I'll bet you can't get a worse Cinebench score than me

[vanished]

11 minutes ago, Captain Chaos said:

I highly doubt it.  Lemme check real quick ...

 

Nope, not even close. 

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

Did these back-to-back.   Normally that CPU gets a better score, but I can't shut down the stuff that I'm working on.

 

Wow, so about a 100x difference then... so, the people getting 0.01 pts on R11.5... not quite as impressive I guess  

[mach]

Not fair you guys are using ancient hardware and disabling shits.....

I wanna have a go on R15 with my atom E3815, all stock speed, but can't be bothered to download and install windows on it It will take ages. 

 

[imreloadin]

On 3/17/2017 at 1:52 PM, Ryan_Vickers said:

I guess we should have some sort of rules... one category for running on "bare metal", no background programs, underclocks allowed, and another that's just "whatever it takes"  

 

52 minutes ago, mach said:

Not fair you guys are using ancient hardware and disabling shits.....

I wanna have a go on R15 with my atom E3815, all stock speed, but can't be bothered to download and install windows on it It will take ages. 

 

The "rules" so to speak were established a couple of pages earlier in the post I've quoted above yours, underclocking/disabling is allowed.

[WereCat]

On 17. 3. 2017 at 5:09 PM, DocSwag said:

Just wait. I'll find a way to run cinebench on my OP2 so that it only utilizes one A53 core.

 

I BET I CAN WIN NOW!!!

I will disable 3 cores and HT on my 4770k. Then underclock it to 800MHz.

Then I will run Cinebench and live stream it on Twitch in best possible quality using x264, run deep AV scan in the background and put Windows folder into RAR with maximum compression.

[DocSwag]

19 minutes ago, WereCat said:

I will disable 3 cores and HT on my 4770k. Then underclock it to 800MHz.

Then I will run Cinebench and live stream it on Twitch in best possible quality using x264, run deep AV scan in the background and put Windows folder into RAR with maximum compression.

Damn, didn't think of that.

[imreloadin]

21 minutes ago, WereCat said:

I will disable 3 cores and HT on my 4770k. Then underclock it to 800MHz.

Then I will run Cinebench and live stream it on Twitch in best possible quality using x264, run deep AV scan in the background and put Windows folder into RAR with maximum compression.

I'll do the same thing except with my Athlon 2650

[dfsdfgfkjsefoiqzemnd]

3 hours ago, WereCat said:

I will disable 3 cores and HT on my 4770k. Then underclock it to 800MHz.

Then I will run Cinebench and live stream it on Twitch in best possible quality using x264, run deep AV scan in the background and put Windows folder into RAR with maximum compression.

Don't forget to use the task manager to set Cinebench's priority to "low" and the others to "high" (or whatever the equivalent in your version of Windows is). 

[Energycore]

If we're gonna jump on the bad cinebench score wagon, someone should try hitting their CPU's thermal throttling point (like for instance, leave the cooler over the CPU without pressure, you can then control the temp by pressing down on the cooler so it has good contact).

 

Then your CPU could hit speeds as low as 100MHz as it desperately tries to stop you from torturing it. Warning: Probably shouldn't do it with your daily driver CPU

[8uhbbhu8]

Excuse me while I get my p3 machine up again  or my p4...

[FlightRisk]

10 hours ago, Energycore said:

 

If we're gonna jump on the bad cinebench score wagon, someone should try hitting their CPU's thermal throttling point (like for instance, leave the cooler over the CPU without pressure, you can then control the temp by pressing down on the cooler so it has good contact).

 

Then your CPU could hit speeds as low as 100MHz as it desperately tries to stop you from torturing it. Warning: Probably shouldn't do it with your daily driver CPU

 

I love the idea, however is it even possible to get below 0.01 points like that other person did?

[dfsdfgfkjsefoiqzemnd]

16 hours ago, Ryan_Vickers said:

so, the people getting 0.01 pts on R11.5... not quite as impressive I guess

I honestly don't know.  I don't think the scores scale the same way.  It took me 16 hours, that would be less than 2cb if my netbook were able to run R15.

 

I'm tempted to put my old rig's i5-2500 on a single core with the lowest possible multiplier and let that run for days on R15 to see if I can get into decimals there too, but unfortunately I'm in the middle of re-ripping my music collection with EAC (there were some issues with the WMP rips so I decided to just rip all CDs again). That that old rig is the only one in my household that has a DVD drive, so I really don't want to make it unusable for a week or longer.

[vanished]

30 minutes ago, FlightRisk said:

I love the idea, however is it even possible to get below 0.01 points like that other person did?

Because as shown earlier, R15 scores roughly 100x higher than R11.5 so the 30 odd points scored by OP would be equivalent to ~0.3 pts in the test where you say 0.01.  Still, the 0.01 is impressively low, but perhaps not as much as it first seems.

[imreloadin]

This is the lowest I could get it with no other programs running, will see if I can loosen the RAM timings more and test it further later.

 

Testing it again now while it's trying to render out a 4K video at the same time should be interesting considering it's only clocked to 800MHz and it's set to only use 1GB of RAM!

 

EDIT: Just checked the progress on it and it's still at the "Performing render test...rendering" screen with a black page and absolutely 0 boxes rendered, made sure it didn't freeze by making the mouse move. Any guesses on how long it's going to take lol?

Edited March 21, 2017 by imreloadin
Added update.

[Energycore]

5 hours ago, imreloadin said:

EDIT: Just checked the progress on it and it's still at the "Performing render test...rendering" screen with a black page and absolutely 0 boxes rendered, made sure it didn't freeze by making the mouse move. Any guesses on how long it's going to take lol?

It might not render at all until your 4K video is done

[imreloadin]

1 minute ago, Energycore said:

It might not render at all until your 4K video is done

It's currently about a fifth of the way through the first Cinebench square while the video render is ~40% complete. Mind you that it's been at this for about 5 hours now

[Energycore]

Just now, imreloadin said:

It's currently about a fifth of the way through the first Cinebench square while the video render is ~40% complete. Mind you that it's been at this for about 5 hours now

Ok you might win

[imreloadin]

Just now, Energycore said:

Ok you might win

And my parents told me that I wouldn't amount to anything in life

[Energycore]

Just now, imreloadin said:

And my parents told me that I wouldn't amount to anything in life

Try to render the same video again once it's done

Even if it takesn weeks

[imreloadin]

1 minute ago, Energycore said:

Try to render the same video again once it's done

Even if it takesn weeks

Oh I am planning on it *wrings hands menacingly*

[Energycore]

22 hours ago, CUDA_Cores said:

Might have to dig out the old Pentium MMX 200MHz. Although I doubt Cinebench would even run on it since cinebench probably requires SSE .

it might run even slower because it has to emulate SSE

[Kobathor]

i bet if i tried this on my Mobile Pentium III laptop, it wouldn't even run.

[8uhbbhu8]

lol I think i'll do this on my c2d T9550 Laptop w/ cinebench and aida64 running  (This is a laptop that struggles to open and run word many days)

[vanished]

6 hours ago, imreloadin said:

EDIT: Just checked the progress on it and it's still at the "Performing render test...rendering" screen with a black page and absolutely 0 boxes rendered, made sure it didn't freeze by making the mouse move. Any guesses on how long it's going to take lol?

My setup was stuck like that for about 4 days before I gave up under the assumption that it might take several weeks or more to complete.

[imreloadin]

Just now, Ryan_Vickers said:

My setup was stuck like that for about 4 days before I gave up under the assumption that it might take several weeks or more to complete.

I'm committed

[FakeNSA]

7 minutes ago, imreloadin said:

I'm committed

We believe in you!