5k monitor

[jamese669]

sooooo there appears too be a 5k monitor from dell

 

 

http://www.maximumpc.com/dells_5k_monitor_pre_reviewed_2014

 

 

is it me or is this too much too soon

 

i mean it nice to have new stuff and i mean 5120x2880 is probably a badass res to watch porn on but it's undoubtedly holy of god expensive

and you probably have to jump through a few techie hoops to get it working. once i got 3 4k monitors on my gtx 21324354 and pay only 20 quid then ill want 5k

if already posted dont bother telling me just get mod to remove

 

STOP THE PRESSES

http://www.eteknix.com/4k-old-news-lg-introduces-8k-98-inch-screen/

seriosly!! 8k??
 

[Lays]

14.74 million pixels = 5k

 

8.33 million pixels = 4k

 

 

woa

[brownninja97]

Dell arent waiting around, 4k is for babies.

[Bloodyvalley]

WTF??? MAKE 4K AFFORDABLE FIRST

[Deletive]

"Dell didn't know the price this morning but according to a press release from the company this afternoon the monitor will cost $2,499.99."

WAIT 5K MONITOR FOR 2.5k?

[qwertywarrior]

why the hell is this guy using a wide lens .....

[zacRupnow]

1080pPoorPCMasterRace

[totjup5]

And it only requires 4 titan blacks to run games on high!

[Victorious Secret]

This is for people who own one of these

 

 

And those obscenely rich enthusiasts. 

[ijKs Snow]

Anyone know who's manufacturing the panels?

[Murdoch]

So are we gonna permanently switch to just using the horizontal pixel count as the naming convention for resolutions?

 

480, 720, 1080, 1440... you will forever be in my heart (RIP).

[UnknownDepths]

All you need are four Titans in SLI for a proper framerate! Seriously though it's too soon and i'm sure only a small portion of people game at 4k.

[felixthemaster1]

1080pPoorPCMasterRace

Hopefully 1080p monitors will go sub $100

[Deletive]

This is for people who own one of these

 

 

And those obscenely rich enthusiasts.

Rich enthusiasts? Thats more like the Industry.

[Swndlr]

And it only requires 4 titan blacks to run games on high!

games on medium*

[Swndlr]

love the way the dude said at the end that all of our 4k panels that we just bought are now... obsolete. 

[JonD7]

Isn't the successor to 4k, 8k?

I don't give an F about this personally, we need an OS that can properly scale high resolutions and IPS monitors with faster response times... and G-sync.

I'm annoyed now.

[othertomperson]

I prefer that 4K is an exact multiple of 1080p so there's no interpolation when viewing HD content. But there's no reason PC monitors need to adopt cinematographic or TV standards. I think the way 1080p became a standard for so long and 1440p and 16:9 became niche and expensive was a detriment to PC use in general.

[patrickjp93]

Isn't the successor to 4k, 8k?

I don't give an F about this personally, we need an OS that can properly scale high resolutions and IPS monitors with faster response times... and G-sync.

I'm annoyed now.

Yes

We have one, called Linux.

IPS is limited to 4ms unless someone puts together lightning-fast graphene switches.

[Norman_the_Owl]

But...why?

 

It just seems like a trivial jump in pixels...But then again...that 1000 or so pixel jump is still nearly more than some of my monitors

[GoodBytes]

That's nice... but it's I still see glare, and prefer non glossy... so I'll only buy 4 of them.

[eLucid]

5K at sub 30" Yeah, no thanks.

[GoodBytes]

So apparently the monitor is 2,500$ based on the maximimumPC article. That is actually cheap.

I mean, considering that the current 32-inch 4K is 3500$, required added circuitry to merge 2 DisplayPort to output 1 image, and is 5K, and not the more produced 4K panels. Based on the video it also looks like it is an IPS panel, or a derivative from.

[patrickjp93]

5K at sub 30" Yeah, no thanks.

I'd love 4K 16:10 at 24-26" honestly.

[jamese669]

1080pPoorPCMasterRace

i think id rather use 1080p overe anything higher. it easier to run