Jump to content

*OEM Rebrands* AMD reveals specs for 360, 370 and 380 cards

Notional

AMD has released the specs for their new 300 non top models

 

*These cards seems to be only preinstalled OEM cards, and NOT the upcoming AIB 300 series cards. This does explain the generally low specs.*

 

With the expected release date of the 390 series, early next month at computex, AMD has released the specs of the upcoming non top model 300 series.

 

AMD-Radeon-Logo3_678x452.jpg

 

Directly from AMD themselves:

 

R9 380 

  • 28nm
  • DirectX 12
  • OpenGL 4.4 Vulkan
  • Mantle 
  • Up to 918 MHz
  • 176 GB/s
  • Up to 4GB GDDR5
  • 1792 stream processing units
  • (28 Compute Units)15


 

R9 370

  • 28nm
  • DirectX 12
  • OpenGL 4.4 Vulkan
  • Mantle
  • Up to 975MHz
  • 179.2 GB/s
  • 2GB or 4GB GDDR5
  • 1024 stream processing units
  • (16 Compute Units)15


 

R9 360

  • 28nm
  • DirectX 12
  • OpenGL 4.4 Vulkan
  • Mantle
  • Up to 1.05 GHz
  • 104 GB/s
  • 2GB GDDR5
  • 768 stream processing units
  • (12 Compute Units)15

*15Discrete AMD Radeon™ and FirePro™ GPUs based on the Graphics Core Next architecture consist of multiple discrete execution engines known as a Compute Unit (“CU”). Each CU contains 64 shaders (“Stream Processors”) working in unison.

 

So what do you guys think? Can you spot rebrands, and do you have any guess on performance?

 

 

My personal take:

Based on the 380's 1792 stream processing units, it seems unlikely to be a rebrand of any 290 card, as 290x has 2816 spu's, and 290 has 2560. R9 285 has exactly 1792 SPU's, but I highly doubt that card would be branded 380?

 

For full specs:

Source: http://www.amd.com/en-us/products/graphics/desktop/oem#3

Watching Intel have competition is like watching a headless chicken trying to get out of a mine field

CPU: Intel I7 4790K@4.6 with NZXT X31 AIO; MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Maximus VII Ranger; RAM: 8 GB Kingston HyperX 1600 DDR3; GFX: ASUS R9 290 4GB; CASE: Lian Li v700wx; STORAGE: Corsair Force 3 120GB SSD; Samsung 850 500GB SSD; Various old Seagates; PSU: Corsair RM650; MONITOR: 2x 20" Dell IPS; KEYBOARD/MOUSE: Logitech K810/ MX Master; OS: Windows 10 Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just waiting for the R9 390 to be $250. It'll take a year or a year and a half but then I'll get dual R9 390s and rek erry thing.

24 fps for that "cinematic" feel


After a couple weeks of behavioral sciences at my school I can easily conclude my parents need to grow up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 380 sounds like a 7950 but with more ram O.o same stream processors I think.

Edit: oh the 285 also has the same amount of stream processors. So the 380 is the 285 with double the ram.

Edit 2: "up to 4gb of ram" I guess they're gonna straight up rebadge the 285 then and maybe sell the 4gb at the current 285 price?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot believe they released a 2GB card! 2GB dosent cut it!

 eGPU Setup: Macbook Pro 13" 16GB DDR3 RAM, 512GB SSD, i5 3210M, GTX 980 eGPU

New PC: i7-4790k, Corsair H100iGTX, ASrock Fatal1ty Z97 Killer, 24GB Ram, 850 EVO 256GB SSD, 1TB HDD, GTX 1080 Fractal Design R4, EVGA Supernova G2 650W

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot believe they released a 2GB card! 2GB dosent cut it!

for 1080p, yes it does

~New~  BoomBerryPi project !  ~New~


new build log : http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/533392-build-log-the-scrap-simulator-x/?p=7078757 (5 screen flight sim for 620$ CAD)LTT Web Challenge is back ! go here  :  http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/448184-ltt-web-challenge-3-v21/#entry601004

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

All rebrands.

 

Wow

Intel Core i7 9700k - EVGA FTW GTX 970

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

for 1080p, yes it does

Barely... I've run over 2GB quite a few times.

Main rig on profile

VAULT - File Server

Spoiler

Intel Core i5 11400 w/ Shadow Rock LP, 2x16GB SP GAMING 3200MHz CL16, ASUS PRIME Z590-A, 2x LSI 9211-8i, Fractal Define 7, 256GB Team MP33, 3x 6TB WD Red Pro (general storage), 3x 1TB Seagate Barracuda (dumping ground), 3x 8TB WD White-Label (Plex) (all 3 arrays in their respective Windows Parity storage spaces), Corsair RM750x, Windows 11 Education

Sleeper HP Pavilion A6137C

Spoiler

Intel Core i7 6700K @ 4.4GHz, 4x8GB G.SKILL Ares 1800MHz CL10, ASUS Z170M-E D3, 128GB Team MP33, 1TB Seagate Barracuda, 320GB Samsung Spinpoint (for video capture), MSI GTX 970 100ME, EVGA 650G1, Windows 10 Pro

Mac Mini (Late 2020)

Spoiler

Apple M1, 8GB RAM, 256GB, macOS Sonoma

Consoles: Softmodded 1.4 Xbox w/ 500GB HDD, Xbox 360 Elite 120GB Falcon, XB1X w/2TB MX500, Xbox Series X, PS1 1001, PS2 Slim 70000 w/ FreeMcBoot, PS4 Pro 7015B 1TB (retired), PS5 Digital, Nintendo Switch OLED, Nintendo Wii RVL-001 (black)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder if the 290 would beat the 380 :P

Specs: CPU - Intel i7 8700K @ 5GHz | GPU - Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 Gaming | Motherboard - ASUS Strix Z370-G WIFI AC | RAM - XPG Gammix DDR4-3000MHz 32GB (2x16GB) | Main Drive - Samsung 850 Evo 500GB M.2 | Other Drives - 7TB/3 Drives | CPU Cooler - Corsair H100i Pro | Case - Fractal Design Define C Mini TG | Power Supply - EVGA G3 850W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

370 is most likely 280 or 280x because it doesn't support true audio and frame rate target control (anyone know what's that btw?)

fx-8350 @4,4Ghz/sapphire r9 fury/2x 8gb Kingstone ddr3 @2030Mhz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Edit: oh the 285 also has the same amount of stream processors. So the 380 is the 285 with double the ram.

Edit 2: "up to 4gb of ram" I guess they're gonna straight up rebadge the 285 then and maybe sell the 4gb at the current 285 price?

 

Maybe they upgraded to GCN 1.3, so it has more performance? It would be quite odd otherwise.

Watching Intel have competition is like watching a headless chicken trying to get out of a mine field

CPU: Intel I7 4790K@4.6 with NZXT X31 AIO; MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Maximus VII Ranger; RAM: 8 GB Kingston HyperX 1600 DDR3; GFX: ASUS R9 290 4GB; CASE: Lian Li v700wx; STORAGE: Corsair Force 3 120GB SSD; Samsung 850 500GB SSD; Various old Seagates; PSU: Corsair RM650; MONITOR: 2x 20" Dell IPS; KEYBOARD/MOUSE: Logitech K810/ MX Master; OS: Windows 10 Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2GB is a fucking travesty for either AMD or Nvidia. Normal games can run up against 2GB no problem even at 1080p, and these clowns market their cards for multi-GPU use fail the basic math that having even 50-60% scaling will be wasted by not having enough VRAM, since two low end cards have enough power to put 4GB of VRAM to use. 

 

Sigh. 

 

I wonder which side will end 2GB cards entirely next generation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

370 is most likely 280x because it doesn't support true audio and frame rate target control (anyone know what's that btw?)

 

It's full synced framerates (freesync). The issue with the 280 series, is an obsolete display controller in the GPU. The same NVidia uses, which is why NVidia cannot use Adaptive Sync, even if they wanted to (includes Maxwell cards).

Watching Intel have competition is like watching a headless chicken trying to get out of a mine field

CPU: Intel I7 4790K@4.6 with NZXT X31 AIO; MOTHERBOARD: ASUS Z97 Maximus VII Ranger; RAM: 8 GB Kingston HyperX 1600 DDR3; GFX: ASUS R9 290 4GB; CASE: Lian Li v700wx; STORAGE: Corsair Force 3 120GB SSD; Samsung 850 500GB SSD; Various old Seagates; PSU: Corsair RM650; MONITOR: 2x 20" Dell IPS; KEYBOARD/MOUSE: Logitech K810/ MX Master; OS: Windows 10 Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

for 1080p, yes it does

2GB is not enough for 1080p, I've ran over the 2GB on my 760 a few times, and I can't crank GTA 5 as high as I'd like because of, again, too little VRAM

LTT's fastest Valley 970, slowest Valley Basic and Extreme HD scores

 

Desktop || CPU - i5 4690k || Motherboard - ASUS Gryphon Z97 || RAM - 16GB Kingston HyperX 1866MHz || GPU - Gigabyte G1 GTX 970 *Cough* 3.5GB || Case - Fractal Design Define R5 || HDD - Seagate Barracuda 160GB || PSU - Corsair AX760
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just don't understand why the R9 370 would have fewer shaders than my R9 270! Unless they drastically improved the performance per stream processor, there is little reason to get that over the 270. Unless, of course, you really need the VRAM, but there are 4 GB R9 270s too...or maybe it's just the 270X. Still...

Why is the God of Hyperdeath SO...DARN...CUTE!?

 

Also, if anyone has their mind corrupted by an anthropomorphic black latex bat, please let me know. I would like to join you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 380 sounds like a 7950 but with more ram O.o same stream processors I think.

Edit: oh the 285 also has the same amount of stream processors. So the 380 is the 285 with double the ram.

Edit 2: "up to 4gb of ram" I guess they're gonna straight up rebadge the 285 then and maybe sell the 4gb at the current 285 price?

That would be down right retarded for AMD to do. I mean the r9 280 is already a rebatch of the  7950. It would be a really stupid move to keep the same chip at the same  performance tier. And if it's the r9 285 that would be even more stupid considering the r9 280 is actually the better card. (I know it doesn't make sense but it's that way) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

All rebrands.

 

Wow

Explain how you came to this conclusion?

Intel Core i7-5820K (4.4 GHz) | Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 Gaming | Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB  | 2x 360mm Custom Loop (Noctua iPPC) | ASRock X99 Extreme6 | Samsung 840 EVO 250GB | Fractal Design Define S | Corsair HX750 | Windows 10 | Corsair M65 RGB PRO | Corsair K70 RGB LUX (CherryMX Brown) | Beyerdynamic Custom One Pro & Creative Sound Blaster Z | Nexus 6P (32GB Aluminium) | Check out my setup: Project Kalte Here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be down right retarded for AMD to do. I mean the r9 280 is already a rebatch of the  7950. It would be a really stupid move to keep the same chip at the same  performance tier. And if it's the r9 285 that would be even more stupid considering the r9 280 is actually the better card. (I know it doesn't make sense but it's that way) 

The R9 280 may be the better card, but the R9 285 is the new architecture.

Intel Core i7-5820K (4.4 GHz) | Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 Gaming | Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB  | 2x 360mm Custom Loop (Noctua iPPC) | ASRock X99 Extreme6 | Samsung 840 EVO 250GB | Fractal Design Define S | Corsair HX750 | Windows 10 | Corsair M65 RGB PRO | Corsair K70 RGB LUX (CherryMX Brown) | Beyerdynamic Custom One Pro & Creative Sound Blaster Z | Nexus 6P (32GB Aluminium) | Check out my setup: Project Kalte Here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2GB is a fucking travesty for either AMD or Nvidia. Normal games can run up against 2GB no problem even at 1080p, and these clowns market their cards for multi-GPU use fail the basic math that having even 50-60% scaling will be wasted by not having enough VRAM, since two low end cards have enough power to put 4GB of VRAM to use.

Sigh.

I wonder which side will end 2GB cards entirely next generation.

Maybe the memory compression that both side uses just works that well. The 285 generally outperforms the 280 despite having less ram but it's no excuse to go backwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does the 380 say "up to 4GB" instead of x-gb or x-gb.

 

Are we dealing with another 3.5gb scandal  :P

Nah. Probably a 2 or 3GB version and a 4Gb  version just like the r9 290x has up to 8 GB of ram and the GT 610 has up to 4GB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2GB is not enough for 1080p, I've ran over the 2GB on my 760 a few times, and I can't crank GTA 5 as high as I'd like because of, again, too little VRAM

Not having enough to play at the settings you want and not having enough to play are not the same thing, 2GB still works for 1080p.

"The of and to a in is I that it for you was with on as have but be they"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×