New AMD RX 480 leaks- shows OC results in firestrike ultra

[Phoenix721]

Found this image today, shows an overclocked RX 480 and various test results. To be fair, I don't think that anyone will overclock their card to 3.2 GHZ (except for LN2) and also, I don't really think that at 1400 MHZ it will beat the fury x. But here it is, you can judge for yourselves.

[Kinda Bottlenecked]

The graph looks so suspicious. 

[Citadelen]

If this is true AMD have got a great overclocker.

[Majestic]

I think i'm going to make some leaked benchmarks aswell in Microsoft Excel.

[TheRandomness]

That looks like so much bullshit. 

[Phoenix721]

4 minutes ago, Pohernori said:

The graph looks so suspicious. 

I know, but new info, right?

[Phoenix721]

3 minutes ago, Citadelen said:

If this is true AMD have got a great overclocker.

I doubt this is true. 3.2 GHZ seems way too damn extreme.

[Majestic]

1 minute ago, Phoenix721 said:

I know, but new info, right?

30% OC, 28% scaling, on 4K with a 256bit memory bus. Doesn't strike you as fake?

 

Atleast have some technical filter when posting stuff.

[Phoenix721]

1 minute ago, Majestic said:

30% OC, 28% scaling, on 4K with a 256bit memory bus. Doesn't strike you as fake?

 

Atleast have some technical filter when posting stuff.

I know, as I said, I doubt this is real.

[Shoob]

Please, don't post every fake graph as "news". I mean, the original graph got debunked and this is next level of bullshitery.

[Citadelen]

1 minute ago, Phoenix721 said:

-snip-

The overclocked card is running at 1400MHz, where've you got 3.2 from? At 3.2GHz an RX 480 would easily be faster than a 1080.

[Thony]

This same as Nvidia and their 63C

[dragoon20005]

how the hell can a GPU OC up to 3.2GHz

 

 

 

AMD Answer

[DXMember]

10 minutes ago, Majestic said:

I think i'm going to make some leaked benchmarks aswell in Microsoft Excel.

already ahead of you

[Phoenix721]

6 minutes ago, Citadelen said:

The overclocked card is running at 1400MHz, where've you got 3.2 from? At 3.2GHz an RX 480 would easily be faster than a 1080.

The first one is overclocked at 3.2 and it IS -apparently- faster than the 1080.

[Paragon_X]

as much I would like for this card to be that fast, I cant see this happening thats 250% increase in clockspeed, even with LN2 it really far far fetched.

[Nacho Marco Segui]

1 minute ago, Phoenix721 said:

The first one is overclocked at 3.2 and it IS -apparently- faster than the 1080.

Yes, my 390 at 5 Ghz outperforms 1080 sli...

[Murasaki]

clickbait af

[Morgan MLGman]

What the fuck... Who in the world would believe in this graph?

[raphidy]

Let's hype this up sky high.

[handymanshandle]

33 minutes ago, Pohernori said:

The graph looks so suspicious. 

It kinda got me laughing, that's for sure.

 

 

[Murasaki]

4 minutes ago, raphidy said:

Let's hype this up sky high.

and then *drop*

[Herman Mcpootis]

i think my nose broke from smelling all this bullshit. i can't smell anything anymore!

[Bouzoo]

If we're to trust some sites, 480 can OC to 1600 MHz. But really, 3.2 GHz?

Is your source C:\Users\Phoenix721\Documents\RX480 Leaks?

[MageTank]

For this to be considered "news", doesn't there have to be a source link somewhere? Even reverse image searching fails to yield this same picture. Typing in "RX 480" on google, and clicking the news tab, also fails to bring up any indication of this graph.

 

If your intent was to make a joke, then you should probably post it elsewhere. Posting it in the news section is only going to make people believe it is true.