AMD accuses BAPCo and Intel of cheating with Sysmark benchmarks

[patrickjp93]

So, you don't care about how "solid" your data is.

One could define one's own method of calculating a processors "overall" IPC, but it would mean jack-shit as another method might yield totally different result. Which is why marketing like that terminology so much.

The remaining error is negligible. The data remains solid, and so do the conclusions.

No, as it has a singular definition. It's the average of the reciprocal of the CPI across the muArch.

[Jahramika]

Sure is easy slandering someone on the other side of a keyboard. I keep the facts straight, nothing more nor less.

Lol ya okay Mr GQ in white your so on top of it all. To accuse me of slandering (false or damaging statement) is retarded, now you could say I am insulting or your Intelligence or Intel lap dog appearance.

[patrickjp93]

Lol ya okay Mr GQ in white your so on top of it all. To accuse me of slandering (false or damaging statement) is retarded, now you could say I am insulting or your Intelligence or Intel lap dog appearance.

Slander is damaging and false. Get your definitions right at the very least you third-rate pseudo-intellectual.

[ivan134]

Slander is damaging and false. Get your definitions right at the very least you third-rate pseudo-intellectual.

It's better to be that than to be a pathological liar.

[Jahramika]

Slander is damaging and false. Get your definitions right at the very least you third-rate pseudo-intellectual.

Well retard that is exactly what I quoted you in order to educate MR GQ that you think you are. I in no way slandered you but I did insult you by calling you a jackass. That's not slander unless you can prove it in court. Its my humble opinion of how you present yourself on this forum but hey you work for Intel your correct as always.

[Dabombinable]

It's better to be that than to be a pathological liar.

Its also better to never defend a product or the company that makes it.

[Jahramika]

Its also better to never defend a product or the company that makes it.

Well that depends on if you are defending something that is just and fair and deserves defending. Still ya you got a good point from a certain perspective.

[Dabombinable]

Well that depends on if you are defending something that is just and fair and deserves defending. Still ya you got a good point from a certain perspective.

AMD has never deserved defending, just like their CMT based CPU and APU. And like Intel and their Netburst Pentium 4 and Celeron. Companies are never just and fair-to all of you fanboys out there-face it.

[HalGameGuru]

AMD has never deserved defending, just like their CMT based CPU and APU. And like Intel and their Netburst Pentium 4 and Celeron. Companies are never just and fair-to all of you fanboys out there-face it.

Why bring CMT into this? Why not specify Bulldozer? CMT was an innocent in all this.

[Jahramika]

Well the simple act of buying a product pretty much means you support it and like it or not by doing that you are defending it. Actions speak louder than words anyways.

[Nena Trinity]

SYSmark is a lie! The test it should be named CPUmark...