Youtube to change Content ID system

[TOMPPIX]

Quote

Today, we’re announcing a major step to help fix that frustrating experience. We’re developing a new solution that will allow videos to earn revenue while a Content ID claim is being disputed. Here’s how it will work: when both a creator and someone making a claim choose to monetize a video, we will continue to run ads on that video and hold the resulting revenue separately. Once the Content ID claim or dispute is resolved, we’ll pay out that revenue to the appropriate party.


We’re working on this new system now and hope to roll it out to all YouTube partners in the coming months. Here’s a closer look at how it’ll work once it’s live:

 

 

took them long enough hahah

 

http://youtubecreator.blogspot.com/2016/04/improving-content-id-for-creators.html

 

[BURNINGJUNK]

HALAGALULAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Derangel]

Awesome. That's one step in the right direction at least. Now Youtube needs to figure out a way to punish companies that make tons of false claims.

 

By the way, the "while" in the first sentence is invisible to people using the default theme unless it's highlighted.

[TOMPPIX]

1 minute ago, Derangel said:

Awesome. That's one step in the right direction at least. Now Youtube needs to figure out a way to punish companies that make tons of false claims.

 

By the way, the "while" in the first sentence is invisible to people using the default theme unless it's highlighted.

fixed it

[Nowak]

About time they started putting ad revenue on content claimed videos into an intermediary account instead of just giving all ad revenue to the claimant. That was completely asinine.

[GoZone]

Finally, but we need punishments for people who will abuse the system though.

[Katorice]

oh, so they finally got it right? lets see how it plays out.

[GoodBytes]

This news post does not meet the posting guidelines, and therefore moved out.

 

[Aereldor]

About damn time, YouTube.

[BonSie]

Kitguru

Quote

Over the last couple of years, YouTube’s Content ID copyright system has been a bit of a pain for quite a few YouTubers, particularly those that rely on Fair Use. Currently, if a claim is made on a video, monetization immediately stops, which means the creator isn’t making any money during the vital first few days of their video going live, when viewership is at its best. However, that will be changing soon.

Following on from a fairly large social media campaign, headed by YouTuber GradeAUnderA, to ‘#MakeYouTubeGreatAgain’, YouTube has come up with a new system that will allow content creators to keep generating revenue while a ContentID claim is being dispute.

As the image shows, in a few months time, YouTube will be introducing a new four step system. First the video goes life and is monetized, then if a claim is placed, that video is still generating revenue held by YouTube. If the copyright claim is disputed, YouTube will continue to hold on to the money until it is settled and then, the pay out will go to whoever won the dispute.

Youtube Blog

Quote

We understand just how important revenue is to our creator community, and we’ve been listening closely to concerns about the loss of monetization during the Content ID dispute process. Currently videos that are claimed and disputed don’t earn revenue for anyone, which is an especially frustrating experience for creators if that claim ends up being incorrect while a video racks up views in its first few days.
Today, we’re announcing a major step to help fix that frustrating experience. We’re developing a new solution that will allow videos to earn revenue while a Content ID claim is being disputed. Here’s how it will work: when both a creator and someone making a claim choose to monetize a video, we will continue to run ads on that video and hold the resulting revenue separately. Once the Content ID claim or dispute is resolved, we’ll pay out that revenue to the appropriate party.
We’re working on this new system now and hope to roll it out to all YouTube partners in the coming months. Here’s a closer look at how it’ll work once it’s live:

 

Well, took them long enough.

Pretty sure creators are a lot more happy.

[Shahnewaz]

FINALLY. Finally giving content creators the peace of mind they deserve.

[AyeJayKay]

Still doesn't fix the Content ID trolls who merely want to see you have a headache and could care less about monetization. 

[Shahnewaz]

2 minutes ago, AyeJayKay said:

Still doesn't fix the Content ID trolls who merely want to see you have a headache and could care less about monetization. 

That is much less of a damage than losing tons of revenue to people who are trolls anyway. At least you get your money back this way.

[NateGSR117]

This is great to hear, this is a great first step in the right direction. 

[AyeJayKay]

3 minutes ago, Shahnewaz said:

That is much less of a damage than losing tons of revenue to people who are trolls anyway. At least you get your money back this way.

Re-read the stipulation of their new policy. The video has to be monetized by both parties in order for revenue to be generated. Once the dispute has been settled, the revenue is collected by the rightful owner. 

 

But if a troll comes and claims a dispute without asking for monetization, neither party receives revenue during the period of dispute.

[Misanthrope]

It's still bullshit because there is no penalty for false claims: you might get the money but it takes weeks and you  can get a second claim holding your funds and so on. 

 

They basically sanction perjury without repercussions for trolls, this is not gonna stop them, at all. 

[Shahnewaz]

Just now, AyeJayKay said:

Re-read the stipulation of their new policy. The video has to be monetized by both parties in order for revenue to be generated. Once the dispute has been settled, the revenue is collected by the rightful owner. 

 

But if the a troll comes and claims a dispute without asking for monetization, neither party receives revenue during the period of dispute.

No, both parties don't need to monetize it. The video is still monetized, as long as a dispute is filed.

5 minutes ago, Misanthrope said:

It's still bullshit because there is no penalty for false claims: you might get the money but it takes weeks and you  can get a second claim holding your funds and so on. 

 

They basically sanction perjury without repercussions for trolls, this is not gonna stop them, at all. 

http://youtubecreator.blogspot.ca/2016/04/improving-content-id-for-creators.html

Quote

Even though Content ID claims are disputed less than 1% of the time, we agree that this process could be better. Making sure our Content ID tools are being used properly is deeply important to us, so we’ve built a dedicated team to monitor this. Using a combination of algorithms and manual review, this team has resolved millions of invalid claims in the last year alone, and acted on millions more before they impacted creators. The team also restricts feature access and even terminates a partner’s access to Content ID tools if we find they are repeatedly abusing these tools.

 

[AyeJayKay]

4 minutes ago, Shahnewaz said:

No, both parties don't need to monetize it. The video is still monetized, as long as a dispute is filed.

http://youtubecreator.blogspot.ca/2016/04/improving-content-id-for-creators.html

 

Sorry, no.

 

 "Here’s how it will work: when both a creator and someone making a claim choose to monetize a video, we will continue to run ads on that video and hold the resulting revenue separately. Once the Content ID claim or dispute is resolved, we’ll pay out that revenue to the appropriate party."

Source: http://youtubecreator.blogspot.com/2016/04/improving-content-id-for-creators.html

[Shahnewaz]

2 minutes ago, AyeJayKay said:

Sorry, no.

 

 "Here’s how it will work: when both a creator and someone making a claim choose to monetize a video, we will continue to run ads on that video and hold the resulting revenue separately. Once the Content ID claim or dispute is resolved, we’ll pay out that revenue to the appropriate party."

Source: http://youtubecreator.blogspot.com/2016/04/improving-content-id-for-creators.html

Now that is shitty.

[BonSie]

8 minutes ago, Shahnewaz said:

Now that is shitty.

That might still change or that scenario hasn't been reported on.

Change will only happen in a few months.

[Misanthrope]

42 minutes ago, Shahnewaz said:

No, both parties don't need to monetize it. The video is still monetized, as long as a dispute is filed.

http://youtubecreator.blogspot.ca/2016/04/improving-content-id-for-creators.html

 

lmao the team does nothing of the sort, ever. See the recent rampage from the Christiano brothers. 

 

Seriously this is the most disingenuous shit ever coming from YouTube: they NEVER intervene most strikes are resolved by both parties which is either the youtubers being censored and agreeing to delete fair use content (like Cinema Snob recently)  or by the troll admitting as much and leaving the strike stand as long as possible and Removing the strike before it even goes to youtube which they don't even look at before 14 business days or some crazy shit like that. 

 

This is a tablespoon of water trying to put out a building on fire really. 

[drc00k3]

It's a step in the right direction but there is still alot to fix. Now, they need to punish people who make false claims. They need to start taking the business/people that do this to court because once they win a few times, it will start to make people think before filing claims.

[darealsoulless]

YouTube is setting themselves up for failure

[GoodBytes]

Does not meet the Tech News posting guideline, and therefore moved out of the forum section:

 

[Godlygamer23]

And now they just need to work on what content can actually be flagged as a copyright infringement. That needs a serious overhaul.