-
Content Count
4,097 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Awards
This user doesn't have any awards
About Fate
-
Title
LTT's Resident AMD, Nvidia, and Intel fanboy
Profile Information
-
Location
Somewhere near the Appalachian Mountains
-
Gender
Male
-
Interests
Computers and photography
System
-
CPU
3570k
-
Motherboard
Asus P8H77 V-LE
-
RAM
8GB Corsair Vengeance
-
GPU
XFX DD R9 290
-
Case
Military Green C70
-
Storage
320GB Hitachi & 256GB MX100
-
PSU
EVGA 750w
-
Display(s)
Acer B286HK 4k
-
Cooling
Corsair H60
-
Keyboard
Razer Blackwidow
-
Mouse
Razer Deathadder
-
Sound
Sennheiser HD 558
-
Operating System
Windows 10
Recent Profile Visitors
3,487 profile views
-
Just got the same thing. Twitch posted this on twitter: Should be fine to visit, but who knows?
-
The 660 is better, and yea it should be fine for most games at 720p; it's an incredibly easy resolution to run.
-
XFX R9 390 Good Enough For Skyrim 1080p 60 FPS Maxed Out?
Fate replied to undefeatedmonarch's topic in Graphics Cards
Except the 6300 is LITERALLY the only problem for OP, and he didn't say anything about any other game. -
Is it wrong to buy something and then return it just for review?
Fate replied to Jacktastic-Mofo's topic in Off Topic
Kinda scummy for small businesses since it could waste a lot of their time and potentially money, but for bigger stores like Walmart, who cares? -
That's how much it is converted to CAD. It says $179.99 for me, since I live in the US.
-
If you want micro ATX and a fury x2, you need to go Intel, period. AMD just doesn't have a viable lineup for it on the CPU & motherboard side.
-
Yes, it's worth it. 390's perform much better than 780's at 4k (~20-25% per card), and you will never be bottlenecked by the vram.
-
Fps scales fairly linearly with pixel count, so if you got for example 30 fps on a 4k monitor, you'd, in most games, get roughly 60-70 fps on a 1440p monitor. With that being said, they're probably very similar in terms of difficulty to run at their full potential. Most people on the forum are going to recommend 1440p 144Hz over 4k 60Hz, because for the majority of people/games, smoothness > image quality.
-
I doubt it will be enforced; the UK and NYC police don't seem to care at all.
-
im offended
-
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sxzGshuqVtFe_2zgRhN3gXCraR7d8p-NazJ6z0nsGGc/edit#gid=0 Based on the forum's R15 scores, a 4.7GHz 3770k is around 15% better than a Xeon E3 1231 v3. I'd imagine at 4.2GHz yours is close to the same performance as the Xeon.
-
If you play very CPU demanding games and you have a much better CPU than them, I wouldn't be surprised. The Titan is a much better card than the 480 though.