Intel Core i7-5820K vs. AMD FX-6300

[Unknown_To_Me]

I know this isn't even in the same league, but I just want to know how different they are.

[i_build_nanosuits]

http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-FX-6300-vs-Intel-Core-i7-5820K/1555vs2579

 

FX-6300

 

                                                                           Poor (30^th percentile

The FX 6-Core, like most CPUs from AMD, delivers reasonably good server orientated multi threaded performance and consequently good processing thoughput at a reasonable price tag. Where the FX 6-Core lacks is in the area of single core performance which although not normally a major problem for server workloads, is always very relevant to desktop users. The overall performance of the FX 6-Core is comparable to Intel's five years older Core i7-950. There are server orientated use cases where the FX 6-Core will excel thanks to its excellent overall throughput and in those instances the FX 6-Core represents good value for money. But typical desktop users will find far better value elsewhere. ^{[Sep '13 CPUPro]}

 

 

[zlolslavez]

5820k has hyperthreading, so it has 6 cores/12 threads vs 6 cores/6 threads.

And obviously 5820k has better single core performance.

[PlayStation 2]

It's... pretty large, to say the least. And this is coming from the guy who defends the FX line a whole lot.

[brandishwar]

Leaps and bounds. The 5820k has twice the thread capability to start -- 6 cores/12 threads -- over the FX-6300's 6-core/6-thread capability. The only place where the FX-6300 wins between the two is price. The FX will cost about 1/4th the price of the 5820k.

[Morgan MLGman]

They're incomparable. That's how different they are in performance.

[Unknown_To_Me]

I currently have the FX 6300, but I bought the i7 today and wanted to see the difference for myself (yes I got a new mb, ram, cpu cooler, ect.)

[Morgan MLGman]

1 minute ago, brandishwar said:

Leaps and bounds. The 5820k has twice the thread capability to start -- 6 cores/12 threads -- over the FX-6300's 6-core/6-thread capability. The only place where the FX-6300 wins between the two is price. The FX will cost about 1/4th the price of the 5820k.

In terms of multithreaded performance you need more than two and a half of FX-6300s to match the 5820k. Single-threaded it's like 60% faster too.

[ismma99]

i dont see the difference just go with fx-6300 its almost as good as 5820k and cheaper aswell 

[Big-G]

Day vs Night? That's basically the situation...

[roctrebira]

Just now, ismma99 said:

i dont see the difference just go with fx-6300 its almost as good as 5820k and cheaper aswell 

huh what?

[i_build_nanosuits]

Just now, ismma99 said:

i dont see the difference just go with fx-6300 its almost as good as 5820k and cheaper aswell 

oh my god

[ismma99]

Just now, i_build_nanosuits said:

oh my god

yo goys crezy men you save like 300 dalla hala

[Fulgrim]

Why are you trying to compare a Corvette C6 with a Prius, OP?

[Unknown_To_Me]

Just now, ismma99 said:

i dont see the difference just go with fx-6300 its almost as good as 5820k and cheaper aswell 

I already have it and I have the money for the i7. Plus I already bought it , I just wanted to see the difference faster.

[Fulgrim]

1 minute ago, ismma99 said:

i dont see the difference just go with fx-6300 its almost as good as 5820k and cheaper aswell 

Not sure if you're a spastic, or are just really shit at trolling.

[ismma99]

Just now, roctrebira said:

huh what?

look at the statistics i the fx scored around 117% 

[Unknown_To_Me]

Just now, Fulgrim said:

Why are you trying to compare a Corvette C6 with a Prius, OP?

lmao.

[roctrebira]

Just now, ismma99 said:

yo goys crezy men you save like 300 dalla hala

This is sarcasm correct? It's hard to tell when it's just typed out.

[i_build_nanosuits]

1 minute ago, Unknown_To_Me said:

I already have it and I have the money for the i7. Plus I already bought it , I just wanted to see the difference faster.

it's worlds faster in every way you can think of...it can handle more than twice the multi-threaded workload per clock cycle, and a good 60 to 70% more throughput in terms of single-threaded performance..., it's head, shoulders and torso above the FX-6300.

[PlayStation 2]

2 minutes ago, ismma99 said:

i dont see the difference just go with fx-6300 its almost as good as 5820k and cheaper aswell 

*sighs very loudly*

[Unknown_To_Me]

Just now, ismma99 said:

look at the statistics i the fx scored around 117% 

 

[ismma99]

Just now, Unknown_To_Me said:

 

i tink that is scam websait ? yes is i correct....?

[Unknown_To_Me]

1 minute ago, i_build_nanosuits said:

it's worlds faster in every way you can think of...it can handle more than twice the multi-threaded workload per clock cycle, and a good 60 to 70% more throughput in terms of single-threaded performance..., it's head, shoulders and torso above the FX-6300.

thanks

[comicsansms]

3 minutes ago, Dan Castellaneta said:

It's... pretty large, to say the least. And this is coming from the guy who defends the FX line a whole lot.

I'll take it from here.

The FX 6300 is a great CPU because of  Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Phasellus malesuada mollis ante, nec luctus orci. Suspendisse feugiat felis nec nisi fermentum, sit amet varius ligula molestie. Duis vel lobortis erat. Etiam nec mauris et dolor volutpat aliquam in eget lectus. Nam commodo suscipit mauris vitae venenatis. Donec convallis ultricies lorem nec cursus. Aliquam erat volutpat. Nulla facilisi. Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos.

 

The i7 will smash it in everything (except cost). If you need more threads, get a consumer grade i7 or Xeon.

If you don't need need threads, get an i5 4690k or 6600k.