Jump to content

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and 4060 Ti get first rumored performance claims, fast but also power hungry

Go to solution Solved by BiG StroOnZ,

@starsmine

 

Yeah saw it on MLID about an hour ago. Figured the thread was dead though, but a mod can lock it since you bumped it.

 

9 minutes ago, Ydfhlx said:

MSRP is just a made up number with next to no relation to actual pricing nowadays. 3080 10GB doesn't even have a MSRP at all...

Correct. Emphasis on "Suggested" in MSRP. The point of MSRP is to at least keep the resellers in the black regardless of how the margins turn out to be. Because of inflationary projections, expect the MSRP to be set higher than normal with a lot of flash deals now and then depending on demand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 8/30/2022 at 4:06 AM, porina said:

75W performance class is its own niche that's generally been neglected. There's the 1650 but I'm not aware of anything else from red or green since that.

6500XT/6400

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, DANK_AS_gay said:

6500XT/6400

Ok, I missed the 6400 being 53W so it does count. I haven't looked for detailed benchmarks but TechPowerUp rate it slightly behind a 1650, although it is also lower power than the 1650 so you can say there is some small progress there.

 

6500XT is over 100W so not even close to the 75W limit from a PCIe slot.

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, RTX 4070, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, random 1080p + 720p displays.
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, porina said:

Ok, I missed the 6400 being 53W so it does count. I haven't looked for detailed benchmarks but TechPowerUp rate it slightly behind a 1650, although it is also lower power than the 1650 so you can say there is some small progress there.

 

6500XT is over 100W so not even close to the 75W limit from a PCIe slot.

And to make things worse the 6400 is a terrible pick for this use case, as most of the systems people want to stick a 75W GPU into (SFF Dells off of eBay) won't have PCIe 4.0, making it substantially (~17%) slower than the 1650.

CPU: i7 4790k, RAM: 16GB DDR3, GPU: GTX 1060 6GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×