AMD Ryzen 5000-series “Vermeer Zen 3" CPU Benchmarks Leaked (Update 2)

[Justaphysicsnerd]

On 10/2/2020 at 11:21 AM, Craftyawesome said:

Currently, zen 2 parts are 3000 series on desktop, but 4000 series on mobile/APU. Desktop will skip 4000 to match all zen 3 parts to 5000 series.

I know, I am kidding. As the news post on the original site said that now the naming will be clear

[Jito463]

21 hours ago, Bombastinator said:

It’s critical that in the next release iteration for the sakes of producers, consumers, and the current business model, the scalpers need to be utterly crushed and forced to tremendous losses.  Apparently some business model systems are already being changed to increase losses and reduce profit for scalpers.  To what degree I do not know. 

My personal suggestion, would be for places like Amazon, Newegg and eBay to set price caps on new product launches.  No more than 10% above MSRP within the first month or two of launch.  No more 50-60% (or more) markups, especially when those vendors almost certainly don't even have the product on hand.  After the initial rush, then maybe they can let them crank up the price, but by then it will be largely irrelevant.

[BiG StroOnZ]

Smol Update(s) added to OP:

 

Here's a family photo of the Zen 3-powered AMD Ryzen 5000 series CPUs:

 

Quote

 

Source 4: https://www.tweaktown.com/news/75765/heres-family-photo-of-the-zen-3-powered-amd-ryzen-5000-series-cpus/index.html

 

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X And 5900X Zen 3 CPUs Show Performance Dominance In Early Benchmark Leak. AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, 5950X Also Benchmarked in Geekbench 5. Ryzen 5 5600X benchmarks appear, cruise past Intel's Core i5-10600K:

 

Quote

Leaker extraordinaire TUM_APISAK has leaked some benchmarks on AMD's upcoming Ryzen 9 5900X and 5950X CPUs - namely, in Geekbench 5. In this round of leaks - which are, admittedly, originating from two different systems), the 12-core, 24-thread AMD Ryzen 9 5900X scores 1605 points in single-core and 12869 in the Multi-core benchmarks. The 16-core, 32-thread Ryzen 9 5950X, on the other hand, scores 1575 points in single and 13605 points in Multi-core workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X's higher base clocks may be responsible for the higher single-core score; however, the Ryzen 9 5959X pulls ahead - expectedly - in the Multi-core portion of the benchmark. Comparing scores between the Zen 3 5950X and the Zen-based 3950X (via AnandTech), which carry the same amount of cores, the 5950X offers a 18% and 12% advantage, respectively, in the single and multi-threaded tests - not a far cry from AMD's touted 19% IPC uplift.  That excitement will be intensified following leaked benchmark results showing the Ryzen 5 5600X outperforming Intel’s Core i5-10600K. Both chips feature a six-core/12-thread design, and while AMD’s offering has 32MB of L3 cache compared to the Intel chip’s 12MB, its 3.7 GHz base/4.6 GHz boost clocks can’t match the i5-10600K’s 4.1 GHz/4.8 GHz specs. Team blue’s processor also comes with a 125W TDP, whereas the Ryzen 5 5600X is rated at 65W. 

 

On paper, one would expect Intel’s product to be the better performer, but it seems the Zen 3 architecture has something to say about that assumption. The Ryzen 5 5600X scores 255.22 GOPS in the Processor Arithmetic test and 904.38 Mpix/s in the Processor Multi-Media test. The Core i5-10600K, meanwhile, managed averages of 224.07 GOPS and 662.33 Mpix/s, respectively. That makes the Ryzen CPU 13.9 percent and 36.5 percent faster, respectively, than its rival.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source 5: https://hothardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-9-5950x-5900x-zen-3-cpus-performance-benchmark

Source 6: https://www.techspot.com/news/87194-ryzen-5-5600x-benchmarks-appear-cruise-past-intel.html

Source 7: https://www.techpowerup.com/273587/amd-ryzen-9-5900x-5950x-also-benchmarked-in-geekbench-5

Source 8: https://ranker.sisoftware.co.uk/show_run.php?q=c2ffcee889e8d5eddeeadce8dafc8eb383a5c0a598a88efdc0f8&l=en

[Fatih19]

Dang, maybe the price hike is justified?

[BiG StroOnZ]

Another quick update:

 

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core CPU Hits 5GHz Without Breaking A Sweat

 

Quote

 

 

 

The Ryzen 9 5950X was just a few megahertz shy of 5GHz in yesterday's leaked benchmarks. However, the 16-core monster (via @Tum_Apisak) has redeemed itself today by shattering the 5GHz mark. Now we see a more mature Zen 3 opening the door for higher clock speeds as shown by the trio of Ryzen 5000 parts that are dancing around the 5-GHz line. Bear in mind that the Ryzen 5000 results correspond to the best scores out of the limited submissions so far. On the contrary, the scores for the other processors are the average performance based on every submission. Primate Labs Inc. updated the scores around 12 hours ago. The Ryzen 9 5950X is the current champ in Geekbench 5's single-core charts. The 16-core processor blew past the Core i9-10900K in the single-core test by 17.7% even though Intel's chip flexes a 5.3 GHz maximum boost clock. In regards to multi-core performance, the Ryzen 9 5950X was up to 6.9% faster than Intel's Core i9-10980XE. Intel Xeon and AMD's own Ryzen Threadripper processors were the only ones to beat the Ryzen 9 5950X. The excitement for Ryzen 5000 processors builds up with every leaked benchmark result. The Zen 3 processors have shown substantial IPC enhancements and now the potential to boost close to or past 5 GHz.

 

Source 9: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?utf8=✓&q=5950X

Source 10: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-9-5950x-5ghz-benchmarks 

 

 

[Bombastinator]

Weird that the 5800 isn’t in the second table but is in the list below it.  An implication that marketing may be present. 
 

independent reviews remain king.

[ravenshrike]

On 10/3/2020 at 2:42 AM, porina said:

I don't understand their two tier ram speed though.

It's either MS being stupid and pinching pennies or the faster memory doesn't play well with the IF for some reason. Given the idiocy that was the XBOne's eSRAM, I'm assuming the former.

[ewitte]

I know these are available to purchase on November 5th but has anyone seen anything about a review embargo?

[porina]

1 hour ago, ewitte said:

I know these are available to purchase on November 5th but has anyone seen anything about a review embargo?

Review embargo seems to be same as sale date. No early info for people to decide.

[Fatih19]

But if the 5950X can hit 5 GHz without much problem, why don't AMD advertise 5 GHz?

[ewitte]

2 hours ago, Fatih19 said:

But if the 5950X can hit 5 GHz without much problem, why don't AMD advertise 5 GHz?

Not all of them will they stated the reason was to have more product availability due to better yields.

[Unixsystem]

On 10/22/2020 at 4:06 AM, BiG StroOnZ said:

Another quick update:

 

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core CPU Hits 5GHz Without Breaking A Sweat

Does it say what cooling was used? I don't want another chiller situation. 

[Bombastinator]

On 10/23/2020 at 4:02 AM, Fatih19 said:

But if the 5950X can hit 5 GHz without much problem, why don't AMD advertise 5 GHz?

This sounds a bit like the yield thing intel has done.  Clearly not all of them can actually hit that number.  Possibly not very many of them. It is at any rate enough that to have a large enough number of chips to sell they had to go with the lower number even though the best examples are capable of more.   This implies that the number that is on one side or the other is too small to make an effective separate line, like the 10850 and the 10900.

[BiG StroOnZ]

6 hours ago, Unixsystem said:

Does it say what cooling was used? I don't want another chiller situation. 

 

It appears it was the Precision Boost (PBO) feature that was the culprit for this entry / outcome; therefore I do not believe exotic cooling would have been needed/necessary (for this result) if that is actually the case:

 

https://www.techradar.com/news/amd-ryzen-9-5950x-16-core-monster-could-be-the-first-ryzen-chip-to-hit-5ghz

 

https://hothardware.com/news/amd-ryzen-9-5950x-16-core-zen-3-cpu-5ghz-precision-boost

 

It seems however, that standard boosts are still around 4.84GHz-4.94GHz though, and since that is higher than the advertised max boost clock speeds; I would say that is still pretty impressive for Ryzen. 

[Arika]

On 10/23/2020 at 10:06 AM, porina said:

Review embargo seems to be same as sale date. No early info for people to decide.

don't pre-order. fixes everything.

[S w a t s o n]

On 10/23/2020 at 5:02 AM, Fatih19 said:

But if the 5950X can hit 5 GHz without much problem, why don't AMD advertise 5 GHz?

PBO is technically overclocking. Cant wait to put a 5950x under water and see what it can do all core