[Titan X Specs] Nvidia's new GPU

[tnlich]

You can't compare it with specs as Maxwell works very different the 336GB/s aren't the actual speed.

The GTX780 Ti as an example destroys the 980 spec wise and but that's not the case at all in actual performance.

Spec wise the HD7970 should beat a 980 which it also not the case.

I bet the R9-390X will barely be faster than a TITAN X maybe a 10% difference at best.

 

 Ill take that bet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I Say it will be more like 25% .

[Fate]

Performance increase is not close to 40% like the rumors stated, at this current point in time at least.

Source: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_Titan_X/29.html

[ChrisxIxCross]

If anyone just has 1000$ to blow here you go http://www.geforce.com/geforce-gtx-titan-x/buy-gpu

[Wesleydn]

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/nvidia_geforce_gtx_titan_x_review,1.html

[LAwLz]

Single precision...what does that mean? No SLI capabilities or...?

FLOP = how many floating-point operations it can do in a single second. A floating-point is a number that can include decimal points.

Single precision = The floating-points are 32 bits long.

Double precision = The floating-points are 64 bits long.

 

The higher precision, the less rounding up/down you have to do, which can be very important in a lot of scientific programs.

 

 

For now though, it is a king of the hill single GPU card. And will hold that place for a month or two until 390x is launched.

Assuming that the 390x will actually be faster.

I think it's a bit premature to say it will be since we have next to no official info about it.

[tnlich]

PCPER Review is HERE 

 

 

Yea ... In my opinion buy 2 980's and smile. JUST MY OPINION.

[MrRavens]

R9 titan X Ti

 

Add some SLIFire in that and woooo baby we taking off!

[ChrisxIxCross]

Yea ... In my opinion buy 2 980's and smile. JUST MY OPINION.

WAY AHEAD OF YOU check my sig hahaha 

[Norman_the_Owl]

O-o 999$, YEY. So the 980 Kingpin did became obsolete eh?

Yea...EVGA is not going to be happy

[zonahbear]

Add some SLIFire in that and woooo baby we taking off!

Intel HD Graphics R9 titan X Ti SLIFire

[CostcoSamples]

I'll take two please.  Here is my first born in exchange.

[CostcoSamples]

Intel HD Graphics R9 titan X Ti SLIFire

Intel HD Graphics Voodoo 2 R9 Titan Banshee X GTi SLIFire White edition.  Also, its powered by lemmings.  And yes, it can run Pac-Man on ultra!

[Notional]

Assuming that the 390x will actually be faster.

I think it's a bit premature to say it will be since we have next to no official info about it.

 

Of course. Look very much forward to see the review. But based on the leaked info, and comparing that to older GCN architecture in 290x, alongside with an insane memory bandwidth, that has proved to make the 290x (with its smaller 512 bit bus), very good at 4K, I think it is possible to make some good estimations already. I haven't seen AMD call their cards, king of the hill before, so I'm sure they know something we don't.

[Icecube26]

titan x performed worse in benchmarks than 980sli (which costs almost the same)  and 295X2 (which is significantly cheaper)....disapointed... not worth the money...imo

[HippY]

@patrickjp93

here is your answer.

[TheMidnightNarwhal]

titan x performed worse in benchmarks than 980sli (which costs almost the same) and 295X2 (which is significantly cheaper)....disapointed... not worth the money...imo

Well 2 GPUs is always or most of the time going to beat single card no?

[deviant88]

only stupids give fucks about 1000$ cards...

[Icecube26]

Well 2 GPUs is always or most of the time going to beat single card no?

price/performance is what matters to me... for the price of the titan x.... or even less...... u can get better performing solutions.... so why not take them...

[Opcode]

You can't compare it with specs as Maxwell works very different the 336GB/s aren't the actual speed.

The GTX780 Ti as an example destroys the 980 spec wise and but that's not the case at all in actual performance.

Spec wise the HD7970 should beat a 980 which it also not the case.

I bet the R9-390X will barely be faster than a TITAN X maybe a 10% difference at best.

I'm not doubting that it won't be significantly faster. Tho the R9 390X has a lot of key selling points for what the card is. One of the biggest that most people here complain about is power consumption. The R9 390X will consume 300 watts at peak load (250 watts typical load like gaming). If we go back and look at Tahiti (the architecture that Fiji is directly based off) the HD 7970 pulls 300 watts at peak load with half the compute units. Which means AMD has doubled their power efficiency with Fiji since the last generation (R9 280X). Fiji could very well be AMD's "Maxwell" without cutting corners like Nvidia did to cut back on power (binary64).

[GoldSrc]

That's cheap?

The 8800 Ultra was around the same price in its time .

[TheMissxu]

… can be very important in a lot of scientific programs. …

Not to mention some audio, visual, and finance applications

[Nup]

God damn, dat price! This thing is gonna rustle some team red jimmies  

[Commander Llama]

This looks really nice for some tasks but for the gamers it would probably be better to go GTX980 SLI OC.

 

edit: okay but playing Devil's Advocate this is at least a single hugely powerful GPU.  My experiences with SLI suck so I can see the appeal.

[BonSie]

Adviced(whats it's) prices in Europe:

 

BeNeLux 1200

Germany 1150

Italy 1250

Finland 1270

[geforceftw]

Gimped FP64 performance, gimped double precision.  It's a gaming card, it will still compute decently, but theres a reason Teslas are still going to use Big Kepler until Pascal.

It better be gimped, it's a quarter of the price of the K6000 and about half the price of the K5200. It's still a good professional card gimped or not gimped. Im not saying it's not a gaming card, it's a great gaming card. It's just not geared towards gamers even though  it destroys every other single gpu card right now.