LTT 3DMark Thread

[Boomaa]

Benchmark: Fire Strike

CPU: i7 4790k @ 4.00 GHz

GPU: GTX 970

GPU Core: 1521.9 MHz

GPU Memory: 1927.8 MHz

Score: 11106

3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/11969545

 

[DXMember]

@Kryptyx @colonel_mortis

Just thought I'd throw this here:

 

THIS IS LINK

 

New list with more than 600 entries pulled from this thread last updated today.

Unfortunately some of the older results have been removed from 3dmark.com and other older results couldn't recognize the detailed scores, but the Total score is present for all entries.

The list contains all entries regardless of the test - Skydiver, Cloud Gate, API Overhead Test - but since this thread is mainly to compare Fire Strike scores, I've set the automatic filters to show only those.

 

EDIT: Fixed the detailed scores (graphics, physics, combined) for all Fire Strike and Sky Diver tests

[done12many2]

3 hours ago, DXMember said:

@Kryptyx @colonel_mortis

Just thought I'd throw this here:

https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=718A6487E3EBF0D2!175&authkey=!AFgMhhezFkbXg6Q&ithint=file%2cxlsx

 

New list with more than 600 entries pulled from this thread last updated today.

Unfortunately some of the older results have been removed from 3dmark.com and other older results couldn't recognize the detailed scores, but the Total score is present for all entries.

The list contains all entries regardless of the test - Skydiver, Cloud Gate, API Overhead Test - but since this thread is mainly to compare Fire Strike scores, I've set the automatic filters to show only those.

 

Is this file locked?

[DildorTheDecent]

2 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

 

Is this file locked?

appears that it is. 

[DXMember]

1 minute ago, done12many2 said:

 

Is this file locked?

shouldn't be...

maybe onedrive being picky or something...

I have it open without authentication on one browser and then it sometimes shows me "File has been moved, deleted or renamed" with the authentication...

give the cloud 5 to 10 minutes to sort it out

[done12many2]

3 hours ago, DXMember said:

shouldn't be...

maybe onedrive being picky or something...

I have it open without authentication on one browser and then it sometimes shows me "File has been moved, deleted or renamed" with the authentication...

give the cloud 5 to 10 minutes to sort it out

 

Thanks for doing this!

[DXMember]

3 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

 

Thanks for doing this!

fixed it... somehow LTT embedded the link incorrectly...

I had the right link in my clipboard but pasting it to the post it made it broken... I embedded it manually, works like a charm

@DildorTheDecent

[DildorTheDecent]

7 minutes ago, DXMember said:

fixed it... somehow LTT embedded the link incorrectly...

I had the right link in my clipboard but pasting it to the post it made it broken... I embedded it manually, works like a charm

@DildorTheDecent

nice

[Arcmanov]

On 12/22/2015 at 10:22 PM, Arcmanov said:

Benchmark: Fire Strike
CPU: 5820K @ 4.3 GHz
GPU: 2 x GTX 970
GPU Core: 1240
GPU Memory: 1853

Score: 18652

3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6768343

 

Slight bump to the score...  

 

 

Benchmark: Fire Strike
CPU: 5820K @ 4.4 GHz
GPU: 2 x GTX 970
GPU Core: 1504
GPU Memory: 1901

Score: 19121

3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8479277

[done12many2]

Benchmark: Fire Strike 1.1
CPU: 5960x @ 4.9 GHz
GPU: EVGA GTX 1080 2-Way SLI
GPU Core: 2,088 MHz
GPU Memory: 11,660 MHz

Score: 31,628 / 47,352 Graphics
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8663634

 

 

[DXMember]

13 hours ago, done12many2 said:

Benchmark: Fire Strike 1.1
CPU: 5960x @ 4.9 GHz
GPU: EVGA GTX 1080 2-Way SLI
GPU Core: 2,088 MHz
GPU Memory: 11,660 MHz

Score: 31,628 / 47,352 Graphics
3DMark Link: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8663634

And I want to congratulate you with the first GTX1080 entry!!!! Dem numbers insane, do you mind posting results with stock clocks single GPU, OC single GPU and stock clocks SLI for a baseline?

[done12many2]

3 hours ago, DXMember said:

And I want to congratulate you with the first GTX1080 entry!!!! Dem numbers insane, do you mind posting results with stock clocks single GPU, OC single GPU and stock clocks SLI for a baseline?

 

Thanks bud. 

 

I'll run those tests for you, but I might be heading up to Micro Center this morning to grab a new CPU so it might be much later in the day.

[Guest]

Benchmark: Sky Diver 1.0

CPU:  Intel Core i/-4720HQ

GPU:  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

GPU memory: 2.048 MB

Score: 7898

 

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/12297225

[DXMember]

42 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

 

Thanks bud. 

 

I'll run those tests for you, but I might be heading up to Micro Center this morning to grab a new CPU so it might be much later in the day.

can I guess that it's a 10 core Broadwell?

going to rek that first place quad titan x?

[done12many2]

1 minute ago, DXMember said:

can I guess that it's a 10 core Broadwell?

 

Yep.  I reserved a 6950x yesterday, but I've been waiting on results on overclock.net before heading up to pick it up.  I'm not impressed with the single core performance of the 6800k I bought a couple of days ago, so it's going back.  Its highest overclock single core performance and my 5960x's highest overclock single core performance were exactly the same.  I suspect that single core performance on the 6950x may be similar, but the guys that picked them up yesterday aren't posting a lot of feedback. Looks like I need to find out for myself, which sucks because I have to drain the loop and pull the board due to a monoblock install.

 

9 minutes ago, DXMember said:

going to rek that first place quad titan x?

I'm #5 on the Hall of Fame for FireStrike x 2, which is the highest water cooled setup so that's pretty cool.  I won't be able to get any higher.  The guys above me either DICE or LN2 their stuff.

[DXMember]

1 minute ago, done12many2 said:

 

Yep.  I reserved a 6950x yesterday, but I've been waiting on results on overclock.net before heading up to pick it up.  I'm not impressed with the single core performance of the 6800k I bought a couple of days ago, so it's going back.  Its highest overclock single core performance and my 5960x's highest overclock single core performance were exactly the same.  I suspect that single core performance on the 6950x may be similar, but the guys that picked them up yesterday aren't posting a lot of feedback. Looks like I need to find out for myself, which sucks because I have to drain the loop and pull the board due to a monoblock install.

 

I'm #5 on the Hall of Fame for FireStrike x 2, which is the highest water cooled setup so that's pretty cool.  I won't be able to get any higher.  The guys above me either DICE or LN2 their stuff.

(: I was talking about our amature hour database... you're ranking 2nd there with only Quad Titan X in front of you

 

Please do share how your Broadwell-E overclocking goes, so far I've only seen a good Tom's Hardware review where they showed that Broadwell overclocking isn't really potent... They hit a wall at 4.3GHz and couldn't go more even at 1.5V

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-broadwell-e-6950x-6900k-6850k-6800k,4587-10.html

[done12many2]

17 minutes ago, DXMember said:

(: I was talking about our amature hour database... you're ranking 2nd there with only Quad Titan X in front of you

Oh wow.  Yeah the this "LTT 3DMark Thread" is dead.  It seems to have been for quite some time.

 

 

17 minutes ago, DXMember said:

Please do share how your Broadwell-E overclocking goes, so far I've only seen a good Tom's Hardware review where they showed that Broadwell overclocking isn't really potent... They hit a wall at 4.3GHz and couldn't go more even at 1.5V

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-broadwell-e-6950x-6900k-6850k-6800k,4587-10.html

Well if I don't hear some feedback from some buddies soon, I'll delay picking up the 6950x.  It's on hold for me until Sunday.

 

I read the review that you linked.  The roughly 4.3 limit has popped up in quite a few reviews and threads.  What I'm wondering is how high you can got 1, 2, 3 or even 4 cores only?  The 4.3 is fine for me if I'm running a multi thread optimize app, but I'd like to go a lot higher on select cores for other purposes as well.  

 

[Mr.Dingle]

Benchmark : Firestrike 1.1 

CPU : i5-4690k @ 4.4Ghz

GPU : Sapphire Nitro R9 390 ( 1100Mhz Core , 1800 Memory ) 

Score : 10752

Link : http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/12322002? 

 

And im just here sitting with big ????? above my head .. 

 

 

[DildorTheDecent]

Benchmark : Firestrike 1.1 

CPU : Intel Core i7 2700K @5.0GHz

GPU : GTX 980 K|NGP|N 1545MHz core | 9192MHz mem

Score : 14442

Link : http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8688701

 

EDIT: HWBOT link for lols: http://hwbot.org/submission/3232070_

[done12many2]

On 6/3/2016 at 8:20 AM, DXMember said:

(: I was talking about our amature hour database... you're ranking 2nd there with only Quad Titan X in front of you

 

Please do share how your Broadwell-E overclocking goes, so far I've only seen a good Tom's Hardware review where they showed that Broadwell overclocking isn't really potent... They hit a wall at 4.3GHz and couldn't go more even at 1.5V

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i7-broadwell-e-6950x-6900k-6850k-6800k,4587-10.html

I'm glad I don't always trust other's and test things on my own.  The 4.3 limitation may be real, but it isn't in my case.  I did very little to get it to 4.5.  I tried 4.5 at 1.3 and it just barely crashed so I ran 1.4 and it was a go.  I would imaging that stability will be somewhere in between the two.  I haven't touched CPU cache or anything else yet, but as you can see, Cinebench R15 didn't mind either way.    There's definitely a little more left in it.  Just not sure how much.

 

 

[DXMember]

2 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

I'm glad I don't always trust other's and test things on my own.  The 4.3 limitation may be real, but it isn't in my case.  I did very little to get it to 4.5.  I tried 4.5 at 1.3 and it just barely crashed so I ran 1.4 and it was a go.  I would imaging that stability will be somewhere in between the two.  I haven't touched CPU cache or anything else yet, but as you can see, Cinebench R15 didn't mind either way.    There's definitely a little more left in it.  Just not sure how much.

SICK!!!

[Simon771]

3 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

I'm glad I don't always trust other's and test things on my own.  The 4.3 limitation may be real, but it isn't in my case.  I did very little to get it to 4.5.  I tried 4.5 at 1.3 and it just barely crashed so I ran 1.4 and it was a go.  I would imaging that stability will be somewhere in between the two.  I haven't touched CPU cache or anything else yet, but as you can see, Cinebench R15 didn't mind either way.    There's definitely a little more left in it.  Just not sure how much.

orgasm!

[DXMember]

@done12many2 but the question still stands - is the 6950X enough to give you a 1000 mark boost to get that throne?

[done12many2]

1 minute ago, DXMember said:

@done12many2 but the question still stands - is the 6950X enough to give you a 1000 mark boost to get that throne?

 

I doubt that my friend, but I'm willing to give it a shot.  Competing against the big guns (3 & 4-way SLI) with two little reference cards is not joke.  

[DXMember]

2 minutes ago, done12many2 said:

 

I doubt that my friend, but I'm willing to give it a shot.  Competing against the big guns (3 & 4-way SLI) with two little reference cards is not joke.  

3DMark scores for balanced systems, if you can get your Combined score and Physics score closer to your Graphics score it will score the system higher