AMD Ryzen Threadripper and Ryzen 3 Product Updates (Threadripper price reveal)

[Jito463]

45 minutes ago, System Error Message said:

heres a funny challenge, build a fanless 64 core threadripper (2x32 cores).

Enthusiast threadripper goes up to 16 cores, server one can have up to 32 cores per CPU with dual socket.

Server procs aren't TR, they're labeled Epyc.  Same package, different sockets (different enough, anyway, despite the same physical size).  You can't put TR on a server board, or Epyc on a TR board.

[DXMember]

 

[Guest]

G4560 MSRP for $64 and already beating a R5 1400 in gaming that I definitely did not nitpick 

 

Hella yes

 

[RuLeZ]

$109? Damn, if the Pentium G4560 didnt kill the i3 for good, this will.

 

PS: With this Intel will just make sense with low budget G4560 and for 144HZ with the 7700K, the rest is AMD all the way.

[DXMember]

Just now, huilun02 said:

Yeah I was sure to check his thread before posting. Please quite from his thread about Ryzen 3 specs and pricing.

Or you could just post them in that topic?

Also your source is "some reddit user seams to have acquired..."

[GirlFromYonder]

Well well well. I see my i5-6500 being trashed by a $110 cheap cpu.

 

 

:'(

#sedlife #fuckduintel #ifuckingneedrising #amdrebellion #competition #reddittriggered #tumblrsjw #iamfuckingrunningoutofhashtags #helpmeineedhelp #plzstopme #plzzzzzzhelp #saveme #twitterhasaguntomy head #immabeded #twitterisamurderer #ibrainisallovermykeyboard 

[RuLeZ]

5 minutes ago, deXxterlab97 said:

G4560 MSRP for $64 and already beating a R5 1400 in gaming that I definitely did not nitpick 

 

Hella yes

 

The G4560 may beat in older titles, but newer titles that can really use the 4 cores will beat the G4560 easily, I dont see why would somebody buy a dual core right now, expect with lower budget.

[VerticalDiscussions]

3 minutes ago, DeezNoNos said:

-snip-

Blue team sucks nowadays...

 

They were good before Ryzen showed up, they maintained some consistency and didnt flip the tables at the office.

 

Nowadays, they blow up everything out of porportions and make no sense whatsoever in what they do.

[Guest]

Just now, RuLeZ said:

The G4560 may beat in older titles, but newer titles that can really use the 4 cores will beat the G4560 easily, I dont see why would somebody buy a dual core right now, expect with lower budget.

Tell that to techpowerup

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Ryzen_5_1600/12.html

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Ryzen_5_1600/13.html

Title it wins: Deus Ex (very old), DOOM (also very old), RE7 (extremely old)

 

Guess which site is not gonna be trusted again for CPU gaming benchmarks lol

[GirlFromYonder]

1 minute ago, VerticalDiscussions said:

Blue team sucks nowadays...

 

They were good before Ryzen showed up, they maintained some consistency and didnt flip the tables at the office.

 

Nowadays, they blow up everything out of porportions and make no sense whatsoever in what they do.

yup

[DXMember]

Just now, huilun02 said:

As for my source, I have put the links there. Guru3D not reputable?

Does this sound reputable to you?

13 minutes ago, huilun02 said:

a Reddit user appears to have obtained more info and pricing

Does it sound like Guru3D themselves believe it's reputable?

The reddit post however is unconfirmed, so I have nothing to add to that if we talk validity

[RuLeZ]

1 minute ago, deXxterlab97 said:

Tell that to techpowerup

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Ryzen_5_1600/12.html

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Ryzen_5_1600/13.html

Title it wins: Deus Ex (very old), DOOM (also very old), RE7 (extremely old)

 

Guess which site is not gonna be trusted again for CPU gaming benchmarks lol

Now look at CPU bounded games, the Pentium dies in CIV IV.

[DocSwag]

4 minutes ago, RuLeZ said:

Now look at CPU bounded games, the Pentium dies in CIV IV.

Civ VI runs really well on Ryzen. Ryzen thrashes every Intel CPU, I believe the quad core ones even beat the i7s, which makes no sense. Civ VI is a horrible example, what about something else like gta v, watch dogs 2, or city skylines?

[DXMember]

1 minute ago, huilun02 said:

So? Entire news threads have been made on just unconfirmed leaks. If Guru3D deems it newsworthy enough to post on their site, I think it fit for LTT too.

If you insist that I post this new information under an older thread, go ahead and report it.

[RuLeZ]

3 minutes ago, DocSwag said:

Civ VI runs really well on Ryzen. Ryzen thrashes every Intel CPU, I believe the quad core ones even beat the i7s, which makes no sense. Civ VI is a horrible example, what about something else like gta v, watch dogs 2, or city skylines?

I dont see this games in the Test, do you have it?

[PCGuy_5960]

There's no reason to get an i3 anymore

[RuLeZ]

1 minute ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

There's no reason to get an i3 anymore

Or to get an i5 for $200

[Nicnac]

Now if ddr4 wasn't so expensive ?

[Jito463]

26 minutes ago, deXxterlab97 said:

Tell that to techpowerup

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Ryzen_5_1600/12.html

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Ryzen_5_1600/13.html

Title it wins: Deus Ex (very old), DOOM (also very old), RE7 (extremely old)

 

Guess which site is not gonna be trusted again for CPU gaming benchmarks lol

Those tests were also run on a GTX 1080 on Ryzen, when there was (is?) a known bug in Nvidia drivers on the Ryzen platform.  Once RX Vega comes out, I'd love to see some of those tests redone, just to see if they vary.  I'd wager they would.  Sorry, but I don't believe a $50 processor is going to be beating a $200+ one.  Especially given that I've seen tests showing it matching or beating a KL i7.

[DocSwag]

4 minutes ago, RuLeZ said:

I dont see this games in the Test, do you have it?

WD2 is in techpowerup. The pentium is not "dying."

Spoiler

I can't find any direct gta v comparisons which is quite annoying . There's g4560 with 1080 and 1500x with 1080 ti on Tom's hardware but I can't compare that. Here's some BF1 instead.

Spoiler

And I can't find anything for Ryzen on cities skylines.

[hobobobo]

 

i mean, show me those idiots buying 7700k's for their 4k gaming riggs, g4560 700hz behind shits on it from its .4 fps advantage

[PCGuy_5960]

3 hours ago, hobobobo said:

i mean, show me those idiots buying 7700k's for their 4k gaming riggs, g4560 700hz behind shits on it from its .4 fps advantage

*In average FPS

 

1% and 0.1% lows are just as important and the 7700K has much higher 1% and 0.1% lows

 

And FYI, 1 game doesn't prove anything

[hobobobo]

6 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

*In average FPS

 

1% and 0.1% lows are just as important and the 7700K has much higher 1% and o.1% lows

 

And FYI, 1 game doesn't prove anything

duh))) its just /s is boring

the graph looks so juicy, couldnt help myself

[Taf the Ghost]

18 minutes ago, Jito463 said:

Those tests were also run on a GTX 1080 on Ryzen, when there was (is?) a known bug in Nvidia drivers on the Ryzen platform.  Once RX Vega comes out, I'd love to see some of those tests redone, just to see if they vary.  I'd wager they would.  Sorry, but I don't believe a $50 processor is going to be beating a $200+ one.  Especially given that I've seen tests showing it matching or beating a KL i7.

There's two things going on that we know about, now that Skylake-X is out.

 

DX12 + Victim Cache L3 = problem on Nvidia cards. The X299 SK-X CPUs are showing the same issues as Ryzen under DX12 with the 1080-class GPUs. 

 

Nvidia's DX11 driver can simply get more out of the pre-Skylake-X architecture on the main thread. That's why the G4560 is such a little beast for the price. Nvidia found something clever (not sure what, exactly) that finds a significant chunk more FPS out of that main thread. On older, single-threaded heavy games, it shows up.

[suicidalfranco]

would still buy a a 7500, at least intel dont use glue and they have many partners that support them like Hitachi and Hitachi