Jump to content

Nvidia might delay RTX 40 series on account of a 30 series market flood

Rym
22 minutes ago, MageTank said:

Realizes they are good at it, decides to setup a streaming environment. They start raking in views, start selling merch and now travels the world to various festivals. All of a sudden they have increased fuel usage due to shipping costs for their merch, started flying more frequently contributing to higher fuel usage in air, and perpetuated a lifestyle in which more people will attempt to follow with more purchased streaming equipment and more electricity used on lighting, video editing and branding

How many of gamers do follow that path? 0.000001 or 0.0000000001%? It's plain irrelevant what you paint here.

23 minutes ago, MageTank said:

You never explicitly explained what it is your neighbor is doing with their truck.

Exactly the same as me. Hauling around a single person, as 95% of people with these huge trucks do that I ever saw in the US. Well plus the useless idling in the driveway and covering distances that I walk or bike, as explained in my previous post.

 

It doesn't matter at all what you or I do with my car, how many mpg or whatever they actually consume. It was an analogy of two people doing fundamentally the same thing, owning and driving a car, but one causing much more damage. And I am pretty sure you know that.

 

And yes, actually F150-sized cars are among the stupidest things that ever came out of the US. Don't even get me started. Utter waste of resources, dangerous for everyone else on the street and for 95% of owners a compact car would totally suffice. I really hope the current fuel prices finally put an end to this stupid class of "cars". Inb4 "but I haul around heavy things all the time, well actually once or twice a year like everyone else but I am too lazy to rent a U-Haul on those occasions"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dracarris said:

How many of gamers do follow that path? 0.000001 or 0.0000000001%? It's plain irrelevant what you paint here.

Exactly the same as me. Hauling around a single person, as 95% of people with these huge trucks do that I ever saw in the US. Well plus the useless idling in the driveway and covering distances that I walk or bike, as explained in my previous post.

 

It doesn't matter at all what you or I do with my car, how many mpg or whatever they actually consume. It was an analogy of two people doing fundamentally the same thing, owning and driving a car, but one causing much more damage. And I am pretty sure you know that.

 

And yes, actually F150-sized cars are among the stupidest things that ever came out of the US. Don't even get me started. Utter waste of resources, dangerous for everyone else on the street and for 95% of owners a compact car would totally suffice. I really hope the current fuel prices finally put an end to this stupid class of "cars". Inb4 "but I haul around heavy things all the time, well actually once or twice a year like everyone else but I am too lazy to rent a U-Haul on those occasions"

bolded quote

how do you figure? trucks haul shit literally so leaving shit in streets is ok? oh we have pros and cons of it lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MageTank said:

Kisai, this is my problem with having a discussion with you on this forum. You seem incredibly intelligent, but you completely ignore the people you are conversing with and attempt to force your words down peoples throats when it has nothing to do with what they are saying. I have NEVER spoke about mining or gaming being worse than one another on this forum. You will NEVER find me comparing the two in that regard. I've only ever pointed out the hypocrisy between both camps whenever they move the goal post towards morals. 

My posts are generally include points to posts not quoted, particularly if I'm done with the conversation.

 

1 hour ago, MageTank said:

You honestly think the hobbiest miners are buying redundant power solutions and using gas powered generators? There is no ROI on that, lol. Who is guilty of "gross generalizations" now?

 

No, "hobby" miners just run their kit full tilt as long as there is power, period. They don't care if it causes the the building to catch fire. As far as I'm concerned, "hobby" miners do not exist.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kisai said:

My posts are generally include points to posts not quoted, particularly if I'm done with the conversation.

 

No, "hobby" miners just run their kit full tilt as long as there is power, period. They don't care if it causes the the building to catch fire.

 

 

have any sources of this happening?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kisai said:

so shit happens with plain dumb people

most miners actually care about resell value most i have met

now can i link sources on people just being plain dumb and setting fire because of ac units/furnances/computers/cars/ etc

you have some links and thank you but you are generalizing it like i can with anything want me find articles on ac units? random pc going up in smokes?

I just wanted to make the point that went way over your head lol like it happens everyday lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, pas008 said:

 

I just wanted to make the point that went way over your head lol like it happens everyday lol

You were perfectly capable of googling the answer, so asking a question in bad faith that you didn't seriously care about the answer, doesn't give you a "gotcha".

 

The point is, "hobby" farms do not exist. Everyone that gets into crypto mining, is doing it with the goal of minmaxing it, and decades of grow-ops for cannabis has proven that people STILL do not give a crap about what happens to the building.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Dracarris said:

How many of gamers do follow that path? 0.000001 or 0.0000000001%? It's plain irrelevant what you paint here.

Well, you fell for the trap perfectly. How many miners are contributing to environmental damage? The average miner puts their hardware to work when they are not using it. Your average miner isn't buying 50-100 GPUs and mining in their basements. I thought I had lost my form given my absence from this forum but apparently I am still pretty good at this, lol.

 

58 minutes ago, Dracarris said:

Exactly the same as me. Hauling around a single person, as 95% of people with these huge trucks do that I ever saw in the US. Well plus the useless idling in the driveway and covering distances that I walk or bike, as explained in my previous post.

Where exactly do you live in the US that you can walk/bike everywhere you go? I live out in the country, it takes me 30 miles to find civilization, let alone make it to work. Best believe if I am gonna spend 30 minutes driving to a grocery store, I'll bring my big yeehaw truck to fit as much groceries as I can in it to save on the $5 per gallon gas prices.

 

1 hour ago, Dracarris said:

It doesn't matter at all what you or I do with my car, how many mpg or whatever they actually consume. It was an analogy of two people doing fundamentally the same thing, owning and driving a car, but one causing much more damage. And I am pretty sure you know that.

I do know that. You are making the point that scale is relevant in moral conundrums, I am the one arguing that it isn't. Scale in and of itself paints only a partial picture, and its convenient to ignore that full picture if it fits an agenda.

 

1 hour ago, Dracarris said:

And yes, actually F150-sized cars are among the stupidest things that ever came out of the US. Don't even get me started. Utter waste of resources, dangerous for everyone else on the street and for 95% of owners a compact car would totally suffice. I really hope the current fuel prices finally put an end to this stupid class of "cars". Inb4 "but I haul around heavy things all the time, well actually once or twice a year like everyone else but I am too lazy to rent a U-Haul on those occasions"

I think I narrowed your location down to the city, lol. When they make a Prius that can handle farm work, or allow people to mass haul lumber, then you'll get your wish. Now I am not in disagreement that there are too many trucks on the road being used as a fashion statement (lifted, mudboggers, giant truck nuts hanging from the reese hitch), but to outright dismiss the utility these vehicles provides, well that is quite poignant to your argument as a whole. "I don't understand this, therefore it shouldn't exist".

 

30 minutes ago, Kisai said:

My posts are generally include points to posts not quoted, particularly if I'm done with the conversation.

Ah, so you make a habit of addressing people specifically with information that doesn't pertain to their individual posts? How has that been working out for you thus far?

 

31 minutes ago, Kisai said:

No, "hobby" miners just run their kit full tilt as long as there is power, period. They don't care if it causes the the building to catch fire. As far as I'm concerned, "hobby" miners do not exist.

Luckily its only as far as you're concerned. The rest of the world might still have a chance here. We have hobbyist miners on this very forum. I am friends with some hobbyist miners. I don't believe in crypto, I don't use crypto, yet I still understand why they do what they do. I don't need to buy into the crypto kool-aid to understand its something they enjoy doing, much like people don't need to buy into my destructive overclocking habits just to understand I enjoy killing my hardware in dumb ways.

 

I said it jokingly at first, but now I firmly believe it. When the miners are gone, they are gonna come for the overclockers next, lol.

My (incomplete) memory overclocking guide: 

 

Does memory speed impact gaming performance? Click here to find out!

On 1/2/2017 at 9:32 PM, MageTank said:

Sometimes, we all need a little inspiration.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Kisai said:

Other than the Russian one since it has almost no details the other two certainly are not "hobby" miners.

 

Quote

reports that 72 servers were destroyed in the fire

Not 72 GPUs, 72 systems of X number of GPUs, def not "hobby".

 

Quote

resulting in thousands of mining rigs going offline.

Not hobby

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Kisai said:

You were perfectly capable of googling the answer, so asking a question in bad faith that you didn't seriously care about the answer, doesn't give you a "gotcha".

 

The point is, "hobby" farms do not exist. Everyone that gets into crypto mining, is doing it with the goal of minmaxing it, and decades of grow-ops for cannabis has proven that people STILL do not give a crap about what happens to the building.

 

lol now crytominers are related to weed growers now

keep reaching lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MageTank said:

Well, you fell for the trap perfectly.

Oh lord. I hope you don't live in the delusion of thinking I didn't smell that from 100 miles away. And that wasn't a trap but just a fallacy.

1 hour ago, MageTank said:

How many miners are contributing to environmental damage?

Every. Single. One.

Every single miner uses their GPU(s) to a much higher extent in comparison to the average gamer and causes significantly more damage.

Every. Single. One.

1 hour ago, MageTank said:

The average miner puts their hardware to work when they are not using it.

And the average gamer doesn't use their hardware when they are not using it, which is true for the lion share of the average day. Plain and simple.

1 hour ago, MageTank said:

I thought I had lost my form given my absence from this forum but apparently I am still pretty good at this, lol.

I think I have to give a hard disagree on that and suggest you tone down your confidence levels a bit.

1 hour ago, MageTank said:

I am the one arguing that it isn't

yeah and that's simply not true. I don't know where some people here pull that crazy idea from. By that logic, murdering 1 or 1 Million people is equally bad. That's just utter BS.

1 hour ago, MageTank said:

Where exactly do you live in the US that you can walk/bike everywhere you go?

I never claimed that I can walk/bike everywhere, but to many places I can. That includes a 30min (one-way) bike ride to work which includes uphill sections, on a regular bike, not E-Bike.

1 hour ago, MageTank said:

Best believe if I am gonna spend 30 minutes driving to a grocery store, I'll bring my big yeehaw truck to fit as much groceries as I can in it to save on the $5 per gallon gas prices.

It's again delusional if you think you require such an utterly wasteful vehicle for grocery shopping. Unless you only go once a month, which obviously is super stupid as you then don't have any fresh food for a good chunk of the month. Well unless you pump chlorine and a shitload of preservatives into everything, so it might actually work in the US, lol.

1 hour ago, MageTank said:

but to outright dismiss the utility these vehicles provides, well that is quite poignant to your argument as a whole. "I don't understand this, therefore it shouldn't exist".

There is utility and actual use cases for these. The problem is the insane number of people that buy them without such a use case. That said, there are whole continents that do fine without them where people still need to haul around heavy machinery and equipment.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dracarris said:

Oh lord. I hope you don't live in the delusion of thinking I didn't smell that from 100 miles away. And that wasn't a trap but just a fallacy.

Let me guess, false equivalence? If so, I am about to teach you the definition of irony while I am at it, lol.

 

2 hours ago, Dracarris said:

Every. Single. One.

Every single miner uses their GPU(s) to a much higher extent in comparison to the average gamer and causes significantly more damage.

Every. Single. One.

Exactly! And how many gamers are contributing to environmental damage? That's right... EVERY. SINGLE.ONE. Entertainment isn't free to make. There are companies keeping lights on, systems put towards rendering scenes, tons of e-waste put towards dev kits that get tossed away once the next shiny console launches. Tell me again how gamers are not part of the problem?

2 hours ago, Dracarris said:

And the average gamer doesn't use their hardware when they are not using it, which is true for the lion share of the average day. Plain and simple.

Ah, so it's not about what you are using it on, but the frequency of use? If they weren't using their GPU's for mining 24/7 but instead hosted a bare metal hypervisor and allowed people to remote in and game on it (Nvidia GRID, anyone?), it would be equally as bad by your logic? Point some of that environmental rhetoric at the cloud gaming companies and I'll take you more seriously in that endeavor.

 

2 hours ago, Dracarris said:

I think I have to give a hard disagree on that and suggest you tone down your confidence levels a bit.

Hey, let me have my delusions of grandeur. If you think I am overconfident, exploit that to your advantage. In the meantime, I am gonna continue admiring my own work until its no longer fun.

 

2 hours ago, Dracarris said:

yeah and that's simply not true. I don't know where some people here pull that crazy idea from. By that logic, murdering 1 or 1 Million people is equally bad. That's just utter BS.

No, by my logic, murdering 1 or murdering 1 million is still defined as murder. Your analogy is the one that is trying to make it seem like murdering 1 is okay since (for this analogy) gamers only murdered 1 person but miners murdered 1 million, so gamers shouldn't be under the same scrutiny. Meanwhile, the rest of the populace that has murdered nobody still wants to call both sides murderers. That is the camp I reside in, you just can't avoid grasping at weak justifications.

 

2 hours ago, Dracarris said:

I never claimed that I can walk/bike everywhere, but to many places I can. That includes a 30min (one-way) bike ride to work which includes uphill sections, on a regular bike, not E-Bike.

That's actually quite impressive, but I am content with not having the calf muscles of Lance Armstrong, so I'll have to give this a hard pass. Not to mention that I enjoy my free time too much to spend the majority of it huffing it on a bike back and forth from work.

 

2 hours ago, Dracarris said:

It's again delusional if you think you require such an utterly wasteful vehicle for grocery shopping. Unless you only go once a month, which obviously is super stupid as you then don't have any fresh food for a good chunk of the month. Well unless you pump chlorine and a shitload of preservatives into everything, so it might actually work in the US, lol.

Oh, not just grocery shopping, though I do fill up both my bed and cab when I go. We have these fancy inventions called "deep freezes" where we can store foods such as meats for a very extended period of time. The only thing I can't keep forever is fresh vegetables, but we live near farmers markets for stuff like that. We haul a lot of lumber, tons of metal for recycling and dirt/compost as well. What kind of vehicle would you recommend for me to be able to accomplish all of these tasks while still having the cab space to drive a family around? I for one chose the all new 2020 Chevy Silverado. Sam Elliot might not have narrated the commercial for my truck, but I can't help but see freedom-colored eagles every time I see it.

 

2 hours ago, Dracarris said:

There is utility and actual use cases for these. The problem is the insane number of people that buy them without such a use case. That said, there are whole continents that do fine without them where people still need to haul around heavy machinery and equipment.

Yeah, but entire continents aren't rural Ohio either, lol. Again, I am not disagreeing entirely. The goobers with the lift kits on their trucks and mud bogger tires on the freeway deserve to be laughed at, but the majority of people where I am from, genuinely need their vehicles to complete their daily tasks. You also forget that our rural roads are not touched by the city when ice gets bad. It's these backyard pickup truck drivers that plow the roads and salt for their neighbors. Don't write us off as "delusional" or overcompensating when we have genuine purposes for our yeehaw trucks. Just like you shouldn't write hobby miners off for wanting to use their GPU's beyond just gaming. See? Full circle again, lol.

 

My (incomplete) memory overclocking guide: 

 

Does memory speed impact gaming performance? Click here to find out!

On 1/2/2017 at 9:32 PM, MageTank said:

Sometimes, we all need a little inspiration.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gaming and consequently all forms of computer use tend to harm the environment in one way or the other. Mining just happens to be extremely computationally intensive for something that doesn't have much utility in the life of a normal person(yet). Gaming at least is a way to unwind and also is quite a bit less intensive than mining. Looking just at the watts consumed by the computer for tasks is meaningless, because even things like f@h will be bundled into the same category as mining, when it is clear that folding actually has a utility to all people, whereas mining has almost a purely selfish motive(the only possible altruistic justification being that you are trying to change finance systems yada yada yada...). Looking at a utility to watts consumed ratio and it is clear that mining straight up loses.

All that being said, simply blaming miners is not a solution and shortages from here on out won't be driven by miners, but by industry trends at large. And even the demand from hobby miners isn't driving up the demand, and most large scale farms are switching to specialized hardware(ASICs), so most probably, mining isn't going to be much of a factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WolframaticAlpha said:

Gaming and consequently all forms of computer use tend to harm the environment in one way or the other. Mining just happens to be extremely computationally intensive for something that doesn't have much utility in the life of a normal person(yet). Gaming at least is a way to unwind and also is quite a bit less intensive than mining. Looking just at the watts consumed by the computer for tasks is meaningless, because even things like f@h will be bundled into the same category as mining, when it is clear that folding actually has a utility to all people, whereas mining has almost a purely selfish motive(the only possible justification being that you are trying to change finance systems yada yada yada...). Looking at a utility to watts consumed ratio and it is clear that mining straight up loses.

All that being said, simply blaming miners is not going to solve the issue anytime soon and shortages from here on out won't be driven by miners, but by industry trends at large.

This is a very interesting point, and one I am glad you posed instead of jumping onto the same "mining bad" bandwagon. Also throws a wrench into the moral dilemma when we've previously established that its the scale of environmental damage that matters and yet F@H is often altruistic in nature despite also being considered an environmental downside.

 

I am aware this won't speak for all miners, but many of my friends that got into mining used it as a means to understand cryptocurrency in general and the concept of trading. A few have even moved on to trading legitimate stocks after learning the ropes in crypto. After all, if you can survive that absurdly volatile mess, stocks should look easy in comparison, lol.

 

My entire point is relatively simple and has remained unchanged since my introduction on this forum. What people choose to do with the hardware purchased with their hard-earned money is up to them. Bending every decision into one of morality simply perverts these fundamentals and opens the floodgates for everyone to point fingers at each other and it only ends with everyone attempting to justify what they enjoy while demonizing others for what they enjoy. I am aware that the culture of this forum likely won't change, but luckily I stubborn enough to keep on trying.

My (incomplete) memory overclocking guide: 

 

Does memory speed impact gaming performance? Click here to find out!

On 1/2/2017 at 9:32 PM, MageTank said:

Sometimes, we all need a little inspiration.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, MageTank said:

What people choose to do with the hardware purchased with their hard-earned money is up to them. Bending every decision into one of morality simply perverts these fundamentals and opens the floodgates for everyone to point fingers at each other and it only ends with everyone attempting to justify what they enjoy while demonizing others for what they enjoy. I am aware that the culture of this forum likely won't change, but luckily I stubborn enough to keep on trying.

I just enjoy the show now

No one's mind is ready to be changed, but that's why it's fun

 

I guess it boils down to this: MYOB

-sigh- feeling like I'm being too negative lately

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Moonzy said:

I just enjoy the show now

No one's mind is ready to be changed, but that's why it's fun

 

I guess it boils down to this: MYOB

Oh, I've admitted many times on this forum when I've been wrong. I enjoy a change in perspective as it at least means I haven't hit that old age where I start refusing these "new fangled do-hickeys" and am capable of learning/adapting. The problem is, most people seem to think being wrong about something is inherently bad. Funny thing about crow is that it's an acquired taste. I am just extremely confident that I am in the right here, and will gladly die on this hill.

My (incomplete) memory overclocking guide: 

 

Does memory speed impact gaming performance? Click here to find out!

On 1/2/2017 at 9:32 PM, MageTank said:

Sometimes, we all need a little inspiration.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, pas008 said:

if you care so much about the the grid, environment, etc why are you bitching here instead of out protesting against millions of companies that do far worse

fyi if the electric company is going to supply them and they are paying then what is your problem? cause you cant get your gpu?

I also think it is important to note that pretty much every single estimate and fact we got points towards "only" about 10% of GPUs sold being used for mining. 

 

The entire supply chain of pretty much everything is completely fucked. Raspberry Pi:s are sold for 5 times the msrp. Network switches for things like hospitals are delayed by years.

Cars are so scares that manufacturers are shipping incomplete cars just to get SOMETHING out on the market. Hell, my 5 year old car has increased in value since I bought it. That is insane. Absolutely crazy. 

 

And yet, gamers seem completely in denial and think that miners are the root of all evil. If only miners didn't exist then you would be able to pick up a GPU at MSRP whenever you wanted! 

 

The pandemic? The war? The out of control inflation? Shipping issues? The increase in demand? The new consoles launching? Nahh... Can't put any blame on those things. It must be miners... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LAwLz said:

The pandemic? The war? The out of control inflation? Shipping issues? The increase in demand? The new consoles launching? Nahh... Can't put any blame on those things. It must be miners... 

And he continues to conveniently ignore the fact that not a single type of PC component had even remotely comparable availability issues to those of GPUs. He continues to ignore facts that he has been notified about time and time again in the past.

 

What‘s next? Are you going to claim again that these other components don‘t have supply chains that are as complex as those of GPUs? Do I have to explain to you again that the supply chain of mainboards is even more complex with more components and more component types, yet you could basically always buy whatever MB you wanted at reasonable prices? ffs!

 

And big FYI: The availability of GPUs rather sharply increased around the time „the war“ started with it now being at its best levels since the start of the freakin 3000 launch when all this happened. All this while the war is ongoing.

 

And which console exactly is easting away GPU wafers that otherwise could‘ve ended as 3080s, one of the cards that were the hardest to get?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dracarris said:

Are you going to claim again that these other components don‘t have supply chains that are as complex as those of GPUs?

There have been large shortages of both AMD CPUs and Intel CPUs, Intel CPUs manufactured on their own uncontested non-shared silicon fabs. There has been DRAM shortages and NAND shortages. And that's without including network cards and RAID cards.

 

1 hour ago, Dracarris said:

And big FYI: The availability of GPUs rather sharply increased around the time „the war“ started with it now being at its best levels since the start of the freakin 3000 launch when all this happened. All this while the war is ongoing.

Over time as buyers get the GPUs they want the backlog of demand decreases and thus availability increases. We're talking a very long time from release so this could well be solely due to time and nothing else at all. Also the war had no immediate impacts on silicon manufacturing and as yet only affects products produced there i.e. RAID cards.

 

Alternative suppliers can be found and have been, along with securing export capability from there despite the ongoing conflict. 

 

It also helps a lot when year over GPU shipments increases by 30%, I think that would have a lot to do with availability, would you not agree?

 

1 hour ago, Dracarris said:

And which console exactly is easting away GPU wafers that otherwise could‘ve ended as 3080s, one of the cards that were the hardest to get?

Any silicon fabrication since raw wafer supply shortage was/is an issue, so basically anything at all that uses 300mm wafers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, leadeater said:

Other than the Russian one since it has almost no details the other two certainly are not "hobby" miners.

 

Not 72 GPUs, 72 systems of X number of GPUs, def not "hobby".

 

Not hobby

Like I said "Hobby" miners do not exist. When people talk about defending mining, they make no distinction between their one-GPU "hobby", the guy with 72 GPU's in their apartment, and the data centers built 100 meters from a coal plant or natural gas well.

 

If you are mining with more than one GPU, that's not a hobby, that's decisive investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MageTank said:

Let me guess, false equivalence? If so, I am about to teach you the definition of irony while I am at it, lol.

 

Exactly! And how many gamers are contributing to environmental damage? That's right... EVERY. SINGLE.ONE. Entertainment isn't free to make. There are companies keeping lights on, systems put towards rendering scenes, tons of e-waste put towards dev kits that get tossed away once the next shiny console launches. Tell me again how gamers are not part of the problem?

Ah, so it's not about what you are using it on, but the frequency of use? If they weren't using their GPU's for mining 24/7 but instead hosted a bare metal hypervisor and allowed people to remote in and game on it (Nvidia GRID, anyone?), it would be equally as bad by your logic? Point some of that environmental rhetoric at the cloud gaming companies and I'll take you more seriously in that endeavor.

 

Hey, let me have my delusions of grandeur. If you think I am overconfident, exploit that to your advantage. In the meantime, I am gonna continue admiring my own work until its no longer fun.

 

No, by my logic, murdering 1 or murdering 1 million is still defined as murder. Your analogy is the one that is trying to make it seem like murdering 1 is okay since (for this analogy) gamers only murdered 1 person but miners murdered 1 million, so gamers shouldn't be under the same scrutiny. Meanwhile, the rest of the populace that has murdered nobody still wants to call both sides murderers. That is the camp I reside in, you just can't avoid grasping at weak justifications.

 

That's actually quite impressive, but I am content with not having the calf muscles of Lance Armstrong, so I'll have to give this a hard pass. Not to mention that I enjoy my free time too much to spend the majority of it huffing it on a bike back and forth from work.

 

Oh, not just grocery shopping, though I do fill up both my bed and cab when I go. We have these fancy inventions called "deep freezes" where we can store foods such as meats for a very extended period of time. The only thing I can't keep forever is fresh vegetables, but we live near farmers markets for stuff like that. We haul a lot of lumber, tons of metal for recycling and dirt/compost as well. What kind of vehicle would you recommend for me to be able to accomplish all of these tasks while still having the cab space to drive a family around? I for one chose the all new 2020 Chevy Silverado. Sam Elliot might not have narrated the commercial for my truck, but I can't help but see freedom-colored eagles every time I see it.

 

Yeah, but entire continents aren't rural Ohio either, lol. Again, I am not disagreeing entirely. The goobers with the lift kits on their trucks and mud bogger tires on the freeway deserve to be laughed at, but the majority of people where I am from, genuinely need their vehicles to complete their daily tasks. You also forget that our rural roads are not touched by the city when ice gets bad. It's these backyard pickup truck drivers that plow the roads and salt for their neighbors. Don't write us off as "delusional" or overcompensating when we have genuine purposes for our yeehaw trucks. Just like you shouldn't write hobby miners off for wanting to use their GPU's beyond just gaming. See? Full circle again, lol.

 

I agree that gaming does harm the environment but I also realize that you can still make comparisons. It's like how using the subway to get to work is environmentally harmful but also using a car is more environmentally harmful than using the subway. You can make that comparison and it would be totally fine. Granted this would be only for people who have both options. So if you have the choice between gaming and mining with your gpu mining will use more energy and be more harmful for the environment. That isn't to say gaming isn't environmentally harmful its just less so than mining. Also people who think people who have trucks are wasteful probably don't live in areas with large amounts of snow. I can't even remember how many times at this point that I have used my truck to help pull out friends and families cars that get stuck in the snow. As much as I would like to not have to use extra gas on 4 wheel drive its just not practical for where I live. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LAwLz said:

I also think it is important to note that pretty much every single estimate and fact we got points towards "only" about 10% of GPUs sold being used for mining. 

 

The entire supply chain of pretty much everything is completely fucked. Raspberry Pi:s are sold for 5 times the msrp. Network switches for things like hospitals are delayed by years.

Cars are so scares that manufacturers are shipping incomplete cars just to get SOMETHING out on the market. Hell, my 5 year old car has increased in value since I bought it. That is insane. Absolutely crazy. 

 

And yet, gamers seem completely in denial and think that miners are the root of all evil. If only miners didn't exist then you would be able to pick up a GPU at MSRP whenever you wanted! 

 

The pandemic? The war? The out of control inflation? Shipping issues? The increase in demand? The new consoles launching? Nahh... Can't put any blame on those things. It must be miners... 

I think a huge issue is that miners made the prices insanely high as they could justify the extremely high prices the scalpers were asking for Because it's and investment to make money. You likely wouldn't have seen it so high if you didn't have miners as alot less people would be willing to pay the ridiculous prices. Also I doubt the 10% figure and how can you even tell who is mining on their gpu and those that are not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LAwLz said:

The pandemic? The war? The out of control inflation? Shipping issues? The increase in demand? The new consoles launching? Nahh... Can't put any blame on those things. It must be miners... 

I think it was a thing.  When in the past has there ever been huge demand for top tier GPU's in the $2000 price range?   Hell even 2080Ti's were hard-sells at $1200.  

 

But now (not right now) it becomes "pssst this GPU can basically be free if you buy it and mine while idle" and all of the sudden everyone wants whatever they can find regardless of the cost.  3090's selling out instantly.  3080Ti's selling out instantly.  I'm looking around like "where the fuck were you guys 5 years ago?!".  I don't think gaming magically became white-hot popular, I think the possible profit motive either from scalping or mining pushed people who were ambivalent into the market.

 

Just like right now, graphics cards didn't become cheap overnight because NV magically got flooded with inventory or gaming became faux paus.  It's because everyone who got in thinking it was guaranteed profit and pushed their credit lines are panic unloading.  Or doing the basic math that profitability is 300+ days out.  Oh hey that payment is coming due and layoffs are on the horizon....you still want to put out $2200 for a GPU?

Workstation:  14700nonK || Asus Z790 ProArt Creator || MSI Gaming Trio 4090 Shunt || Crucial Pro Overclocking 32GB @ 5600 || Corsair AX1600i@240V || whole-house loop.

LANRig/GuestGamingBox: 13700K @ Stock || MSI Z690 DDR4 || ASUS TUF 3090 650W shunt || Corsair SF600 || CPU+GPU watercooled 280 rad pull only || whole-house loop.

Server Router (Untangle): 13600k @ Stock || ASRock Z690 ITX || All 10Gbe || 2x8GB 3200 || PicoPSU 150W 24pin + AX1200i on CPU|| whole-house loop

Server Compute/Storage: 10850K @ 5.1Ghz || Gigabyte Z490 Ultra || EVGA FTW3 3090 1000W || LSI 9280i-24 port || 4TB Samsung 860 Evo, 5x10TB Seagate Enterprise Raid 6, 4x8TB Seagate Archive Backup ||  whole-house loop.

Laptop: HP Elitebook 840 G8 (Intel 1185G7) + 3060 RTX Thunderbolt Dock, Razer Blade Stealth 13" 2017 (Intel 8550U)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Brooksie359 said:

I think a huge issue is that miners made the prices insanely high as they could justify the extremely high prices the scalpers were asking for Because it's and investment to make money. You likely wouldn't have seen it so high if you didn't have miners as alot less people would be willing to pay the ridiculous prices. Also I doubt the 10% figure and how can you even tell who is mining on their gpu and those that are not. 

Yep, that is certainly one thing that is the case. It actually take very little in terms of supply shortage to drive up market price significantly and then when there are people willing to pay a very high price regardless, even if only a small number of people globally, then the market price goes up as they seek to sell to those known sell prices.

 

So one thing I agree on is that both scalpers and miners are the cause of high prices, just not the supply issues itself. Everyone contributes to that issue along with all the other global factors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kisai said:

Like I said "Hobby" miners do not exist. When people talk about defending mining, they make no distinction between their one-GPU "hobby", the guy with 72 GPU's in their apartment, and the data centers built 100 meters from a coal plant or natural gas well.

 

If you are mining with more than one GPU, that's not a hobby, that's decisive investment.

Of course hobby miners exist, but you know what the issue is, for you? They don't have news stories about them because they aren't running 72+ GPUs and causing fires, they are just happily using 1 or a few GPUs and mining, like many on this forum.

 

So don't say they do not exist, they exist in the many thousands. 

 

"I don't hear about them so they don't exist", that's not how it works, like at all. Do you need news stories to tell you there are many hobby gamers?

 

3 hours ago, Kisai said:

When people talk about defending mining, they make no distinction between

No, you don't make that distinction, literally everyone else here not beating down the narrative you are do. You don't get to set the rules of the discussion, I don't get the set the rules of the discussion. What you can do is do the courtesy of reading what people actually say and discuss what has been said, because if you were actually doing that here you'd be having an actual discussion about hobby vs not hobby and thus the distinction would exist even in your own mind.

 

If hobby miners do not exist then hobby gamers do not exist, we shall only talk about professional gamers and twitch streamers since money can be made from gaming so naturally the only form of gaming could ever be this.

 

3 hours ago, Kisai said:

If you are mining with more than one GPU, that's not a hobby, that's decisive investment.

So people can't make small profit off their hobbies? Well that sucks for every artist in the world, twitch streamer, or any number of hobby activities because if they even dare scale it out to a small degree then it's negated and suddenly no longer a hobby.

 

Also darn I guess when I had two 290X's in crossfire I'd only be allowed to mine on one of them otherwise not a hobby 🤦‍♂️

 

Remind me again why you get to the set the rules and definitions of what is and is not a hobby?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×