Unigine Valley Benchmark Scores Thread + SUPERPOSITION ***Over 1000 Submissions!***

[SixtyDashOne]

CPU: Intel Core i5 4650k @ 4.3 GHz

GPU: MSI Lightning 780 @ 980 MHz / 1502 MHz

Average FPS: 65.2

Score: 2728

 

Just got the card last night, so running out-the-box factory settings right now. If I get bored this weekend I might play around with some overclocking.

[GzeroD]

GzeroD

Intel I5 3570k @ 4.4

ASUS reference Radeon R9 290 @ 1209/1545

FPS: 68.5

SCORE: 2867

real temp was 82C @core 74@ vrm2 don't know why valley always shows the wrong core temp for me.

Had to push it harder; can't be getting beat by another reference 290 user even managed to edge out a 290x user. although it looks like this is the end of the line until I get this guy underwater.

 

 

Edit: noticed this

 

Bloodkil933

AMD FX-8350 OC'd to 4.4Ghz

Sapphire R9 290X BF4 Edition @ 1200/1680

67.6 FPS

2827

 

You might want to try this with slightly lower clocks or voltage I would think a 290x with higher clocks than mine (with memory being so important for this benchmark) would outperform it especially since they both use reference coolers. Then again the types of tweaks that boost a 290 may not work on the 290x.

 

 

[GzeroD]

Deleted: double post

[Leonard]

Leonard

Intel 3570k

GTX 660Ti @ 1084Mhz /1285Mhz

31.7 FPS

1328 Score

 

[SixtyDashOne]

MSI 780 Lightning overclocked on "normal" bios (disregard last night's entry from me I guess).

 

SixtyDashOne
CPU: Intel Core i5 4650k @ 4.3 GHz
GPU: MSI Lightning 780 @ 1145 MHz / 1652 MHz
Average FPS: 73.7
Score: 3084

[GzeroD]

Damn you people with your "real" high end cards trying to push my poor 290 out of the single card top 30.

[AMD_Nemesis]

IDK this isn't super reliable as you can shop it to get above some one or a slightly better score. Just my opinion BTW this isn't an entry if ya didn't know lol, Just be aware of this.

[IvIast3r]

IDK this isn't super reliable as you can shop it to get above some one or a slightly better score. Just my opinion BTW this isn't an entry if ya didn't know lol, Just be aware of this.

 

it is called integrity

[Guest]

CPU: i7-4770k @ 4.4ghz

GPU: Zotak GTX 780 ti 1200mhz/3750mhz

FPS: 76.4

Score: 3196

[AMD_Nemesis]

it is called integrity

But as you may know, not everyone in the world is a trustworthy person.

[othertomperson]

 

GzeroD

Intel I5 3570k @ 4.4

ASUS reference Radeon R9 290 @ 1209/1545

FPS: 68.5

SCORE: 2867

 

Hahahaa wow I've heard AMD cards tend to run hot but sixty-five thousand degrees celsius is impressive

[Leonard Brooks]

I am looking at the screenshots from you people and I don't understand where you are getting the second number in the GPU speeds.  Where do I find the second number?

[ivhyn]

I am looking at the screenshots from you people and I don't understand where you are getting the second number in the GPU speeds. Where do I find the second number?

You mean Vram clocks? Either GPU-z or in the top right

[GzeroD]

Hahahaa wow I've heard AMD cards tend to run hot but sixty-five thousand degrees celsius is impressive

. Its some sort of bug..... Or I'm building a deathday with a 290 at its core .

Look at the first entry I had in this thread it was listed higher then when I take the 7850 out of my rig it shows up with no temp field at all.

[SixtyDashOne]

You mean Vram clocks? Either GPU-z or in the top right

 

The top right numbers read quite a bit higher than what GPU-Z says. Which one ends up getting put into the spreadsheet?

[GzeroD]

The top right numbers read quite a bit higher than what GPU-Z says. Which one ends up getting put into the spreadsheet?

I could be wrong but that is probably the card throttling itself after it hits 85 (could not see the screenshot well on my phone) but I'm pretty sue it's the clocks to set it to that go in the sheen not the ones the software decided to set it at because those can change a lot from run to run.

[SixtyDashOne]

I could be wrong but that is probably the card throttling itself after it hits 85 (could not see the screenshot well on my phone) but I'm pretty sue it's the clocks to set it to that go in the sheen not the ones the software decided to set it at because those can change a lot from run to run.

 

My card gets nowhere near 85, it was 67c at the end of the bench.

[GzeroD]

Wow I couldn't read the screen shot on my phone but those numbers are nowhere near each other. No clue whats is causing that.

[SixtyDashOne]

Seems to be somewhat common, for example this post: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/69448-ungine-valley-benchmark-top-30-scores/page-28#entry1507391

 

And this one: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/69448-ungine-valley-benchmark-top-30-scores/page-23#entry1439674

 

They list what is presumably what GPU-Z says, but the numbers on the screenshot are considerably higher. Was just curious which number I should post when I make a submission.

 

Edit: Looking at the spreadsheet, it looks like the lower numbers are what's being input there. Still curious why the difference.

 

Edit edit: Oh, apparently it's GPU Boost is why the onscreen numbers are higher?

[GzeroD]

 

Edit edit: Oh, apparently it's GPU Boost is why the onscreen numbers are higher?

I really doubt anyone Is useing gddr5 memory with a base clock of 3000Mhz

 

I'm guessing that the numbers they are putting are the overclock setting they put in afterburner or trixx. on my 290 the clocks are always the same to the numbers in the screenshots.

[VSG]

Don't ever trust the numbers reported by Valley unless you are on a bios with any form of boost disabled. Run a log on GPU-Z and check the text file at the end of the run.

[ivhyn]

The top right numbers read quite a bit higher than what GPU-Z says. Which one ends up getting put into the spreadsheet?

Valley shows the memory baseclock multiplied by two (obviously because GDDR5 stands for graphics double data rate).

You can now divide the valley memory clock by two or directly take the GPU-Z values, they should be identical. 

[GzeroD]

Valley shows the memory baseclock multiplied by two (obviously because GDDR5 stands for graphics double data rate).

You can now divide the valley memory clock by two or directly take the GPU-Z values, they should be identical.

this is not true for some AMD cards; also modern GDDR5 in high end cards runs at quad rate not double

[ivhyn]

also modern GDDR5 in high end cards runs at quad rate not double

Did I say otherwise? GDDR5 is not called GQDR5

[GamersCouch]

GamersCouch

Intel i7 4770K

GTX 780 SLI @ 941/993

107.8FPS

4509 Score