NVIDIA unveils a 360Hz refresh rate ASUS ROG Swift Monitor w/ G-Sync

[That Franc]

My hardware struggles to run games at 60 FPS so I'm probably not a part of their target audience.

[Bombastinator]

3 minutes ago, That Franc said:

My hardware struggles to run games at 60 FPS so I'm probably not a part of their target audience.

Me too.  For me the hardware that fails is eyes and fingers. It doesn’t even get as far as the computer.

[kingmustard]

7 hours ago, dizmo said:

Impressive, but nothing I'd ever think about purchasing.

Same as it's not 1440p/2160p nor IPS.

[cesh me inside b0z]

I am fully interested in running Unreal Tournament 2004 & Splinter Cell 1.

There i would get all i could from this monitor! So bomb! i can play pre-2007 games at sick FPS.

[WolfDeville]

9 hours ago, huilun02 said:

But the human eye can only see 30fps

lol are you dumb? We can only see 24FPS, only fukn gods and demigods can see a whopping 30.

 

 

 

 

Yes I am joking, just need to clarify that for the special peeps out there.

[yian88]

But does it have 10 bit panel with accurate colors and good blacks? i dont think so, i had 200hz monitor and it was shitty.

[Bombastinator]

9 minutes ago, TehStranger said:

lol are you dumb? We can only see 24FPS, only fukn gods and demigods can see a whopping 30.

 

 

 

 

Yes I am joking, just need to clarify that for the special peeps out there.

It’s like these constant statements I keep seeing about humans being able to fly.  I stood outside and flapped my arms but all I got was stares from the neighbors.

[suicidalfranco]

2 minutes ago, Bombastinator said:

It’s like these constant statements I keep seeing about humans being able to fly.  I stood outside and flapped my arms but all I got was stares from the neighbors.

git gud u scrub

[BiG StroOnZ]

 

[DoctorNick]

EXTREME!

[Tan3l6]

TN is for gamers the better type of panel mostly ... as the reaction speed and vertical refresh rate combined are better than most other.

If one wants to have a decent image quality from angles, obviously they are not the target audience.

 

I don't prefer TN, but I understand why people do.

[Blademaster91]

Great for those who can notice the difference, but I'd really like to see a gaming monitor that you could also use for browsing and watching video on without it looking terrible. I'd rather have a 10 bit IPS panel with accurate color at 144Hz.

[dizmo]

3 hours ago, kingmustard said:

Same as it's not 1440p/2160p nor IPS.

Or, most importantly....ultra wide.

[Brooksie359]

6 hours ago, Bombastinator said:

I’m curious to see the guy with long straight dark hair do it too.  He was apparently good with predicting movement on low refresh rates but higher fps which is sort of the opposite of what is happening.

Honestly I had the same issue when switching from 60hz to 240hz. I was so used to overcompensating with prediction on the lower refreshrate that I would miss a ton when I switched. After awhile I got use to more or less point and clicking without much prediction of where they were going to be and increased my rank in overwatch from gold to masters within a couple of months. 

[Brooksie359]

2 hours ago, Blademaster91 said:

Great for those who can notice the difference, but I'd really like to see a gaming monitor that you could also use for browsing and watching video on without it looking terrible. I'd rather have a 10 bit IPS panel with accurate color at 144Hz.

Doesn't gigabyte have a 1440p 144hz monitor with that?

[Guest]

does anyone have an estimate of price?

[Brooksie359]

3 hours ago, Blademaster91 said:

Great for those who can notice the difference, but I'd really like to see a gaming monitor that you could also use for browsing and watching video on without it looking terrible. I'd rather have a 10 bit IPS panel with accurate color at 144Hz.

https://www.newegg.com/black-gigabyte-aorus-fi27q-p-27/p/N82E16824012011?Item=N82E16824012011&nm_mc=AFC-RAN-COM&cm_mmc=AFC-RAN-COM&utm_medium=affiliates&utm_source=afc-PCPartPicker&AFFID=2558510&AFFNAME=PCPartPicker&ACRID=1&ASID=https%3a%2f%2fpcpartpicker.com%2fproduct%2fMqdrxr%2fgigabyte-aorus-fi27q-p-270-2560x1440-165-hz-monitor-aorus-fi27q-p&ranMID=44583&ranEAID=2558510&ranSiteID=8BacdVP0GFs-Ifar34.irFkiYprH8QIqBQ yeah I was remembering correctly it's this monitor that has 10 bit color and 144hz at 1440p. 

[WolfDeville]

On 1/7/2020 at 12:04 AM, Bombastinator said:

It’s like these constant statements I keep seeing about humans being able to fly.  I stood outside and flapped my arms but all I got was stares from the neighbors.

Wait, are you saying you can't fly? omg ahaha what a total noob

[Bombastinator]

8 minutes ago, TehStranger said:

Wait, are you saying you can't fly? omg ahaha what a total noob

It’s true.  People talk about these flying machine contraptions but it’s just not the same.

[Eaglerino]

There was a huge difference from 60 to 144, but I didn't notice nearly as much of a difference from 144 to 240. I can't fathom there will be a big one at 360 Hz, but the only game I can think of that my computer can play at that FPS is CS: Go and that might be the only game that does benefit from that many FPS

[Unixsystem]

On 1/8/2020 at 3:51 PM, Eaglerino said:

There was a huge difference from 60 to 144, but I didn't notice nearly as much of a difference from 144 to 240. I can't fathom there will be a big one at 360 Hz, but the only game I can think of that my computer can play at that FPS is CS: Go and that might be the only game that does benefit from that many FPS

We're definitely approaching/pat the point of diminishing returns. The benefit to me, though is that if we get 360 or 480hz as the absolute top of the line "gamer" monitors, then hopefully it'll force basically all decent monitors to get dragged up to 120+ by default. While they are getting super common, it's still rare for an image quality focused monitor to have anything above 75-90 without paying $1000+.

 

If everyone starts making the insanely high refresh panels and internal hardware, hopefully that'll drive prices down and make it just another bullet point that every monitor is expected to have, even ones that aren't explicitly "gaming" focused. 

[redbread123]

probs lotta ghosting, how will they make the pixels switch every 2.8~ ms...

[Arika]

36 minutes ago, redbread123 said:

probs lotta ghosting, how will they make the pixels switch every 2.8~ ms...

1ms panels already exist...

[redbread123]

7 minutes ago, Arika S said:

1ms panels already exist...

pixel response times, and the best i've was was the gigabyte kd25f with almost sub frame time responses

[Arika]

7 minutes ago, redbread123 said:

pixel response times, and the best i've was was the gigabyte kd25f with almost sub frame time responses

that's a (advertised) 0.5ms response time panel..you kind of disproved your own point. long response times are the cause of ghosting.