Unreleased R9 290X review performance charts

[James_AJ]

So... MOAR R9 290X performance!

 

It's interesting to see that it goes head-to-head against Titan most of the time (which it should with 2816 stream processors and 512-bit bus)

 

http://videocardz.com/47106/amd-radeon-r9-290x-review-charts-leak

 

(I didn't post images. Go to the link to check it out)

[sonarctica]

"Destroys" is a pretty strong word when describing 1-6 fps difference

[James_AJ]

"Destroys" is a pretty strong word when describing 1-6 fps difference

oh, you sure? Look at the first image. 10+ fps difference. Also, I'm saying 'destroys' because it consistently beats the 780. VERY consistently.

[sonarctica]

oh, you sure? Look at the first image. 10+ fps difference. Also, I'm saying 'destroys' because it consistently beats the 780. VERY consistently.

Okay fine you got me ): 

[Blackterror25]

Destroys might be a little over reached.
 

 

OT, I really like the way everything has been looking according to the rumors but until I see something official and about pricing I'm trying to not jump on the hype train to much.

[James_AJ]

Okay fine you got me ): 

also, there is about 10+% of performance difference between 780 and 290x in firestrike (which I consider a pretty good synthetic for getting the jist of how generally a GPU performs). 10+% is actually quite a lot.

[ivhyn]

 

Wut? something seems wrong with this chart. 7990 in front of TriFire 7970 GHz and both under the r9 290x?

[Lays]

destroys? 5-10 fps is hardly a huge deal.. it's a new card designed to compete w/ the 780/titan, so obviously newer technology will win lol.  But "destroys" is hardly it. Especially since the 780 already plays almost every game at well over 60 fps already, adding an extra 5-10 fps ontop of that is barely a big deal

[CwGoh]

I'd say the 290X gives the 780 and Titian a good beating but does not destroy them. But I'd really like these benchmarks to be true, a strong AMD will return at some point!

[chillxnate]

Meh. For all the hype that came along with this GPU's announcement the performance is a little underwhelming. As someone whos been waiting on these results before starting a new build I've gotta say, if there's a 780 price drop any time soon I'll probably be picking one or two up.

[Air tree]

 

Wut? something seems wrong with this chart. 7990 in front of TriFire 7970 GHz and both under the r9 290x?

What's even more odd is that 780 Tri sli is on the second from the bottom..

[Warcony]

I assume in response (if these results are true) Nvidia will lower the price of the 780 below the 290X and bring in the 780 TI at the price of the 290X or a bit above.

[Humbug]

 

Wut? something seems wrong with this chart. 7990 in front of TriFire 7970 GHz and both under the r9 290x?

This looks a bit like a CPU bottleneck.Only 7% difference here from fastest to slowest. It is medium settings at 1080p after all. Not exactly challenging given the graphics hardware on trial.

[TheSLSAMG]

 

Wut? something seems wrong with this chart. 7990 in front of TriFire 7970 GHz and both under the r9 290x?

Methinks this is bullshit, seeing as:

1. The 7970 TriFire is below a 7990

2. All of the NVIDIA cards are at the bottom.

and

3. Where are  Quad-SLI TITANS? Also, a GTX 690 and Dual 760s would be nice.

[AlexGoesHigh]

dat 392w power consuption

[iWearKiltz]

i wouldnt call that destroying, and if that is destroying to you, then i feel sorry for your girlfriend/wife..

 

banter aside, i dont trust this source, as apparently 660ti in sli is better then 7970 crossfire.. am i missing something here?

 

 

[ViruZ_HUN]

So... MOAR R9 290X performance!

 

It's interesting to see that it goes head-to-head against Titan most of the time (which it should with 2816 stream processors and 512-bit bus)

 

It's also interesting to see that it pretty much destroys 780 in every possible configuration.

 

Now the question is, will it beat 780 Ti?

 

http://videocardz.com/47106/amd-radeon-r9-290x-review-charts-leak

 

(I didn't post images. Go to the link to check it out)

 

well the differnce is vs the 780 around 1-10 FPS and i am 100% sure that 780 TI will beat it, but this is leaked benchmarkes mabye not true

[Gunjob]

They seem fake, http://videocardz.com/images/2013/10/AMD-Radeon-R9-290X-Performance-Chart-18.png shows the Titan putting out more frames than 2-3 way SLI 780's, as well as 7950's in CFX out benching dual, triple and quad 7970's. I call bs on these.

[ViruZ_HUN]

They seem fake, http://videocardz.com/images/2013/10/AMD-Radeon-R9-290X-Performance-Chart-18.png shows the Titan putting out more frames than 2-3 way SLI 780's, as well as 7950's in CFX out benching dual, triple and quad 7970's. I call bs on these.

agree here:)

[KieranThePCGuy]

I'm just waiting for proper ones to come out from Linus etc; then I will make my mind up buying one.

[Stonep11]

What's even more odd is that 780 Tri sli is on the second from the bottom..

DAT uber mode

[Youbetternot]

We now have leaks of R9 290x  Benchmarks on different games/Reviews

.

http://videocardz.com/images/2013/10/AMD-Radeon-R9-290X-Performance-Chart-9.png

 

Source: http://videocardz.com/47106/amd-radeon-r9-290x-review-charts-leak

[Sarcasm]

No temps and thermals? Disappoint.

[TheSLSAMG]

TL;DR: Unimpressive in some occasions.

[Youbetternot]

No temps and thermals? Disappoint.

Temps were in the last one, I posted