Crab Puncher

In the words of dj khalid, "Another one." Rockstar has made this launcher a mandatory install if you want to play steam Rockstar titles such as GTA V. I don't know about you guys but it's kind of ridiculous. I have: Steam, Uplay, battle.net, Origin, and now Rockstar launchers. Does this bother anyone else? or is it just me?
 
source: arstechnica

In the words of dj khalid, "Another one." Rockstar has made this launcher a mandatory install if you want to play steam Rockstar titles such as GTA V. I don't know about you guys but it's kind of ridiculous. I have: Steam, Uplay, battle.net, Origin, and now Rockstar launchers. Does this bother anyone else? or is it just me?
 
source: arstechnica

Says you... FROM THE INTERNET!!
 
But, yes, I agree. All these different launchers are absurd. When I bought my GPU, it came with a game download. Went to download the game, and it only way I can redeem it is through the stupid launcher. >__<
 
So, what I've done is just put all my games on a 4TB drive, then add all those games to my Steam library manually.

In the words of dj khalid, "Another one." Rockstar has made this launcher a mandatory install if you want to play steam Rockstar titles such as GTA V. I don't know about you guys but it's kind of ridiculous. I have: Steam, Uplay, battle.net, Origin, and now Rockstar launchers. Does this bother anyone else? or is it just me?
 
source: arstechnica

In the words of dj khalid, "Another one." Rockstar has made this launcher a mandatory install if you want to play steam Rockstar titles such as GTA V. I don't know about you guys but it's kind of ridiculous. I have: Steam, Uplay, battle.net, Origin, and now Rockstar launchers. Does this bother anyone else? or is it just me?
 
source: arstechnica

In the words of dj khalid, "Another one." Rockstar has made this launcher a mandatory install if you want to play steam Rockstar titles such as GTA V. I don't know about you guys but it's kind of ridiculous. I have: Steam, Uplay, battle.net, Origin, and now Rockstar launchers. Does this bother anyone else? or is it just me?
 
source: arstechnica

In the words of dj khalid, "Another one." Rockstar has made this launcher a mandatory install if you want to play steam Rockstar titles such as GTA V. I don't know about you guys but it's kind of ridiculous. I have: Steam, Uplay, battle.net, Origin, and now Rockstar launchers. Does this bother anyone else? or is it just me?
 
source: arstechnica

In the words of dj khalid, "Another one." Rockstar has made this launcher a mandatory install if you want to play steam Rockstar titles such as GTA V. I don't know about you guys but it's kind of ridiculous. I have: Steam, Uplay, battle.net, Origin, and now Rockstar launchers. Does this bother anyone else? or is it just me?
 
source: arstechnica

+121313131
Why is not removing selfie camera courage? If they only left proximity and light sensor there that would be awesome. They would be able to make all screen phone and say to isheep that they were first to make all screen phones

It is going to cost $2k. Ima going to rob Apple store instead of bank in the future. 

Out of curiosity I looked up the specifications of that weapon system. It is an EOS R-400s Mk2. Depending on the gun and ammunition used, it can hold between 75-1200 rounds of ammunition. I can already see a fatal flaw in the design of this killer robot.
 
 

As someone who left cable TV to Netflix and other streaming services because the ads are so annoying is quite infuriating. My stance on it is that your paying money to watch TV not ads. But luckily not only is it temporary the ads are skippable. Sadly this might spread and become a permanent feature. If this does not effect netflix's bottom line then other streaming companies that currently don't have ads will most likely follow suit. There excuse is, "cut the time members spend browsing and helped them find something they would enjoy watching even faster." If I need something to watch I will just go to the recommended tab why can't they just put the shows they want us to watch there? Hmmmmmm. What are your thoughts?
 
 
Source : The Verge

I always thought about going into the past but it's probably not the best place for me. My very existence would be illegal before 1967 (since I'm mixed race) . So I've changed to wanting to go to the future and see all the technological advancements. You know... if the human species survives long enough to create cool stuff. Although if i could only go to the past I would see is Jesus really exists.

As someone who left cable TV to Netflix and other streaming services because the ads are so annoying is quite infuriating. My stance on it is that your paying money to watch TV not ads. But luckily not only is it temporary the ads are skippable. Sadly this might spread and become a permanent feature. If this does not effect netflix's bottom line then other streaming companies that currently don't have ads will most likely follow suit. There excuse is, "cut the time members spend browsing and helped them find something they would enjoy watching even faster." If I need something to watch I will just go to the recommended tab why can't they just put the shows they want us to watch there? Hmmmmmm. What are your thoughts?
 
 
Source : The Verge

As someone who left cable TV to Netflix and other streaming services because the ads are so annoying is quite infuriating. My stance on it is that your paying money to watch TV not ads. But luckily not only is it temporary the ads are skippable. Sadly this might spread and become a permanent feature. If this does not effect netflix's bottom line then other streaming companies that currently don't have ads will most likely follow suit. There excuse is, "cut the time members spend browsing and helped them find something they would enjoy watching even faster." If I need something to watch I will just go to the recommended tab why can't they just put the shows they want us to watch there? Hmmmmmm. What are your thoughts?
 
 
Source : The Verge

As someone who left cable TV to Netflix and other streaming services because the ads are so annoying is quite infuriating. My stance on it is that your paying money to watch TV not ads. But luckily not only is it temporary the ads are skippable. Sadly this might spread and become a permanent feature. If this does not effect netflix's bottom line then other streaming companies that currently don't have ads will most likely follow suit. There excuse is, "cut the time members spend browsing and helped them find something they would enjoy watching even faster." If I need something to watch I will just go to the recommended tab why can't they just put the shows they want us to watch there? Hmmmmmm. What are your thoughts?
 
 
Source : The Verge

As someone who left cable TV to Netflix and other streaming services because the ads are so annoying is quite infuriating. My stance on it is that your paying money to watch TV not ads. But luckily not only is it temporary the ads are skippable. Sadly this might spread and become a permanent feature. If this does not effect netflix's bottom line then other streaming companies that currently don't have ads will most likely follow suit. There excuse is, "cut the time members spend browsing and helped them find something they would enjoy watching even faster." If I need something to watch I will just go to the recommended tab why can't they just put the shows they want us to watch there? Hmmmmmm. What are your thoughts?
 
 
Source : The Verge

As someone who left cable TV to Netflix and other streaming services because the ads are so annoying is quite infuriating. My stance on it is that your paying money to watch TV not ads. But luckily not only is it temporary the ads are skippable. Sadly this might spread and become a permanent feature. If this does not effect netflix's bottom line then other streaming companies that currently don't have ads will most likely follow suit. There excuse is, "cut the time members spend browsing and helped them find something they would enjoy watching even faster." If I need something to watch I will just go to the recommended tab why can't they just put the shows they want us to watch there? Hmmmmmm. What are your thoughts?
 
 
Source : The Verge

Could be, I don't know. I mean, when I was younger, there weren't touchscreen-phones at all and my first phone was literally the size of a brick. That said, a keyboard you can slide in/out, like on the N900, can be quite useful, depending on what one uses the phone for, and I totally, absolutely hate typing anything on a touchscreen, so there's that, too.

Even though the price says $2,400 that is in CAD and that is $1,835USD
 
AMD is having quite the umm... not losing streak? With Ryzen gen 1 they rose back from Bulldozer past with a punch. But with there desktop Ryzen gen 2 chips looking like a refresh that we are all to familiar with, (cough) Intel. It doesn't look the same for there higher end counter parts. "Threadripper 2990X flagship processor was recently spotted listed at a Canadian retailer" It is said to be a 32 core 64 thread processor with a price tag of $1,835 which is incomparable to anything Intel has to offer, at least when it comes to core count. The nearest Intel chip is the i9 7980XE with only 18 cores and a price tag of $1,879. The new Threadripper 2 chips are cheaper with almost double the cores. But there is a caveat, your going to need one hell of a cooler to tame this 250W beast.
 
 
Source: wccftech.com
 

thanks for the help

For me I never use any "Smart Assistant" just because they are not very smart, how about you?

Hard core Steins;gate fan I assume

If you can afford it and you get a good deal go for the 1070 ti it has better base performance and if you plan to overclock hits way higher frequencies