Jump to content

(Rumour) Nvidia Preparing Nvidia Geforce GTX 960 Ti Graphic Card To Compete With The Radeon R9 380X – Alleges Report

Mr_Troll

Nvidia allegedly preparing the Geforce GTX 960 ‘Ti’ graphic card for launch

The GTX 960 has 1024 CUDA Cores (in 8 SMMs) while as the GTX 970 has 1664 CUDA Cores (in 13 SMMs). If green is preparing a card that lies somewhere between the GTX 960 and GTX 970 then the card will probably have either 10 or 11 SMMs (for 1280 – 1408 CUDA Cores), both of which are comfortably spaced from the GTX 960 and GTX 970 respectively. The price points of the 960 and 970 are $199 and $329, so a card lying in the center will probably retail around the $249 mark. 

Its worth nothing that the variant with 10 SMMs is more likely because Nvidia already has a GTX 960 OEM edition with 10 SMMs (1280 CUDA Cores), something it can brand as the GTX 960 Ti for the mainstream market. The OEM edition of the card also has a 192 bit bus width (an upgrade over the 128 bit bus width provided with the mainstream 960) which makes it a completely different card, even though the primary nomenclature is the same. Given below is a specification comparison of the two cards:

 

The new card will naturally be based on the MX 2.0 architecture and will support DirectX 12 upto feature level 12_1. Since Pascal wont be arriving before the second quarter of 2016, Nvidia has to make sure its lineup is in tip top shape to compete against AMD. The company actually lost a bit of market share this quarter, and its relatively weak middle end lineup could be one reason for that. With a GTX 960 Ti (we don’t know what the final nomenclature would be, this is just a guess) competing against the Radeon R9 380X (which outclasses its Nvidia counterpart currently) the company would have a well balanced lineup in its mid-end as well.

Before we end this piece, I would like to note once again that this is a rumor, and should therefore be taken with a healthy amount of your favorite salt. Even though this seems logical, it is possible that Nvidia pulls a Maxwell 1.0 and releases pascal test chips as the 950 Ti/960 Ti respectively (like it did with the GTX 750 and GTX 750 Ti). It is also my duty to point out that while the aforementioned is certainly a possibility, it is not a probability, since the chances of Nvidia repeating that marketing gimmick are quite slim.

 

 

GM204? A cut down version of a cut down version? Lol? Its too late Nvidia. U should have it ready already. Guess amd wins this time.

 

 

Source: https://benchlife.info/nvidia-postpone-geforce-gtx-960-ti-or-geforce-gtx-950-ti-11232015/

http://wccftech.com/nvidia-preparing-launch-geforce-gtx-960-ti/


 

Intel Core i7 7800x @ 5.0 Ghz with 1.305 volts (really good chip), Mesh OC @ 3.3 Ghz, Fractal Design Celsius S36, Asrock X299 Killer SLI/ac, 16 GB Adata XPG Z1 OCed to  3600 Mhz , Aorus  RX 580 XTR 8G, Samsung 950 evo, Win 10 Home - loving it :D

Had a Ryzen before ... but  a bad bios flash killed it :(

MSI GT72S Dominator Pro G - i7 6820HK, 980m SLI, Gsync, 1080p, 16 GB RAM, 2x128 GB SSD + 1TB HDD, Win 10 home

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see the point. But I guess green team can afford whatever decision even if it doesn't make sense.

ROG X570-F Strix AMD R9 5900X | EK Elite 360 | EVGA 3080 FTW3 Ultra | G.Skill Trident Z Neo 64gb | Samsung 980 PRO 
ROG Strix XG349C Corsair 4000 | Bose C5 | ROG Swift PG279Q

Logitech G810 Orion Sennheiser HD 518 |  Logitech 502 Hero

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see the point. But I guess green team can afford whatever decision even if it doesn't make sense.

Makes sense, the 380X is substantially better than the 960, even the 4GB 960 for only a slightly higher price. If Nvidia can match the performance at the same price or maybe even beat it. It will keep them in the high mid range market.

i7 6700K - ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger - Corsair H110i GT CPU Cooler - EVGA GTX 980 Ti ACX2.0+ SC+ - 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz - Samsung 850 EVO 500GB - AX760i - Corsair 450D - XB270HU G-Sync Monitor

i7 3770K - H110 Corsair CPU Cooler - ASUS P8Z77 V-PRO - GTX 980 Reference - 16GB HyperX Beast 1600MHz - Intel 240GB SSD - HX750i - Corsair 750D - XB270HU G-Sync Monitor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, such insider information, nothing that you could take a complete guess at and have an extremely high chance of being right about ;P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's been a while since we had a x60Ti card.

i5 4670k @ 4.2GHz (Coolermaster Hyper 212 Evo); ASrock Z87 EXTREME4; 8GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3 RAM @ 2133MHz; Asus DirectCU GTX 560; Super Flower Golden King 550 Platinum PSU;1TB Seagate Barracuda;Corsair 200r case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

why does GPU companies hold back section of GPU for a while? aside from business aspect the consumers feel pretty shitty knowing that they bought a new GPU & a few weeks later a fresh gpu (better than what they've originally bought) shows up with similar price range with better performance :/

 

#Rant

Details separate people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

why is GPU companies hold back section of GPU for a while? aside from business aspect the consumers feel pretty shitty knowing that they bought a new GPU & a few weeks later a fresh gpu (better than what they've originally bought) shows up with similar price range with better performance :/

 

#Rant

They don't hold back a section of a GPU like that.

 

 

INB4 another useless 2GB obsolete-from-the-drawing-board card.

 

Nvidia discontinued 960 2GB cards. 4GB is the normal now.

i7 6700K - ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger - Corsair H110i GT CPU Cooler - EVGA GTX 980 Ti ACX2.0+ SC+ - 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz - Samsung 850 EVO 500GB - AX760i - Corsair 450D - XB270HU G-Sync Monitor

i7 3770K - H110 Corsair CPU Cooler - ASUS P8Z77 V-PRO - GTX 980 Reference - 16GB HyperX Beast 1600MHz - Intel 240GB SSD - HX750i - Corsair 750D - XB270HU G-Sync Monitor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't hold back a section of a GPU like that.

 

is it planned manufacture delay? i thought they just delayed to sell a certain performance tier section of GPU to sell more of that tier for profit , giving consumers no other option but to buy that instead of waiting...

Details separate people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nvidia discontinued 960 2GB cards. 4GB is the normal now.

 

Well it's a 192-bit bus so it can't be an even number of VRAM. It's 99% guaranteed it's going to be 3GB.

In case the moderators do not ban me as requested, this is a notice that I have left and am not coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fucking called it 6 months ago :D

Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280  3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD Red
Celestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70
Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VT

Windows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

INB4 another useless 2GB obsolete-from-the-drawing-board card.

Probably not all board parters are dropping 2GB cards it's time for them to die in the mid range market.

If you want to reply back to me or someone else USE THE QUOTE BUTTON!                                                      
Pascal laptops guide

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's a 192-bit bus so it can't be an even number of VRAM. It's 99% guaranteed it's going to be 3GB.

660 Ti had 192 bit bus and 2 GB of VRAM. It was Kepler though.

From salty to bath salty in 2.9 seconds

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

660 Ti had 192 bit bus and 2 GB of VRAM. It was Kepler though.

the memory there was 1GB module + 512MB + 512MB modules

Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280  3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD Red
Celestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70
Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VT

Windows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I don't see 960 Ti 3GB with 192-bit, when we have 960 4GB, that seem kind of strange

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes sense, the 380X is substantially better than the 960, even the 4GB 960 for only a slightly higher price. If Nvidia can match the performance at the same price or maybe even beat it. It will keep them in the high mid range market.

Maybe. Maybe it's just a pure douche move, just so you can compete on whatever little foothold AMD has. I mean come on, green team dominates the dGPU already by a shit ton.

The move would be retarded, but with their current profit margin- they can certainly afford it.

ROG X570-F Strix AMD R9 5900X | EK Elite 360 | EVGA 3080 FTW3 Ultra | G.Skill Trident Z Neo 64gb | Samsung 980 PRO 
ROG Strix XG349C Corsair 4000 | Bose C5 | ROG Swift PG279Q

Logitech G810 Orion Sennheiser HD 518 |  Logitech 502 Hero

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it planned manufacture delay? i thought they just delayed to sell a certain performance tier section of GPU to sell more of that tier for profit , giving consumers no other option but to buy that instead of waiting...

Not 100% sure how it works, but I believe a lot of the chips they use for lesser GPUs such as 970 over 980 are just cut down versions that wouldn't run properly fully unlocked.

 

Someone more educated could probably correct me. But they generally haven't delayed any performance tiers this time around. The GTX 980 was fully unlocked and the GTX Titan X was a different, fully unlocked chip. The GTX 980 Ti was a cut down Titan X which came later, suggesting the usual 'didn't make the cut for Titan X' sort of thing.

 

Depending on the chip it could be that it was a delayed tier of GM206, but it also could be just a cut down 970 (GM204) which is what the article suggests.

i7 6700K - ASUS Maximus VIII Ranger - Corsair H110i GT CPU Cooler - EVGA GTX 980 Ti ACX2.0+ SC+ - 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz - Samsung 850 EVO 500GB - AX760i - Corsair 450D - XB270HU G-Sync Monitor

i7 3770K - H110 Corsair CPU Cooler - ASUS P8Z77 V-PRO - GTX 980 Reference - 16GB HyperX Beast 1600MHz - Intel 240GB SSD - HX750i - Corsair 750D - XB270HU G-Sync Monitor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fucking called it 6 months ago :D

TBH, I think everyone called it when we knew the performance of the 960 and CUDA count.

System specs
  • Graphics card: Asus GTX 980 Ti (Temp target: 60c, fan speed: slow as hell)
  • CPU: Intel 6700k @ 4.2Ghz
  • CPU Heatsink: ThermalRight Silver Arrow Extreme
  • Motherboard: Asus Maximus Viii Gene
  • Ram: 8GB of DDR4 @ 3000Mhz
  • Headphone source: O2 + Odac 
  • Mic input: Creative X-Fi Titanium HD
  • Case: Fractal Design Arc midi R2
  • Boot Drive: Samsung 840 Pro 128GB 
  • Storage: Seagate SSHD 2TB
  • PSU: Be quiet! Dark Power Pro 550w

Peripherals

  • Monitor: Asus ROG Swift PG278Q
  • Mouse: Razer DeathAdder Chroma (16.5 inch/360)
  • Mouse surface: Mionix Sargas 900
  • Tablet: Wacom Intuos Pen
  • Keyboard: Filco Majestouch Ninja, MX Brown, Ten Keyless 
  • Headphones: AKG K7xx
  • IEMs: BrainWavs S1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's a 192-bit bus so it can't be an even number of VRAM. It's 99% guaranteed it's going to be 3GB.

With a 6GB version. :)

Software Engineer for Suncorp (Australia), Computer Tech Enthusiast, Miami University Graduate, Nerd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe. Maybe it's just a pure douche move, just so you can compete on whatever little foothold AMD has. I mean come on, green team dominates the dGPU already by a shit ton.

The move would be retarded, but with their current profit margin- they can certainly afford it.

There's no such thing as a douche move. You want to be the best at every price range. Period.

Main Gaming PC - i9 10850k @ 5GHz - EVGA XC Ultra 2080ti with Heatkiller 4 - Asrock Z490 Taichi - Corsair H115i - 32GB GSkill Ripjaws V 3600 CL16 OC'd to 3733 - HX850i - Samsung NVME 256GB SSD - Samsung 3.2TB PCIe 8x Enterprise NVMe - Toshiba 3TB 7200RPM HD - Lian Li Air

 

Proxmox Server - i7 8700k @ 4.5Ghz - 32GB EVGA 3000 CL15 OC'd to 3200 - Asus Strix Z370-E Gaming - Oracle F80 800GB Enterprise SSD, LSI SAS running 3 4TB and 2 6TB (Both Raid Z0), Samsung 840Pro 120GB - Phanteks Enthoo Pro

 

Super Server - i9 7980Xe @ 4.5GHz - 64GB 3200MHz Cl16 - Asrock X299 Professional - Nvidia Telsa K20 -Sandisk 512GB Enterprise SATA SSD, 128GB Seagate SATA SSD, 1.5TB WD Green (Over 9 years of power on time) - Phanteks Enthoo Pro 2

 

Laptop - 2019 Macbook Pro 16" - i7 - 16GB - 512GB - 5500M 8GB - Thermal Pads and Graphite Tape modded

 

Smart Phones - iPhone X - 64GB, AT&T, iOS 13.3 iPhone 6 : 16gb, AT&T, iOS 12 iPhone 4 : 16gb, AT&T Go Phone, iOS 7.1.1 Jailbroken. iPhone 3G : 8gb, AT&T Go Phone, iOS 4.2.1 Jailbroken.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's a 192-bit bus so it can't be an even number of VRAM. It's 99% guaranteed it's going to be 3GB.

Did you know that the GTX 660 Ti 2GB is operating on a 192-bit bus?

if you have to insist you think for yourself, i'm not going to believe you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe. Maybe it's just a pure douche move, just so you can compete on whatever little foothold AMD has. I mean come on, green team dominates the dGPU already by a shit ton.

The move would be retarded, but with their current profit margin- they can certainly afford it.

LOL how is it a douche move. It's nothing new? cut-throat competition.

Nvidia released the 780ti as a response to 290x. They probably released the 980ti in anticipation of Fury-X, and sucesfully took the wind out of AMD's sales.

Going back AMD released the 7970Ghz edition as a response to the 680 to ensure they kept the performance crown.

I could go on; this has been happening for over a decade. Nothing douche about it. Just competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes sense, the 380X is substantially better than the 960, even the 4GB 960 for only a slightly higher price. If Nvidia can match the performance at the same price or maybe even beat it. It will keep them in the high mid range market.

 

there's also the fact that you can get an r9 290 for more or less the same price as a 380x, and chances are it will wipe the floor with a hypothetical 960ti. This is simply because the 290 is much closer to 970 performance levels. If they don't want to cannbalize the 970's market they'll want to nerf the 960ti accordingly

Don't ask to ask, just ask... please 🤨

sudo chmod -R 000 /*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×