Jump to content

Made the AMD to Intel switch!

Okay this is going to be a before and after story:

 

Before:

 

FX-8350@4.8ghz

16GB (4x4)

6GB GTX 780 no OC

 

70ish fps Titanfall maxed out no AA

Cinibench R15 78 FPS

Crysis 3 70fps (With low drops)

 

After:

i5 4670k @ 3.4ghz

6GB GTX 780 no OC

Cinibench R15 99fps

Titanfall maxed out and 8x MSAA maxed out my monitor at 138-144fps

 

i5 4670k @ 4.4ghz

6GB GTX 780 no OC

 

Titanfall maxed out and 8x MSAA maxed out my monitor at 138-144fps

Cinibench R15 147.8fps

Crysis 3 70fps

 

Other thoughts:

The 8350 is a space heater. Not even joking. My room is at 75F but after an hour of gaming it gets to 82F in here. I was using an H110 with 2 noctua industrial fans @ 3000 rpm to cool it.

So far the room is at 77F with the FX machine off and i have gamed just over an hour on the Intel machine so i'm glad i did this before summer.

To anyone planning to buy FX, just DONT for ANY reason. Hope this info helps people out. 

Mea Culpa.

Laptop: Thinkpad W520 i7 2720QM 24GB RAM 1920x1080 2x SSDs Main Rig: 4790k 12GB Hyperx Beast Zotac 980ti AMP! Fractal Define S (window) RM850 Noctua NH-D15 EVGA Z97 FTW with 3 1080P 144hz monitors from Asus Secondary: i5 6600K, R9 390 STRIX, 16GB DDR4, Acer Predator 144Hz 1440P

As Centos 7 SU once said: With great power comes great responsibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

nice :)

NEW PC build: Blank Heaven   minimalist white and black PC     Old S340 build log "White Heaven"        The "LIGHTCANON" flashlight build log        Project AntiRoll (prototype)        Custom speaker project

Spoiler

Ryzen 3950X | AMD Vega Frontier Edition | ASUS X570 Pro WS | Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB | NZXT H500 | Seasonic Prime Fanless TX-700 | Custom loop | Coolermaster SK630 White | Logitech MX Master 2S | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Pro 512GB | Samsung 58" 4k TV | Scarlett 2i4 | 2x AT2020

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice, I'm also making the switch, I'm on an 8120 and have ordered a 5820K :D

CPU: i7 5820K 4.0GHz @1.15V | MOBO: Asus X99 Sabertooth | GPU: Gigabyte Windforce GTX 980Ti, LTT Orange | CASE: NZXT H440 Black 2015 | COOLER: Noctua NH-D15S w/ LTT Fans | RAM: 32GB Patriot 3000MHz | STORAGE: 512GB Samsung 950 Pro, 960GB Sandisk Ultra II 3 x 8TB Seagate HDD's | PSU: 750W Seasonic X series, black / orange cablemod cables| Monitors: 3x Asus VX24AH's | AUDIO OUT: Microlab SOLO 8C, Sennheiser HD 650's, Audio engine D1 Amp / DAC | AUDIO IN: Blue Snowball | Keyboard: CM Storm QuickFire TK MX Green | Mouse: Logitech G900 Proteus Spectrum + RSI Extended Mouse Pad | PCPP Linkhttp://nz.pcpartpicker.com/list/hPjFd6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do know...

The cinebench R15 Opencl test depends ONLY on GPU...

Then explain how i had 99fps on the i5 and when i OCed it i got 147

I ran both tests twice.

Laptop: Thinkpad W520 i7 2720QM 24GB RAM 1920x1080 2x SSDs Main Rig: 4790k 12GB Hyperx Beast Zotac 980ti AMP! Fractal Define S (window) RM850 Noctua NH-D15 EVGA Z97 FTW with 3 1080P 144hz monitors from Asus Secondary: i5 6600K, R9 390 STRIX, 16GB DDR4, Acer Predator 144Hz 1440P

As Centos 7 SU once said: With great power comes great responsibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do know...

The cinebench R15 Opencl test depends ONLY on GPU...

Main processor performance (CPU)

CINEBENCH test procedures include a comprehensive test of the main processor’s performance by rendering a photo-realistic 3D scene. This scene, with approx. 280,000 polygons, uses various algorithms and all available cores. The test result is displayed in points.

 

Graphics card performance (OpenGL)

This test uses a car chase consisting of complex 3d scenes to ascertain the graphics card’s OpenGL render performance. This scene contains a large amount of geometry (approx. 1 million polygons), high-res textures and numerous effects. The result is displayed in frames per second.

 

it does both

and he uses the same GPU for both tests

it is obvious that the 8350 was bottlenecking his GPU

NEW PC build: Blank Heaven   minimalist white and black PC     Old S340 build log "White Heaven"        The "LIGHTCANON" flashlight build log        Project AntiRoll (prototype)        Custom speaker project

Spoiler

Ryzen 3950X | AMD Vega Frontier Edition | ASUS X570 Pro WS | Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB | NZXT H500 | Seasonic Prime Fanless TX-700 | Custom loop | Coolermaster SK630 White | Logitech MX Master 2S | Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Pro 512GB | Samsung 58" 4k TV | Scarlett 2i4 | 2x AT2020

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Praise the Lord he's seen the light he's left his dark days over at the red club he's now a real enthusiast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You were already getting 70 fps. I mean sure it's gone up, but by an important metric? I'm not sure. Knowing that your CPU was limiting you anyway, you could have afforded some AA at no cost, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Praise the Lord he's seen the light he's left his dark days over at the red club he's now a real enthusiast

I had the i5 for a year i just wasnt gaming on it.

I also own a G3258 for my home security system, i switched long ago jsut not for gaming  :P

Laptop: Thinkpad W520 i7 2720QM 24GB RAM 1920x1080 2x SSDs Main Rig: 4790k 12GB Hyperx Beast Zotac 980ti AMP! Fractal Define S (window) RM850 Noctua NH-D15 EVGA Z97 FTW with 3 1080P 144hz monitors from Asus Secondary: i5 6600K, R9 390 STRIX, 16GB DDR4, Acer Predator 144Hz 1440P

As Centos 7 SU once said: With great power comes great responsibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You do know...

The cinebench R15 Opencl test depends ONLY on GPU...

Not true.

 

An FX8 @ 4.6Ghz with a 780 at stock only does about 100fps.

 

Meanwhile an i5-4670k @ stock with a 780 @ stock does over 120fps.

 

When you overclock the i5, that fps grows.

"I genuinely dislike the promulgation of false information, especially to people who are asking for help selecting new parts."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You were already getting 70 fps. I mean sure it's gone up, but by an important metric? I'm not sure. Knowing that your CPU was limiting you anyway, you could have afforded some AA at no cost, too.

70fps with no msaa and i have a 144hz monitor so id like to make use of the 144hz

Laptop: Thinkpad W520 i7 2720QM 24GB RAM 1920x1080 2x SSDs Main Rig: 4790k 12GB Hyperx Beast Zotac 980ti AMP! Fractal Define S (window) RM850 Noctua NH-D15 EVGA Z97 FTW with 3 1080P 144hz monitors from Asus Secondary: i5 6600K, R9 390 STRIX, 16GB DDR4, Acer Predator 144Hz 1440P

As Centos 7 SU once said: With great power comes great responsibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never seen this results replicated in benchmarks anywhere else. Yes you always see gains, but never double the FPS everytime it was just maybe 10 or 20% better.

 

I mean no offense but I seriously doubt your results, your issues on the previous chip were probably somewhere else.

-------

Current Rig

-------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

And you used to be such a freaking hater.

 

Edit your post and put this at the bottom line:

 

Mea Culpa.

Done.

Laptop: Thinkpad W520 i7 2720QM 24GB RAM 1920x1080 2x SSDs Main Rig: 4790k 12GB Hyperx Beast Zotac 980ti AMP! Fractal Define S (window) RM850 Noctua NH-D15 EVGA Z97 FTW with 3 1080P 144hz monitors from Asus Secondary: i5 6600K, R9 390 STRIX, 16GB DDR4, Acer Predator 144Hz 1440P

As Centos 7 SU once said: With great power comes great responsibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just swapped from an ol' Phenom II 965 which was OC'd to 3.8GHz, to an i7 4790k, which i have running @4.6GHz. All i gotta do now is wait for my GTX 980 which is arriving tomorrow.

Shot through the heart and you're to blame, 30fps and i'll pirate your game - Bon Jovi

Take me down to the console city where the games are blurry and the frames are thirty - Guns N' Roses

Arguing with religious people is like explaining to your mother that online games can't be paused...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never seen this results replicated in benchmarks anywhere else. Yes you always see gains, but never double the FPS everytime it was just maybe 10 or 20% better.

 

I mean no offense but I seriously doubt your results, your issues on the previous chip were probably somewhere else.

I had the FX for a year and 6 months of which with the 780, during which time i ran both at stock and with OC but always 70-80 fps in titanfall nothing more.

There were no issues on the previous system. It even had more RAM

Laptop: Thinkpad W520 i7 2720QM 24GB RAM 1920x1080 2x SSDs Main Rig: 4790k 12GB Hyperx Beast Zotac 980ti AMP! Fractal Define S (window) RM850 Noctua NH-D15 EVGA Z97 FTW with 3 1080P 144hz monitors from Asus Secondary: i5 6600K, R9 390 STRIX, 16GB DDR4, Acer Predator 144Hz 1440P

As Centos 7 SU once said: With great power comes great responsibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Feel the power of the #IntelMasterRace :P

Specs: CPU - Intel i7 8700K @ 5GHz | GPU - Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 Gaming | Motherboard - ASUS Strix Z370-G WIFI AC | RAM - XPG Gammix DDR4-3000MHz 32GB (2x16GB) | Main Drive - Samsung 850 Evo 500GB M.2 | Other Drives - 7TB/3 Drives | CPU Cooler - Corsair H100i Pro | Case - Fractal Design Define C Mini TG | Power Supply - EVGA G3 850W

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinking of switching when Skylake comes out :D Then I plan to switch back to AMD when Gen 2 Zen comes out.

Intel i5 6600k~Asus Maximus VIII Hero~G.Skill Ripjaws 4 Series 8GB DDR4-3200 CL-16~Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Tri-X~Phanteks Enthoo Pro M~Sandisk Extreme Pro 480GB~SeaSonic Snow Silent 750~BenQ XL2730Z QHD 144Hz FreeSync~Cooler Master Seidon 240M~Varmilo VA87M (Cherry MX Brown)~Corsair Vengeance M95~Oppo PM-3~Windows 10 Pro~http://pcpartpicker.com/p/ynmBnQ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

@rtpb5642

 

With your permission, I would like to add your post to my user experience/testimonial section of my long spoiler post.  Also, please update this thread as you test more games.

"I genuinely dislike the promulgation of false information, especially to people who are asking for help selecting new parts."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just swapped from an ol' Phenom II 965 which was OC'd to 3.8GHz, to an i7 4790k, which i have running @4.6GHz. All i gotta do now is wait for my GTX 980 which is arriving tomorrow.

if I was in your shoes I wouldn't be able to sleep it would be like christmas as a 8 year old again
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the FX for a year and 6 months of which with the 780, during which time i ran both at stock and with OC but always 70-80 fps in titanfall nothing more.

There were no issues on the previous system. It even had more RAM

 

There were perhaps no show stopping issues but your previous motherboard obviously had issues. Sorry but if I see 100 tests from everyone around the web that show one result and I see yours showing something way abnormal, I'm gonna assume that your result is the anomaly.

-------

Current Rig

-------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

@rtpb5642

 

With your permission, I would like to add your post to my user experience/testimonial section of my long spoiler post.  Also, please update this thread as you test more games.

I have an i5 and my nans computer runs amd can I be a part
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

@rtpb5642

 

With your permission, I would like to add your post to my user experience/testimonial section of my long spoiler post.  Also, please update this thread as you test more games.

Sure sounds great.  I only switched an hour ago but plan to add crysis 3 once its done downloading on the i5 machine.

Laptop: Thinkpad W520 i7 2720QM 24GB RAM 1920x1080 2x SSDs Main Rig: 4790k 12GB Hyperx Beast Zotac 980ti AMP! Fractal Define S (window) RM850 Noctua NH-D15 EVGA Z97 FTW with 3 1080P 144hz monitors from Asus Secondary: i5 6600K, R9 390 STRIX, 16GB DDR4, Acer Predator 144Hz 1440P

As Centos 7 SU once said: With great power comes great responsibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

There were perhaps no show stopping issues but your previous motherboard obviously had issues. Sorry but if I see 100 tests from everyone around the web that show one result and I see yours showing something way abnormal, I'm gonna assume that your result is the anomaly.

What are you talking about?  Results ALL over the web are showing exactly what he experienced.

 

H93GZC3.png

---

67506.png

---

67507.png

---

67510.png

---

batman.png

---

civilization.png

---

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test

---

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test

---

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test

---

Even this supposedly very good multi-threaded game, Call of Duty:Advanced Warefare runs better on an i3 than an FX9

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test

---

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test

---

d1b73da9_http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-sto

---

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test

Really pitiful when modern games are playing so much better on an i3 than an FX9.

---

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test

---

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test

---

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test

---

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test

---

http--www.gamegpu.ru-images-stories-Test

---

60-Bioshock-R9-295X2.png

---

65-DiRT-3-R9-295X2.png

---

arma3_1920.png

---

bf4_cpu_radeon.png

You have to OC an FX8 to 5Ghz just to match an i5-4440 at stock in BF4 multiplayer with an R9 290X.

---

bf4_1920m.png

Even Mantle doesn't bridge the gap.  Too bad they don't show the minimums in this above graph.

---

bfh_cpu_nv.png

---

civ_1920.png

---

csgo_1920.png

---

crysis3_1920_2.png

---

fc3_1920.png

---

fc4_n_1920.png

---

gtav_vhigh_cpu.png

Very modern, multi-threaded game that does take advantage of all cores available, yet you have to OC an FX to 5Ghz to MATCH an i3.

---

starcraft_1920.png

---

gta4_1920.png

---

rome2_1920.png

---

witchercpu_1920.png

This one above is Witcher 2

---

assassin_1920n.png

---

fsx_1920n.png

"I genuinely dislike the promulgation of false information, especially to people who are asking for help selecting new parts."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

And you used to be such a freaking hater.

 

Edit your post and put this at the bottom line:

 

Mea Culpa.

i knew what this meant... lol

thanks latin teacher that randomly talks to me when i walk into spanish class :P

4690K // 212 EVO // Z97-PRO // Vengeance 16GB // GTX 770 GTX 970 // MX100 128GB // Toshiba 1TB // Air 540 // HX650

Logitech G502 RGB // Corsair K65 RGB (MX Red)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×