, Original Titan, and 780 Ti @ 863, 837 and 876 core clocks. All three of those cards can hit 1076 or 1127 with ease (what the 970 and 980 are running at). Match the 780, 780 Ti and Titan's clock speeds to the 980 and 970 and then let see what happens. No improvements whatsoever after that is done. Only thing we can hope for is 1400 core clocks on air for the 970 and 980 to make more of a performance gap (maybe binned cards even higher). Cant wait to see overclocked benchmarks by proper reviewers. https://linustechtips.com/topic/1381504-community-standards/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 dat Gainward Cooler tho 5.1GHz 4770k My Specs Intel i7-4770K @ 4.7GHz | Corsair H105 w/ SP120 | Asus Gene VI | 32GB Corsair Vengeance LP | 2x GTX 780Ti| Corsair 750D | OCZ Agility 3 | Samsung 840/850 | Sandisk SSD | 3TB WD RED | Seagate Barracuda 2TB | Corsair RM850 | ASUS PB278Q | SyncMaster 2370HD | SyncMaster P2450 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 Match the 780 Ti's clock speeds to the 980 and match the 780's clock speeds to the 970 (simple and basic overclocks) then lets see what happens... :rolleyes: Only hope for the 970 and 980 is 1400MHz core clocks on air. https://linustechtips.com/topic/1381504-community-standards/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 I'm not very disappointed as most of you guys. Sure, in the benchmark the 780 Ti clock is lower than common, but if the stock speeds of the 980 are that high, and they overclock as 780's and 780 Ti's, they will be at least 20% better with that tempting power consumption. And about 4k performance in a single GPU, it's true, you're not going to run 4k with a 980, but we shouldn't expect that any time soon. I guess it would at least 2 more years to be confortably at 4k ultra (and I think I'm being pretty optimistic). Going to 4k was quite a jump. Don't forget that if you have the money to SLI these, you can probably play a bunch of games on ultra settings with steady 60+ frames (2x 780 Ti's achieve 45-50 w/ ultra preset on BF4. Don't forget that you'll probably not need 4xMSAA.) I CAN BE WRONG, THOUGH! Oh, and the price makes me feel bad about not waiting, but I'm okay with my card now. edit: It was supposed to be 45-50...sorry PC: 5600x @ 4.85GHz // RTX 3080 Eagle OC // 16GB Trident Z Neo // Corsair RM750X // MSI B550M Mortar Wi-Fi // Noctua NH-D15S // Cooler Master NR400 // Samsung 50QN90A // Logitech G305 // Corsair K65 // Corsair Virtuoso // Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 a 13% jump is actually pretty big especially with a lot less cores and alot less power, imagine the 980 ti Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 a 13% jump is actually pretty big especially with a lot less cores and alot less power, imagine the 980 ti which probably will not exist. If it will exist it better comes before 2015 Why do I even care. When I will get my GPU I will be happy with that and screw the new GPUs for at least 2-3 years:D [spoiler= Dream machine (There is also a buildlog)] Case: Phanteks Enthoo Luxe - CPU: I7 5820k @4.4 ghz 1.225vcore - GPU: 2x Asus GTX 970 Strix edition - Mainboard: Asus X99-S - RAM: HyperX predator 4x4 2133 mhz - HDD: Seagate barracuda 2 TB 7200 rpm - SSD: Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB SSD - PSU: Corsair HX1000i - Case fans: 3x Noctua PPC 140mm - Radiator fans: 3x Noctua PPC 120 mm - CPU cooler: Fractal design Kelvin S36 together with Noctua PPCs - Keyboard: Corsair K70 RGB Cherry gaming keyboard - mouse: Steelseries sensei raw - Headset: Kingston HyperX Cloud - Build Log Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 which probably will not exist. If it will exist it better comes before 2015 Why do I even care. When I will get my GPU I will be happy with that and screw the new GPUs for at least 2-3 years:D next year we should get the gtx1080p right?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 Why are the temps so high on 980/970? TDP is much lower than 780ti's. I thought the whole point was to provide more OC headroom? SimRacer - Casual FSX Pilot! Spoiler Mobo: MSI B550 Tomahawk | CPU: Ryzen R5 3600 | GPU: Vega 64 Sapphire Nitro | RAM: 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4 3200Mhz | PSU: EVGA P2 1000W 80Plus Platinum | Storage: 256GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD - 1TB WD Black - 2TB Seagate HDD | Cooling: Dark Rock Pro 3, Noiseblocker eLoop Fans | Case: Phanteks Enthoo Luxe | Audio: Sennheiser HD598 - JBL LSR305s | Display: BenQ EX3501R, Asus VG278H Spoiler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 This will be awesome if we take true. I'll probably get a gtx 970 (if I can) and call it a day. But I really want that 980 tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted September 18, 2014 To me the biggest thing is the additional Displayports. this is a really nice feature. Doesn't look like enough performance over a 780Ti to justify upgrading but a very solid card. I have seen price rumors from 550 to 899 though so who knows. Tell my tale to those who ask. Tell it truly; the ill deeds along with the good, and let me be judged accordingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now