Can someone with a GTX 970 run a benchmark for me

[H0R53]

Can someone with a GTX 970 run the Passmark 3D test? 

 

I know most people use Firestrike but it's fucking 4 gigs and I'm not downloading that. Passmark is only 50MB downloaded and 75MB installed, which is why I use it.

 

I know Pssmark isn't that great for several reasons, but I just want stock clock numbers.

[Shiv78]

https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gpu.php?gpu=GeForce+GTX+970

?

[PCGuy_5960]

Passmark isn't very good. Unigine Superposition/Heaven/Valley are much better.

[H0R53]

On 8/10/2017 at 0:14 PM, PCGuy_5960 said:

Passmark isn't very good. Unigine Superposition/Heaven/Valley are much better.

I know. My GTX 1050Ti scores higher than a 970 in Passmark and everyone here says it doesn't. But it does. So I want real numbers from a person instead of averages off a webpage

Edited August 11, 2017 by W-L
Moderation

[H0R53]

On 8/10/2017 at 11:23 AM, thom derksen said:

So averages do not resemble real world perfomance??? WHAAAAAAT?! My maths teacher lied to me...

So the thing with the averages is that it factors in people who load their GPUs and run the test anyway, like I saw a score from Passmark for the GTX 1080 that was LOWER than the average for the GTX 1050 non-Ti.

 

That's why I want an unbiased score.

[Shiv78]

1 minute ago, H0R53 said:

So the thing with the averages is that it factors in people who load their GPUs and run the test anyway, like I saw a score from Passmark for the GTX 1080 that was LOWER than the average for the GTX 1050 non-Ti.

 

That's why I want an unbiased score.

 

I can't believe I have to explain this.

If you had just explained in the original post you wouldn't have had to

[H0R53]

Just now, Shiv78 said:

If you had just explained in the original post you wouldn't have had to

You shouldn't be questioning my super simple requests anyway, like I ask for someone to run a benchmark that takes 5 minutes and instead I've been waiting for almost 20 arguing with people as to why I want it. Like damn, can you understand my frustration here?

[Princess Luna]

Just now, H0R53 said:

can you understand my frustration here?

Honestly no I don't, a Forum is a place of interaction and exchange, you should expect in return the amount you give ya know? kinda the whole point of a socializing website.

[Shiv78]

3 minutes ago, H0R53 said:

You shouldn't be questioning my super simple requests anyway, like I ask for someone to run a benchmark that takes 5 minutes and instead I've been waiting for almost 20 arguing with people as to why I want it. Like damn, can you understand my frustration here?

if you had explained the reasoning behind the request nobody would be arguing...

[H0R53]

35 minutes ago, Shiv78 said:

if you had explained the reasoning behind the request nobody would be arguing...

They shouldnt be arguing in the first place.

 

Regardless, do you have a 970 to test? Does anyone replying here have a 970 or are you just criticizing me now?

[H0R53]

Here's my Passmark score for the GTX 1050Ti.

[alphaproject]

I just ran my 970.  The score was 7864.

[H0R53]

7 hours ago, alphaproject said:

I just ran my 970.  The score was 7864.

Thank you, kind person.

 

7864 is pretty close, I'm afraid that's not within the margin of error of 200 marks.

 

So all withstood, then, my 1050Ti is almost as good as a 970.

 

Could you upload a screenshot so I can compare individual test scores?

[ApolloX75]

8 hours ago, alphaproject said:

I just ran my 970.  The score was 7864.

 

1 hour ago, H0R53 said:

Thank you, kind person.

 

7864 is pretty close, I'm afraid that's not within the margin of error of 200 marks.

 

So all withstood, then, my 1050Ti is almost as good as a 970.

 

Could you upload a screenshot so I can compare individual test scores?

Not sure how accurate this test suite is, or if there's more at play here than just GPU power since my 970 scored 9452.

 

[H0R53]

Just now, ApolloX75 said:

 

Not sure how accurate this test suite is, or if there's more at play here than just GPU power since my 970 scored 9452.

 

is yours tweaked or did you run it stock?

[ApolloX75]

Just now, H0R53 said:

is yours tweaked or did you run it stock?

That is without my usual overclock.

[H0R53]

1 minute ago, ApolloX75 said:

That is without my usual overclock.

What version of the 970 is it?

[ApolloX75]

Just now, H0R53 said:

What version of the 970 is it?

Gigabyte 970 Windforce 3X. Not the G1 Gaming.

[Vellinious]

I seem to remember my 970 hitting near 10k on the 3D portion, running at 1630ish on the core...and a 290X I had went over 10k.

[H0R53]

2 hours ago, ApolloX75 said:

Gigabyte 970 Windforce 3X. Not the G1 Gaming.

So it's got a stock overclock.

[stealth80]

2 hours ago, Vellinious said:

I seem to remember my 970 hitting near 10k on the 3D portion, running at 1630ish on the core...and a 290X I had went over 10k.

1630mhz on the core, you sure? That's an amazing overclock for a 970, I had 1518mhz with modded bios and on water

[H0R53]

43 minutes ago, stealth80 said:

1630mhz on the core, you sure? That's an amazing overclock for a 970, I had 1518mhz with modded bios and on water

My 1050Ti can sit at over 2GHz with the fans and shroud (but not heat sink) removed. Stock clock is around 1400MHz.

[stealth80]

1 hour ago, H0R53 said:

My 1050Ti can sit at over 2GHz with the fans and shroud (but not heat sink) removed. Stock clock is around 1400MHz.

Ok.... of course it can it's pascal not maxwell, it's a different architecture. Most pascal can do around 2100mhz. 970's struggled to get more than 1500mhz

[HisEvilness]

3D Mark 11: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/12234316
I do not have either programs for benching.

[DrMikeNZ]

26 minutes ago, stealth80 said:

Ok.... of course it can it's pascal not maxwell, it's a different architecture. Most pascal can do around 2100mhz. 970's struggled to get more than 1500mhz

My Gigabyte Windforce 970 out of the box it runs around 1320MHz and can overclock to 1550MHz. Out of the box my GTX 1080 runs at around 1990MHz, and can overclock to around 2050MHz. The 970 is on the higher end of the silicon lottery, while the 1080 is mediocre.

 

GTX 970 Windforce, stock (boosted to 1315 MHz).