Gun enthusiasts move their videos to Porn Hub.

[AshleyAshes]

1 minute ago, TopHatProductions115 said:

It's actually not as difficult as you think. Combatants in other countries do it to U.S. aircraft at times (unfortunately)...

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2013/02/diy-weapons-of-the-syrian-rebels/100461/

WOW!  Amazing!  By showing that small arms and improvized weapons can on uncommon occasions be effective against aircraft, you have proven that there is zero need for proper MANPAD's or other kinds of air defence weapons to stop the aircraft of a major power!

 

...Seroiusly, this sounds like propaganda issued by a TYRANICAL GOVERNMENT who wants you to ACCEPT that they get to have effective weapons systems while trying to convince you that you could totally use a sling shot and a hand grenade.  Yup, here you are just trying to PLAYCATE the population into thinking that it is PERFECTLY acceptable that their second ammendment right to a FIM-92 Stinger missile system is DENIED.  Tisk, tisk, tisk.

[Drak3]

7 minutes ago, Selah said:

get it right.

He did.

 

1 hour ago, JAKEBAB said:

I just don't think it's fair to play it off like giving civilians guns in a situation like that would do nothing.

It's completely unfair, especially when ultimately, the loyalty of the US military is not ultimately with any branch of the Government. Particularly when the US Government will absolutely ruin the lives of soldiers for making unavoidable mistakes whilst doing their jobs, such as shooting a shady civilian in a war where the combatants appear and act in the exact same manner.
 

And the military isn't stupid enough to attack their own assets, nor will they blindly attack the civilians they're employed to protect.

[TopHatProductions115]

7 minutes ago, AshleyAshes said:

WOW!  Amazing!  By showing that small arms and improvized weapons can on uncommon occasions be effective against aircraft, you have proven that there is zero need for proper MANPAD's or other kinds of air defence weapons to stop the aircraft of a major power!

 

...Seroiusly, this sounds like propaganda issued by a TYRANICAL GOVERNMENT who wants you to ACCEPT that they get to have effective weapons systems while trying to convince you that you could totally use a sling shot and a hand grenade.  Yup, here you are just trying to PLAYCATE the population into thinking that it is PERFECTLY acceptable that their second ammendment right to a FIM-92 Stinger missile system is DENIED.  Tisk, tisk, tisk.

I'm sorry to say, civilians shouldn't need weapons of the type (fighter jets, tanks, missiles, etc.). If the need ever becomes a reality, it's called a Civil War - the second in all of American history to be exact. And I am quite sure that simply having those things wouldn't even the playing field, since there's cyberspace and misinformed citizenry to deal with as well...

The infrastructure simply isn't there, for civilians to stand against tyranny, should it ever truly rear its ugly head on American shores.

 

#Screwed

[DildorTheDecent]

PornHub has hit the shitter over the last few years. Not the place it used to be...not like I know or anything. New and irrelevant content is going make it much worse too. Thanks lads.

 

YouTube has went off the rails entirely. It's not the only video platform and it certainly isn't the only area where gun bois can "shoot their loads" but sure, whatever makes them think they're making a difference kek.

[jagdtigger]

11 minutes ago, Drak3 said:

And the military isn't stupid enough to attack their own assets,

Are you sure?

Spoiler

 

 

[TopHatProductions115]

25 minutes ago, jagdtigger said:

And this is why the US should stick with the Warthog there...

I'm just glad no one's said that civilians should have the 'pleasure' of flying in F-35 Lightnings. Those things are TERRIBLE...

[Arika]

8 hours ago, Noctus said:

 

No, that's your interpretation 

Yes, It is. Not everyone has to like guns. Gun advocates use "anti-gun" like a derogatory term.

 

Do I think YouTube should ban these gun videos? Sure, otherwise advertiser are going to pull out and everyone loses money. There should be an alternative for people to watch these kinds of videos. Maybe live leak or just go full patreon with it. 

[Drak3]

13 hours ago, Sierra Fox said:

you say that like it's a bad thing? not everyone has to like guns. i don't like guns, never going to own one and believe most people don't really NEED to own guns, but i know I'm not going to be able to prevent anyone from owning them, doesn't mean i have to like them

It is. Being anti gun explicitly means opposing gun ownership. Making the personal decision to not own a personal gun, but allowing someone that wants to, is not being anti gun.

 

You're free to not like guns. Just don't use that to try to take away mine.

[Ezzy-525]

19 hours ago, Drak3 said:

Inb4 lock.

 

How long before Pornhub replaces YouTube?

 

Would they change their name? How would the recommended filtering algorithm for SFW and NSFW work?

Call it NormHub

[Snapperx]

13 minutes ago, Drak3 said:

You're free to not like guns. Just don't use that to try to take away mine.

So people on the other hand should also be allowed to consume and buy whatever drugs they like, right?

 

You are free to not like the drugs. Just don't use that to take theirs away.

[Drak3]

Just now, Snapperx said:

So people on the other hand should also be allowed to consume and buy whatever drugs they like, right?

 

You are free to not like the drugs. Just don't use that to take theirs away.

Legal gun owners aren't committing crimes against or hurting others.

 

Whereas most illicit drug use explicitly leads to criminal activity and hurting others.

[Arika]

19 minutes ago, Drak3 said:

It is. Being anti gun explicitly means opposing gun ownership. Making the personal decision to not own a personal gun, but allowing someone that wants to, is not being anti gun.

Wish everyone else had that mentality. Anti-gun just seems to be thrown around at anyone with a differing opinion to discard their opinion on the matter.

[Snapperx]

1 minute ago, Drak3 said:

Legal gun owners aren't committing crimes against or hurting others.

 

Whereas most illicit drug use explicitly leads to criminal activity and hurting others.

Which drugs are you referring to? The thing that leads them into the criminal activity is mostly a money issue.

I have never seen anyone on LSD, ecstasy, weed hurting someone because of their use.

[BlueChinchillaEatingDorito]

12 minutes ago, Snapperx said:

Which drugs are you referring to? The thing that leads them into the criminal activity is mostly a money issue.

I have never seen anyone on LSD, ecstasy, weed hurting someone because of their use.

Dealers. We in Vancouver recently had a young teenage boy hit while in his parents car by a stray bullet at the time of a gang shooting near the downtown area. He died from his injuries. These turf wars typically leads to more violence and shootings. The public is usually not at risk as these attacks are targeted. But as we just seen recently, public casualties do happen. 

[Snapperx]

1 minute ago, BlueChinchillaEatingDorito said:

Dealers. We in Vancouver recently had a young teenage boy hit while in his parents car by a stray bullet at the time of a gang shooting near the downtown area. These turf wars typically leads to more violence and shootings. The public is usually not at risk as these attacks are targeted. But as we just seen recently, public casualties do happen. 

Ah ok so the crime was committed using a gun.
Quite interesting since in Germany there are barely dealers fighting for turf and even less with guns while people here still consume drugs.

 

Also that is the issue with the dealer and not the user.

[BlueChinchillaEatingDorito]

1 minute ago, Snapperx said:

Ah ok so the crime was committed using a gun.
Quite interesting since in Germany there are barely dealers fighting for turf and even less with guns while people here still consume drugs.

 

Also that is the issue with the dealer and not the user.

I'm not entirely sure where that person is referring to saying "illicit drug use explicitly leads to criminal activity ". But at least in Canada, it's not the drug users that have firearms. Not to say they aren't violent as robberies and theft is a common avenue some will go to fund their habits, particularly if you look at the demographic of Vancouver's Downtown East Side, widely known to be Canada's poorest neighbourhood. 

 

Most illegal gun owners are part of gangs which as I mentioned before, will use them to protect their turf regarding drug distribution.

[Drak3]

2 minutes ago, BlueChinchillaEatingDorito said:

I'm not entirely sure where that person is referring to saying "illicit drug use explicitly leads to criminal activity ".

The only eventuality of most illicit drug use is criminal activity. Most illicit drugs introduce chemicals that inhibit brain functionality, and reduce rationale. The need to sustain a euphoria, to chase a fleeting high, becomes more important than the lives around you, so you stop caring about their well being.

 

There's a reason that many drugs that are illegal today, are illegal.

[Snapperx]

1 minute ago, BlueChinchillaEatingDorito said:

I'm not entirely sure where that person is referring to saying "illicit drug use explicitly leads to criminal activity ". But at least in Canada, it's not the drug users that have firearms. Not to say they aren't violent as robberies and theft is a common avenue some will go to fund their habits, particularly if you look at the demographic of Vancouver's Downtown East Side, widely known to be Canada's poorest neighbourhood. 

 

Most illegal gun owners are part of gangs which as I mentioned before, will use them to protect their turf regarding drug distribution.

As I said it is mainly a money problem that leads to being criminal in a way like that.

 

3 minutes ago, Drak3 said:

There's a reason that many drugs that are illegal today, are illegal.

Same could be said for guns.(Other countries)

 

10 minutes ago, Drak3 said:

The need to sustain a euphoria, to chase a fleeting high, becomes more important than the lives around you, so you stop caring about their well being.

Actually there are a lot of people using drugs like cocaine and work on high level jobs. Those individuals are functional.

[Drak3]

2 minutes ago, Snapperx said:

Same could be said for guns.

Only that there is a reason behind it, but not the same reason.

 

With guns, it's a reason that only that subjects accept.

[Deli]

17 hours ago, Drak3 said:

 

Whereas, a knife is far more personal. It's silent. It's easily concealed. It can be carried everywhere without any issue. And given the body density of a classroom, it's just as effective at ending lives.

I can use a  chair to fight someone with a knife. I don't think it will be the case if that guy has a gun in his hand.

[Deli]

18 hours ago, Blademaster91 said:

A gun is just a tool,should we ban videos with knives in them because someone can choose to use it as a destructive weapon?

I don't see how hunting is so offensive, it's what people do to sustain themselves and what everyone did before you could walk down to the supermarket to buy meat.

Grenade is just a tool also. It should be allowed for civilian use, based on your logic.

[flibberdipper]

If Demolition Ranch ends up jumping to something like Floatplane I'd actually consider subscribing to that. YouTube is taking all our fun away.

Edited March 25, 2018 by PCGuy_5960

[Snapperx]

21 minutes ago, Drak3 said:

With guns, it's a reason that only that subjects accept.

Sorry I don't get what you are trying to say.

[Blademaster91]

13 minutes ago, Deli said:

Grenade is just a tool also. It should be allowed for civilian use, based on your logic.

A grenade is considered as an explosive, but by your logic you can fight off a knife attacker with a chair.

[Snapperx]

3 minutes ago, Blademaster91 said:

A grenade is considered as an explosive, but by your logic you can fight off a knife attacker with a chair.

A grenade is considered an explosive weapon. There are a lot of explosives that are not a weapon.

A gun is also primarily a weapon.

Weapons are used to damage or kill creatures.