Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


This user doesn't have any awards

About Fate

  • Title
    LTT's Resident AMD, Nvidia, and Intel fanboy

Profile Information

  • Location
    Somewhere near the Appalachian Mountains
  • Gender
  • Interests
    Computers and photography


  • CPU
  • Motherboard
    Asus P8H77 V-LE
  • RAM
    8GB Corsair Vengeance
  • GPU
    XFX DD R9 290
  • Case
    Military Green C70
  • Storage
    320GB Hitachi & 256GB MX100
  • PSU
    EVGA 750w
  • Display(s)
    Acer B286HK 4k
  • Cooling
    Corsair H60
  • Keyboard
    Razer Blackwidow
  • Mouse
    Razer Deathadder
  • Sound
    Sennheiser HD 558
  • Operating System
    Windows 10

Recent Profile Visitors

3,628 profile views
  1. Just got the same thing. Twitch posted this on twitter: Should be fine to visit, but who knows?
  2. The 660 is better, and yea it should be fine for most games at 720p; it's an incredibly easy resolution to run.
  3. Except the 6300 is LITERALLY the only problem for OP, and he didn't say anything about any other game.
  4. Why not look up the answer before blindly throwing out a "most likely" no? Should be able to get around 40-50fps with your setup high 1080p. http://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/asus-geforce-gtx-950-strix-review,12.html
  5. The i7 will be better for gaming because gaming tends to favor fewer, stronger cores.
  6. Kinda scummy for small businesses since it could waste a lot of their time and potentially money, but for bigger stores like Walmart, who cares?
  7. That's how much it is converted to CAD. It says $179.99 for me, since I live in the US.
  8. If you want micro ATX and a fury x2, you need to go Intel, period. AMD just doesn't have a viable lineup for it on the CPU & motherboard side.
  9. Yes, it's worth it. 390's perform much better than 780's at 4k (~20-25% per card), and you will never be bottlenecked by the vram.
  10. Fps scales fairly linearly with pixel count, so if you got for example 30 fps on a 4k monitor, you'd, in most games, get roughly 60-70 fps on a 1440p monitor. With that being said, they're probably very similar in terms of difficulty to run at their full potential. Most people on the forum are going to recommend 1440p 144Hz over 4k 60Hz, because for the majority of people/games, smoothness > image quality.
  11. I doubt it will be enforced; the UK and NYC police don't seem to care at all.
  12. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sxzGshuqVtFe_2zgRhN3gXCraR7d8p-NazJ6z0nsGGc/edit#gid=0 Based on the forum's R15 scores, a 4.7GHz 3770k is around 15% better than a Xeon E3 1231 v3. I'd imagine at 4.2GHz yours is close to the same performance as the Xeon.
  13. If you play very CPU demanding games and you have a much better CPU than them, I wouldn't be surprised. The Titan is a much better card than the 480 though.