Nvidia Keynote at CES

[Humbug]

deleted- double post

[zMeul]

GeForce Now - 25$ for 20 hours of gameplay

did nVidia lost their marbles? you are better off with buying the game from STEAM / GoG than streaming it trough nVidia's service

a game that offers 20 hours of gameplay does not worth 25$

and a game that you can play for 50+ hours will cost less if you own it

 

 

this service is for people with too much $ and no brains

[Ashaira]

13 minutes ago, zMeul said:

GeForce Now - 25$ for 20 hours of gameplay

did nVidia lost their marbles? you are better off with buying the game from STEAM / GoG than streaming it trough nVidia's service

a game that offers 20 hours of gameplay does not worth 25$

and a game that you can play for 50+ hours will cost less if you own it

 

 

this service is for people with too much $ and no brains

from my understanding you still have to buy the game and then you can pay 25 for the hours. and if you want 1080 level of performance you only get 4 hours for 25$.

someone correct me if i'm wrong.

[Core_Tech]

14 minutes ago, zMeul said:

GeForce Now - 25$ for 20 hours of gameplay

did nVidia lost their marbles? you are better off with buying the game from STEAM / GoG than streaming it trough nVidia's service

a game that offers 20 hours of gameplay does not worth 25$

and a game that you can play for 50+ hours will cost less if you own it

 

 

this service is for people with too much $ and no brains

The future is just 64GB 3DXPoint storage for home computers and everything is streamed. That is how Intel and Nvidia will destroy Samsung and the entire data storage industry

[zMeul]

2 minutes ago, Core_Tech said:

The future is just 64GB 3DXPoint storage for home computers and everything is streamed

the future?! I highly doubt it

[Ashaira]

3 minutes ago, Core_Tech said:

The future is just 64GB 3DXPoint storage for home computers and everything is streamed. That is how Intel and Nvidia will destroy Samsung and the entire data storage industry

over my dead body. cloud has it's uses but it will never replace local computers.

[Core_Tech]

1 minute ago, Ashaira said:

over my dead body. cloud has it's uses but it will never replace local computers.

Well, remote desktops on servers first replaced enterprise workstations. Now they've replaced layman desktops for business computers, and the clients are just dumb terminals using dual-core Atoms. The idea it can't be done to consumerville is, well, quite silly.

[S w a t s o n]

1 hour ago, Space Reptile said:

it was ONE core , not ALL cores , all core overclock is estimated at 4.4ghz 

1 hour ago, Core_Tech said:

That was on one core.

 

It was one core due to the vrm not being able to handle it on all cores according to them but we'll see when it comes out

[Space Reptile]

1 minute ago, Swatson said:

it was one core due to the vrm not being able ot handle it on all cores according to them but we'll see when it comes out

that 7ghz kaby was also only one core on ln2 , you dont seem to understand extreme overclocking 

[Core_Tech]

1 minute ago, Swatson said:

 

It was one core due to the vrm not being able to handle it on all cores according to them but we'll see when it comes out

If a 10-phase of solid state caps with ferrite chokes couldn't cut it, I don't want to see the price tag of the board that can.

[S w a t s o n]

1 minute ago, Space Reptile said:

that 7ghz kaby was also only one core on ln2 , you dont seem to understand extreme overclocking 

No i quite understand extreme overclocking. This was on air and not extreme overclocking, besides the magazine said it themselves, it was the vrm giving them issue.

[Core_Tech]

2 minutes ago, Space Reptile said:

that 7ghz kaby was also only one core on ln2 , you dont seem to understand extreme overclocking 

5GHz isn't extreme except on air. I understand extreme OC just fine. I'm merely saying this result is as meaningless as the 7GHz Kaby Lake.

[Space Reptile]

2 minutes ago, Swatson said:

No i quite understand extreme overclocking. This was on air and not extreme overclocking, besides the magazine said it themselves, it was the vrm giving them issue.

we will see then , OC boards are on there way  (MSI X370 TITANIUM) 

[S w a t s o n]

5 minutes ago, Core_Tech said:

5GHz isn't extreme except on air. I understand extreme OC just fine. I'm merely saying this result is as meaningless as the 7GHz Kaby Lake.

I hate it when people imply that something is impossible or extreme because it's on air. You put a big enough cooler (NH-D15 anyone) on it and it's gonna be fine. You need a pretty beefy loop to see an improvement and even then it's usually not a make or break situation.

[captain cactus]

Buildzoid already debunked Ryzen doing 5GHz on air. On one core, sure, but not all 4/6/8. Just not happening. 4.4-4.5 is way more realistic.

[leadeater]

24 minutes ago, Core_Tech said:

The future is just 64GB 3DXPoint storage for home computers and everything is streamed. That is how Intel and Nvidia will destroy Samsung and the entire data storage industry

Not likely, Samsung is working on their own technology and 3DXPoint isn't going to replace much in the short term.

Edited January 5, 2017 by leadeater

[S w a t s o n]

1 minute ago, lots of unexplainable lag said:

Buildzoid already debunked Ryzen doing 5GHz on air. On one core, sure, but not all 4/6/8. Just not happening. 4.4-4.5 is way more realistic.

Yea I saw his post too, anecdotes are the opposite of data. Like I said i dont really expect every chip to do 5ghz but I'm betting it's possible without getting a top 1% chip

[dragoon20005]

1 hour ago, Fetzie said:

Where do you get a monthly price from?

25 x 30 days. Let say we play games everyday. Worse case.

[SteveGrabowski0]

Holy fuck, GeForce Now is ten times worse than it sounded at CES last night:

 

http://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-expands-geforce-gaming-to-millions-more-pcs-and-macs

Pricing and Availability

When gamers register for GeForce NOW, they can play for free for 8 hours on a GeForce GTX 1060 PC or 4 hours on a GeForce GTX 1080 PC. For an additional $25, gamers can play for 20 hours on a GTX 1060 PC or 10 hours on a GTX 1080 PC.

 

 

You also have to buy the fucking game first. What a shit service. 

 

In development at NVIDIA for five years, GeForce NOW is compatible with most Windows- and Mac-based desktop PCs and laptops. Gamers simply download the GeForce NOW app to their local machine. With a few clicks, they can connect to their own GeForce GTX virtual PC, install their favorite games from popular digital game stores -- like Steam, Battle.net, Origin, Uplay and GOG -- and start playing.

[S w a t s o n]

5 minutes ago, SteveGrabowski0 said:

10 hours on a GTX 1080 PC.

$2.50 an hour, seems worth

[Dabombinable]

8 minutes ago, SteveGrabowski0 said:

Holy fuck, GeForce Now is ten times worse than it sounded at CES last night:

 

http://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-expands-geforce-gaming-to-millions-more-pcs-and-macs

Pricing and Availability

When gamers register for GeForce NOW, they can play for free for 8 hours on a GeForce GTX 1060 PC or 4 hours on a GeForce GTX 1080 PC. For an additional $25, gamers can play for 20 hours on a GTX 1060 PC or 10 hours on a GTX 1080 PC.

 

 

You also have to buy the fucking game first. What a shit service. 

 

In development at NVIDIA for five years, GeForce NOW is compatible with most Windows- and Mac-based desktop PCs and laptops. Gamers simply download the GeForce NOW app to their local machine. With a few clicks, they can connect to their own GeForce GTX virtual PC, install their favorite games from popular digital game stores -- like Steam, Battle.net, Origin, Uplay and GOG -- and start playing.

Well they can fuck off. Remote access is my friend in this regard. I can play any game installed on my main rig, on my laptop with its pathetic APU.

[Fetzie]

21 minutes ago, dragoon20005 said:

25 x 30 days. Let say we play games everyday. Worse case.

I assumed 20 hours of gameplay per week, which is about what I do. That means you'd burn the 25 dollars of time in a week. 52 weeks in the year times $25 is $1300 per year.

[Lays]

50 minutes ago, Space Reptile said:

that 7ghz kaby was also only one core on ln2 , you dont seem to understand extreme overclocking 

wat about that near 6.8 on 4c 8t tho?

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/3412515_der8auer_cinebench___r15_core_i7_7700k_1515_cb

[Space Reptile]

1 minute ago, Lays said:

wat about that near 6.8 on 4c 8t tho?

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/3412515_der8auer_cinebench___r15_core_i7_7700k_1515_cb

can you repeat that on 80% of the chips?

[Lays]

5 minutes ago, Space Reptile said:

can you repeat that on 80% of the chips?

6.8, probably not 6.3-6.5, probably.