NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 3DMark performance From [ videocardz ] & [ChipHell]

[DildorTheDecent]

Was there ones with the original Titan?

Sadly, no. 

 

although Gigabyte did release a Windforce cooler i think. 

[Misanthrope]

I find it funny when people say the 290(x) is kicking everythings ass when it is a dual gpu Consumes more then double the power. The titan is truly a better card the price is kinda high as well however remember it consumes way less power so if you were upgrading a older computer you would need to upgrade your psu for a 290 series card making it most likely the same or near price of a 980. I would get the 980. Also some people just need the power of a titan and have the money or just want the best. So tell me still worth it? I actually use both amd and nvidia cards they are both great I just prefer nvidia.

It's not a complicated equation: half the price for dual 290xs means you have 600 bucks left for a better psu and a better case. The only compelling use right now (other than CUDA development) is Titan x sli for absolute best performance possible.

[i_build_nanosuits]

Obviously fake...the GM200 GPU will outperform the GTX 980 GM104 by a lot more than 20% like shown in the graphs..that's for sure!

 

Not really impressed here.

For a card that cost twice the price of a 980, it's barely 20% faster.

I'm sure those performance figures are pulled out of someone's ass...unless maybe the titan X is a significantly cut down version of the GM200 GPU.

[VerticalDiscussions]

4 TITAN X O-O?

 

 

Btw will we get avg 250 fps in Crysis 3 in 1080p with this card ?

[MegaDave91]

4 TITAN X O-O?

 

giphy.gif

 

Btw will we get avg 250 fps in Crysis 3 in 1080p with this card ?

I sincerely hope no one buys this card for 1080p.

[VerticalDiscussions]

I sincerely hope no one buys this card for 1080p.

oh k.....

[Arct1c0n]

I sincerely hope no one buys this card for 1080p.

 

So they have to get authorization to purchase stuff from you first? Interesting....  I game at 1200p, you wanna tell me what I can and can't do with my money?

[MegaDave91]

So they have to get authorization to purchase stuff from you first? Interesting....  I game at 1200p, you wanna tell me what I can and can't do with my money?

Interesting how you interpreted that because I never alluded to that.

 

Also, you want to tell me I can't share my opinion? 

[i_build_nanosuits]

I sincerely hope no one buys this card for 1080p.

Of course you buy this for 1080p Maxed out settings at 120FPS+ in FUTURE games...of course you do bro!

Unless you enoy playing games at 1440p medium settings 60ish FPS...

[JustCallMeVlad]

Obviously fake...the GM200 GPU will outperform the GTX 980 GM104 by a lot more than 20% like shown in the graphs..that's for sure!

 

I'm sure those performance figures are pulled out of someone's ass...unless maybe the titan X is a significantly cut down version of the GM200 GPU.

 

 

Im willing to bet they're pretty accurate. 

[Tiber1337]

They should've just called it 980 Ti and be done with it, the performance isn't much above a 980, certainly not enough for the price

[i_build_nanosuits]

Im willing to bet they're pretty accurate.

...unless the titan X is a significantly cut down GM200 GPU i can't see how it could be accurate...reviewers so far have been talking about twice the amount of cuda cores and rops when compaired to the current flagship GM104...how could twice the amount of cuda cores could translate into only a 20% performance increase? it just doesnt make sense...also don't you find it weird that reviewers so far have barely even been able to take a PICTURE of this card...and this website would have FOUR of them for testing already?! i'm telling you these results are BS.

 

They should've just called it 980 Ti and be done with it, the performance isn't much above a 980, certainly not enough for the price

it's a NEW GPU it will be under a new naming scheme when the mainstream GM200 based cards come out.

[JustCallMeVlad]

...unless the titan X is a significantly cut down GM200 GPU i can't see how it could be accurate...reviewers so far have been talking about twice the amount of cuda cores and rops when compaired to the current flagship GM104...how could twice the amount of cuda cores could translate into only a 20% performance increase? it just doesnt make sense...also don't you find it weird that reviewers so far have barely even been able to take a PICTURE of this card...and this website would have FOUR of them for testing already?! i'm telling you these results are BS.

 

it's a NEW GPU it will be under a new naming scheme when the mainstream GM200 based cards come out.

 

 

Tons of people already have them in their hands for reviews. Linus has one, Jayztwocents has one. Reviewers have them and as for the bad scores. Stock clocks.. These arent maxed out 

[i_build_nanosuits]

Tons of people already have them in their hands for reviews. Linus has one, Jayztwocents has one. Reviewers have them and as for the bad scores. Stock clocks.. These arent maxed out

There is also most likely at least one or two SMX units disabled on this card...the yields for such huge chips usualy arent that good...nvidia is probably setting the perfect one's aside for the top end quadro's and next mainstream flagship cards...but i'm sure the titan X will still be a lot more than 20% stronger than a GTX 980.

[JustCallMeVlad]

There is also most likely at least one or two SMX units disabled on this card...the yields for such huge chips usualy arent that good...nvidia is probably setting the perfect one's aside for the top end quadro's and next mainstream flagship cards...but i'm sure the titan X will still be a lot more than 20% stronger than a GTX 980.

 

And what happens when reviews come out and they're right? 

[patrickjp93]

...unless the titan X is a significantly cut down GM200 GPU i can't see how it could be accurate...reviewers so far have been talking about twice the amount of cuda cores and rops when compaired to the current flagship GM104...how could twice the amount of cuda cores could translate into only a 20% performance increase? it just doesnt make sense...also don't you find it weird that reviewers so far have barely even been able to take a PICTURE of this card...and this website would have FOUR of them for testing already?! i'm telling you these results are BS.

 

it's a NEW GPU it will be under a new naming scheme when the mainstream GM200 based cards come out.

No, it's 3072 cores vs. 2048 in the 980. 50% more cores, but lowered clocks, greater bandwidth, but release drivers. For now a 20-25% boost lends itself very well to these figures with all this in mind.

[FireFox]

That seems pretty good if it is real but I'm waiting on the GTX 980 Ti

[fringie]

Not as impressive as I thought it'd be ;o.

[OlekKing]

Those numbers seem kind of... Off, only a 20% at the most  increase for what will likely cost more than twice as much as a 980? I was kinda expecting something, crazy with all the hype they gave it :l

Close to 50% just based off those benches.

Titan is running on 1222Mhz in the bench, it's 35% faster than the 980 G1 which boosts to 1400 and above by default, you add up the difference in clock speed and it gives around 45%, that's what the difference would be if both cards were running at the same frequency.

In the bench there's a non OC 980 which boosts to around 1220Mhz by default, there's a 45% gap between that an the Titan X running at 1222Mhz.

[MLGNOSCOPEHEADSHOTGETREKT]

DONT BUY THIS BULLCRAP.THE R9295X2 PERFORMS BETTER THEN THE SINGLE TITAN X

[Guest Kloaked]

Not really impressed here.

For a card that cost twice the price of a 980, it's barely 20% faster.

 

Did they even announce the price?

[sgloux3470]

Obviously fake...the GM200 GPU will outperform the GTX 980 GM104 by a lot more than 20% like shown in the graphs..that's for sure!

I'm sure those performance figures are pulled out of someone's ass...unless maybe the titan X is a significantly cut down version of the GM200 GPU.

I dunno, the 960 numbers were pretty spot on and Maxwell has generally been a pretty miniscule improvement over Kepler.

[SurvivorNVL]

If this is GM200, I want to -hope- this is finally 20nm.  Techpowerup had said that nVidia themselves claims this to be more powerful than the Titan Z, and that was two fully enabled Blacks on a single pcb.  If this performs 50% above the 980 and with DX12 offers 100% scaling for each additional card - this is going to be a monster single card solution, and I hope that for once there'll be more than just the reference version.  Really wish the whole 3xx line-up would just be shown already, or a release for the 380(x) to the 390(x).  Need that upgrade ;-;

[i_build_nanosuits]

I dunno, the 960 numbers were pretty spot on and Maxwell has generally been a pretty miniscule improvement over Kepler.

well...1664 (GTX 970) maxwell cuda cores is roughly equals to 2688 (vanilla titan) kepler cuda cores...so it's roughly a 60% performance increase PER CORE...i call that nothing short of spectacular personally.

 

now, what a 3072 maxwell cuda cores can deliver in terms of performance...wow

[sgloux3470]

well...1664 (GTX 970) maxwell cuda cores is roughly equals to 2688 (vanilla titan) kepler cuda cores...so it's roughly a 60% performance increase PER CORE...i call that nothing short of spectacular personally.

now, what a 3072 maxwell cuda cores can deliver in terms of performance...wow

But they cut down the number of cores.

The end of the day performance difference between the 780Ti and 980 or 970/780 are pretty mediocre.