Upcoming GTX 1650 to beat 1060

[williamcll]

According to VideoCardz.com, along with the benchmarked 1660 super, Nvidia will also refresh the 1650 card with a later release that, supposedly matching the 1060 (and maybe the RX 5300 as well?) in terms of performance. Scheduled to launch at Novermber 22nd.

Quote

NVIDIA has provided the full specifications of smaller Turing Super series to the press under an embargo. The new series will utilize new GDDR6 memory technology as opposed to GDDR5 found in a lower-spec GTX 16 variants.

 

The rumors pointed towards 1024-1152 CUDA specs, but in reality, the GTX 1650 SUPER will be equipped with 1280 CUDA cores, which is the same as the GTX 1060 series. This model will be based on TU116 GPU.

NVIDIA’s cheapest SUPER model will have 4GB GDDR6 memory onboard. The card will keep 1650’s 128-bit memory bus and 32 ROP count. The higher specs will come at a cost of 25W higher TDP, as the GTX1650S will now require 100W of power. This model will also be clocked 50-60 MHz higher than the non-Super variant.

Source:https://videocardz.com/82408/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1660-super-and-gtx-1650-super-final-specifications

Thoughts: There must be some kind of name to refer to this kind of market saturation, and I honestly don't think it would nudge Radeon sales at all.

[DKL]

But can it run Crysis?

[dgsddfgdfhgs]

pricing is all it matters

[Fasauceome]

20 minutes ago, williamcll said:

There must be some kind of name to refer to this kind of market saturation,

the word "excessive" comes to mind

[Animal901]

This must be to compete with rx 470 to 580?

[Guest]

[williamcll]

1 minute ago, Den-Fi said:

You're right I should start streaming.

[Turtle Rig]

44 minutes ago, DKL said:

But can it run Crysis?

LMAO!  Actually depends on settings hehe.

[RejZoR]

"Upcoming GTX 1650 to beat 1060"

 

No shit Sherlock. If it couldn't, it would be absolutely shameful. Also sentence reads the same as when Apple is releasing a new iPhone and they always say "This is our fastest iPhone to date". Yeah no shit, it's the latest one, it's absolutely expected it to be faster than old one.

[Jurrunio]

I doubt they'll let it bare the xx50 name if it goes past 75w TDP. We know how well things have gone for the 90w GTX 950, pretty much entirely replaced by the 75w version later on since they realize people just buy the 960 instead when neither card meet the PCIe-plugless status.

[mr moose]

well, somewhere along the line i would have expected the 1060 to get beaten, but usually the next model down in the next series up performs about the same. So this would be only a little bit interesting if it turns out to be true.

 

 

[dgsddfgdfhgs]

55 minutes ago, RejZoR said:

"Upcoming GTX 1650 to beat 1060"

Too many hidden agenda , meaningless comparison

faster ddr6 over ddr5?

faster under same clock speed / power?

also which 1060?

etc etc

 

[Guest]

well this is just ridiculous. Nvidia is now having to compete with itself.

[dgsddfgdfhgs]

more different confusion names/ models = more market share

[RejZoR]

1 hour ago, dgsddfgdfhgs said:

Too many hidden agenda , meaningless comparison

faster ddr6 over ddr5?

faster under same clock speed / power?

also which 1060?

etc etc

 

No, GTX 1650 should ALWAYS and UNCONDITIONALLY be faster than GTX 1060 from frigging 3 years ago.

[dgsddfgdfhgs]

7 minutes ago, RejZoR said:

GTX 1650 should ALWAYS and UNCONDITIONALLY be faster than GTX 1060 from frigging 3 years ago.

"always"??

 

 

 

[RejZoR]

1 hour ago, dgsddfgdfhgs said:

"always"??

 

 

 

Yeah, ain't my fault if ppl buy and support companies that sell new products that are inferior to 3 year old ones. Especially given it's meant for the same damn range. But hey, when AMD released RX580 everyone sperged it's just RX480 with some OC, but when NVIDIA releases whole new card, calls it different but performs poorly even to its former self, no one is bothered. Ppl are weird as hell.

[GoldenLag]

So a ~170$ card that removes the one good thing about the 1650. The fact it doesnt need a powerconnector. 

 

Its gonna be nice competition for the rx 580 which sits at 170$........

[MichaelWd]

So there is the 1660, 1660TI, 2060, 2060 Super, 2070, 2070 Super, 2080, 2080 Super, 2080 Ti, and the Titan.

And now Nvidia is adding a 1650...

 

This is just infuriatingly confusing. 

 

 

[GoldenLag]

10 minutes ago, MichaelWd said:

And now Nvidia is adding a 1650...

No, the 1650 has been out for a while. Its only redeeming factor was the lack of powerconnectors. Otherwise it was overshadowed by the faster and cheaper rx 570. 

 

They are adding the 1650 super. Tieing the rx 580 probably performance wise at the same cost or higher cost

[NumLock21]

8 hours ago, RejZoR said:

"Upcoming GTX 1650 to beat 1060"

 

No shit Sherlock. If it couldn't, it would be absolutely shameful. Also sentence reads the same as when Apple is releasing a new iPhone and they always say "This is our fastest iPhone to date". Yeah no shit, it's the latest one, it's absolutely expected it to be faster than old one.

GTX 1650 is the successor to the GTX 1050, it's an entry level card. Nvidia isn't going to let a entry level card out perform its more expensive GTX 1060, when Turing (the architecture in GTX 1650), is only a gen newer than a GTX 1060. Most of the time, it will take about 2 generations of GPUs for a entry level card to out perform a mid-range like the GTX 1060.

 

 

[illegalwater]

47 minutes ago, NumLock21 said:

GTX 1650 is the successor to the GTX 1050, it's an entry level card. Nvidia isn't going to let a entry level card out perform its more expensive GTX 1060, when Turing (the architecture in GTX 1650), is only a gen newer than a GTX 1060. Most of the time, it will take about 2 generations of GPUs for a entry level card to out perform a mid-range like the GTX 1060.

 

 

The 1060 isn't in production anymore, why would they care about it being outperformed by their latest entry-level card?

[NumLock21]

25 minutes ago, System32.exe said:

The 1060 isn't in production anymore, why would they care about it being outperformed by their latest entry-level card?

I'm sure plenty of 1060 owners will, if a entry level card that's only a generation newer, out performs their card, and comes at a much lower price.

[RejZoR]

4 minutes ago, NumLock21 said:

I'm sure plenty of 1060 owners will, if a entry level card that's only a generation newer, out performs their card, and comes at a much lower price.

So? Tough fucking luck. My expensive GTX 980 also got challenged by an RX480 a year after I bought it. For basically half as much as I paid for GTX 980.

[illegalwater]

44 minutes ago, NumLock21 said:

I'm sure plenty of 1060 owners will, if a entry level card that's only a generation newer, out performs their card, and comes at a much lower price.

This is literally how computer hardware has worked for decades.