Unigine Valley Benchmark Scores Thread + SUPERPOSITION ***Over 1000 Submissions!***

[Guest]

Ryzen 7 5800x with PBO settings: 120W PPT, 75 TDC, 110 EDC, -10 all-core curve.

AMD reference design Radeon RX 7900 XT - GPU core Min 1Ghz, Max 3Ghz, slight undervolt 1075mV.

Getting close to that 20k..

 

@WallacEngineering I tried the same resolution with the 4k optimized textures with my 5800X vs your 3700X, interesting comparison..

 

[WallacEngineering]

9 minutes ago, si1enze said:

 

@WallacEngineering I tried the same resolution with the 4k optimized textures with my 5800X vs your 3700X, interesting comparison..

Ya I am very much bottlenecked at the 3700X CPU.

 

I noticed when I was using the old Unigine Valley Loop to help Stress test the GPU. I quite literally had to run the absolute maximum custom resolution of 4096x4096 with completely maxed out settings to even push 100% load onto the GPU, otherwise the CPU would just hit a wall around 220 FPS or so.

 

I definitely need a system overhaul to utilize this new GPU to its fullest extent.

[Guest]

Just now, WallacEngineering said:

Ya I am very much bottlenecked at the 3700X CPU.

 

I noticed when I was using the old Unigine Valley Loop to help Stress test the GPU. I quite literally had to run the absolute maximum custom resolution of 4096x4096 with completely maxed out settings to even push 100% load onto the GPU, otherwise the CPU would just hit a wall around 220 FPS or so.

 

I definitely need a system overhaul to utilize this new GPU to its fullest extent.

I'm in the same boat, need a 5800X3D or to jump to a similar AM5 setup to get the most out of it.. I'm happy with the performance so far though.  

[QuantumSingularity]

Decided to run Heaven, which i haven't done forever and it got me bit off-guard - i have forgotten how old it is. Btw why with the extreme preset it doesn't let me run in 1080p or Fullscreen and forces me to 1600x900 ?

 

These are the only options i have:

 

P.S

Oddly at 1440p there isn't a bellow 10FPS drop:

 

Same with 1600x900 where the 5800X3D finally gets to go above 10% utilization occasionally.

[Guest]

Ryzen 7 5800x with PBO settings: 120W PPT, 75 TDC, 110 EDC, -10 all-core curve.

AMD reference design Radeon RX 7900 XT - GPU core 500Mhz Min / 2,950Mhz Max, 1050mV / +15% Power Limit

 

[WallacEngineering]

Got my Ryzen 7800X-3D set up tonight, will re-do benchmarking soon.

 

Just a heads up guys, "Extreme" shaders are broken in SuperPosition.

 

Say your score is 20,000 in 4K Optimized - then your 1080p High score should be close to 40,000. However, 1080p extreme score will be close to 15,000. Its broken for sure.

 

On another note, SuperPosition has been around for over 6 years now. Any idea on the successor?

[WallacEngineering]

@si1enze

 

Testing Done (At Least Regarding SuperPosition) on the new PC I just finished building last night.

 

Specs are as follows:

 

CPU: AMD Ryzen 7800X-3D

CPU Cooler: Noctua D-15

RAM: Trident Z5 Neo 2 x 16GB 6000MHz CL30 Sticks

MoBo: MSI MAG B-650 Tomahawk WiFi

GPU: AMD RX 7900-XTX 24GB (Power Color Red Devil AIB)

PSU: Seasonic PX-850 (850-Watt Platinum)

Primary/Boot Storage: Samsung 980 Pro NVME 2TB

Secondary Storage: Kingston NV2 NVME 4TB

Case: Lian Li LanCool 216

Monitor: 3440x1440p

 

Gaming Goal: 3440x1440p at High Settings over 100 FPS AVG for many years to come. As of now it easily handles even Ultra settings over 120 FPS in most games.

 

So ya, my new GPU was heavily bottlenecked by that old Ryzen 3700X CPU at lower settings and lower resolutions (High FPS) plus the fact that I couldn't get S.A.M. working with the 3700X. I blew right past that 25,000 score for 3440x1440p and went straight to 35,000 - a full 40% improvement, thats pretty nutz.

 

I tested everything in SuperPosition from 720p low to 8K Optimized. Certain modes are broken. 720p refuses to utilize GPU to 100%, probably too much framerate for the engine. Also, "Extreme" Shaders are definitely broken. They cut my score in half. I can get a score of nearly 40,000 on 1080 High but go Extreme and the score drops to 15,000-ish, thats lower than even my 4K scores.

 

It would seem that SuperPosition has become too old. Like Valley and Heaven before it, it looks like SuperPosition must be replaced with something more modern. This will be the last time I use the benchmark.

 

My OC settings are quite MILD and are designed for daily driving. These Settings are:

 

CPU/RAM: Expo 1 with 1.275V SOC

GPU: +5% Power, 2600MHz VRAM with Fast Timings, Aggressive Fan Curve

 

Results:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ALL TESTS PERFORMED:

 

MY DAILY OC SETTINGS:

 

1080 Medium: 45673

1080 High: 38165

Custom 3440x1440: 34852

4K Optimized: 23961

8K Optimized: 9207

 

FACTORY DEFAULT SETTINGS:

 

1080 Medium: 45441

1080 High: 37247

Custom 3440x1440: 34031

4K Optimized: 23343

8K Optimized: 8786

[thekingofmonks]

External RX 6600 (M.2 PCIe x4 3.0) with a ROG G531GT

 

CPU: i7-9750H

RAM: 2666 Samsung 8GB + Transcend 16GB

dGPU: MSI Radeon RX 6600 Armor 8G (stock)

 

The RX 6600 is routed through the iGP and the total shared GPU memory is 12GB, hence the "Intel UHD Graphics 630 12 GB" readings

 

[Pascal Parvex]

Hello everyone. I thought I'll post my 8K resolution Superposition test from the 18th of September 2020 I got a screenshot from.

 

 

[WallacEngineering]

I lied, one more test on SuperPosition 4K optimized...

 

A recent driver update has made higher OC settings more stable, so I decided to use my new maximum semi-stable (survives a benchmark but will not survive gaming sessions over 30 mins lol) overclock settings to see what would happen.

 

Well... This is what happened... And remember my previous results were already a mild OC...

 

 

 

Here are the settings on my Red Devil RX 7900-XTX used to achieve this score:

 

 

 

The one setting you cannot see because it is cutoff is the power tuning slider which of course is maxed out at +15% power limit resulting in a GPU power draw of 430 watts under full load. This settings screenshot was taken while TimeSpy Extreme Ran in the background so you can see how the card was behaving under full load at high resolutions.

 

But you can see from my previous scores that this test has a very hard time scaling lower resolution scores on powerful hardware, and the fact that this card averages nearly 200 FPS at 4K during this test tells you just how dated this software is. Unigine really needs a more modern test, it really is too old at this point.

[WalmartFrozenDoughPack]

I would like to be added to leaderboards. We need more data points... It doesnt look like it's getting updated though?

 

The OS is Windows 11 Pro, version 22H2. 

 

CPU: Intel i5-13500

GPU: XFX AMD Radeon 6750XT
FPS 1080p: 164 Valley, 55 Superposition
Score 1080p: 6860 Valley, 7406 Superposition
 

FPS 1440p: 102.3

Score 1440p: 4279

 

FPS 4k: 44.9

Score 4: 1877

 

Spoiler

 

 

 

 

Edited August 1, 2023 by WalmartFrozenDoughPack
Eyesore

[WallacEngineering]

9 hours ago, WalmartFrozenDoughPack said:

The OS is Windows 11 Pro, version 22H2. 

 

CPU: Intel i5-13500

GPU: XFX Radeon 6750XT

 

Dont use 'extreme" any test in Superposition, its broken. Extreme shaders cut down performance by like 60%. Run 4K optimized and ull see a way higher score even tho its 4K.

[WalmartFrozenDoughPack]

1 hour ago, WallacEngineering said:

 

Dont use 'extreme" any test in Superposition, its broken. Extreme shaders cut down performance by like 60%. Run 4K optimized and ull see a way higher score even tho its 4K.

Huh, you're right. Thank you.

 

Spoiler

[WallacEngineering]

1 hour ago, WalmartFrozenDoughPack said:

Huh, you're right. Thank you.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

No worries, nobody really knows why. If you go to 1080p extreme, then go to custom and just lower the shaders from extreme to high, your score will more than double.

 

Unfortunately SuperPosition is obsolete at this point and we are waiting for the next Unigine Benchmark.

[MasterDeeJay]

Intel Iris Xe MAX (Teclast DG1 4Gb pcie 8x)

i9 7980xe@4.5ghz custom loop

8x16Gb DDR4 3200@4000 Hynix ECC REG

Asrock X299 Taichi Xe

 

[Tech-man]

Build: z490-p

I7-10700

Rtx 3070

Ram 16-3200

--------------------------

4k:

--------------------

1080 p high:

[SocomSuade]

Are these scores any good? I really have no idea what I'm doing. Just building a new PC and wanted to test. 

 

 

 

 

[.Sam.]

Probably CPU bottleneck at 1080p high, also extreme preset is broken as @WallacEngineering said

[WallacEngineering]

On 2/7/2024 at 10:32 AM, SocomSuade said:

Are these scores any good? I really have no idea what I'm doing. Just building a new PC and wanted to test. 

 

 

 

 

Your Scores are a bit low, but still an overall great experience. I also have a 7800X-3D and 7900-XTX and even at factory settings, I get more like 30,000 points in TimeSpy. Your PC might be running hot or be limited somewhere in settings, but regardless as I said its not like ur going to have a poor gaming experience.

[MasterDeeJay]

 

CMP 100-210 (Tesla V100) 160 USD mining card with quadro GV100 driver, overclocked, only runs in windowed mode. pcie 1x mode so only usable for syntetic bench. (i can repair the lanes, just missing the smd caps)

Not a gaming card but why not to test it. 

3dmark not working (crash at systeminfo screen)

 

1080p extreme

 

 

4K optimized