Can someone with a GTX 970 run a benchmark for me

[stealth80]

1 hour ago, DrMikeNZ said:

My Gigabyte Windforce 970 out of the box it runs around 1320MHz and can overclock to 1550MHz. Out of the box my GTX 1080 runs at around 1990MHz, and can overclock to around 2050MHz. The 970 is on the higher end of the silicon lottery, while the 1080 is mediocre.

 

GTX 970 Windforce, stock (boosted to 1315 MHz).

Like I said, 970s struggled to get more than 1500, mine with bios mod and on water ran 1518 (although I had 2 on sli, that is what I needed for both to be stable), whilst 1550 is doable, 1650 seems like an exaggeration

 

my 1089 boosts to 2050 without any overclocking (on water, palit gamerock premium) and can do over 2100

[H0R53]

 

7 hours ago, stealth80 said:

Like I said, 970s struggled to get more than 1500, mine with bios mod and on water ran 1518 (although I had 2 on sli, that is what I needed for both to be stable), whilst 1550 is doable, 1650 seems like an exaggeration

 

my 1089 boosts to 2050 without any overclocking (on water, palit gamerock premium) and can do over 2100

Over 2100? The highest I've gotten my 1050Ti FTW to do is 2055, but the Kernel Mode driver crashes any higher.

 

Fuckin' Pascal. Jesus.

 

I've gotten my 550Ti up to 1350Mhz, but it gets too hot for any of the coolers I have.

 

I have an FM3 cooler soldered onto the Maxwell/Pascal base plate (I got it from my 1050Ti SSC that popped too many caps), but have yet to test it.

Edited August 11, 2017 by wkdpaul
Cleaned up

[stealth80]

5 hours ago, H0R53 said:

Over 2100? The highest I've gotten my 1050Ti FTW to do is 2055, but the Kernel Mode driver crashes any higher.

 

Fuckin' Pascal. Jesus.

 

I've gotten my 550Ti up to 1350Mhz, but it gets too hot for any of the coolers I have.

 

I have an FM3 cooler soldered onto the Maxwell/Pascal base plate (I got it from my 1050Ti SSC that popped too many caps), but have yet to test it.

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11520247

 

been a while since I tried, also remember, i'm on water 

Edited August 11, 2017 by wkdpaul
Cleaned up

[H0R53]

12 minutes ago, stealth80 said:

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/11520247

 

been a while since I tried, also remember, i'm on water 

Cooling has little to do with my 1050Ti crashing. Even while playing Fallout 5 on Ultra, when at the top of the Corvega Factory (well know performance problem location) it stays below 60C. Throttle temperature is set to 97C.

 

If I could set core clock +1000...I'd have a 2.45GHz 1050Ti that would probably destroy a stock 970. Lol.

[stealth80]

1 minute ago, H0R53 said:

Cooling has little to do with my 1050Ti crashing. Even while playing Fallout 5 on Ultra, when at the top of the Corvega Factory (well know performance problem location) it stays below 60C. Throttle temperature is set to 97C.

 

If I could set core clock +1000...I'd have a 2.45GHz 1050Ti that would probably destroy a stock 970. Lol.

well technically it would "if" Nvidia allowed us to adjust the voltage to the card by more than a penny ... but ye its the lack of volts causing your issues. My point been about water is that the standard NVidia boost (at least for my 1080) is based on temperature, so it sit at a constant 2050mhz (not clocked) 

[Vellinious]

Voltage doesn't  help on pascal until the core temps are down under 10c, max....even then, it's marginal gains.  Above that?  Waste of time.

Get them colder.....the colder they run, the higher they'll boost and the better they'll run when they get there.

[gbergeron]

13 hours ago, H0R53 said:

Thank you, kind person.

 

7864 is pretty close, I'm afraid that's not within the margin of error of 200 marks.

 

So all withstood, then, my 1050Ti is almost as good as a 970.

 

Could you upload a screenshot so I can compare individual test scores?

my 1050 ti is almost as good as 970 -- > lol  

I'm just gona leave this here : 

As you can see, it's not even close.....

[Shiv78]

2 minutes ago, gbergeron said:

my 1050 ti is almost as good as 970 -- > lol  

I'm just gona leave this here : 

As you can see, it's not even close.....

yup, it's actually slower than a 960 in some titles. 

 

Just goes to show that passmark is bad

[H0R53]

2 minutes ago, gbergeron said:

my 1050 ti is almost as good as 970 -- > lol  

I'm just gona leave this here : 

As you can see, it's not even close.....

How about you be quiet?

 

That is at stock clocks, if you've been paying attention to the WHOLE FUCKING THREAD you'd know mine's heavily overclocked.

 

2 minutes ago, Evolution90 said:

LMAO 1050Ti is no where close to a GTX 970.

Read what I typed above. Unless you can't read, which is probably why you posted what you did.

 

A STOCK 1050Ti is not as good as a STOCK 970.

3 minutes ago, Shiv78 said:

yup, it's actually slower than a 960 in some titles. 

 

Just goes to show that passmark is bad

An OVERCLOCKED 1050Ti can perform as well if not better than SOME 970s.

 

How do you not know that READING THE WHOLE THREAD is PROPER FORUM ETIQUETTE? SERIOUSLY, IT'S NOT HARD.

[Evolution90]

Download Superposition and show us your mighty overclocked 1050Ti please.

 

My result, if you overclock your hard drive you might beat mine!!!!

 

 

 

 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jvq_--P35FbqY8Iv_jn3YZ_7iP1I_hR0_vk7DjKsZgI/edit#gid=0

 

See if you can beat that lonely GTX 970.

 

1080P extreme preset, off you go.

 

 

[H0R53]

2 minutes ago, Evolution90 said:

Download Superposition and show us your mighty overclocked 1050Ti please.

 

My result, if you overclock your hard drive you might beat mine!!!!

 

 

 

 

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jvq_--P35FbqY8Iv_jn3YZ_7iP1I_hR0_vk7DjKsZgI/edit#gid=0

 

See if you can beat that lonely GTX 970.

 

1080P extreme preset, off you go.

 

 

1.275GB? Ha, that'll take all day on my connection. One reason I use Passmark.

[Shiv78]

Just now, H0R53 said:

One reason I use Passmark.

only reason anyone should ever use passmark

[Evolution90]

Totally legit how great passmark is haha.

 

 

 

 

1050Ti vs R9 Fury (stock Fury 1ghz, mine is at 1120mhz)

 

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1050-Ti-vs-AMD-R9-Fury/3649vs3509

 

 

 

R9 Fury stock is 109% faster.

 

Not going to add insult to injury.

 

1050Ti vs 970.

 

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-970-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1050-Ti/2577vs3649

 

 

970 is 63% faster.

[gbergeron]

3 minutes ago, Evolution90 said:

Totally legit how great passmark is haha.

 

 

 

 

1050Ti vs R9 Fury (stock Fury 1ghz, mine is at 1120mhz)

 

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1050-Ti-vs-AMD-R9-Fury/3649vs3509

 

 

 

R9 Fury stock is 109% faster.

 

Not going to add insult to injury.

 

1050Ti vs 970.

 

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-970-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1050-Ti/2577vs3649

 

 

970 is 63% faster.

real gaming performance in game, showed in youtube, confirm this. and theres no way overclocking a gpu gets you 50% more performance... so even if you reach 15% ( which is almost never achievable , more probable to be 1 to 10% gains ) there's absolutely no way a 1050 ti performs as good or better than  a 970

[WkdPaul]

Thread cleaned.

 

Remember that personal attacks aren't tolerated regardless of the situation

[Shiv78]

5 hours ago, H0R53 said:

Even while playing Fallout 5 on Ultra

whoa do you work for Bethesda or something? how do you have Fallout 5 already ?!!! 

 

</sarcasm>

[H0R53]

18 hours ago, Shiv78 said:

only reason anyone should ever use passmark

 

18 hours ago, Evolution90 said:

Totally legit how great passmark is haha.

 

 

 

 

1050Ti vs R9 Fury (stock Fury 1ghz, mine is at 1120mhz)

 

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1050-Ti-vs-AMD-R9-Fury/3649vs3509

 

 

 

R9 Fury stock is 109% faster.

 

Not going to add insult to injury.

 

1050Ti vs 970.

 

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-970-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1050-Ti/2577vs3649

 

 

970 is 63% faster.

 

18 hours ago, gbergeron said:

real gaming performance in game, showed in youtube, confirm this. and theres no way overclocking a gpu gets you 50% more performance... so even if you reach 15% ( which is almost never achievable , more probable to be 1 to 10% gains ) there's absolutely no way a 1050 ti performs as good or better than  a 970

 

15 hours ago, Shiv78 said:

whoa do you work for Bethesda or something? how do you have Fallout 5 already ?!!! 

 

</sarcasm>

It was a typo. You know that.

 

Here's my Unigine benchmark score.

[Evolution90]

Gotta love this ass clown.

 

Faking scores.

 

 

So now your 1050Ti is not only faster than a 970, it's also faster than the fastest overclocked GTX 1070.

 

On top of that your score is higher than the FPS shown, 28 average, 8 minimum, 65 maximum.

 

So driver tweaks, messing in config files, and some lovely photoshop work.

 

What else? your Nissan Micra 1.0 liter is faster in a straight line than a Bugatti Veyron?

[PCGuy_5960]

1 hour ago, H0R53 said:

Here's my Unigine benchmark score.

100% fake. It's as legit as this score.

[NicholasNicholasNicholas]

On 8/10/2017 at 6:22 PM, H0R53 said:

Thank you, kind person.

 

7864 is pretty close, I'm afraid that's not within the margin of error of 200 marks.

 

So all withstood, then, my 1050Ti is almost as good as a 970.

 

Could you upload a screenshot so I can compare individual test scores?

your 1050ti is bad compared to a 970. the 970 is like a 1060 3gb/470. theyre quite a bit ahead

[PCGuy_5960]

8 minutes ago, Evolution90 said:

So now your 1050Ti is not only faster than a 970, it's also faster than the fastest overclocked GTX 1070.

This score is on par with a 1080  I bet that he run it at 1080p low and then edited the screenshot to show 1080p Extreme

[NicholasNicholasNicholas]

On 8/11/2017 at 4:09 AM, H0R53 said:

 

Over 2100? The highest I've gotten my 1050Ti FTW to do is 2055, but the Kernel Mode driver crashes any higher.

 

Fuckin' Pascal. Jesus.

 

I've gotten my 550Ti up to 1350Mhz, but it gets too hot for any of the coolers I have.

 

I have an FM3 cooler soldered onto the Maxwell/Pascal base plate (I got it from my 1050Ti SSC that popped too many caps), but have yet to test it.

its because your 1050ti is heavily binned 

[NicholasNicholasNicholas]

1 hour ago, H0R53 said:

 

Lmfao. 
you gotta admire how little goddamn work you put into this and yet still have the confidence to post it  ??????????????????????????????
not to mention the shitty? ? ? ? ? ? ?  fps does not match up ?‍⚖️with the score. ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

lol? but for real????, stop✋✋ trolling?????. the 1050ti???????????? is a shitty gpu

[NicholasNicholasNicholas]

11 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

This score is on par with a 1080  I bet that he run it at 1080p low and then edited the screenshot to show 1080p Extreme

nah, he didnt even bother to do that. the fps doesnt match with the score. he just threw a 1080s score over his ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

[NicholasNicholasNicholas]

16 minutes ago, PCGuy_5960 said:

100% fake. It's as legit as this score.

V A L I D  R E S U L T