NVIDIA Announces GP102-based TITAN X with 3,584 CUDA cores

[Bouzoo]

3 hours ago, dalekphalm said:

Cost is still an issue though, and I imagine it's probably still in short supply.

With the price tag of $1200, they should be able to cover the costs pretty well. Supply is my bet. 

[Thony]

http://wccftech.com/nvidia-gtx-1080-ti-pascal-gp102/

Spot on CUDA cores count from 2 months ago. 
ITs coming out very soon, makes me wonder if they release HBM2 version of it next year as planned or not.

Cant find it now but someone posted estimated prices for All Pascal GPUs and there was 1080ti for $999 which looking at Titan X makes sense. And it could be out in September/October and be brutal value/performance card if it really has only 500 less cuda cores than Titan X.

[Bouzoo]

16 minutes ago, Senzelian said:

This doesn't seem to leave room for a potential 1080Ti, because the Titan has only 12GB of VRAM.
Launching a 1080Ti with 12GB of VRAM and a few more cuda cores would seem kind of useless.

But launching it for a much lower price, say the price of a 1080, would make sense. Same story as 980Ti. 

[DXMember]

that fkn cuda core count though....

 

was there no fancy press conference with unveiling and stuff?

[Senzelian]

22 minutes ago, Bouzoo said:

But launching it for a much lower price, say the price of a 1080, would make sense. Same story as 980Ti. 

But the 980Ti had less VRAM than the Titan X.
So that made at least a bit of sense.

[Bouzoo]

9 minutes ago, Senzelian said:

But the 980Ti had less VRAM than the Titan X.
So that made at least a bit of sense.

Who knows, we might get 10 GB 1080Ti. Speculations. 

[HKZeroFive]

1 hour ago, mattebad said:

It's not even using HBM2, there is absolutely no reason for them to raise the price another $200 besides the fact that they are gouging their customers until Vega releases

GDDR5X will be fast enough (HBM2 is being used up for Teslas) and seeing how this is the Titan X successor and it's allegedly 60% faster, it isn't as bad as I thought. The Titan series was never about value and there's nothing AMD can do about it until Vega releases.

 

Also, it appears to be less of a 'gaming card' than the previous variant and more of a HPC card.

[corsairian]

3 hours ago, Belgarathian said:

GDDR5X?

 

Will we be seeing a V2 with HBM later?

I think next generation we will see it. Maybe on the next titan in ~1.5 years. HBMs yields are still probably not there and not worth it yet.

 

Gddr5X is fine for now. It is plenty fast, faster than GDDR5. Hypothetically speaking, If we were to slap some HBM2 on the new Titan X, im sure there wouldn't be much, if any performance increase. It's like putting 4gb or 8gb of ram with a 512 bit bus on a GT740, The core will never be powerful enough to effectively use it.

[ManIkWeet]

I'm going to wait for the 1080ti, seems more reasonable...

 

Oh yeah this card is called 'Nvidia Titan X' instead of 'GTX Titan X', it's not marketed towards gamers at all

 

2 hours ago, FloRolf said:

Wow Nvidia you are so fucking high... 

Titan P would've been a good name actually... 

Titan P... Titan Pee... Titan's Pee, gross.

[Valentyn]

Those clocks are really low. Looks like they're having a very hard time keeping it cool with the same old reference cooler. The same vapor chamber is having issues with the 1080, and the 250W Titan XP might be pushing it far too much.

Honestly I'm a little worried those low clocks mean it's not a huge jump over a 2Ghz 1080.

Then there's the fact that it has less CUDA cores than full P100, by a decent amount and is on a smaller die as well.

I wouldn't be surprised if next year we get a New New Titan X Black that's a full core with a better reference cooler, that also has better clocks.

Also the increase in price? Seems NVIDIA simply did raise the price on everything, and the new card came in where I expected.

 

My other issue is the constant price raising. I paid less on launch day last year for my EVGA Superclocked 980Tis, than a 1080 does on launch and now.

I wouldn't be surprised if the new 1080Ti comes in at $900-950

[Senzelian]

44 minutes ago, Bouzoo said:

Who knows, we might get 10 GB 1080Ti. Speculations. 

Is that even possible? I thought i has to be 12,8 or 4GB.

[vanished]

I'm disappointed it doesn't have 3840 CUDA cores, just to keep with the resolution references  

[TheRandomness]

MOAR BOTTLENECKING <3

Yeah the amount of people that might slap this with an i5...

Seriously though, so many CUDA cores...

[gilang01]

17 minutes ago, Ryan_Vickers said:

I'm disappointed it doesn't have 3840 CUDA cores, just to keep with the resolution references  

I'm disappointed it still uses the same old reference cooler. Not good enough  

[LordLeewee]

much better than titan p, but what a beast! and yeah, 1080ti will end up better choice for gaming, ill stick to my 1080sli plan.

[Daiyus]

This is both good news and bad for me. My current plan to upgrade from my old HD 7870/720p TV set-up is to buy a 1080p card (RX 480, R9 390, GTX 1060), then buy a decent 2160p screen and game at 1080p, then buy a 4K capable GPU. 

 

The fact that this thing holds so much power bodes well for me that by the time I'm into that phase of saving and buying a 4K GPU there'll actually be some capable hardware as I still believe the GTX 1080 is too weak for perfect 4K gaming; looks like being patient and slumming nit with a four year old card is paying off. The price of the Titan X (Pascal) is insane though. I'm not sure how I'd justify that to my wife. I really hope that in a 12 to 18 months time AMD have kicked back with Vega and forced nVidia to start pricing competitively again so the market will hold something that'll do 2160p60 Ultra locked gaming for ~£600.

[Bouzoo]

1 hour ago, Senzelian said:

Is that even possible? I thought i has to be 12,8 or 4GB.

Iirc HBM is limited to 4,8 and 12, GDDR5X is free, like we got 6 GB GDDR5 980Ti and 1060. I'm sure someone will correct me. 

[RagnarokDel]

only 1200$ what a bargain!

[iiNNeX]

1 hour ago, gilang01 said:

I'm disappointed it still uses the same old reference cooler. Not good enough  

anyone who buys this better watercool it or else, so screw the cooler.

[marldorthegreat]

5 hours ago, Valermos said:

Had my hopes for HBM2 memory but this is still a beast. For that price it better drown the 1080's.

 

Still hoping for a 1080ti.

 

Yeah, and its also $1200, a 1080 ti will probably be $800-$900

[DELTAprime]

So much for HBM on the Titan. I guess if the 1080 Ti comes along now it will be GDDR5X also.

[asim1999]

Well now the question is will it support higher than 2 way SLI or ``will it even support SLI at all?

[Lays]

6 hours ago, SamStrecker said:

I am guessing no 1080ti as this is GP102 and the full fat GP100 with HBM2 comes out in August so we will still have to wait.

Well it says this is coming in August, this is probably the card everyone keeps saying was coming out in August.

 

It wouldn't make any sense to release full fat a few weeks after they release this unless it's like $1500.

[MilkJugg24]

They need to take lessons from Razer and call it the The New Titan X

[ThinkWithPortals]

I'm getting a sense of deja vu from the name...