Jump to content

The GT 1030 GDDR5 Isn't a bad card at all

Mattk13

It can play literally any game 20-70 fps MSAA Off

GTA V High Settings 45-60FPS

Minecraft Max settings (With optifine) 100-1000Fps

Rocket League high settings MSAA Max 60fps solid

GTA IV 60 FPS Very High settings

Doom (new) Medium Settings MSAA Turned off 40-50 fps lows to 30-25

Overwatch High settings 50-60 FPS

Witcher 3 Wild Hunt High settings 30-40 fps

This is all based on the processor you have

and the ram installed on your machine

this card isn't bad just don't get the DDR4 Version as it is clocked lower and has half the performance.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what, the 750ti cost much less (because it's used), is slightly faster, and supports Geforce Experience features like Shadowplay

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this mean you replaced the i3 3240 that was causing you issues? If so, what did you replace it with?

 

 

CPU: Intel i7 6700k  | Motherboard: Gigabyte Z170x Gaming 5 | RAM: 2x16GB 3000MHz Corsair Vengeance LPX | GPU: Gigabyte Aorus GTX 1080ti | PSU: Corsair RM750x (2018) | Case: BeQuiet SilentBase 800 | Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34 eSports | SSD: Samsung 970 Evo 500GB + Samsung 840 500GB + Crucial MX500 2TB | Monitor: Acer Predator XB271HU + Samsung BX2450

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mattk13 said:

It can play literally any game 20-70 fps MSAA Off

GTA V High Settings 45-60FPS

Minecraft Max settings (With optifine) 100-1000Fps

Rocket League high settings MSAA Max 60fps solid

GTA IV 60 FPS Very High settings

Doom (new) Medium Settings MSAA Turned off 40-50 fps lows to 30-25

Overwatch High settings 50-60 FPS

Witcher 3 Wild Hunt High settings 30-40 fps

This is all based on the processor you have

and the ram installed on your machine

this card isn't bad just don't get the DDR4 Version as it is clocked lower and has half the performance.

 

At what? 480p?

Specs: CPU - Intel i7 8700K @ 5GHz | GPU - Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 Gaming | Motherboard - ASUS Strix Z370-G WIFI AC | RAM - XPG Gammix DDR4-3000MHz 32GB (2x16GB) | Main Drive - Samsung 850 Evo 500GB M.2 | Other Drives - 7TB/3 Drives | CPU Cooler - Corsair H100i Pro | Case - Fractal Design Define C Mini TG | Power Supply - EVGA G3 850W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mattk13 said:

i7 3770

Very nice!

Glad to see you were able to remove the CPU as the bottleneck and improve your performance.

CPU: Intel i7 6700k  | Motherboard: Gigabyte Z170x Gaming 5 | RAM: 2x16GB 3000MHz Corsair Vengeance LPX | GPU: Gigabyte Aorus GTX 1080ti | PSU: Corsair RM750x (2018) | Case: BeQuiet SilentBase 800 | Cooler: Arctic Freezer 34 eSports | SSD: Samsung 970 Evo 500GB + Samsung 840 500GB + Crucial MX500 2TB | Monitor: Acer Predator XB271HU + Samsung BX2450

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

as far as really low end goes not bad if you're stuck with it like it was included with a desktop or something, but just flat out a bad value to buy. 

muh specs 

Gaming and HTPC (reparations)- ASUS 1080, MSI X99A SLI Plus, 5820k- 4.5GHz @ 1.25v, asetek based 360mm AIO, RM 1000x, 16GB memory, 750D with front USB 2.0 replaced with 3.0  ports, 2 250GB 850 EVOs in Raid 0 (why not, only has games on it), some hard drives

Screens- Acer preditor XB241H (1080p, 144Hz Gsync), LG 1080p ultrawide, (all mounted) directly wired to TV in other room

Stuff- k70 with reds, steel series rival, g13, full desk covering mouse mat

All parts black

Workstation(desk)- 3770k, 970 reference, 16GB of some crucial memory, a motherboard of some kind I don't remember, Micomsoft SC-512N1-L/DVI, CM Storm Trooper (It's got a handle, can you handle that?), 240mm Asetek based AIO, Crucial M550 256GB (upgrade soon), some hard drives, disc drives, and hot swap bays

Screens- 3  ASUS VN248H-P IPS 1080p screens mounted on a stand, some old tv on the wall above it. 

Stuff- Epicgear defiant (solderless swappable switches), g600, moutned mic and other stuff. 

Laptop docking area- 2 1440p korean monitors mounted, one AHVA matte, one samsung PLS gloss (very annoying, yes). Trashy Razer blackwidow chroma...I mean like the J key doesn't click anymore. I got a model M i use on it to, but its time for a new keyboard. Some edgy Utechsmart mouse similar to g600. Hooked to laptop dock for both of my dell precision laptops. (not only docking area)

Shelf- i7-2600 non-k (has vt-d), 380t, some ASUS sandy itx board, intel quad nic. Currently hosts shared files, setting up as pfsense box in VM. Also acts as spare gaming PC with a 580 or whatever someone brings. Hooked into laptop dock area via usb switch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol, now i remember you. you're always hostile when people tell you the GT 1030 isn't good, maybe it's buyers remorse and you're trying to convince you're self you bought the right thing because its better than admitting fault.

 

however you look at it, the price to performance of the GT1030 is terrible, is it a bad card? technically no, but there are much much better options for the same price

🌲🌲🌲

 

 

 

◒ ◒ 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

We can all make bad buying decisions, its how we learn from them and move on in life and enjoy our purchases.

My friend recently paid $15k for an suv and the gas mileage is not good, there is no storage so he needs to buy a box for the roof. People do that all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mattk13 said:

It can play literally any game 20-70 fps MSAA Off

GTA V High Settings 45-60FPS

Minecraft Max settings (With optifine) 100-1000Fps

Rocket League high settings MSAA Max 60fps solid

GTA IV 60 FPS Very High settings

Doom (new) Medium Settings MSAA Turned off 40-50 fps lows to 30-25

Overwatch High settings 50-60 FPS

Witcher 3 Wild Hunt High settings 30-40 fps

This is all based on the processor you have

and the ram installed on your machine

this card isn't bad just don't get the DDR4 Version as it is clocked lower and has half the performance.

 

Yes and no. The GT 1030, like the GT 730 before it, has a handful of situations in which it's very useful. Of course, if you find a used GDDR5 model in good shape for $40-50, yeah, grab it. If you find a $40-50 GTX 750 Ti, get that instead, because it outperforms the GT 1030 and costs considerably less on the used market. Truthfully, there's really no situation in which I'd consider a brand new GT 1030 to be a good buy.

 

Some other perfectly good uses for it:

  • SFF gaming rig. The 1030 takes up something like 30W at full load, so if you've got a SFF Optiplex that you want to do some light gaming on, you could do a whole lot worse. I'd actually argue that the 1030 is a better option for that use case than the MSI low-profile GTX 750 Ti I'm using in my Optiplex is because of its lower power draw and lower heat output in a very compact case with iffy airflow.
  • Giving a suitable GPU to an old system. If you've got a Core 2 Quad system sitting around and you just want to play Overwatch as cheaply as you can, a used 1030 would be a good card for it. But again, 750 Tis are cheaper, and if your system can support a 750 Ti comfortably, do that.
  • Low-profile HTPCs. Yes, it's the best "value" Pascal card for an HTPC, as the slim form 1050 and 1050 Ti still have a pretty sharp premium on them, but even a 4K HTPC would be fine with something like a GT 730 or R7 240 for a whole lot less. Hell, even the lowly GT 710 can push 4K at 24 Hz. If your low profile HTPC needs to do some basic gaming at 1080p while pushing 4K for video content, a 1030 makes sense.

It bears noting that the RX 550 is a stronger card than the 1030, but for whatever reason it still sells at a price approaching (or past) $100 new, at which point you're better off spending up a little for a 1050 or a 460. The real 1030 killer, though, is the Ryzen 5 2400G. Vega 11 performs very similarly to the GT 1030, but the AMD APU is a much better buy. For one, the cost of parts would probably come out in AMD's favor if someone was pairing the 1030 with a G5400 Pentium, and definitely would come out in AMD's favor is the GT 1030 were being paired with an i3-8100 or i5-8400 to try and match the performance of the stronger Ryzen chip. Bottom line, if you're buying new, there is absolutely no reason to go with a GT 1030 over a Ryzen APU, even the Ryzen 3 2200G.

 

If you're buying used or just need a GPU, you could do worse than the 1030, but the prices it goes for used still don't make a whole lot of sense when a more powerful GTX 750 Ti goes for the same price or less.

Aerocool DS are the best fans you've never tried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a bad card.

 

If you're in that range there is absolutly no reason you should be spening more for what you can(more or less) do with a Ryzen APU (for much less, thanks to Ryzen 3 pricing, AM4 MoBo pricing etc).

 

And if you're willing to spend that cash, ultimately better to just go higher...or, of course, just go used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, aisle9 said:

Yes and no. The GT 1030, like the GT 730 before it, has a handful of situations in which it's very useful. Of course, if you find a used GDDR5 model in good shape for $40-50, yeah, grab it. If you find a $40-50 GTX 750 Ti, get that instead, because it outperforms the GT 1030 and costs considerably less on the used market. Truthfully, there's really no situation in which I'd consider a brand new GT 1030 to be a good buy.

 

Some other perfectly good uses for it:

  • SFF gaming rig. The 1030 takes up something like 30W at full load, so if you've got a SFF Optiplex that you want to do some light gaming on, you could do a whole lot worse. I'd actually argue that the 1030 is a better option for that use case than the MSI low-profile GTX 750 Ti I'm using in my Optiplex is because of its lower power draw and lower heat output in a very compact case with iffy airflow.
  • Giving a suitable GPU to an old system. If you've got a Core 2 Quad system sitting around and you just want to play Overwatch as cheaply as you can, a used 1030 would be a good card for it. But again, 750 Tis are cheaper, and if your system can support a 750 Ti comfortably, do that.
  • Low-profile HTPCs. Yes, it's the best "value" Pascal card for an HTPC, as the slim form 1050 and 1050 Ti still have a pretty sharp premium on them, but even a 4K HTPC would be fine with something like a GT 730 or R7 240 for a whole lot less. Hell, even the lowly GT 710 can push 4K at 24 Hz. If your low profile HTPC needs to do some basic gaming at 1080p while pushing 4K for video content, a 1030 makes sense.

It bears noting that the RX 550 is a stronger card than the 1030, but for whatever reason it still sells at a price approaching (or past) $100 new, at which point you're better off spending up a little for a 1050 or a 460. The real 1030 killer, though, is the Ryzen 5 2400G. Vega 11 performs very similarly to the GT 1030, but the AMD APU is a much better buy. For one, the cost of parts would probably come out in AMD's favor if someone was pairing the 1030 with a G5400 Pentium, and definitely would come out in AMD's favor is the GT 1030 were being paired with an i3-8100 or i5-8400 to try and match the performance of the stronger Ryzen chip. Bottom line, if you're buying new, there is absolutely no reason to go with a GT 1030 over a Ryzen APU, even the Ryzen 3 2200G.

 

If you're buying used or just need a GPU, you could do worse than the 1030, but the prices it goes for used still don't make a whole lot of sense when a more powerful GTX 750 Ti goes for the same price or less.

I have a sff optiplex or i would have put a 1050ti in this the power is a big issue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, N1NJ4W4RR10R said:

It's a bad card.

 

If you're in that range there is absolutly no reason you should be spening more for what you can(more or less) do with a Ryzen APU (for much less, thanks to Ryzen 3 pricing, AM4 MoBo pricing etc).

 

And if you're willing to spend that cash, ultimately better to just go higher...or, of course, just go used.

not really...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Arika S said:

buyers remorse and you're trying to convince you're self you bought the right thing because its better than admitting fault

many men are guilty of this so frustrating lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, emosun said:

many men are guilty of this so frustrating lol

I learnt my mistake last time I bought electronics. Turned out the phone didn't support the 4g frequency in my area and the laptop was...bad.

 

The gut knows all, don't ignore the buyers remorse!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, N1NJ4W4RR10R said:

I learnt my mistake last time I bought electronics. Turned out the phone didn't support the 4g frequency in my area and the laptop was...bad.

 

The gut knows all, don't ignore the buyers remorse!!!

a friend told me to get this card cause it was '' good '' bought had fun want something better now XD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mattk13 said:

not really...

Eh, maybe I just have to much money :shrug:

 

Was gonna say how it'd be better to just buy an APU then save moey for a grphics card. But then I realised people buying 1030s will probably be running with chips like the Athlon 200GE (assuming they go new).

 

So I suppose for the budget line it might be somewhat worth it. Though I'd personally still just go with a 2200G then save for something like a 1050 (only about $100 more than the cheapest 1030 I found).

 

All, of course, assuming new parts...because I can't b bothered searching up used parts prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2018 at 9:23 PM, N1NJ4W4RR10R said:

Eh, maybe I just have to much money :shrug:

 

Was gonna say how it'd be better to just buy an APU then save moey for a grphics card. But then I realised people buying 1030s will probably be running with chips like the Athlon 200GE (assuming they go new).

Athlon 200GE: $55

GT 1030 GDDR5: $80

 

Ryzen 5 2400G: $159

 

That's a difference of $34. For that price, you get integrated graphics right on par with the GT 1030, more or less, and a processor with two more cores, four more threads, a higher base clock speed and overclockability. There's no real competition there. The 200GE is not a "stepping stone" to a better CPU/APU. It's an endpoint for office PCs, HTPCs and ultra budget gamers who want an A320 board, cheaper 2666MHz RAM and a used RX 460 to play Fortnite with.

Aerocool DS are the best fans you've never tried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/12/2018 at 7:10 AM, Mattk13 said:

It can play literally any game 20-70 fps MSAA Off

GTA V High Settings 45-60FPS

Minecraft Max settings (With optifine) 100-1000Fps

Rocket League high settings MSAA Max 60fps solid

GTA IV 60 FPS Very High settings

Doom (new) Medium Settings MSAA Turned off 40-50 fps lows to 30-25

Overwatch High settings 50-60 FPS

Witcher 3 Wild Hunt High settings 30-40 fps

This is all based on the processor you have

and the ram installed on your machine

this card isn't bad just don't get the DDR4 Version as it is clocked lower and has half the performance.

 

Wow, impressive! Maybe I should have gotten the GT1030 instead throwing away a wad of cash for the RTX 2080 Ti I had gotten.??

Main Rig: AMD AM4 R9 5900X (12C/24T) + Tt Water 3.0 ARGB 360 AIO | Gigabyte X570 Aorus Xtreme | 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 3600C16 | XFX MERC 310 RX 7900 XTX | 256GB Sabrent Rocket NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen 3.0 (OS) | 4TB Lexar NM790 NVMe M.2 PCIe4x4 | 2TB TG Cardea Zero Z440 NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen4x4 | 4TB Samsung 860 EVO SATA SSD | 2TB Samsung 860 QVO SATA SSD | 6TB WD Black HDD | CoolerMaster H500M | Corsair HX1000 Platinum | Topre Type Heaven + Seenda Ergonomic W/L Vertical Mouse + 8BitDo Ultimate 2.4G | iFi Micro iDSD Black Label | Philips Fidelio B97 | C49HG90DME 49" 32:9 144Hz Freesync 2 | Omnidesk Pro 2020 48" | 64bit Win11 Pro 23H2

2nd Rig: AMD AM4 R9 3900X + TR PA 120 SE | Gigabyte X570S Aorus Elite AX | 2x 16GB Patriot Viper Elite II DDR4 4000MHz | Sapphire Nitro+ RX 6900 XT | 500GB Crucial P2 Plus NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen 4.0 (OS)2TB Adata Legend 850 NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen4x4 |  2TB Kingston NV2 NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen4x4 | 4TB Leven JS600 SATA SSD | 2TB Seagate HDD | Keychron K2 + Logitech G703 | SOLDAM XR-1 Black Knight | Enermax MAXREVO 1500 | 64bit Win11 Pro 23H2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just purchased this card as well (Gigabyte OC GDDR5 version) to throw into a retired xeon server as a project build. So many claim that its a terrible value, and yes that is true, but so is every card on the market these days. GPU prices have gone through the roof thanks to GPU miners. A lot of people recommend going used, which isnt a bad idea considering you can get a 750 Ti at a great price these days however, there's some counterfeit cards on the used market these days as well so it's a gamble. So someone looking for a deal, The 1030 GDDR5 version is the way to go in my opinion as its only $100 CAD, The GTX 1050's start at $180 CAD.

Intel Core i7 9700F / Cooler Master 212 Evo / GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER / 16 GB G.SKILL RAM @ 2666MHz / GA-B365M-DS3H / EVGA 500w PSU

HP Pavilion Gaming 15 / Ryzen 5 4600H / GeForce GTX 1050 / 8 GB @ 3200MHz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×