Jump to content

AMD Readies 9 Threadripper models

10 minutes ago, JurunceNK said:

Uhh the Threadripper will also have 4 dies, each having up to 4 cores each, like the Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 5 having two dies with up to 4 cores each.

If it had 4 dies it would be 8 channel memory since each die (2 CCXs) gives 2 memory channels. This is what I think of course but if it was 4 dies that would also mean the highest SKU has 50% cores disabled which is a huge waste.

 

Much more likely 2 dies giving the 16 cores and 4 memory channels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

22 minutes ago, JurunceNK said:

Uhh the Threadripper will also have 4 dies, each having up to 4 cores each, like the Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 5 having two dies with up to 4 cores each.

Ryzen 5 and 7 don't have 2 dies, they are single die. They have 2 CCXs, both on the same die. 

Threadripper has 2 dies, each with 2 CCXs, for a total of 4 CCXs. 

Naples has 4 dies, hence 8 CCXs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SpaceGhostC2C said:

 

Ryzen 5 and 7 don't have 2 dies, they are single die. They have 2 CCXs, both on the same die. 

Threadripper has 2 dies, each with 2 CCXs, for a total of 4 CCXs. 

Naples has 4 dies, hence 8 CCXs. 

This is exactly why people shouldn't be allowed to spread bullshit, now many people think Ryzen is a two die chip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Space Reptile said:

pretty shure 4.1 its its Limit including xfr , i might be wrong tho who knows what yields they have on These Monsters

its the same ryzen 7 die, so they have the same great yields 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JurunceNK said:

Uhh the Threadripper will also have 4 dies, each having up to 4 cores each, like the Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 5 having two dies with up to 4 cores each.

ryzen 7 is a single die!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WereCat said:

Despite this being 155W TDP, I think it will be actually easier to cool due to the huge surface area and all the heat spread across 4 dies.

Here is a thought - Why not make a larger surface to help cool down a previous, smaller versions of CPU? Larger CPU surface is not going to be an issue when planting in a PC case anyway. MB makers could have adapted. Only now they come out with this excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

now that intel changed gears and released a 18 core, i still want to see if amd responds to it with a bigger core count.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SCHISCHKA said:

i want prices

I'm guessing lowest SKU is $599; highest ends up $1199.

 

I'm still surprised that they managed to end up with 10c & 14c parts.  I wonder if that's where the 3+2 & 4+3 dies ended up going?  This would also explain the 3 SKUs for the 12c parts. The symmetric disabled setup allows for just a bit more headroom.  Though I am rather surprised that the leak about the entire stack ended up being correct, as it seemed like a few too many SKUs.

 

Lastly, well, the top-end SKU is pretty much 2 Ryzen 7 1800X put together.  That's going to be a beast of a chip, and have a price tag to match.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the right price, this should be a massive benefit to increase productivity without paying the Intel Tax for high end desktop machines and workstations alike.

 

Look forward to seeing it become a reality and finally have AMD back in the mix for pushing technology forward.  It's about time as we haven't had an Opteron based servers in about 8 years as everything is Intel only.   My industry (enterprise hosting) is stagnant due to the Intel dominance, hoping AMD can bring their name back to high end compute and server hardware.

Please quote or tag me if you need a reply

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

i-dont-need-it-meme.jpg

New Build (The Compromise): CPU - i7 9700K @ 5.1Ghz Mobo - ASRock Z390 Taichi | RAM - 16GB G.SKILL TridentZ RGB 3200CL14 @ 3466 14-14-14-30 1T | GPU - ASUS Strix GTX 1080 TI | Cooler - Corsair h100i Pro | SSDs - 500 GB 960 EVO + 500 GB 850 EVO + 1TB MX300 | Case - Coolermaster H500 | PSUEVGA 850 P2 | Monitor - LG 32GK850G-B 144hz 1440p | OSWindows 10 Pro. 

Peripherals - Corsair K70 Lux RGB | Corsair Scimitar RGB | Audio-technica ATH M50X + Antlion Modmic 5 |

CPU/GPU history: Athlon 6000+/HD4850 > i7 2600k/GTX 580, R9 390, R9 Fury > i7 7700K/R9 Fury, 1080TI > Ryzen 1700/1080TI > i7 9700K/1080TI.

Other tech: Surface Pro 4 (i5/128GB), Lenovo Ideapad Y510P w/ Kali, OnePlus 6T (8G/128G), PS4 Slim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Falconevo said:

At the right price, this should be a massive benefit to increase productivity without paying the Intel Tax for high end desktop machines and workstations alike.

 

Look forward to seeing it become a reality and finally have AMD back in the mix for pushing technology forward.  It's about time as we haven't had an Opteron based servers in about 8 years as everything is Intel only.   My industry (enterprise hosting) is stagnant due to the Intel dominance, hoping AMD can bring their name back to high end compute and server hardware.

what do you think of the increased io in for the single socket servers, in my eyes it seems great as now you can have more efficient servers as you don't need an additional cpu burning power

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Phentos said:

i-dont-need-it-meme.jpg

you don't. 

if you do i could keep that ryzen right ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cj09beira said:

now that intel changed gears and released a 18 core, i still want to see if amd responds to it with a bigger core count.

Could just go with a single socket Naples with 32 cores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cj09beira said:

you don't. 

if you do i could keep that ryzen right ;)

You're right I don't.

 

But still...

New Build (The Compromise): CPU - i7 9700K @ 5.1Ghz Mobo - ASRock Z390 Taichi | RAM - 16GB G.SKILL TridentZ RGB 3200CL14 @ 3466 14-14-14-30 1T | GPU - ASUS Strix GTX 1080 TI | Cooler - Corsair h100i Pro | SSDs - 500 GB 960 EVO + 500 GB 850 EVO + 1TB MX300 | Case - Coolermaster H500 | PSUEVGA 850 P2 | Monitor - LG 32GK850G-B 144hz 1440p | OSWindows 10 Pro. 

Peripherals - Corsair K70 Lux RGB | Corsair Scimitar RGB | Audio-technica ATH M50X + Antlion Modmic 5 |

CPU/GPU history: Athlon 6000+/HD4850 > i7 2600k/GTX 580, R9 390, R9 Fury > i7 7700K/R9 Fury, 1080TI > Ryzen 1700/1080TI > i7 9700K/1080TI.

Other tech: Surface Pro 4 (i5/128GB), Lenovo Ideapad Y510P w/ Kali, OnePlus 6T (8G/128G), PS4 Slim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Phentos said:

You're right I don't.

 

But still...

Bildergebnis für just do it

RyzenAir : AMD R5 3600 | AsRock AB350M Pro4 | 32gb Aegis DDR4 3000 | GTX 1070 FE | Fractal Design Node 804
RyzenITX : Ryzen 7 1700 | GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI | 16gb DDR4 2666 | GTX 1060 | Cougar QBX 

 

PSU Tier list

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, leadeater said:

Could just go with a single socket Naples with 32 cores.

imagine a unlocked 32 core :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, leadeater said:

Or two for 64 ;)

Or get a quad socket board which is likely a thing as the Opteron was the choice for quad socket server boards ;)

 

128 Cores, 256 Theads omgwtfbbq *Mindblown*

Please quote or tag me if you need a reply

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, leadeater said:

Or two for 64 ;)

to soon to soon,

that would be crazy, imagine the 3dmark physics score 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, leadeater said:

Or two for 64 ;)

call now and get 32 cores

 

BUT WAIT THERE IS MORE

Bildergebnis für dual slot naples

 

64 cores and 128 threads if you call now!!!!!

 

RyzenAir : AMD R5 3600 | AsRock AB350M Pro4 | 32gb Aegis DDR4 3000 | GTX 1070 FE | Fractal Design Node 804
RyzenITX : Ryzen 7 1700 | GA-AB350N-Gaming WIFI | 16gb DDR4 2666 | GTX 1060 | Cougar QBX 

 

PSU Tier list

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Falconevo said:

Or get a quad socket board which is likely a thing as the Opteron was the choice for quad socket server boards ;)

 

128 Cores, 256 Theads omgwtfbbq *Mindblown*

it seems there isn't a quad socket, maybe in the future

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Falconevo said:

Or get a quad socket board which is likely a thing as the Opteron was the choice for quad socket server boards ;)

 

128 Cores, 256 Theads omgwtfbbq *Mindblown*

I actually don't think they can. Naples actually has 128 PCIe lanes but 64 of them are for the Infinity Fabric used in dual socket configuration. I think it's currently limited to two sockets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, leadeater said:

I actually don't think they can. Naples actually has 128 PCIe lanes but 64 of them are for the Infinity Fabric used in dual socket configuration. I think it's currently limited to two sockets.

It will come, the early opterons didn't have quad support to start with if memory serves.

Please quote or tag me if you need a reply

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×