So, this guy on youtube said you can see more then 30fps (NSFW)

[NJHourigan]

While it is supposedly true the human eye cannot see past 24 (sights per second?), this is why films and alot of tv are filmed at 24fps to give a more natural feel, people can definitely tell the difference between different refresh rates, for example Linus. Some people like it because it feels more responsive.

[martlart]

While it is supposedly true the human eye cannot see past 24 (sights per second?) People can definitely tell the difference between different refresh rates. Some people like it because it feels more responsive.

That's not even supposedly true. That's just something someone came up with to justify consoles' low fps.

[theereal]

While it is supposedly true the human eye cannot see past 24 (sights per second?) People can definitely tell the difference between different refresh rates. Some people like it because it feels more responsive.

WTH Are you talking about?

[DEDRICK]

Stop feeding the troll, you guys act like you haven't used the internet before

[Mattrixx]

While it is supposedly true the human eye cannot see past 24 (sights per second?), this is why films and alot of tv are filmed at 24fps to give a more natural feel, people can definitely tell the difference between different refresh rates, for example Linus. Some people like it because it feels more responsive.

It's not even supposedly true. Might want to check your sources mate. And no, /r/ConsoleGaming doesn't count as a source, no matter how firmly some people believe you can't see any more than 30 or 24.

[SkixAces]

Thats not true. You can see past 60fps. Thats just peasentry talk to defend their consoles

[NJHourigan]

It's not even supposedly true. Might want to check your sources mate. And no, /r/ConsoleGaming doesn't count as a source, no matter how firmly some people believe you can't see any more than 30 or 24.

Yeah I don't know where I heard it tbh, I've just always thought it I guess

[Agazed]

The human eye cannot see past 24 fps!!! Why would all movies be in 24 fps then?!?!? Thats right. Your wrong.

[Aytex]

The human eye cannot see past 24 fps!!! Why would all movies be in 24 fps then?!?!? Thats right. Your wrong.

for the cinmetic feel

[Guest]

The human eye cannot see past 24 fps!!! Why would all movies be in 24 fps then?!?!? Thats right. Your wrong.

 

I hope you are trolling, otherwise that mighty expensive build of yours is purely a waste no? If you can't see past 24fps? 

[Suika]

The eye isn't mechanically measured like camera lenses are, they see in a fluid motion.

[Kyuubixchidori]

The eye can see thousands of FPS. the question is how much can you comprehend. some people cant tell the diffrence between 5$ earbuds and 500$ headphones. some cant comprehend over 30. a video auto played on youtube at 60fps, I joked about how much smoother it looked, my dad had no idea what i was talking about. 

 

and some people hate 30fps and prefer 24. look up the soap opera effect. 

[Yummychickenblue]

[Jääger]

eyes dont see in fps, as stated above, we see fluid motion, the more fps the smoother it feels.

i have 144hz and 60hz monitor in front of me and i can confirm theres a night and day difference even when moving cursor on one screen and then another. not to mention gaming

[sgtcool]

AN EYE DOESNT SEE IN FRAMES

AN EYE SEES AN INFINITE FLOW OF LIGHT NOT FRAMES

damn people

[Speakerator]

The "The-eyes-can-only-process/see-24-images"-crap sticks like nothing...

 

from around ~30 fps the eye does not notice heavy stuttering anymore, nonetheless, just as "dumb", there are superlatives for "smooth" . Hence, more is better.

 

Also, see above for all the "does not work with fps" stuff.

[aaro.peramaa]

As stated above, the eye does not see in fps. Back when ww2 was going US army decided to test how fast their fighter pilots eyes could recognise a flashing light. Now the results vary with test subjects from 1/240 to 1/1000 of a second. This would indicate that eye can see, depending on the person, at 240-1000fps. Later tests proved this wrong, with test subjects not seeing any difference in ~200+fps videos. The reason we have 24fps movies is that back in the day when films were a new thing, frame rates varied from 16 to 26fps. Then in order to make movie watching experience more consistent people agreed on 24fps standard. Later when tvs came along we got 30fps, and even later with computers 60fps,120fps,144fps

[GlassBomb]

Here is a good read. You all should read it.

 

http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm

[blackadder]

You eye is actually pretty shit, at a instant it may gather a ton of information but, after those chrmicals are used up they take time to refold and you brain adds some stuff, this most pertains to colors but if you bought a camera that was as good as your eyes you would take it back.

[Trik'Stari]

Human eyes don't see in frames.

 

Comparing the human eye to a monitor or camera, is comparing apples to oranges, our eyes are just so drastically different from camera's.

 

Also interesting to watch:

[TheConverter]

MAH PEECEE STATION ONE PLAYS GTA V AT CINEMATIC 24 FPS!! SUCK IT MUSTARD RICE!! /unjerk

 

[Misanthrope]

Sure we all know that the speed of light is a mere 24 frames per second anything else is unnecessary.

[TheConverter]

 

60FPS is unplayable for me, it feels like a slideshow.

[Bhav]

I cannot believe this is still being said in 2015.

Faith in humanity, -2 points.

[theereal]

The human eye cannot see past 24 fps!!! Why would all movies be in 24 fps then?!?!? Thats right. Your wrong.

Can't figure out if trolling or stupid, either way, they include alot of "special effects" that makes the movie look smoother, also for a cinematic feel.