LTT 3DMark Thread

[DXMember]

1 minute ago, Jumper118 said:

give it more voltage and it will artifact less

that wasn't artifacting like with a bad overclock, that was like legit rainbow colors and strobing all over the place, on graphics test on one scene two black bars from top and bottom came down float over my screen and make it like a 45:9 aspect ratio or something and moving up and down at the same time 3DMark recorded GPU utilization at 5%

passed the bench, but not gaming with that )))

[arnavvr]

1 minute ago, DXMember said:

that wasn't artifacting like with a bad overclock, that was like legit rainbow colors and strobing all over the place, on graphics test on one scene two black bars from top and bottom came down float over my screen and make it like a 45:9 aspect ratio or something and moving up and down at the same time 3DMark recorded GPU utilization at 5%

passed the bench, but not gaming with that )))

That is the difference between a Fury and a Fury X. Some cores are unstable on the Fury X so they become Furys.

[Jumper118]

2 minutes ago, DXMember said:

that wasn't artifacting like with a bad overclock, that was like legit rainbow colors and strobing all over the place, on graphics test on one scene two black bars from top and bottom came down float over my screen and make it like a 45:9 aspect ratio or something and moving up and down at the same time 3DMark recorded GPU utilization at 5%

passed the bench, but not gaming with that )))

ok then  

[DXMember]

1 minute ago, arnavvr said:

That is the difference between a Fury and a Fury X. Some cores are unstable on the Fury X so they become Furys.

yeah, others get lucky with the unusual high bumps in yields, so they cut down some full Fury X's to make some Furies

[Jumper118]

1 minute ago, DXMember said:

yeah, others get lucky with the unusual high bumps in yields, so they cut down some full Fury X's to make some Furies

HAVE YOU TRIED UNLOCKING THE MEMORY AND OVERCLOCKING THAT? 

[DXMember]

1 minute ago, Jumper118 said:

HAVE YOU TRIED UNLOCKING THE MEMORY AND OVERCLOCKING THAT? 

 I THINK MY MSI AFTERBURNER IS NOT PRO ENOUGH TO DO IT, GOT THE LATEST VERSION - THE SLIDER SLIDES BUT IT RESETS BACK TO 500 AFTER SOME TIME, IT'S LIKE SOME ANNOYING DRIVER SOFTWARE RUNNING IN THE BACKGROUND DOESN'T WANT TO DO THE RIGHT THING

[arnavvr]

2 minutes ago, DXMember said:

 I THINK MY MSI AFTERBURNER IS NOT PRO ENOUGH TO DO IT, GOT THE LATEST VERSION - THE SLIDER SLIDES BUT IT RESETS BACK TO 500 AFTER SOME TIME, IT'S LIKE SOME ANNOYING DRIVER SOFTWARE RUNNING IN THE BACKGROUND DOESN'T WANT TO DO THE RIGHT THING

WHY IS EVERYONE TALKING IN ALL CAPS USE SAPPHIRE TRIXX

[DXMember]

1 minute ago, arnavvr said:

WHY IS EVERYONE TALKING IN ALL CAPS USE SAPPHIRE TRIXX

I'M nOT tyPING IN capS, I JUST HIt the KEYbOARd SO Hard iT CRiTS

 

I THINK I'LL TRY trIXX!!!
ThaNKs

[Jumper118]

1 minute ago, DXMember said:

I'M nOT tyPING IN capS, I JUST HIt the KEYbOARd SO Hard iT CRiTS

 

I THINK I'LL TRY trIXX!!!
ThaNKs

sorry  

[Vellinious]

Got some updates.  Still having a little trouble getting these tuned just right, but....they're getting there.

Firestrike: 27712
2 x 980ti @ 1528 / 2128
5820k @ 4.75 

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9011300




Firestrike Extreme:  17488
2 x 980ti @ 1528 / 2128
5820k @ 4.75

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9010329




EDIT:  Already submitted the FS Ultra run

[DildorTheDecent]

9 hours ago, Vellinious said:

Got some updates.  Still having a little trouble getting these tuned just right, but....they're getting there.

Firestrike: 27712
2 x 980ti @ 1528 / 2128
5820k @ 4.75 

Firestrike Extreme:  17488
2 x 980ti @ 1528 / 2128
5820k @ 4.75

EDIT:  Already submitted the FS Ultra run

You're fastest in your bracket for 5820K and two 980Ti

 

?

[Vellinious]

Yeah....doesn't seem like the guys with that processor are pushing hard.  I've got one card on air, one card on water and managed to place myself at the top of the rankings without lowering ambients or adding voltage.....  I saw it, but didn't consider it much of a win.

[DildorTheDecent]

5 minutes ago, Vellinious said:

Yeah....doesn't seem like the guys with that processor are pushing hard.  I've got one card on air, one card on water and managed to place myself at the top of the rankings without lowering ambients or adding voltage.....  I saw it, but didn't consider it much of a win.

Would be great if these guys on 3DMark would go faster

 

HWBOT is where the fast results are though. Personally i can hardly compete their D:

[Vellinious]

I can't compete with those guys either....I need more processor.  That's about next....

[Vellinious]

Single card submission.

Vellinious - 5820k @ 4.75  / 980TI @ 1567 / 2140 - SCORE: 19430

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9076134

[IGJoe2192]

RX480 Crossfire - Undervolt Overclock at 1340Mhz.

 

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9097893

[DXMember]

Benchmark: Fire Strike

CPU: i7 5820K @ 4.20 Ghz

GPU: R9 Fury 2-way CF

GPU Core: 1100 MHz

GPU Memory: 500 MHz

Score: 23375

3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9113158

 

Benchmark: Fire Strike Extreme

CPU: i7 5820K @ 4.20 Ghz

GPU: R9 Fury 2-way CF

GPU Core: 1100 MHz

GPU Memory: 500 MHz

Score: 14268

3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9113238

 

Benchmark: Fire Strike Ultra

CPU: i7 5820K @ 4.20 Ghz

GPU: R9 Fury 2-way CF

GPU Core: 1100 MHz

GPU Memory: 500 MHz

Score: 7813

3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9113094

 

P.S. - updated the table

[IGJoe2192]

EDIT: Changed overclock 

Benchmark: Fire Strike

CPU: i7 5930K @ 4.33 Ghz

GPU: RX 480 2-way CF

GPU Core: 1360 MHz

GPU Memory: 2200Mhz ( 8800Mhz effective )

Score: 19,437

3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9137925

 

[Majestic]

Benchmark: (Fire Strike, Fire Strike Extreme, Sky Diver)
CPU: 4670K @ 4,2ghz
GPU: MSI GTX 980 4G Gaming
GPU Core: 1528
GPU Memory: 2001

Score: 12 723
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/12968025
PCPartPicker Link: (optional)

 

Wonder how people got like 18K graphics score on much lower GPU clocks. Is my CPU the limiting factor even in the graphics tests?

[Jumper118]

49 minutes ago, Majestic said:

Benchmark: (Fire Strike, Fire Strike Extreme, Sky Diver)
CPU: 4670K @ 4,2ghz
GPU: MSI GTX 980 4G Gaming
GPU Core: 1528
GPU Memory: 2001

Score: 12 723
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/12968025
PCPartPicker Link: (optional)

 

Wonder how people got like 18K graphics score on much lower GPU clocks. Is my CPU the limiting factor even in the graphics tests?

that or they optimise the pc for the benchmark. 

[Majestic]

5 minutes ago, Jumper118 said:

that or they optimise the pc for the benchmark. 

Yeah, i'm running a pretty cluttered windows

[AmbellinaThePrise]

Lowered clocks on my card, still managed to improve my score a bit on each bench. With results now showing as valid instead of invalid like the last ones, I think perhaps those old clock were not stable. These certainly are as I have put them through the wringer today with multiple games and benchmarks and haven't encountered any artifacts or anomalies in performance. 

 

Benchmark: Fire Strike Ultra 
CPU: Xeon E3 1231 V3 @3.8 GHz (boost)
GPU: Sapphire Nitro R9 390
GPU Core: 1155
GPU Memory: 1600
Score: 3157
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/12980687?
 
 
Benchmark: Fire Strike Extreme
CPU: Xeon E3 1231 V3 @3.8 GHz (boost)
GPU: Sapphire Nitro R9 390
GPU Core: 1155
GPU Memory: 1600
Score: 5858
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/12980614?
 
Benchmark: Fire Strike
CPU: Xeon E3 1231 V3 @3.8 GHz (boost)
GPU: Sapphire Nitro R9 390
GPU Core: 1155
GPU Memory: 1600
Score: 11622
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/12980507?

 

GPU-Z to verify card clocks: 

 

[Jamesrideout2]

CPU I-7 3770k @ 5ghz 

 gpu gigabyte extreme waterforce 

gpu core 1642

gpu mem 8540 

score firestrike performance 18237 

24.3k graphics 

 

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9137000

[IGJoe2192]

Working on getting a valid result with near this score. 

[IGJoe2192]

Single RX480 8GB @ 1390Mhz & Memory @ 2250Mhz (9000Mhz effective)

i7-5930K @ 4.5Ghz