NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti official specifications AND GAMING PERFORMANCE

[Youbetternot]

Here are the Official Specs of the GTX 780 TI 

 

 

I got my hands on some official documents from NVIDIA, thus I decided to share my knowledge with you.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti “the best gaming GPU on the planet” GeForce GTX 780 Ti in a nutshell:

• 25% more cores than GTX 780 – 2880
• GPU Boost 2.0 — Max Clocks
• Power Balancing — Max OC
• Blazing Fast Memory – 7 Gbps

GeForce GTX 780 Ti specifications

The new flagship was not designed as TITAN replacement, it will serve a different purpose, which is strictly gaming-oriented. TITAN is still better for CUDA developers, researches or scientists, since it provides good double-precision performance and 6GB frame buffer. The GTX 780 Ti on the other hand, will (for now) only ship with 3GB memory. Official document does not mention any 6GB or 12GB variants.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti is equipped with 2880 CUDA cores. The most interesting part is that GTX 780 Ti still has high number of 64-bit CUDA cores, with the same ratio as GTX TITAN — 1/3 of FP32. So technically the only benefit of having a TITAN right now is 6GB frame buffer.

GTX 780 Ti is using GK110 GPU with 5 Graphics Processing Clusters, 15 Streaming Multiprocessors, 2880 FP32 CUDA cores, 960 FP64 CUDA cores, 240 Texture Mapping Units and and 48 Raster Operating Units.

Card is equipped with 3GB GDDR5 memory clocked at 7 GHz, across 384-bit interface. This equals to 336 GB/s bandwidth (16GB/s more than R9 290X). The GTX 780 Ti has higher base clock, although AMD does not officially confirm 800 MHz clock for 290X. On the other hand 780 Ti has lower boost clock (928 MHz vs 1000 MHz), but AMD is using peak performance clock, which is far from real-world scenario.

 

GeForce GTX 780 Ti Power Balancing for overclockers

NVIDIA equipped its GTX 780 Ti with a new feature called Power Balancing. Without this feature power drawn from: 6-pin power connector, 8-pin power connector and PCI Express interface would be balanced across these three sources respectively depending on the current load. However if user overclocks the card power delivery becomes unbalanced, thus card draws more power from one source than the others. To fix this problem NVIDIA came up with an idea of Power Balancing. You probably see where this is going. With this feature enabled GPU can steer the power from one input to another. This will improve overclocking capabilities in comparison to GTX 780 or the TITAN.

 

 

Bigger die equals better heat dissipation

NVIDIA clearly targets Radeon R9 290X in their comparisons. The green team is well aware of AMD problems with the noise and the temperature of their new flagship. NVIDIA’s theory is that since R9 290X is using 455mm² die and GTX 780 Ti is based on 533 mm² die, it equals to lower thermal density, thus less power condensed into smaller area. Long story short, NVIDIA’s GPU will generate less thermal density per square millimeter, so it is easier to dissipate.

NVIDIA made a test 20 minute Crysis 3 run with R9 290X and 780 TI. According to their data after 2 minutes R9 290X drops to 720 MHz, while GTX 780 Ti sustains 940 MHz clock. The average clock speeds are 799 MHz and 968 MHz for 290X and 780 Ti respectively.

 

 

 

GeForce GTX 780 Ti gaming performance

[sone to be added]

 

source:http://videocardz.com/47576/nvidia-geforce-gtx-780-ti-official-specifications

 

GAMING Performance 

According to our newest data, NVIDIA’s GeForce GTX 780 Ti is much faster than Radeon R9 290X.

This was confirmed by multiple leaks already, including synthetic benchmarks or some preliminary gaming tests. Today I have some official scores of both cards confronted with each other with the most popular gaming titles.

There are two things that you should know before making any final judgments here. First is that NVIDIA used 2560×1600 resolution for the most of these games. This is very important since AMD clearly targets 4k resolution in their tests. NVIDIA says that if you want to play on 4k resolution, then you need at least two cards in SLI.

 

 

Conclusion

According to the official data NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti would perform 30% better than 290X. Of course we are looking at the numbers from NVIDIA, so it’s necessary to take these numbers with a grain of salt. I was told that in ‘real’ benchmarks GeForce GTX 780 Ti is about 20% faster than 290X in Quiet Mode. In Uber Mode R9 290X is still slower than 780 Ti, but only by 13%. If we add 4k benchmarks this number will get even better in AMD favor.

Source: http://videocardz.com/47587/nvidia-geforce-gtx-780-ti-official-gaming-performance

 

[miyabwah]

Really is the Titan Ultra, then.

[M-ursu]

Aint this 10th topic, and haven't you posted least 2 of them?

[heineygoat]

3GB 384bit GDDR5?

 

):<

 

Oh wait, just realised dat clock speed. SWEET

May upgrade from two 7970's to a black edition.

[Youbetternot]

Aint this 10th topic, and haven't you posted least 2 of them?

But they are official it beats all

[FloRolf]

Well nvidia, but since you (kinda) mentioned the Black edition, nobody cares about the normal Ti anymore!

[lhikary]

R9 290X let the big boys talk you go umm play somewhere else LOL

[heineygoat]

R9 290X let the big boys talk you go umm play somewhere else LOL

To be fair the 290x is currently a strong  price/performance competitor, particularly at large resolutions.

[Jamdude]

If this releases at £550 then it's looking very good.

[lhikary]

To be fair the 290x is currently a strong price/performance competitor, particularly at large resolutions.

to be fair the 780 dosent get to 95c or even gets that loud as a r9 290x

jus TO BE FAIR

[heineygoat]

to be fair the 780 dosent get to 95c or even gets that loud as a r9 290x

jus TO BE FAIR

It will if you allow the software to clock it that high, just like AMD. 

You're fanboying.

[ajoy39]

to be fair the 780 dosent get to 95c or even gets that loud as a r9 290x

jus TO BE FAIR

It would if it actively turned clock speeds up and fan speeds down until it hit its thermal limit, which by default is at 95, but don't let facts get in your way man. You do you. 

[Sarcasm]

 

I really hope that's a typo and they meant GHz, because if not that's going to be the mother of all bottlenecks...

[lhikary]

780 at full lo get that hot or that loud

simple

[Youbetternot]

GAMING PERFORMANCE

[KakaoDj]

The market sure is heating up, glad i waited for AMD's release 

[akhil.padmanabhan]

The videocardz.com just released some official performance and specification of GTX 780ti, it kinda seems to true.The performance comparison shows it is much faster than the AMD's flagship R9 290X.  check both the links guys. It worth reading   

 

 

 

 

 

Source:

 

http://videocardz.com/47576/nvidia-geforce-gtx-780-ti-official-specifications

 

 

http://videocardz.com/47587/nvidia-geforce-gtx-780-ti-official-gaming-performance

[piplupgao]

Just set the 290X to Uber and see what happens

[YellowDragon]

Yeh much faster my ass, those are biased as they are running the 290X in the quiet mode.

[Morpheus]

what's the point of this lol 290x is on quiet 

[Oradian]

For a second I was like WOW, 780 ti makes 290x look like crap, until I found out it was 290x quiet..... now why was 290x set to "quiet".....................

[Drown]

What's the point of making a benchmark if you limit the card?

[CoolBeans]

Just set the 290X to Uber and see what happens

And then wait for a non reference cooler

[Vitalius]

Just set the 290X to Uber and see what happens

Yeh much faster my ass, those are biased as they are running the 290X in the quiet mode.

I think they are trying to compare it fairly. Like, I doubt the 780Ti hits 95C or sounds like a jet engine doing this FPS.

Edit:

I also doubt the 780Ti is overclocked. Effectively, Uber Mode is an overclock.

[CoolBeans]

For a second I was like WOW, 780 ti makes 290x look like crap, until I found out it was 290x quiet..... now why was 290x set to "quiet".....................

"quiet" still sounds like a jet taking off