(Update)Nvidia GP104 Pascal GPU Spotted in a shipment – Roughly ~350mm^2 Die Size, May not feature HBM, but GDDR5X memory

[VagabondWraith]

I hope nVidia releases these soon. I'm already ready to ditch my 980 Ti. Can't wait for Pascal!

[VagabondWraith]

But the fury x did that because of no reason, the heat was managed. the r9 nano shows that fiji was efficient. 

The Nano thermal throttles.

[KemoKa]

I would welcome a 650w GPU.  "Behold the nVidia Voodoo GTX, 1080 Titanium Edition x3!  With four 8-Pin connectors, 16gb of HBM2, and an HMC 512mb cache.  Three-GPUS, one card, one way that it was meant to be played."  Lol.. if that was a thing.  I'd so buy one.. just for the, "Well, this is an abomination."

Except that Nvidia GPUs don't support fewer than eight PCI Express lanes when running in SLI, so they'd have to bump their limitation down to at least 5.3 PCIe lanes.

 

It would be an abomination.

 

If you're going for a multi-GPU card, you can already get a 295x2, that'll draw about 600W...

 

[KemoKa]

The Nano thermal throttles.

Unless you water-cool it, then it turns beastmode.

[VagabondWraith]

Unless you water-cool it, then it turns beastmode.

Sure, unfortunately it only has 1 8 pin.

[azurezeed]

Meh this tell us nothing

[Citadelen]

It's probably a full system or comes with a system PSU. I can guarantee that no cards are going to be 650w, single, dual or even triple GPU cards (like that would ever happen).

*points at GTX 485* (if it ever existed)

[Shoob]

That's a pretty small die (almost as small as Tahiti). If the midrange Pascal GPUs match the 980 Ti, it will be great.
 

*points at GTX 485* (if it ever existed)

There was a 485M afaik, but the GTX 480 was the heater. (mostly due to the bad reference cooler)

[marldorthegreat]

The Nano thermal throttles.

On a small 6 inch cooler with 1 fan, yeah of course it will. But it uses <200 watts of power.

[KemoKa]

Is the GTX 1070 going to have full-speed access to only 7GB of its memory?

 

Yes. You're right. You're absolutely right. I'm never going to let it go. Never. Deal with it.

[Shoob]

Is the GTX 1070 going to have full-speed access to only 7GB of its memory?

 

Yes. You're right. You're absolutely right. I'm never going to let it go. Never. Deal with it.

Can't deal with it. 

I doubt we'll see such screw up with the current generation and HBM.

 

There's always room for other screw ups of course.

[don_svetlio]

Can't deal with it. 

I doubt we'll see such screw up with the current generation and HBM.

 

There's always room for other screw ups of course.

650W?

[Shoob]

650W?

Hell no. Polaris Pascal will surely be even more efficient than Maxwell.

[don_svetlio]

Hell no. Polaris will surely be even more efficient than Maxwell.

I mean Pascal

[Prysin]

Why? They are both manufactured by the same people aren't they? Maybe just first batches coming out.

no...

 

AMD is mostly using GloFo/Samsung AND TSCM... Nvidia is purely using TSCM....

[Coaxialgamer]

Wait wait wait, 650 watts? What?

where do you see 650W ?

[Coaxialgamer]

But the fury x did that because of no reason, the heat was managed. the r9 nano shows that fiji was efficient. 

The main question is : why not ?

[Coaxialgamer]

Unless you water-cool it, then it turns beastmode.

and then you can flash it to a fury x , and you basically have a ghetto fury x !

[don_svetlio]

where do you see 650W ?

first line of text

[DarkBlade2117]

I honestly would lose my shit if we suddenly need 750W to power a single Nvidia GPU system. I mean, when they said "10x higher than Maxwell" did they mean power draw?

Ehh good thing I got me a 850w PSU

[MageTank]

where do you see 650W ?

It is on the image itself, it is not a text you will find using control + F. 

 

 

650 WATTS TEC is what @don_svetlio is referring to.

 

However, i personally do not see it using 650w. It might be total system consumption like others have stated, or the usual over-estimation that us done with every GPU. After all, we can run 980 Ti's on 500w PSU's, when the recommendation is 600w.

[KemoKa]

and then you can flash it to a fury x , and you basically have a ghetto fury x !

afaik that's the Fury. The R9 Nano is a Fury X binned to run at 175W. It has the same specs as the Fury X, same number of shaders, ROP count, you name it... it just has a 6" cooler on it.

[Coaxialgamer]

It is on the image itself, it is not a text you will find using control + F. 

 

 

650 WATTS TEC is what @don_svetlio is referring to.

 

However, i personally do not see it using 650w. It might be total system consumption like others have stated, or the usual over-estimation that us done with every GPU. After all, we can run 980 Ti's on 500w PSU's, when the recommendation is 600w.

IDK , maybe it's a dual gpu , like the titan Z ?

[MageTank]

IDK , maybe it's a dual gpu , like the titan Z ?

Would be pretty odd for Nvidia to come out swinging like that out of the gate. They normally reserve those cards until the very end, after they've already milked the enthusiasts dry with normal Ti and Titan cards. 

[marldorthegreat]

I mean Pascal

Agreed, 2x the efficiency of of fiji. Which is MORE efficient than maxwell.