Would You Rather Tech Game 2.0

[Clanscorpia]

13 minutes ago, KingKeith55 said:

Mouse and keyboard in the wrong hands, I could probably get used to it.

 

Have a PC that's loud as and sounds like a blowdryer/vacuum cleaner but is very powerful? Or have a quiet PC that performs the same as a PS4/Xbox One?

 

Loud PC. Server room  WYR have a toaster or an ps4

[Syros119]

7 minutes ago, Clanscorpia said:

Loud PC. Server room  WYR have a toaster or an ps4

Toaster, can do something useful...XD

 

WYR have a side panel with crap inside or no side panel with leds inside

[MoonlightSylv]

6 minutes ago, Syros119 said:

Toaster, can do something useful...XD

 

WYR have a side panel with crap inside or no side panel with leds inside

No side panel with LEDs inside, it'd be likens windows but you can touch the parts

 

WYR attempt to eat a deep fried Pentium 4 or throw you desktop onto concrete?

[Sauron]

4 minutes ago, ShadowTechXTS said:

WYR attempt to eat a deep fried Pentium 4 or throw you desktop onto concrete?

Desktop onto concrete, I'm pretty sure the 800D can take it. I'd be a bit concerned about the graphics card yanking out the pcie slot but it's still better than what I think would lead to certain death...

 

Would you rather become world champion of a game you don't like, or be really awful at a game you enjoy?

[kakhat]

6 hours ago, Sauron said:

Desktop onto concrete, I'm pretty sure the 800D can take it. I'd be a bit concerned about the graphics card yanking out the pcie slot but it's still better than what I think would lead to certain death...

 

Would you rather become world champion of a game you don't like, or be really awful at a game you enjoy?

I rather became champion in game i dont like

Would you  rather  have a powerful pc with no paid games ever or pc as strong as ps4 with every game you want 

 

[z123killer]

23 minutes ago, kakhat said:

I rather became champion in game i dont like

Would you  rather  have a powerful pc with no paid games ever or pc as strong as ps4 with every game you want 

 

 

Second Option.

 

Would You Rather play browser games your whole life or cool games that are on low graphics, very low FPS?

[BingoFishy]

23 minutes ago, z123killer said:

Second Option.

 

Would You Rather play browser games your whole life or cool games that are on low graphics, very low FPS?

Browser games. BTD ftw.

 

WYR have a glass phone screen, moto style shatterproof screen, or Samsung style shatterproof screen?

[Grovers1]

Deleted

[Grovers1]

1 hour ago, BingoFishy said:

WYR have a glass phone screen, moto style shatterproof screen, or Samsung style shatterproof screen?

Samsung style shatterproof.

 

Would you rather a Duel core CPU at 5Ghz or a Quad core CPU at 2Ghz? No overclocking.

 

[BingoFishy]

9 hours ago, Grovers1 said:

Samsung style shatterproof.

 

Would you rather a Duel core CPU at 5Ghz or a Quad core CPU at 2Ghz? No overclocking.

 

Dual core. I won't be able to run VMs or certain games well, but it's okay. The most CPU intensive game I play is probably KSP, but that can be run off a dual core.

 

WYR use a spoon AND a fork, or just a spork?

[AlTech]

Just now, BingoFishy said:

Dual core. I won't be able to run VMs or certain games well, but it's okay. The most CPU intensive game I play is probably KSP, but that can be run off a dual core.

 

WYR use a spoon AND a fork, or just a spork?

Ummm..... Tech related pls. It's in the name of the title.......

[BingoFishy]

13 minutes ago, AluminiumTech said:

Ummm..... Tech related pls. It's in the name of the title.......

It's tech. Someone had to invent it.

[AlTech]

29 minutes ago, BingoFishy said:

It's tech. Someone had to invent it.

Would you rather, have 8 Extremely Low Power cores (Think AMD Potato Jaguar cores) or have 2 High Performance cores (Think Intel Core i3)/?

[insyght]

26 minutes ago, AluminiumTech said:

Would you rather, have 8 Extremely Low Power cores (Think AMD Potato Jaguar cores) or have 2 High Performance cores (Think Intel Core i3)/?

2 Cores.

 

Would you rather use your shitty laptop to game or not game at all?

[malon]

28 minutes ago, AluminiumTech said:

Would you rather, have 8 Extremely Low Power cores (Think AMD Potato Jaguar cores) or have 2 High Performance cores (Think Intel Core i3)/?

 

For the sake of gaming on pc give me 2 high performance cores assuming they are hypertreaded

 

WYR  in a game where sound/voices and visuals/clear details are equally important rather have a 55inch craptastic tv only capable of 360p resolution with thebest custom hifi audio solution in the world ,or the best tv/monitor of your prefered size resolution and paneltype with all your prefered features but an loud terrible unclear and distorted audio solition that is so bad you get physicly ill listening to it( unable to turn sound off)

[AlTech]

Just now, malon said:

 

For the sake of gaming on pc give me 2 high performance cores assuming they are hypertreaded

 

WYR  in a game where sound/voices and visuals/clear details are equally important rather have a 55inch craptastic tv only capable of 360p resolution with thebest custom hifi audio solution in the world ,or the best tv/monitor of your prefered size resolution and paneltype with all your prefered features but an loud terrible unclear and distorted audio solition that is so bad you get physicly ill listening to it( unable to turn sound off)

Difficult question....... I hate low res gameplay or video and I hate distorted audio.

 

I think i'd have to go with TV.....

 

Would you rather, have a game running at 1080p Vsync at max settings or 144fps+ at high settings?

[Mr.Meerkat]

Just now, AluminiumTech said:

Would you rather, have a game running at 1080p Vsync at max settings or 144fps+ at high settings?

Ez question, 144fps+ on high (or even lower) settings  

 

WYR have triple 4K monitors with a potato (such as a gt740) or a single 720p monitor with a titan XP? 

[AlTech]

4 minutes ago, Mr.Meerkat said:

Ez question, 144fps+ on high (or even lower) settings  

 

WYR have triple 4K monitors with a potato (such as a gt740) or a single 720p monitor with a titan XP? 

720p monitor since you're idea with 4K is flawed since potato GPU can't even power it .

 

Would you rather, have your parents discover Porn on your phone OR have your school's Principal discover Porn on your Phone?

[Mr.Meerkat]

3 minutes ago, AluminiumTech said:

720p monitor since you're idea with 4K is flawed since potato GPU can't even power it .

 

Would you rather, have your parents discover Porn on your phone OR have your school's Principal discover Porn on your Phone?

Principal as they technically can't do anything about it unless I was sharing it  

 

WYR have a potato (pentium and something like a 740) running windows or a mac pro?

[AlTech]

3 minutes ago, Mr.Meerkat said:

Principal as they technically can't do anything about it unless I was sharing it  

 

WYR have a potato (pentium and something like a 740) running windows or a mac pro?

Mac Pro. I've used OS X in the past and I kinda liked it. it's just that I can't carry an OS X laptop and  a Windows laptop at the same time....

[MoonlightSylv]

2 minutes ago, Mr.Meerkat said:

Principal as they technically can't do anything about it unless I was sharing it  

 

WYR have a potato (pentium and something like a 740) running windows or a mac pro?

Potato because I could upgrade that.

 

Also I lived with an LGA 775 Pentium and an R7 240 for a while as my main PC.

 

WYR only be able to use 1080p 40" TVs as monitors (It's bad, trust me) or only use 1280x1024 monitors.

[Mr.Meerkat]

1 minute ago, ShadowTechXTS said:

WYR only be able to use 1080p 40" TVs as monitors (It's bad, trust me) or only use 1280x1024 monitors.

1280x1024 cause I'm a CSGO gamer  (although I play at low/med 1080p)

 

WYR have all the tech devices in the world but live in solitary confinement or only one tech device and be freeeeee?

[AlTech]

Just now, ShadowTechXTS said:

Potato because I could upgrade that.

 

Also I lived with an LGA 775 Pentium and an R7 240 for a while as my main PC.

 

WYR only be able to use 1080p 40" TVs as monitors (It's bad, trust me) or only use 1280x1024 monitors.

1280x1024 monitor since I love 4:3 monitors for programming or writing reports .

 

Would you rather, have a core i7 in the next Airbus flight computer system but run only at 100MHz (power consumption reasons) OR have an Atom in the next Airbus Computer system BUT it lags like hell and takes forever to register information (but it uses like 5x less power).

[BlueChinchillaEatingDorito]

9 hours ago, AluminiumTech said:

1280x1024 monitor since I love 4:3 monitors for programming or writing reports .

 

Would you rather, have a core i7 in the next Airbus flight computer system but run only at 100MHz (power consumption reasons) OR have an Atom in the next Airbus Computer system BUT it lags like hell and takes forever to register information (but it uses like 5x less power).

Have the Core i7. The entire aircraft is basically fly by wire now so any time a flight control has the possibility to lag behind is an accident waiting to happen.

 

Would you rather drive a fully autonomous or non-autonomous car if you were the only one in the world given that choice? Knowing that any accident you're involved in would be certainly blamed on you (minus mechanical problems); but you'll be the only person in the world to experience the joy of driving.

[AlTech]

26 minutes ago, BlueChinchillaEatingDorito said:

Have the Core i7. The entire aircraft is basically fly by wire now so any time a flight control has the possibility to lag behind is an accident waiting to happen.

 

Would you rather drive a fully autonomous or non-autonomous car if you were the only one in the world given that choice? Knowing that any accident you're involved in would be certainly blamed on you (minus mechanical problems); but you'll be the only person in the world to experience the joy of driving.

Autonomous.

 

would you rather have a $200 GPU which performs 50% slower than the flagship $800 GPU OR have a $800 GPU which performs 50% faster but has 4x less value for money?