Rate the Photo Above you

[bob345]

8.5 out of 10

Nice and simple, love it

Mine was taken with an Asus Transformer Infinity, edited in the stock editor. I have lots more of flowers but thought this was pretty cool

6/10, its a good subject, but it seems to be a bit out of focus and looks a bit over edited. Other than that it looks like a good picture. Macro shots can be hard to do well.

 

Here is a picture i took while on a road trip to yellowstone national park

 

[virusal19]

8.5/10, would've loved the shot if the river was centered so that the river looks like it's dividing the two sides. Nonetheless, it's still a good shot. 

Anyways, here is my shot. Taken awhile ago at Hillarys Boat Harbour in Perth, WA. 

[NeverNotExhausted]

8.5/10, would've loved the shot if the river was centered so that the river looks like it's dividing the two sides. Nonetheless, it's still a good shot. 

Anyways, here is my shot. Taken awhile ago at Hillarys Boat Harbour in Perth, WA. 

 

7/10, loving that scene a ton, But it's lacking sharpness and is pretty noisy, That cloud formation is amazing though!

 

Here's mine, Taken with a 5D Mk iii, 24-105 f4L lens, 100ISO, f/4, 4 second shutter.

 

http://i.imgur.com/jNfmGcy.jpg

 

[PhantomChevron]

7/10, loving that scene a ton, But it's lacking sharpness and is pretty noisy, That cloud formation is amazing though!

 

Here's mine, Taken with a 5D Mk iii, 24-105 f4L lens, 100ISO, f/4, 4 second shutter.

 

http://i.imgur.com/jNfmGcy.jpg

9/10, really loving the lights and the ship near the bottom, good picture

 

Can't remember what setting I used for this shot:

[NeverNotExhausted]

9/10, really loving the lights and the ship near the bottom, good picture

 

Can't remember what setting I used for this shot:

 

It's actually a bar built in to the structure of the bridge above it instead of a ship Thank you for the awesome rating though!

[Tam3n]

9/10, really loving the lights and the ship near the bottom, good picture

 

Can't remember what setting I used for this shot:

 

6/10 Nice angle. However, I find the photo has too much glare, noise reduction (blurry) and washed out look.

 

I just can't stop taking some panos The previous day we were playing in some nice waves at the ocean, but the next morning it was all nice and calm.

[oThatsEric]

9/10, is a dam nice banner wallpaper. 

 

anyone in ontario, this is from Stouffville motorfest 2014 )

 

[monaka25]

               @oThatsEric    Thats a great picture, great lighting! I say 8/10 I like the black and white, great with this picture. I took the 2 points off because normally, I like to see a more focus of a scenery of a broad area, without blurred sides, or a specific subject,with closer and slightly different angles, with blur around it to the attention is around the subject. Very great, I like it 

 

     I got my Canon Powershot SX150 IS recently in a trade, but before that, when it was raining, I took some pictures, and the night of the day it rained(when raining was done) I took some more pictures, and this is one. This was taken with a Sony DSC H70. Sorry about light bleed from flash.. It was night time, and this camera supports only up to ISO 800 anyway. Enjoy

 

[mcmxcii]

               @oThatsEric    Thats a great picture, great lighting! I say 8/10 I like the black and white, great with this picture. I took the 2 points off because normally, I like to see a more focus of a scenery of a broad area, without blurred sides, or a specific subject,with closer and slightly different angles, with blur around it to the attention is around the subject. Very great, I like it 

 

     I got my Canon Powershot SX150 IS recently in a trade, but before that, when it was raining, I took some pictures, and the night of the day it rained(when raining was done) I took some more pictures, and this is one. This was taken with a Sony DSC H70. Sorry about light bleed from flash.. It was night time, and this camera supports only up to ISO 800 anyway. Enjoy

DSC00621.JPG

 

6/10 nice idea, highlights a bit blown out. I like what is going on in the bottom left though.

 

Riddle's Gravestone at Warner Brothers Studio Tour in London.

http://www.dowdenphotos.com/still-life/pe14t7tjvjuowdbbvj4n1348s3ahmm

[angst92]

9/10, is a dam nice banner wallpaper. 

 

anyone in ontario, this is from Stouffville motorfest 2014 )

 

 

8/10 i like it

 

Wedding flowers by Phil  watson, on Flickr

[mcmxcii]

 

 

Sure just skip me...

[angst92]

Sure just skip me...

Sorry your photo didnt show when i commented.

[Guest]

Guess I'm rating two then...

 

 

Riddle's Gravestone at Warner Brothers Studio Tour in London.

http://www.dowdenphotos.com/still-life/pe14t7tjvjuowdbbvj4n1348s3ahmm

 

I guess it's alright, I've never been to fond of "touristy" pictures - they're just too standard and quite bland for me. Good amount of lighting in a dark room like that though.

 

 

 

Wedding flowers by Phil  watson, on Flickr

 

Good colour and composition, but again, a pretty standard picture. I do really like things that stand out, and flowers just aren't one of them Personal opinion though, technically a great shot still. If anything, background could use a bit more blurring (maybe something larger than f/3.2?)

 

 

Took this with simple window lighting and a t3i. I'm still surprised at how sharp it came out, love the shadows and colours on the ABYX buttons:

 

 

On another note, looking forward to attempting some Astrophotography and nighttime HDRs, as well as some panoramas at the cottage this weekend ^.^ Stay tuned.

[handymanshandle]

I rate above a solid 9/10, over all pretty nice, I guess a little more contrast would be nice.

 

 

 

I know it doesn't have the greatest bokeh or that it's the sharpest/most detailed photo but honestly if you take the time to read the properties you'll see that it's pretty impressive given what I shot it on.

So I shot this today [May 16th, 2015] on a Motorola Moto G (2014) [XT1064], f/2, ISO-80, Exp. time 1/370 sec, Exp. Bias 0, and a Focal Length of 4mm. 

[bob345]

I rate above a solid 9/10, over all pretty nice, I guess a little more contrast would be nice.

 

 

 

 

I know it doesn't have the greatest bokeh or that it's the sharpest/most detailed photo but honestly if you take the time to read the properties you'll see that it's pretty impressive given what I shot it on.

So I shot this today [May 16th, 2015] on a Motorola Moto G (2014) [XT1064], f/2, ISO-80, Exp. time 1/370 sec, Exp. Bias 0, and a Focal Length of 4mm. 

Id say 10/10. That is a great picture even by dslr standards. That kind of image coming from a phone makes it just that much more impressive. Anyway here is a pic i took at makerfaire earlier today of this color changing led tower

.

 

[angst92]

9/10 Nice framing, nice dof and strong colours.

 

WW2 Airstrip by Phil  watson, on Flickr

[Thorium19]

8/10 I like the subject, it looks really cool with the barbed wire just tangled up around it, but it all seems a little too bright, I'm not sure really. It's a good photo though, especially with the sign being off to the side.

 

Another from my continuing series of phone photos, this one is again from my trip to the park a few weeks ago, but I have more coming soon.

[Chibi]

8/10 I like the subject, it looks really cool with the barbed wire just tangled up around it, but it all seems a little too bright, I'm not sure really. It's a good photo though, especially with the sign being off to the side.

 

Another from my continuing series of phone photos, this one is again from my trip to the park a few weeks ago, but I have more coming soon.

 

-snip-

 

6/10 I think you could have taken the photo in a more dramatic angle. The framing could also be a bit better.

I have no idea what the white thing actually is

 

Taking photos of small birds without scaring them away is hard

Fjällbo Park Bird by Pierre Lindgren, on Flickr

[handymanshandle]

@Chibi

9/10 really pretty, I mean I feel that the leaves are too yellowish green but the colors in the bird are nice and vibrant but all in all quite nice.

 

 

Another shot from yesterday [May 16, 2015] taken on my Moto G (2014) similar settings except the exposure time was a few stops slower (1/204).

[nicon]

8/10 Amazing shot, the bokeh seems like it's almost 'pulled' into the center of the frame, weird. But great shot overall.

 

 

Canon 50D + 300mm f2.8L

[IBIubbleTea]

8/10 Amazing shot, the bokeh seems like it's almost 'pulled' into the center of the frame, weird. But great shot overall.

 

 

Canon 50D + 300mm f2.8L

 

 

SNIP

 

This is my first time rating someones photo so don't hate me.. 

 

9/10. The thing that is holding it back from being a 10/10 shot is that I wish the whole eagle was in the shot, without its wings cut out. I do understand that you used a 300m. 

 

~~

 

I only purchased the D7100 a month ago and just starting photography.  Is it me or does it seem to be out of focus or not as sharp..? I don't know because most of my pictures seem to look like that when opened up on my computer. But when on camera they seem sharp. Maybe I have the wrong af settings..? camera defective? my 50mm prime be broke? 

 

DSC_2595 by Collin Zheng, on Flickr

[handymanshandle]

@IBIubbleTea  9/10, Honestly nice composition, I think the issue is not the glass itself but rather the focal length. Now say you were using a 70-200mm f/2 towards the end of it's length and you were further away from your subject, the background would be pulled in towards the subject. However it would seem that there is some distance between the foreground (subject) and the background) so it would seem that your shallow depth of field and possible bokeh isn't as crisp or clean as you'd like it. I mean it's not to say that your copy might have a slight difference not making it as good as another copy. (Essentially with lenses there's a sort of glass lottery as is there is a silicon lottery with CPUs.) 

Anyways I have another shot from Moto G 2014, same day as the others (16 May, 2015.)

[IBIubbleTea]

@IBIubbleTea  9/10, Honestly nice composition, I think the issue is not the glass itself but rather the focal length. Now say you were using a 70-200mm f/2 towards the end of it's length and you were further away from your subject, the background would be pulled in towards the subject. However it would seem that there is some distance between the foreground (subject) and the background) so it would seem that your shallow depth of field and possible bokeh isn't as crisp or clean as you'd like it. I mean it's not to say that your copy might have a slight difference not making it as good as another copy. (Essentially with lenses there's a sort of glass lottery as is there is a silicon lottery with CPUs.) 

Really confused as people say that the 50mm prime lens is really sharp and what not. Is it because I'm using F1.8 or something? Do I need my subject to hold it's position? I try to capture the action without disturbing the subject it if you know what I mean. Maybe a zoom lens? 

 

Like the original file doesn't look as sharp when opened on the computer. 

 

I thought all glass was built the same unlike CPUs... >.<

[handymanshandle]

Really confused as people say that the 50mm prime lens is really sharp and what not. Is it because I'm using F1.8 or something? Do I need my subject to hold it's position? I try to capture the action without disturbing the subject it if you know what I mean. Maybe a zoom lens? 

 

Like the original file doesn't look as sharp when opened on the computer. 

 

I thought all glass was built the same unlike CPUs... >.<

Generally it depends on how detailed quality control is. 

[StormtrooperStu]

I only purchased the D7100 a month ago and just starting photography.  Is it me or does it seem to be out of focus or not as sharp..? I don't know because most of my pictures seem to look like that when opened up on my computer. But when on camera they seem sharp. Maybe I have the wrong af settings..? camera defective? my 50mm prime be broke? 

 

I'm sure your lens is fine. Remember that when you shoot wide open at 1.8 you have a very narrow depth of field so always focus on the eyes, as long as they are sharp all is good.  If you try f5 to f8 there will be a lot more of the shot in focus but you will need to adjust the iso and the shutter speed to compensate for the lower amount of light entering the camera.