Post your GPUs ASIC quality.

[,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]

Just noticed my 760's ASIC quality is 86.9% and apparently 77% is good.

ASIC quality is essentially  an easy way to view how good your chip is, you can googlygoogle about it for more details.

 

My 760's OC amount:

+12mV

+140 Core

+ 500 Memory

 

How to read ASIC quality:

- Download GPU-Z

- Right click on the top left menu corner and select "Read ASIC quality..."

 

 

It is still relevant today.

 

"The ASIC Quality screenshot on the right can be evoked from GPU-Z's context menu and is individual for each graphics card and GPU. This feature has been developed for Nvidia’s Fermi (GX10x and GF11x) and AMD’s Southern Islands chips (Radeon HD 78xx and HD 79xx) and is supposed to indicate the quality of the specific GPU, in percent, based on electrical leakage data.

The GPU of our sample of the card has an ASIC quality of 76.6%. The higher this number, the lower voltage the GPU needs to work at the default clock rate and the higher overclocking results you can get with it by increasing its voltage.


According to Alexey Nikolaichuk (the author of RivaTuner and MSI Afterburner), the correlation between voltage and quality is like follows:

 

ASIC quality < 75% - 1.1750 V;
ASIC quality < 80% - 1.1125 V;
ASIC quality < 85% - 1.0500 V;
ASIC quality < 90% - 1.0250 V;
ASIC quality ≤ 100% - 1.0250 V."

[Jerakl]

My 780 is 87.4%

[Godlygamer23]

64.3% on my Windforce 970.

[Aytex]

my integrated grpahics at at 1%

[dfsdfgfkjsefoiqzemnd]

78.7% for my 770s

[Gofspar]

68.7

[xnoobftw]

71.6% on my tri x r9 290x (is that good?)

[Enderman]

You realize that doesn't mean anything right?

 

an ASIC is hardware programmed to process a specific task, which is why an asic the size of a GPU can do something like mine thousands of times faster than your whimsical 780ti or whatever youve got

 

this percentage does not correlate to the performance of your GPU vs an ASIC

[,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]

You realize that doesn't mean anything right?

 

an ASIC is hardware programmed to process a specific task, which is why an asic the size of a GPU can do something like mine thousands of times faster than your whimsical 780ti or whatever youve got

 

this percentage does not correlate to the performance of your GPU vs an ASIC

 

"The lower the ASIC quality is, the higher the voltage leakage is, which results in better voltage response thus better overclocks."

It does have to do with your measure of performance in a way, overclocknet users swear by it.

 

GPU-Z explains how it calculates your GPUs ASIC quality.

[aLemonNation]

83 percent for me, but how what affects the quality?

[Enderman]

"The lower the ASIC quality is, the higher the voltage leakage is, which results in better voltage response thus better overclocks."

It does have to do with your measure of performance in a way, overclocknet users swear by it.

 

GPU-Z explains how it calculates your GPUs ASIC quality.

so its estimating your overclocking performance, not performance compared to an ASIC? ok then...

[thekeemo]

GTX 650 is 72.5

iGPU 0%

[,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]

so its estimating your overclocking performance, not performance compared to an ASIC? ok then...

 

Googlygoogle it for more information, I just read a little bit in.

 

"The ASIC Quality screenshot on the right can be evoked from GPU-Z's context menu and is individual for each graphics card and GPU. This feature has been developed for Nvidia’s Fermi (GX10x and GF11x) and AMD’s Southern Islands chips (Radeon HD 78xx and HD 79xx) and is supposed to indicate the quality of the specific GPU, in percent, based on electrical leakage data.

The GPU of our sample of the card has an ASIC quality of 76.6%. The higher this number, the lower voltage the GPU needs to work at the default clock rate and the higher overclocking results you can get with it by increasing its voltage.

According to Alexey Nikolaichuk (the author of RivaTuner and MSI Afterburner), the correlation between voltage and quality is like follows:

 

ASIC quality < 75% - 1.1750 V;

ASIC quality < 80% - 1.1125 V;

ASIC quality < 85% - 1.0500 V;

ASIC quality < 90% - 1.0250 V;

ASIC quality ≤ 100% - 1.0250 V."

[Aleks]

Wow mine sucks.

[W-L]

GTX 970 G1, 80.9%

[Guest]

My 780 is 87.4%

my 780 is dead

[Guest]

GTX 650 72% lol

[alphaproject]

My Zotac 770 4 GB is 79% and that's pretty good for the 770's from what I've read. It's memory OC's very nicely. I have not pushed it to the max yet but I can run +93 core without going over 80c. I OC in Witcher 3.

 

+93 core

+150 Memory.

[,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]

My Zotac 770 4 GB is 79% and that's pretty good for the 770's from what I've read. It's memory OC's very nicely. I have not pushed it to the max yet but I can run +93 core without going over 80c. I OC in Witcher 3.

 

+93 core

+150 Memory.

 

I get +140 on the core and +500 memory.

[sgloux3470]

ASIC quality doesn't mean much.

 

Both my chips are around the same.  69.8% on the Strix and 71.5 on the SC ACX

[,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]

ASIC quality doesn't mean much.

 

Both my chips are around the same.  69.8% on the Strix and 71.5 on the SC ACX

 

"The ASIC Quality screenshot on the right can be evoked from GPU-Z's context menu and is individual for each graphics card and GPU. This feature has been developed for Nvidia’s Fermi (GX10x and GF11x) and AMD’s Southern Islands chips (Radeon HD 78xx and HD 79xx) and is supposed to indicate the quality of the specific GPU, in percent, based on electrical leakage data.

The GPU of our sample of the card has an ASIC quality of 76.6%. The higher this number, the lower voltage the GPU needs to work at the default clock rate and the higher overclocking results you can get with it by increasing its voltage.

According to Alexey Nikolaichuk (the author of RivaTuner and MSI Afterburner), the correlation between voltage and quality is like follows:

 

ASIC quality < 75% - 1.1750 V;

ASIC quality < 80% - 1.1125 V;

ASIC quality < 85% - 1.0500 V;

ASIC quality < 90% - 1.0250 V;

ASIC quality ≤ 100% - 1.0250 V."

 

Can't believe you're running 980's with an 8370 lol. I thought I was ballsy with my 8320.

[sgloux3470]

 

"The ASIC Quality screenshot on the right can be evoked from GPU-Z's context menu and is individual for each graphics card and GPU. This feature has been developed for Nvidia’s Fermi (GX10x and GF11x) and AMD’s Southern Islands chips (Radeon HD 78xx and HD 79xx) and is supposed to indicate the quality of the specific GPU, in percent, based on electrical leakage data.

The GPU of our sample of the card has an ASIC quality of 76.6%. The higher this number, the lower voltage the GPU needs to work at the default clock rate and the higher overclocking results you can get with it by increasing its voltage.

According to Alexey Nikolaichuk (the author of RivaTuner and MSI Afterburner), the correlation between voltage and quality is like follows:

 

ASIC quality < 75% - 1.1750 V;

ASIC quality < 80% - 1.1125 V;

ASIC quality < 85% - 1.0500 V;

ASIC quality < 90% - 1.0250 V;

ASIC quality ≤ 100% - 1.0250 V."

 

Can't believe you're running 980's with an 8370 lol. I thought I was ballsy with my 8320.

 

I know what ASIC quality is meant to mean, but I'd be very surprised to see overclocking scale remotely linearly with it.

[,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,]

I know what ASIC quality is meant to mean, but I'd be very surprised to see overclocking scale remotely linearly with it.

 

There are other variables but this is the easiest way to view the "quality" of your chip and possible overclocking potential.

[SteveGrabowski0]

My EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 has ASIC quality of 69.8%. The highest rock solid stable boost clock is 1417.5 MHz.

[xAcid9]

ASIC quality % don't mean much these day.